Re: [WISPA] Looking for service in Milwaukie Or.
http://www.freewirebroadband.com/company/ Marlon, these guys might be her best bet, depending on location in Milwaukie. Frank On 2/22/2012 1:58 PM, Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181) wrote: Hi All, Can anyone service my sister? I'd hate to send her to the cable co or telco. thanks! marlon - Original Message - From:damee...@odessaoffice.com To:o...@odessaoffice.com Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:58 PM 14332 se cedar ave Milwaukie or 97267. Thanks for your help Sent via BlackBerry by ATT ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Re: [WISPA] Seasickness guaranteed (no password)
Ya I say them loading into there boat. On 8/1/2011 6:15 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote: Oh shit! Someone is stealing the rig! http://i.imgur.com/gDTkE.jpg On 1 August 2011 19:40, Tom Sharples tsharp...@qorvus.com mailto:tsharp...@qorvus.com wrote: http://69.96.154.17/cgi-bin/guestimage.html WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] test
test WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Just a test
Anyone Home? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OpenSource Email Server platform
http://www.mailenable.com/standard_edition.asp There is a free (as in beer) edition and versions with the requirements that you requested. Frank On 3/28/2011 12:53 PM, Patrick D. Nix, Jr wrote: Since we began in '98 we've been using the same windows based email server MailMax. Because of some support/productivity issues we are investigating integrating a new box. The requirements are: webmail, web management of individuals mail accounts (with password reset), pop3/smtp/imap, can run on Windows or Linux. We would also like a calendar and address book module in webmail as well. Anyone have suggestions? Thanks, Patrick Nix, Jr., Computer Network Solutions CSWEB.NET Internet Services IT Manager http://www.cnetworksolutions.com http://www.csweb.net (918) 235-0414 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] 110 input for ARC enclosure
This might be of interest. http://www.fpolc.com/featured_products.htm On 3/6/2011 1:32 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote: Looking for a waterproof 3 position male/female connector assembly similar to the RJ45 assembly for an ARC Wireless enclosure. Needs to fit a 14/3 outdoor cable coming from a streetlight photocell adapter. Any suggestions? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Used Trango gear
How much? On 3/4/2011 2:47 PM, Kevin Sullivan wrote: We've got eighteen Trango 900 SU's, and two Trango 915. All working pulls. Anyone interested? Kevin WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Access to sell plans on 3G and 4G
http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/news/fcc-grants-go-ahead-potential-interferer-with-gps-signal-10989 http://www.lightsquared.com/what-we-do/ On 1/27/2011 8:47 PM, Scottie Arnett wrote: http://www.broadbandqwireless.com/ Sorry for the confusion. Scott - Original Message - *From:* Scottie Arnett mailto:sarn...@info-ed.com *To:* WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org ; Principal WISPA Member List mailto:w...@wispa.org *Sent:* Thursday, January 27, 2011 10:42 PM *Subject:* [WISPA] Access to sell plans on 3G and 4G I am a new member to Wispa, and I have a few questions? I have in close proximity to my area a http://www.broadband wireless.com/ http://www.broadband%20wireless.com/ and another provider I have forgot the name of...They both provide wireless data internet through cell phone data plans on 3G and 4G. They both advertise it as unlimited, but if you read into it, it is not unlimited. My question is, how or how can us WISP get access to sell a 3G or 4G plan on Sprint or Verizon as these plan's have been sold to other companies? I will get the Verizon company with unlimited access as soon as I can return back to the office. Scottie WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OT: Eqypt Has Been Disconnected from the Internet
Thanks Jack, I'm interested in such governmental actions around the world and the ways that it will be worked around. Frank On 1/27/2011 9:06 PM, Jack Unger wrote: Sorry for the OT post. I thought some might be interested. *** Confirming what a few have reported this evening: in an action unprecedented in Internet history, the Egyptian government appears to have ordered service providers to shut down all international connections to the Internet. Critical European-Asian fiber-optic routes through Egypt appear to be unaffected for now. But every Egyptian provider, every business, bank, Internet cafe, website, school, embassy, and government office that relied on the big four Egyptian ISPs for their Internet connectivity is now cut off from the rest of the world. Link Egypt, Vodafone/Raya, Telecom Egypt, Etisalat Misr, and all their customers and partners are, for the moment, off the air. At 22:34 UTC (00:34am local time), Renesys observed the virtually simultaneous withdrawal of all routes to Egyptian networks in the Internet's global routing table. Approximately 3,500 individual BGP routes were withdrawn, leaving no valid paths by which the rest of the world could continue to exchange Internet traffic with Egypt's service providers. Virtually all of Egypt's Internet addresses are now unreachable, worldwide. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Webcam
It was - tsharp...@qorvus.com On 11/17/2010 7:22 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: There was a vendor on one of these wireless lists selling some nice looking ones... Mobtix or something like that. They have had IIRC tens of thousands of them deployed for large event security. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com On 10/26/2010 5:27 AM, Jeremie Chism wrote: A group of radio stations that I provide phone and Internet service would like to setup a webcam in a few of their studios to stream video to their website. Any suggestions on hardware and configuration? Sent from my iPhone4 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Recover deleted email from Outlook
ZMEIL works, don't remember the cost but there is a trial that I used with the same problem.. Frank On 11/13/2010 8:55 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Does anyone have any recommendations for free software to do this? My sister deleted all of her email. I don't think any of it is important enough to spend money on to recover. Most tools I've seen were over $100. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height
Fred and Jack Antenna Height - Height is restricted to 30 meters above HAAT (height above average terrain) of 76 meters this can be calculated here. »www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/haat···tor.html http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/haat_calculator.html Where it asks this question (Enter the height (in meters) of the antenna radiation center above mean sea level (RCAMSL)) Enter your site elevation NOT the antenna radiation center because you get to go 30 meters above ground level at that point. ref: Second Memorandum Opinion and Order (paragraph - 66) Frank Frank On 9/30/2010 7:37 PM, Jack Unger wrote: Fred, I'm sorry to seem dense but I don't understand your explanation below. I'd appreciate it if you would re-explain. The FCC said: transmit antenna used with fixed devices may not be more than 30 meters above the ground. In addition, fixed devices may not be located at sites where the height above average terrain (HAAT) at ground level is more than 76 meters. I'm trying to reconcile that with your statements. Could you please re-explain more clearly or by using better actual numbers (both HAAT at ground level and antenna height above ground)? Thanks in advance, jack On 9/23/2010 4:48 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote: The rules allow antenna heights up to 30 meters, around 100 feet. One problem with the maximum HAAT limit is that it applies to the ground height, based on having a 30 meter high antenna. In other words, the ruling assumed a maximum antenna HAAT, and then set the ground HAAT to be 30m below that. If somebody's house is 10m below the limit, then a 10m antenna should be legal. (The minimum antenna height went away, since sensing is no longer required. That frankly seems to be the only major improvement in the rules.) Brian *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom DeReggi *Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:32 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height Yeah, that really sucks. Many areas needing served have thick forest/trees easilly 70ft tall. A 90ft height, just wouldn't allow enough of the signal to have open air, and the signal would be going through trees most of the full path. In 900Mhz, the difference between having the tower side over the tree line and below the tree line can be the difference between a quarter mile coverage and a 7 mile coverage in our market. All be it, 700Mhz does have better NLOS propogation characteristics than 900 does. I would have liked to see that height doubled. However, admittedly, it will allow much better spectrum re-use in areas that have a limited number of channels available. Spectrum reuse is one of the best ways to serve more people. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Fred Goldstein mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:36 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height This item alone may be the show-stopper, the poison pill that makes it useless to WISPs in much of the country. In places where the routine variation in elevation is more than 75 meters, there will be houses (subscribers) that are more than 76 meters AAT. I notice this in the areas I'm studying, both in the east and in the upper midwest. In a place like Kansas, nobody is 75m AAT. But in the woody Berkshires of Western Massachusetts, the UHF space is needed to get through the trees, and a significant share of houses are 75m AAT. Also, if you want to cover a decent radius, the access point needs to be up the hill too. 75 meters isn't a mountaintop; it's just a little rise. It makes no sense to absolutely ban fixed use at a site that is 100m AAT if the nearest protected-service contour is, say, 50 miles away. A more sensible rule would be to follow broadcast practice, and lower the ERP based on height, so that the distance to a given signal strength contour is held constant as the height rises. Hence a Class A FM station is allowed up to 15 miles, and if it is more than 300 feet AAT, then it is allowed less than the 3000 watts ERP that apply at lower heights. Maybe the lawyers want to have more petitions to argue over. At 9/23/2010 04:07 PM, Rich Harnish wrote: 65. Decision. We decline to increase the maximum permitted transmit antenna height above ground for fixed TV bands devices. As the Commission stated in the Second Report and Order, the 30 meters above ground limit was established as a balance between the benefits of increasing TV bands device transmission range and the need to minimize the impact on licensed services.129 Consistent with the Commission's stated approach in the Second Report and Order
Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height
Fred, I think were saying the same thing? On 9/30/2010 8:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote: At 9/30/2010 10:37 PM, Jack Unger wrote: Fred, I'm sorry to seem dense but I don't understand your explanation below. I'd appreciate it if you would re-explain. The FCC said: transmit antenna used with fixed devices may not be more than 30 meters above the ground. In addition, fixed devices may not be located at sites where the height above average terrain (HAAT) at ground level is more than 76 meters. I'm trying to reconcile that with your statements. Could you please re-explain more clearly or by using better actual numbers (both HAAT at ground level and antenna height above ground)? Thanks in advance, jack Sure. In the Order itself, the FCC explained the origin of the 76 meter HAAT limit. They explained that they didn't want any antennas more than 106 meters AAT. That's the maximum antenna HAAT I referred to. Since antennas are allowed to be 30 meters above ground, they subtracted 30 from 106 and got 75. See paragraph 66 of the Order: We find that limiting the fixed device antenna HAAT to 106 meters (350 feet), as calculated by the TV bands database, provides an appropriate balance of these concerns. We will therefore restrict fixed TV bands devices from operating at locations where the HAAT of the ground is greater than 76 meters; this will allow use of an antenna at a height of up to 30 meters above ground level to provide an antenna HAAT of 106 meters. Accordingly, we are specifying that a fixed TV bands device antenna may not be located at a site where the ground HAAT is greater than 75 meters (246 feet). The Order cited an IEEE 802 Petitition http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=6520201311 which called for HAAT to be a factor. But they didn't call for a ban on operation above 75 meters; rather, they wanted co-channel separation to increase with height: less than 3 meters | 6 km 0.1 km 3 Less than 10 meters* 6.9 km 0.256 km 10 Less than 30 meters 10.8 km 0.285 km 30 Less than 50 meters 13.6 km 0.309 km 50 Less than 75 meters 16.1 km 0.330 km 75 Less than 150 meters22.6 km 0.372 km 150 Less than 300 meters 32 km 0.405 km 300 Less than 600 meters 45.7 km 0.419 km 600 meters or higher68 km 0.426 km That's rational. On the other hand I'd prefer allowing fixed devices at any ground elevation, to allow everyone to subscribe, so I'd suggest instead that they maximum ERP be decreased in order to limit interference to the same level. So maybe 6 dB from 76 to 150 meters and 10 dB to 300 meters, though that's a guess; I haven't run the calculations. And I'd allow directional antennas, professionally installed, to have ERP measured in the direction of the protected contour, with no reduction in ERP if it's clear to the distance the above chart. I'm thinking about a petition to that effect. I have real subscriber sites in mind. On 9/23/2010 4:48 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote: The rules allow antenna heights up to 30 meters, around 100 feet. One problem with the maximum HAAT limit is that it applies to the ground height, based on having a 30 meter high antenna. In other words, the ruling assumed a maximum antenna HAAT, and then set the ground HAAT to be 30m below that. If somebody's house is 10m below the limit, then a 10m antenna should be legal. (The minimum antenna height went away, since sensing is no longer required. That frankly seems to be the only major improvement in the rules.) Brian *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Tom DeReggi *Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:32 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height Yeah, that really sucks. Many areas needing served have thick forest/trees easilly 70ft tall. A 90ft height, just wouldn't allow enough of the signal to have open air, and the signal would be going through trees most of the full path. In 900Mhz, the difference between having the tower side over the tree line and below the tree line can be the difference between a quarter mile coverage and a 7 mile coverage in our market. All be it, 700Mhz does have better NLOS propogation characteristics than 900 does. I would have liked to see that height doubled. However, admittedly, it will allow much better spectrum re-use in areas that have a limited number of channels available. Spectrum reuse is one of the best ways to serve more people. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Fred Goldstein mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:36 PM Subject:
Re: [WISPA] FW: Transmit Antenna Height
So, if we have a negative HAAT, is it correct that we are within the rules. Say we have a location with -100 calculated HAAT and it can not be above +75. Frank On 9/24/2010 2:11 PM, Brian Webster wrote: This rule as it is written states that the ground elevation not more than 75 meters HAAT. Remember that is the not actual ground elevation of the site, it is the HAAT calculation. See my other email with a HAAT report pasted within. My office at an elevation of 1420 ft AMSL actually has a negative HAAT value. I think people are misunderstanding how HAAT is calculated. Brian *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Fred Goldstein *Sent:* Friday, September 24, 2010 3:37 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] FW: Transmit Antenna Height At 9/24/2010 03:03 PM, you wrote: Steve, Here is another question to pose to the FCC. Does the HAAT requirement include receive antennas. In otherwords, can no clients be installed above the 76 meter HAAT level? I see no mention of receive-only terminals, though I doubt anybody asked. But if by receive you mean client (such as a Mode 1 CPE), then the rules seem to ban those entirely, not just APs, from high ground: ...We will therefore restrict fixed TV bands devices from operating at locations where the HAAT of the ground is greater than 76 meters; this will allow use of an antenna at a height of up to 30 meters above ground level to provide an antenna HAAT of 106 meters. Accordingly, we are specifying that a fixed TV bands device antenna may not be located at a site where the ground HAAT is greater than 75 meters (246 feet). The ground HAAT is to be calculated by the TV bands database using computational software employing the methodology in Section 73.684(d) of the rules to ensure that fixed devices comply with this requirement. They cite to the IEEE's filing, but it didn't call for a ban; instead it called for wider protection distances based on HAAT: 13.We recommend that HAAT be used to determine the required separation distance from TV protected contours as described in the Table below.6 The method for calculating HAAT should be the same as was employed in Part 90 to protect the TV service from PLMRS. In addition, we recommend no limits on the antenna height above ground for fixed base stations.7 We further recommend that no changes in the assumption of antenna heights of 10m AGL for fixed user terminals (CPEs) be made for the purpose of calculating the separation distance to the TV protected contour. That would have been reasonable. *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Fred Goldstein *Sent:* Friday, September 24, 2010 2:57 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height At 9/24/2010 02:16 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote: There is one other benefit of this No body else will be able to install higher either. Mounting lower to the ground, its more likely a WISP will be able to install their own tower, and no longer have to pay huge colocation costs on a commercial tower. I predict more houses up on the hill, being the new TVWhitespace towers. Although, aren't these low channel Whitespace omnis like giant, and weight a ton? No, Tom, you missed the poison pill. If somebody lives on a hill, more than 76 meters above average terrain, then they are banned from using fixed whitespace devices AT ALL. Not at 4W. Not at 1W. Just the flea-power portable devices, which are basically wireless mics. This new rule needs to be changed. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Brian Webster mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com To: 'WISPA General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:41 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height But what if you are able to use spectrum around 200 or 300 MHz? That certainly goes through trees. Brian From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tom DeReggi Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:32 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height Yeah, that really sucks. Many areas needing served have thick forest/trees easilly 70ft tall. A 90ft height, just wouldn't allow enough of the signal to have open air, and the signal would be going through trees most of the full path. In 900Mhz, the difference between having the tower side over the tree line and below the tree line can be the difference between a quarter mile coverage and a 7 mile coverage in our market. All be it, 700Mhz does have better NLOS propogation characteristics than 900 does. I would have liked to see that height doubled. However, admittedly, it will allow much better spectrum re-use in areas that have a limited number of channels available. Spectrum reuse is one of the best
Re: [WISPA] FW: FIPS 140-2
That gateway has nice pricing. On 9/7/2010 4:18 PM, Bret Clark wrote: Seems Meru has a solution or try googling 802.11 fips http://www.merunetworks.com/corporate/press_releases/index.php?articleID=091609 On 09/07/2010 05:30 PM, Kevin Sullivan wrote: For some reason, they say they can't use 802.16 -- it has to be 802.11. Kevin - Original Message - *From:* Dave Rumore mailto:drum...@redlinecommunications.com *To:* 'wireless@wispa.org' mailto:%27wirel...@wispa.org%27 *Sent:* Tuesday, September 07, 2010 2:24 PM *Subject:* [WISPA] FW: FIPS 140-2 The Redline AN-80i is FIPS 140-2 certified in both PtP and PtMP but they are 802.16 based not 802.11. They are also the most widely deployed COTS (commercial off the shelf) broadband radios in US DoD today. I hope this helps. *redline*^® ** *Communications* *David Rumore* *Territory Manager** *120 Mystic Lane Jupiter, FL 33458 Phone: +1 561.741.0756 Fax: +1 561.741.1561 * *Mobile: 561.254.0758 e-mail: drum...@redlinecommunications.com** Web: www.redlinecommunications.com http://www.redlinecommunications.com/** *Advancing Broadband Wireless * *P** **Think green before printing this email* *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Brad Belton *Sent:* Tuesday, September 07, 2010 4:58 PM *To:* 'WISPA General List' *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] FIPS 140-2 Possibly RedLine or Alvarion, but I think they are only AES256. BridgeWave PtP has been our radio of choice for FIPS 140-2 requirements. Best, Brad *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Sullivan *Sent:* Tuesday, September 07, 2010 3:52 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* [WISPA] FIPS 140-2 We have a customer that is part of the Federal government, and they are looking for a FIPS 140-2 certified 802.11-based PtMP outdoor solution. Anyone have any ideas? Kevin IMPORTANT NOTICE : This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Redline immediately by email at postmas...@redlinecommunications.com mailto:postmas...@redlinecommunications.com . Thank you. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives:http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] OT -- ISS visual space phenomenon
At our age we are the wonder.. On 8/29/2010 7:49 PM, Robert West wrote: Yeah, 13 year old boy was all hot for it. Watched it a few years ago with my now 16 year old. Was cool to see it through his eyes. Me, just another moving light! Sucks to get old and lose the sense of wonder... *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Mike *Sent:* Saturday, August 28, 2010 9:31 PM *To:* 'WISPA General List' *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OT -- ISS visual space phenomenon Beautiful pass of the ISS here. Share the experience with a kid if you can. Follow the link below. *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman *Sent:* Saturday, August 28, 2010 4:10 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] OT -- ISS visual space phenomenon Cool, thanks! On Aug 28, 2010 5:07 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com mailto:m...@aweiowa.com wrote: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/realdata/sightings/SSapplications/Post/JavaSSOP/JavaSSOP.html I have been enjoying showing people around here the ISS. Since they have added so much hardware to the Space Station, it has become one of the spectacles of the night sky. If you are in the right position for a pass, the ISS is the third brightest object in the night sky after the sun and moon. Yes, it's way brighter than Venus. Follow the link above to calculate when and where you should look. At 8:15 tonight we have a pass going over 70 degrees which will put it almost straight overhead. Friendly Regards, Mike Mike Gilchrist Disruptive Technologist Advanced Wireless Express P.O. Box 255 Toledo, IA 52342 Mike's Weekly Column http://www.tamatoledonews.com/page/category.detail/nav/5001/Local-Columns.html 239.770.6203 m...@aweiowa.com mailto:m...@aweiowa.com *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Jerry Richardson *Sent:* Saturday, August 28, 2010 11:50 AM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] DC Remote reboot? I would not want the ability to change the voltage remotely. Switch to voltage too low and lose connectivity. Switch to a voltage too high and you might let the smoke out. - Jerry *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *RickG *Sent:* Friday, August 27, 2010 8:10 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] DC Remote reboot? Oh, so it doesnt have to be direct AC in? On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com mailto:m...@tc3net.com wrote: Yes, I've got several of them deployed, very nice. It will run off AC as well, and is outdoor hardened. Only negatives, voltage isn't changeable per port via the web interface, manual toggle only, and they need a version with more ports. Regards Michael Baird Inscape LPS-1000 POE Switch, with reboot capabilites. It will run off 48VDC. Five ports. http://www.connectronics.com/inscape/PoE%20Switch.htm Phil On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net mailto:li...@mtin.net wrote: Does anyone know of a product which is a POE power supply in addition to having remote reboot capabilities? Imagine this scenario. You have DC running up a 400 foot tower. You have a DCV switch at the top with DC POE's. The switch is not POE but external POEs plugged into a distribution block. In otherwords there is no AC running up the tower. Are there any devices which can interrupt the DC power via remote management to reboot a single device? Justin -- Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net http://j...@mtin.net http://www.mtin.net/blog -- xISP News http://www.twitter.com/j2sw -- Follow me on Twitter Wisp Consulting -- Tower Climbing -- Network Support WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/
Re: [WISPA] Electrical Question.......
Thanks Ralph for clearing up my confusion about 3 phase metering. Frank On 8/13/2010 6:46 AM, Ralph wrote: If you don't NEEED three phase, don't install it. The metering is more complex, there are 3 transformers, and the basic monthly bill is probably more expensive as they pass their costs of the complexity on to you. Someone wrote about the Demand Meter with the peak indicator, and I wanted to clear up one thing that was said. Demand meters usually work on a 15 or 50 (and rarely 60) minute period. If you exceed the highest peak of use during any of these periods, your billing rate ratchets up. This rate remains for a period, sometimes as long as 13 months, during which your per KWH charge is higher. It does not cause you to be billed the same total amount whether or not you use it- it only affects the RATE. These are called demand charges and supposedly go to offset the cost of the extra cost they incurred to handle your little spike. I used to be the lead Field Engineer for a company that specialized in reading the meter pulses and predicting the demand minute by minute so that the system could shed load in order to keep from hitting a new 30 minute demand. It was really amazing- I could set the demand limit and then watch as it cycled fans, compressors, lights and other energy users to keep that demand down. We even built a box that controlled the load on big A/C chillers, which basically turned the water temperature up a degree or so until the prediction went down. This gear was in large buildings: hospitals, schools, factories, arenas, etc. The worst case I ever saw (or the easiest one to sell) was a Hercules plant in Louisiana, where a single peak overage cost them 0ne million dollars over the next 13 months! Ralph *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert West *Sent:* Thursday, August 12, 2010 11:32 PM *To:* WISPA General List *Subject:* [WISPA] Electrical Question... Putting together a new NOC. The new NOC is in an older warehouse and we ripped out ALL the crazy wiring and the multiple electrical panels. Total gut job. Installed a single phase electrical panel for the retail and service area in the front but we have three phase coming into the building. Electrician uncle Dude, 80+ years, tells me that three phase protects against power surges since it adds another transformer. My question is, would installing a three phase panel for the NOC be a proactive thing? Advantageous against the great lightning and idiotic power company Godz? (GODZ Rock And Roll Machine) Old location was all three phase and we never had one lick of trouble Not one. Would this be the reason or would it be just a stroke of luck, one that didn't involve the lottery Figures. Bob- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Electrical Question.......
3 phase metering (as in how much you pay the utility )is done different than single phase, I would check with your utility, also check your initial costs of 3 phase equipment - meter base and entrance panel. How I understand the billing in our area is, 3 phase meter has a needle that is moved to the max use and you are billed that amount whether the elec is on or off. Just check, it may not be important but then again. Frank On 8/12/2010 8:31 PM, Robert West wrote: Putting together a new NOC. The new NOC is in an older warehouse and we ripped out ALL the crazy wiring and the multiple electrical panels. Total gut job. Installed a single phase electrical panel for the retail and service area in the front but we have three phase coming into the building. Electrician uncle Dude, 80+ years, tells me that three phase protects against power surges since it adds another transformer. My question is, would installing a three phase panel for the NOC be a proactive thing? Advantageous against the great lightning and idiotic power company Godz? (GODZ Rock And Roll Machine) Old location was all three phase and we never had one lick of trouble Not one. Would this be the reason or would it be just a stroke of luck, one that didn't involve the lottery Figures. Bob- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Electrical Question.......
Cameron; I was currious, how does your monthly billing work where you are located. Frank On 8/12/2010 10:20 PM, cc...@dot11net.com wrote: Three phase does not provide any more or less protection against lightning. I have three phase power to my house...lucky me...live in a 60 year old house. I, and one other guy on my block who still has three phase power, both lost our AC compressors in a lightning storm on the same night two summers ago. Everyone on single phase...no problem. Three phase does have some advantages especially with efficiency with high current devices like compressors and such, but it does not provide inherent protection against power surges like lightning strikes. Cameron 3 phase metering (as in how much you pay the utility )is done different than single phase, I would check with your utility, also check your initial costs of 3 phase equipment - meter base and entrance panel. How I understand the billing in our area is, 3 phase meter has a needle that is moved to the max use and you are billed that amount whether the elec is on or off. Just check, it may not be important but then again. Frank On 8/12/2010 8:31 PM, Robert West wrote: Putting together a new NOC. The new NOC is in an older warehouse and we ripped out ALL the crazy wiring and the multiple electrical panels. Total gut job. Installed a single phase electrical panel for the retail and service area in the front but we have three phase coming into the building. Electrician uncle Dude, 80+ years, tells me that three phase protects against power surges since it adds another transformer. My question is, would installing a three phase panel for the NOC be a proactive thing? Advantageous against the great lightning and idiotic power company Godz? (GODZ Rock And Roll Machine) Old location was all three phase and we never had one lick of trouble Not one. Would this be the reason or would it be just a stroke of luck, one that didn't involve the lottery Figures. Bob- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Bandwidth Cap Implementation
Matt; Thanks for sharing your information. Frank On 5/6/2010 11:11 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: Since there has been a lot of discussion about bandwidth caps on this list recently, I thought that I would share the one that we recently implemented, along with some details on how we are enforcing it and how we established the caps. Going back to day 1, we have had a 3gig cap on broadband customers with a $25/gig surcharge for anyone exceeding that amount. When we were using all StarOS V2, the radius accounting information was keeping fairly close track of the bandwidth per customer. Fast forward six years, and that cap was so low as to be a joke -- and we had not been enforcing it. It was also very difficult to collect accurate accounting data - StarOS evolved and the radius accounting became useless in version 3, so some access points were tracking it and others were not. We also have a few Tranzeo and Mikrotik access points in the system and no good way to collect the individual subscriber download information from them either. After looking at several different options for collecting the bandwidth traffic information, we decided to use open source tools to develop our own solution. We installed a switch between our core and edge routers -- behind the NAT so that it could see all customer's IP addresses -- and mirrored a port to our new collection server. The collection server is a Linux box running CentOS 5.2. The linux box is using softflowd-0.98 to collect the netflows, and flow-tools-v-0.68.5 to look at the data. Daily reports are mailed out to our techs list to show the customer who are nearing or over