Re: [Ninux-Wireless] Nodo Kali - Matera - riconfigurazione rete
perfetto, ma avendo solo una rete 10.27.0.0/24 .volevo dividerla. Non mi va di appropiarmi di un'altra rete che può essere destinata ad un'altro nodo. Da ciò che ho capito...1 nodo = 1 rete. Il giorno 16 maggio 2015 20:20, Luigi Porto ha scritto: > "errata corrige" dove vedi vlan7 sono vlan10 nel tuo caso (sono abituato a > tener la gestione sulla 7) > > Il giorno 16 maggio 2015 20:19, Luigi Porto ha > scritto: > >> Due minuti ti ho buttato giù un disegno >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B58ofxAgtVGsa2xpOTNyc2ZRWlk/view?usp=sharing >> >> pfSense: >> Dividendo la lan interna dall l'hotspot avrai 2 HNA da annunciare: >> 10.27.0.0 / 10.27.1.0 . Così coloro che si connettono sulla tua Bullet sono >> già in Ninux, su una /24 dedicata. >> Avrai in totale 4 interfacce: >> || wan || lan || WirelessAntenna5GHz || Hotspot || >> >> Il giorno 16 maggio 2015 14:25, Michele Salerno ha >> scritto: >> >>> Ciao ragazzi, mi sono perso nella configurazione, forse solo perchè mi >>> sono confuso le idee. >>> >>> Mi aiutate? >>> >>> Descrizione hardware: >>> - Alix con PfSense e 4 nic >>> - 2 TP-Link Smart Switch TL-SG108E >>> - Nanostaton M5 >>> - Bullet M2 >>> >>> La rete: >>> Gestione: 10.27.0.0/25 >>> Wifi casalingo: 10.27.0.128/26 >>> Hotspot (M2): 10.27.0.192/26 >>> Backbone (M5): 172.27.0.0/24 >>> >>> >>> Uno smart switch è solo per le antenne con le relative porte in vlan 3,4 >>> e 10 >>> L'altro smart switch ha una porta mappata sulla vlan 10 >>> >>> >>> Le interfacce del pfsense sono >>> rl0 = wan >>> rl1 = lan (vlan 10) >>> rl2 = wifi casalingo >>> rl3 = Gestione, Backbone, Hotspot (vlan 3,4 e 10) >>> >>> funzionerà? >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Wireless mailing list >>> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >>> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> #musk from calabria.ninux.org - CS >> >> @openmusk >> > > > > -- > #musk from calabria.ninux.org - CS > > @openmusk > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@ml.ninux.org > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- Informativa Privacy - Ai sensi del D. Lgs n. 196/2003 (Codice Privacy) si precisa che le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio sono riservate e ad uso esclusivo del destinatario. Qualora il messaggio in parola Le fosse pervenuto per errore, La preghiamo di eliminarlo senza copiarlo e di non inoltrarlo a terzi, dandocene gentilmente comunicazione. Grazie. Privacy Information - This message, for the D. Lgs n. 196/2003 (Privacy Code), may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [Ninux-Wireless] Nodo Kali - Matera - riconfigurazione rete
"errata corrige" dove vedi vlan7 sono vlan10 nel tuo caso (sono abituato a tener la gestione sulla 7) Il giorno 16 maggio 2015 20:19, Luigi Porto ha scritto: > Due minuti ti ho buttato giù un disegno > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B58ofxAgtVGsa2xpOTNyc2ZRWlk/view?usp=sharing > > pfSense: > Dividendo la lan interna dall l'hotspot avrai 2 HNA da annunciare: > 10.27.0.0 / 10.27.1.0 . Così coloro che si connettono sulla tua Bullet sono > già in Ninux, su una /24 dedicata. > Avrai in totale 4 interfacce: > || wan || lan || WirelessAntenna5GHz || Hotspot || > > Il giorno 16 maggio 2015 14:25, Michele Salerno ha > scritto: > >> Ciao ragazzi, mi sono perso nella configurazione, forse solo perchè mi >> sono confuso le idee. >> >> Mi aiutate? >> >> Descrizione hardware: >> - Alix con PfSense e 4 nic >> - 2 TP-Link Smart Switch TL-SG108E >> - Nanostaton M5 >> - Bullet M2 >> >> La rete: >> Gestione: 10.27.0.0/25 >> Wifi casalingo: 10.27.0.128/26 >> Hotspot (M2): 10.27.0.192/26 >> Backbone (M5): 172.27.0.0/24 >> >> >> Uno smart switch è solo per le antenne con le relative porte in vlan 3,4 >> e 10 >> L'altro smart switch ha una porta mappata sulla vlan 10 >> >> >> Le interfacce del pfsense sono >> rl0 = wan >> rl1 = lan (vlan 10) >> rl2 = wifi casalingo >> rl3 = Gestione, Backbone, Hotspot (vlan 3,4 e 10) >> >> funzionerà? >> >> >> ___ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@ml.ninux.org >> http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > > > -- > #musk from calabria.ninux.org - CS > > @openmusk > -- #musk from calabria.ninux.org - CS @openmusk ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [Ninux-Wireless] Nodo Kali - Matera - riconfigurazione rete
Due minuti ti ho buttato giù un disegno https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B58ofxAgtVGsa2xpOTNyc2ZRWlk/view?usp=sharing pfSense: Dividendo la lan interna dall l'hotspot avrai 2 HNA da annunciare: 10.27.0.0 / 10.27.1.0 . Così coloro che si connettono sulla tua Bullet sono già in Ninux, su una /24 dedicata. Avrai in totale 4 interfacce: || wan || lan || WirelessAntenna5GHz || Hotspot || Il giorno 16 maggio 2015 14:25, Michele Salerno ha scritto: > Ciao ragazzi, mi sono perso nella configurazione, forse solo perchè mi > sono confuso le idee. > > Mi aiutate? > > Descrizione hardware: > - Alix con PfSense e 4 nic > - 2 TP-Link Smart Switch TL-SG108E > - Nanostaton M5 > - Bullet M2 > > La rete: > Gestione: 10.27.0.0/25 > Wifi casalingo: 10.27.0.128/26 > Hotspot (M2): 10.27.0.192/26 > Backbone (M5): 172.27.0.0/24 > > > Uno smart switch è solo per le antenne con le relative porte in vlan 3,4 e > 10 > L'altro smart switch ha una porta mappata sulla vlan 10 > > > Le interfacce del pfsense sono > rl0 = wan > rl1 = lan (vlan 10) > rl2 = wifi casalingo > rl3 = Gestione, Backbone, Hotspot (vlan 3,4 e 10) > > funzionerà? > > > ___ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@ml.ninux.org > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- #musk from calabria.ninux.org - CS @openmusk ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
