Re: [Wikitech-l] Small tweak to Gerrit Verified category - tomorrow

2012-12-19 Thread Krinkle
On Dec 18, 2012, at 6:01 AM, Liangent liang...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Linting jobs will receive Verified ±1 votes. Unit tests jobs
 (triggered after someone votes CR+2, as it currently is) will
 receive Verified ±2 votes.
 
 
 Actually I prefer running unit tests on every new patchset as what we
 did in the past. Some issues in my code were caught by it.
 


Afaik everybody prefers tests to be ran on submission, including yours truly. 
However this thread does not discuss that change. This change was made a few 
weeks back.

Now that everything is in place we can elaborate on this. Antoine and I sent 
out a mai to wikitech-l just now:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-December/065202.html

-- Krinkle

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Small tweak to Gerrit Verified category - tomorrow

2012-12-18 Thread Chad
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 After some of the recent changes to the Gerrit workflow with
 Jenkins and Zuul, we've received some complaints about how
 Jenkins is reporting its results. Right now, it is using both the
 Verified and Code Review categories. This is bad because
 it gives you a false sense of what has been reviewed for most
 queries and dashboards.

 So tomorrow, we are going to tweak the way Jenkins reports
 back to Gerrit by extending the Verified vote range from -1..+1
 to -2..+2. This will allow Jenkins to give a range of results, all
 in the Verified category (and keeping it out of Code Review,
 which will once again only be for humans). The new Verified
 range will behave as Code Review does now (-2 is veto, +2 for
 submit).

 Linting jobs will receive Verified ±1 votes. Unit tests jobs
 (triggered after someone votes CR+2, as it currently is) will
 receive Verified ±2 votes.

 So, anyone who's got Verified permissions on a repository
 (project owners, this means you), beginning tomorrow at around
 13:00 UTC you will see extended Verified options. We'll let
 everyone know when this is complete.


This is complete. We noticed this morning that there was actually a
mistake in last night's e-mail: we did not add a Verified category for -2.
The current Verified options look as follows:

-1 : Fails
0  : No Score
1  : Checked
2  : Verified

Code Review is now back to being human-only. As always, please
reach out to us if you have any problems at all.

-Chad  Antoine

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

[Wikitech-l] Small tweak to Gerrit Verified category - tomorrow

2012-12-17 Thread Chad
Hello,

After some of the recent changes to the Gerrit workflow with
Jenkins and Zuul, we've received some complaints about how
Jenkins is reporting its results. Right now, it is using both the
Verified and Code Review categories. This is bad because
it gives you a false sense of what has been reviewed for most
queries and dashboards.

So tomorrow, we are going to tweak the way Jenkins reports
back to Gerrit by extending the Verified vote range from -1..+1
to -2..+2. This will allow Jenkins to give a range of results, all
in the Verified category (and keeping it out of Code Review,
which will once again only be for humans). The new Verified
range will behave as Code Review does now (-2 is veto, +2 for
submit).

Linting jobs will receive Verified ±1 votes. Unit tests jobs
(triggered after someone votes CR+2, as it currently is) will
receive Verified ±2 votes.

So, anyone who's got Verified permissions on a repository
(project owners, this means you), beginning tomorrow at around
13:00 UTC you will see extended Verified options. We'll let
everyone know when this is complete.

--
The Gerrit/CI guys
Chad  Antoine

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Small tweak to Gerrit Verified category - tomorrow

2012-12-17 Thread Liangent
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello,

 After some of the recent changes to the Gerrit workflow with
 Jenkins and Zuul, we've received some complaints about how
 Jenkins is reporting its results. Right now, it is using both the
 Verified and Code Review categories. This is bad because
 it gives you a false sense of what has been reviewed for most
 queries and dashboards.

 So tomorrow, we are going to tweak the way Jenkins reports
 back to Gerrit by extending the Verified vote range from -1..+1
 to -2..+2. This will allow Jenkins to give a range of results, all
 in the Verified category (and keeping it out of Code Review,
 which will once again only be for humans). The new Verified
 range will behave as Code Review does now (-2 is veto, +2 for
 submit).

 Linting jobs will receive Verified ±1 votes. Unit tests jobs
 (triggered after someone votes CR+2, as it currently is) will
 receive Verified ±2 votes.


Actually I prefer running unit tests on every new patchset as what we
did in the past. Some issues in my code were caught by it.

 So, anyone who's got Verified permissions on a repository
 (project owners, this means you), beginning tomorrow at around
 13:00 UTC you will see extended Verified options. We'll let
 everyone know when this is complete.

 --
 The Gerrit/CI guys
 Chad  Antoine

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

-Liangent

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l