their caps. A customer page was created that shows the customers how much bandwidth they have used, how much they have left before charges and what their overage charges are (if any). The customer page also shows their historical usage trend for the last 12 months -- starting with April 2010 when we started collecting the information. Starting on June 1, we will bill overages as a separate charge to the customers on the 1^st of the month, regardless of their billing anniversary. The process of implementing this was quite interesting. Out of 2000+ customers, 80 used more than 10 gigs for the month. One customer - a 1 meg subscriber at the far eastern edge of our network, behind seven wireless hops and on an 802.11b AP -- downloaded 140gig. Another one, on the far western side of our network, downloaded 110gig. We called them and found out that they were watching a ton of online video. We discovered a county government connection that was around 100gig -- mostly because someone in the sheriff's department was pounding for BitTorrent files from 1am to 7am in the morning, and sometimes crashing their firewall machine because of the traffic. We also discovered that there was 80-100meg of stateless udp type traffic traversing our routed network and getting to our core router. Revised firewall rules on the APs fixed this problem. The majority of the rest of the subs on the list were either online video watchers, people with virus problems or who had left filesharing programs running on their computers. After reviewing the usage records, we decided on the following cap sizes for our plans: Package Monthly Download Cap 384k 10 gigabytes 640k 10 gigabytes 1 meg 20 gigabytes 2 meg 40 gigabytes 3 meg 50 gigabytes 4 meg 60 gigabytes 8 meg 80 gigabytes Additional capacity over cap $1 per gigabyte over the cap I feel that these caps are more than generous, and should have a minimal effect on the majority of our customers. With our backbone consumption per customer increasing, implementing caps of some kind became a necessity. I am not looking at the caps as a new profit center -- they are a deterrent as much as anything. It will provide an incentive for customers to upgrade to a faster plan with a higher cap, or take their download habits to a competitor and chew up someone else's bandwidth. This has been an educational experience, and probably one that we should have gone through a couple of years ago. I would like to thank the people on the WISPA and Butch Evans' Mikrotik lists for their input while we were developing this system. Matt Larsen Vistabeam.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Re: [WISPA] You're going to love this... New IRS rules
It looks to me like there might have been a change ralph On 4/28/2010 7:48 PM, Ralph wrote: This is not correct. Please don't spread FUD. Check with your CPA to find out who and when you need to 1099. Only Individuals get 1099s, and only for services- not merchandise. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of MDK Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:40 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] You're going to love this... New IRS rules http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2010/04/26/costly-irs-mandate-slipped-into-he alth-bill/ It requires 1099's for EVERY entity you do more than $600 business with a year. Gas station. Walmart, your landlord, a $700 used car or truck.Ebay purchases, ALL require 1099's now if you go over $600 a year. That's almost enough for me to throw up my hands and say I quit. Frankly, we should all just quit. For a week. Or a month.Call up the White House and say you want it so bad, well now you got it, we quit. When about 50 million of us do that, perhaps the administration will realize it should consult someone besides insane marxists as it concerns business and economics. ++ Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy 541-969-8200 509-386-4589 ++ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Remotely Adjusted Dish Mount
TV antenna rotator Robert West wrote: I recently acquired an 80 foot Super Heavy Duty Will-Burt telescopic mast with the goal for dual use of A) Site Survey and B) Emergency use during AP failure. I'm looking for a dish mount that can be remotely adjusted while the mast is extended. I haven't seen anything in my searches, wanted to know if anyone is using such a thing or have any recommendations of something they have seen. It's a cool toy so I gots to at least make the wife think I'm really gonna use it. Bob- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids
Now there's a vision i could have lived with out. LOL Josh Luthman wrote: I like that idea way more then living comfortably. Sitting at home on the couch naked eating Cheetos provides minimal benefit to society. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com wrote: Yes, it depends on what you put in. Remember that unemployment is generally what you put in, to a point. The extensions that the feds put out are actually loans to your state that get paid back via unemployment taxes that you pay later. The system works as a basic safety net. I don't mind it.. I just sweat when I am on it. ryan On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote: Unemployment is dependent on your previous job from what I understand. He was in the Marines. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com wrote: How much is unemployment in OH? I max out here at 33% of my normal salary. I tell you I sweat and sweat trying to pick up my next gig. ryan On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote: My roommate is on unemployment. How do you feel it sucks? He goes to school ~12 hours a week and gets paid more then I take for salary with tuition paid. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Ryan Spott rsp...@cspott.com wrote: Obviously you have never been on unemployment. It sucks. ryan On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Kurt Fankhauser k...@wavelinc.com wrote: I heard that un-employment benefits recently got extended to 100 weeks Let's give the masses' more reason to not go find a job. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto: wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of RickG Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:33 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids Wow, you're 22 and think like that?!?! I thought that mindset was dated! Just come help with the family business and I'll make sure you eat, have a place to sleep, get a percentage of the profits :) On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: What would my allowance be with no chores? Another big thing...I never got an allowance. I worked for my money (odd jobs, helping people out, etc.)Before Rick that is. IMO it's crap. Giving a child money to do what is expected (help cleaning and keeping up the house) just makes no sense. Both my parents came from a farm - work all day every day and in turn food and a bed. On 4/19/10, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote: Can I adopt you? :) On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote: Keep in mind I am 22 and have no kids. This is my personal point of view. My parents never set guidelines or many rules (just the basic things). I have never done any drugs. Been offered and been around them more then enough. Never smoked a cigarette in my life. Never drank until I was...very close to 21. Never got in any trouble at school. My first job led to the second job/career I have today. I enjoy my life, the people around me and the things I have. My partner has 3 teenage girls. He is extremely strict. One of them gets in to trouble, disobeys, does wrong things, etc. A friend I had in high school was in the same position. I know where that
Re: [WISPA] Imagestream (was Vyatta?)
http://www.imagestreamsolutions.com/Network_Cards/PCI_Cards.html Josh Luthman wrote: What everyone is saying is the Cisco is not Imagestream. I think we can all be very very very thankful of that. It's an Imagestream policy not to put in third party parts. Follow it or don't, it is your choice. I will like to know what the part costs from Imagestream as Newegg charges $45. On 4/16/10, Eje Gustafsson e...@wisp-router.com wrote: Last I heard Cisco don't provide free firmware upgrade/warranty especially on resold products unless specific IOS license is purchased with the reselling. Cisco don't provide free support period. With the myriad of PC based cards out there I don't blame IS for not providing warranty support on third party cards installed in their routers. How do you know that card isn't a cheap knock off card. Further even if it's not a knock off card maybe the revision of the card is newer or older then what IS provides and have tested out to work with their software. So should they then support a card they didn't make anything at all from selling and that they have not tested to work in their software solution? What if they came to the conclusion that specific card don't work well at all and simply decided to not offer this particular card and you buy and install this card in your IS router why should they support and warranty their router just to track it down to a non certified third party card being installed in your router? If they find this IMO it wouldn't be too much to ask for compensation for the technical support assistance you where given on a none IS product. Just like most ISPs they have their demarcation point at the Ethernet side on their CPE when they provide the CPE. So if there are issues with the client they do testing of the Ethernet side on the CPE and if everything works out well and the customer want you to trouble shoot further to see what is wrong with their computer or router almost all ISPs I talked to charge for it or they go so far as provide free broadband routers that they trust. I'm sure there are those that set themselves apart and will help out for free especially if the client is a higher $$ client or the client has a router the ISP trust in and like. I see little difference between these here. IS provide a boxed solution that can be expanded. They support and warrant their products, their cards they provide for the products because they know they work with their hardware and their software. If it doesn't they will fix it. Where is the incentive for them to fix a problem with a NIC card they didn't sell and earned any money for? When they sold the router they have appropriate margin to handle warranty and support on that particular product. If you want another card you might pay a bit of a premium over a third party card but that is the extra you pay for the extended warranty and support to handle this product as well. Just my 2 cents. / Eje -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Brad Belton Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 11:13 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Imagestream (was Vyatta?) I completely agree if the card installed is 3rd party and completely different than what Imagestream, Cisco or any OEM sells. The point is If the card is exactly the same as OEM, however being sourced from somewhere else other than the OEM, I don't see why the OEM should get their panties all in a wad and void the warranty on the product. Brad -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Scott Vander Dussen Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 11:00 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Imagestream (was Vyatta?) Gotta disagree Brad- show me the price point differences between any Cisco and IS that are comporable - don't forget TCO for OS upgrades etc. Are you suggesting Cisco provides a cheaper HW upgrade solution? This is like pulling your car into the oil change station, handing the guy 5 qt of your own oil that you purchased for a few bucks cheaper and a new air filter.. Doesn't work that way- everyone needs a business model that's profitable. Thanks, ‘S --- Sent mobile (and probably one handed while driving!) On Apr 16, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Brad Belton b...@belwave.com wrote: I may be wrong on this, but I doubt Cisco will void your warranty if you buy an expansion card (exact same as you could buy from Cisco directly) and install it in your Cisco router. I'm not suggesting Imagestream should be onboard with a user installing something other than what Imagestream sells directly, but if the card the end user installs is exactly the samewhat's the problem? Imagestream doesn't keep record of how a product was configured before it was sold? So, if there is an expansion card added Imagestream can simply
Re: [WISPA] Imagestream (was Vyatta?)
Tom, You might want to check if that imagestream 2006 MoBo has pci-e slots in it Josh Luthman wrote: You just saved many people hundreds or thousands :) On 4/15/10, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote: Yup... that's the one. Travis Josh Luthman wrote: Maybe this one? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106036 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Tom Sharples tsharp...@qorvus.com wrote: Thanks guys! - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: Tom Sharples ; WISPA General List Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Imagestream (was Vyatta?) We installed several Intel Gigabit cards in our old Imagestream and they worked great. They were the $40 Intel desktop cards. Travis Microserv Tom Sharples wrote: Just received the imagestream gateway router (vintage 2006 or so) , unfortunately it's equipped with 4-port T1/E1 cards, not ethernet cards (sigh). Does anyone know if these will work with standard (e.g. 3com, intel, whatever) 10/100 ethernet adaptors, or do we have to use a proprietary card? Thanks, Tom S. - Original Message - From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vyatta? Well, for that many NIC included, you got a steal. A single 4port Intel oem Gig card PCI-e costs $430 new. (Actually that is probably not true, cause its probably an older model that doesn't have PCI-E nic cards.) Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Tom Sharples tsharp...@qorvus.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:10 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vyatta? I picked up the Gateway model, equipped with nine 4-port ethernet expansion boards, for $625 on Ebay. Seems like a good deal altho I don't know what this model costs new with the added ports. Way more than we really need. I'm looking forward to trying it out tho. Tom S. - Original Message - From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:57 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vyatta? Call support and they can fix your ImageStream issues. Need to push a little bit and use the phone. To this day I've not had a response to my emails without a phone call. On 4/6/10, Scott Lambert lamb...@lambertfam.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:37:54PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote: I really think you'll love ImageStream... I don't mind the three living ImageStream TransPort routers we inherited. Once I changed the editor to default to vi, I was pretty happy. I am not much of a fan of the interface configuration, though it is currently more flexible and transparent than pfSense for multiple subnets on the same interface. The shellcmd plugin lets me have a GUI to get around the current inadaquacy of the interface configuration GUI of pfSense 1.2.3. I do find that I will make a change to the default route on the Interface Configuration file; it will reload sand; and I will have to go to bash and route delete default, route add default gateway newip manually. Or, I will put a new subnet on an interface and can't get OSPFd to talk on that interface until I reboot the box. Just stopping and starting OSPFd didn't work. I don't know if that is an indication that I have bad hardware or what. Using suspect gear for your first experience with a platform is probably not the best situation for figuring out what is what. The other 4 inherited TransPorts all have one or more blown ethernet ports so I haven't been able to use them. I can't point to anything on the other three that screams I'm busted. Having to reboot is really annoying. Having to use the shell to manually apply desired configuration changes, annoying, but at least they give me the tools to do it. :-) I like flexibility. The biggest problem I have with going whole hog for the ImageStreams is, it would take me much longer to train guys to run the ImageStreams than it will take to train them to run pfSense. The secondary problem is cost : pfSense on Alix: $204 3 eth pfSense on soekris: $275-350 4 eth ImageStream on TransPort: $900 new 4 eth $600 e-bay. 3 eth We only do about 20 to 30 Mbps where I will have these deployed. More horsepower would be wasted. The BGP running pfSense box is a bit beefier than the Alix boxes, but didn't quite cost as much as a new TransPort. On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Scott Lambert lamb...@lambertfam.orgwrote: On Mon, Apr 05,
Re: [WISPA] Imagestream (was Vyatta?)