[Ninux-Wireless] Freifunk Memorandum of Understanding
Community diverse, problemi simili. Vi consiglio di leggere questo: https://github.com/freifunk/MoU/blob/master/FreifunkMemorandumofUnderstanding_en.md Riporto per la felicità degli archivi. Freifunk Memorandum of Understanding After 10 years Freifunk is quite successful, well known and widespread. However we don't see that the original ideas and goal of Freifunk are still taken into consideration by all communities or all community members. Our main concern is not to exclude communities which don't identify themselves with the hereby stated self-understanding. But we are interested in a basic dispute about what we are doing here jointly under the label Freifunk. This draft was written by a group associated with the Förderverein Freie Netzwerke e.V. It is meant to be a basic principle of understanding and intends to encourage all communities to reflect on the stated topics. Why do we engage in Freifunk? Which ideas are behind it? Which goals do we pursuit? According to which principle do we make decisions and take action? It is the goal of this ext, to develop an understanding which connects all individuals and groups who act under the label Freifunk. Preamble Free (wireless) networks are build and provided by many local initiatives. The users are simultaneously operators of the computer networks. They create "do it yourself" network by self-reliantly connecting apartments, houses, streets of houses, districts, villages or whole cities. A Freifunk-network is built in a decentralized way and is operated by many individuals. This decentralized structure of organization promotes deliberately local activities instead of wanting to be governed by a higher entity. "Frei" (free) stands for making these networks open and anonymously accessible, they are to be operated in a non-commercial way, are not analyzed and the thereby contained information is not to be inspected, modified or censored. Although Freifunk refers primarily to WLAN-networks, the term "freie Netzwerke" should be taken into a broader context. It is oriented among others by the freenetworks.org definition. Despite all decentralization we reasonable and important to come to a common understanding on the basic principles of the undertaking Freifunk, in order to act jointly and support each other in our activities. Goals of Freifunk The use of technical networks has become a everyday occurrence long ago, nevertheless the underlying power and action mechanism are often not being reflected on sufficiently. Freifunk has set one of its goal to be the creation of an awareness of these contexts in the broader society and to promote the free and open access to give impulses for a self-determined actions. Thereby we would like to include the needs of distinct societal groups. We consider diversity and a broad spectrum of ideas to be an important foundation to reach these goals. We would like to encourage all participants to take matters in their own hands and support them to get familiarized with the subject matter. We are aware of the fact that this is an elaborate learning process. However we would like to avoid the continuation of knowledge-hierarchies by the desire of participant to be merely supplied. According to our view this leads to the erosion of the basic idea of a "do it yourself" network. Being Freifunkers we participate in the political process getting the judicial preconditions for free networks. Hereby the Freifunk movement is above party lines. Principles of Freifunk It is our wish to have the social community-building and the technical implementation of free networks in the communities according to similar principles: decentralized, with as few and as shallow hierarchies as possible, yet with a common agreements. Many of our principles have already been formulated elsewhere. As Freifunkers we commit to the following already existing documents: * Pico Peering Agreement * Our Vision: * Free Culture Definition * Community Wireless Definition * free networks definition * secrecy of telecommunications (GG Art. 10,1) * pinciple of Datensparsamkeit (data scarsity) and Datenvermeidung (data avoidance) (BDSG § 3a * We do not log! * The hacker ethics of the Chaos Computer Clubs (CCC) is transferable to free networks. * The declaration of the incompatibility of the CCC “acknowledge color against fascism” , especially the paragraph “Die Erklärung” Technical principles The Pico Peering Agreement is the basis of our networks. For us the following pillars constitute a free network: * Our nodes build a mesh-network among on another. When talking about freifunk-network we refer to this mesh network, which is being created between the routers. It ends where the internet begins, that is where a router routes the data traffic into the internet. And it ends where the private home-network begins. * We design our networks to be open and public: everybody can operate a no
[Ninux-Wireless] Nodo Kali - Matera - riconfigurazione rete
Ciao ragazzi, mi sono perso nella configurazione, forse solo perchè mi sono confuso le idee. Mi aiutate? Descrizione hardware: - Alix con PfSense e 4 nic - 2 TP-Link Smart Switch TL-SG108E - Nanostaton M5 - Bullet M2 La rete: Gestione: 10.27.0.0/25 Wifi casalingo: 10.27.0.128/26 Hotspot (M2): 10.27.0.192/26 Backbone (M5): 172.27.0.0/24 Uno smart switch è solo per le antenne con le relative porte in vlan 3,4 e 10 L'altro smart switch ha una porta mappata sulla vlan 10 Le interfacce del pfsense sono rl0 = wan rl1 = lan (vlan 10) rl2 = wifi casalingo rl3 = Gestione, Backbone, Hotspot (vlan 3,4 e 10) funzionerà? ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
