[WISPA] Opinions Requested...

2014-04-23 Thread Sam
Good Morning Everyone and Happy Wednesday!

Have any of you had the opportunity to use Xirrus wifi equipment? 
Specifically I'm trying to determine if it would be a good fit for some 
of the areas we're looking at covering.

The areas are defined mostly like this:

Town A  Town B  Town C  Town D  Town E  Town F

Either Town A or Town F will have 100 Mbps circuit to the carrier (Pop)

There is anywhere from seven to fifteen miles between each of the towns.

All towns have less than 100 families; some less than 50.

I will have wireless PtP back hauls between all the towns. Each 
structure holding my PtP radios (as well as the AP(s)) for the towns is 
80 to 200 feet tall, averaging about 100 feet. Where I don't have LOS 
between two towns, I have intermediate structures at my disposal to 
backhaul around or over obstructions.

To me this is a perfect scenario for Nanobeams for the PtP links and 
CPEs, and Rockets with either a couple sectors or even an omni in the 
smallest of these towns.

A vendor who was demo'ing PureWave solutions before I moved into this 
position is now wanting to demo Xirrus wifi solutions for us. Based on 
my understanding of how this product works, in my example above we'd 
require (at least) one AP (or base station as I think they are called in 
Xirrus Land) in each of the six towns (along with separate PtP back 
hauls between the six towns...unless the Xirrus APs/Base stations negate 
the use of PtP back hauls for this layout...?

Sam's Assumption
Having never seen Xirrus products, nor knowing what these units cost, 
it's my guess that the initial investment in equipment (just for the 
infrastructure - not to mention the client CPE) would be many times that 
of a Ubiquiti solution without much (if anything) to gain by using the 
more-expensive equipment. From the little bit of pricing information I 
was able to find online, while less-expensive than Purewave, the Xirrus 
stuff still seems pretty high - especially for rolling out into a town 
of 35 families. (And yes I'm all-too-familiar with what frequently 
happens when one assumes) :)
/Sam's Assumption

Have any of you used Xirrus wifi? If you had areas like described above, 
is Xirrus wifi something you would consider?

Thank you all so much,
Sam

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] BGP Initial Setup Consult

2014-04-23 Thread Chris Fabien
Anyone who is able to setup BGP routing on a CCR1016 please contact me
offlist for details. We just got our initial IP allocation and need to hire
out setting this up and some initial training.

Thanks
Chris Fabien
LakeNet LLC
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] Relay agreement

2014-04-23 Thread ~NGL~
I need an agreement that covers my using a clients roof to relay wifi to other 
clients.
Anyone have one they would share?
Thanx
NGL
 If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
  And if it's in English Thank A Soldier! 
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] Relay agreement

2014-04-23 Thread Roger Howard
+1.. we're starting to expand again and looking for the same thing. About
to go on a new rooftop in a couple weeks.


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:35 AM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:

  I need an agreement that covers my using a clients roof to relay wifi to
 other clients.
 Anyone have one they would share?
 Thanx
 NGL
   If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
 And if it's in English Thank A Soldier!

 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


[WISPA] FCC to propose new Net Neutrality Rules

2014-04-23 Thread Hass, Douglas A.
In case you missed it:

http://on.wsj.com/1jC9dVR

The Federal Communications Commission plans to propose new open Internet rules 
on Thursday that would allow content companies to pay Internet service 
providers for special access to consumers, according to a person familiar with 
the proposal.

The proposed rules would prevent the service providers from blocking or 
discriminating against specific websites, but would allow broadband providers 
to give some traffic preferential treatment, so long as such arrangements are 
available on commercially reasonable terms for all interested content 
companies. Whether the terms are commercially reasonable would be decided by 
the FCC on a case-by-case basis.


Douglas A. Hass
Associate
312.786.6502
d...@franczek.com

Franczek Radelet P.C.
Celebrating 20 Years | 1994-2014http://www.franczek.com/20thAnniversary/

300 South Wacker Drive
Suite 3400
Chicago, IL 60606
312.986.0300 - Main
312.986.9192 - Fax
www.franczek.comhttp://www.franczek.com/

Franczek Radelet is committed to sustainability - please consider the 
environment before printing this email

Circular 230 Disclosure: Under requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue 
Service, we inform you that, unless specifically stated otherwise, any federal 
tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not 
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of (i) 
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing 
or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter herein.

For more information about Franczek Radelet P.C., please visit franczek.com. 
The information contained in this e-mail message or any attachment may be 
confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for the use of the named 
recipient. If you are not the named recipient of this message, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or 
any attachment thereto, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] FCC to propose new Net Neutrality Rules

2014-04-23 Thread Mike Hammett
Probably if they're charging the going rate for paid peering or if they're 
being raked over the coals. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



- Original Message -

From: Douglas A. Hass d...@franczek.com 
To: a...@afmug.com, WISPA General List (wireless@wispa.org) 
wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 3:07:39 PM 
Subject: [WISPA] FCC to propose new Net Neutrality Rules 




In case you missed it: 

http://on.wsj.com/1jC9dVR 
The Federal Communications Commission plans to propose new open Internet rules 
on Thursday that would allow content companies to pay Internet service 
providers for special access to consumers, according to a person familiar with 
the proposal. 
The proposed rules would prevent the service providers from blocking or 
discriminating against specific websites, but would allow broadband providers 
to give some traffic preferential treatment, so long as such arrangements are 
available on commercially reasonable terms for all interested content 
companies. Whether the terms are commercially reasonable would be decided by 
the FCC on a case-by-case basis. 

Douglas A. Hass 
Associate 
312.786.6502 
d...@franczek.com 

Franczek Radelet P.C. 
Celebrating 20 Years | 1994-2014 

300 South Wacker Drive 
Suite 3400 
Chicago, IL 60606 
312.986.0300 - Main 
312.986.9192 - Fax 
www.franczek.com 

Franczek Radelet is committed to sustainability - please consider the 
environment before printing this email 

Circular 230 Disclosure: Under requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue 
Service, we inform you that, unless specifically stated otherwise, any federal 
tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not 
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of (i) 
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing 
or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter herein. 
For more information about Franczek Radelet P.C., please visit franczek.com. 
The information contained in this e-mail message or any attachment may be 
confidential and/or privileged, and is intended only for the use of the named 
recipient. If you are not the named recipient of this message, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or 
any attachment thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. 




































































___ 
Wireless mailing list 
Wireless@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless