[2021-06-23 10:56 +0100] petr: > Hi! Hi! Thanks for your reply.
> Yeah, for something like fifteen years, I guess… :-) See e.g. OmegaWiki > (formerly known as WiktionaryZ). OmegaWiki is, if not exactly, astoundingly near what I was proposing. It links words to meanings and automatically derives translations from that, which is the main feature I was looking for. It also supports linking words with one another with different relationships like hypo- and hypernimic. I wonder why it isn't more popular. > The modern incarnation of machine-readable dictionary is the > Lexicographical Data project on Wikidata. It is a nice project, definitely > go take a look at it, but it is not really an evolution/improvement of > Wiktionary but rather a fresh start. (Among other reasons because of the > license incompatibility of Wiktionary’s CC-BY-SA with Wikidata’s CC-0.) See > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Lexicographical_data Thanks, this is interesting too, though this project doesn't seem to decouple meanings from words, so automatic translations don't work with it (as far as I could see from my short snoop-around.) I'll stick to OmegaWiki and hopefully add my grain of salt to it. Thanks for bringing that to the conversation! Regards, Wolter HV _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list -- wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to wikitech-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