Also ENU inc off airport way stocks both PCI and PCIe. http://www.enuinc.com/ Frank Crawford wrote: Tom, You might want to check if that imagestream 2006 MoBo has pci-e slots in it Josh Luthman wrote: You just saved many people hundreds or thousands :) On 4/15/10, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote: Yup... that's the one. Travis Josh Luthman wrote: Maybe this one? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833106036 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” --- Winston Churchill On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Tom Sharples tsharp...@qorvus.com wrote: Thanks guys! - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: Tom Sharples ; WISPA General List Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:57 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Imagestream (was Vyatta?) We installed several Intel Gigabit cards in our old Imagestream and they worked great. They were the $40 Intel desktop cards. Travis Microserv Tom Sharples wrote: Just received the imagestream gateway router (vintage 2006 or so) , unfortunately it's equipped with 4-port T1/E1 cards, not ethernet cards (sigh). Does anyone know if these will work with standard (e.g. 3com, intel, whatever) 10/100 ethernet adaptors, or do we have to use a proprietary card? Thanks, Tom S. - Original Message - From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vyatta? Well, for that many NIC included, you got a steal. A single 4port Intel oem Gig card PCI-e costs $430 new. (Actually that is probably not true, cause its probably an older model that doesn't have PCI-E nic cards.) Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: Tom Sharples tsharp...@qorvus.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:10 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vyatta? I picked up the Gateway model, equipped with nine 4-port ethernet expansion boards, for $625 on Ebay. Seems like a good deal altho I don't know what this model costs new with the added ports. Way more than we really need. I'm looking forward to trying it out tho. Tom S. - Original Message - From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 9:57 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vyatta? Call support and they can fix your ImageStream issues. Need to push a little bit and use the phone. To this day I've not had a response to my emails without a phone call. On 4/6/10, Scott Lambert lamb...@lambertfam.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:37:54PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote: I really think you'll love ImageStream... I don't mind the three living ImageStream TransPort routers we inherited. Once I changed the editor to default to vi, I was pretty happy. I am not much of a fan of the interface configuration, though it is currently more flexible and transparent than pfSense for multiple subnets on the same interface. The shellcmd plugin lets me have a GUI to get around the current inadaquacy of the interface configuration GUI of pfSense 1.2.3. I do find that I will make a change to the default route on the Interface Configuration file; it will reload sand; and I will have to go to bash and route delete default, route add default gateway newip manually. Or, I will put a new subnet on an interface and can't get OSPFd to talk on that interface until I reboot the box. Just stopping and starting OSPFd didn't work. I don't know if that is an indication that I have bad hardware or what. Using suspect gear for your first experience with a platform is probably not the best situation for figuring out what is what. The other 4 inherited TransPorts all have one or more blown ethernet ports so I haven't been able to use them. I can't point to anything on the other three that screams I'm busted. Having to reboot is really annoying. Having to use the shell to manually apply desired configuration changes, annoying, but at least they give me the tools to do it. :-) I like flexibility. The biggest problem I have with going whole hog for the ImageStreams is, it would take me much longer to train guys to run the ImageStreams than it will take to train them to run pfSense. The secondary problem is cost : pfSense on Alix: $204 3 eth pfSense on soekris: $275-350 4 eth ImageStream on TransPort: $900 new 4 eth $600 e-bay. 3 eth We only do about 20 to 30 Mbps where I will have these deployed. More horsepower would be wasted. The BGP running pfSense box is a bit beefier than the Alix boxes, but didn't quite cost
Re: [WISPA] how to protect your kids
Speak firmly and borrow that big stick from Roosevelt when necessary. Fear of God is useless but Fear of Dad is profound. I raised 5 kids, youngest is 32, still works, no stick necessary, they just know where i keep it. Frank Marlon K. Schafer wrote: Hi All, Here's the scenario. My kids are expressly forbidden from having email addresses outside my domain. They are forbidden from having myspace, facebook etc. sites. If they want an email, fine by me, but it's one that *I* can check on. If they want a web site, fine by me, but make it a real one that *I* can delete things from. I'm trying to teach them to NOT do or say things on the internet that might bite them in the butt later. The days of people eventually forgetting the stupidity of youth or passion are long gone. Anyway, my 13 year old has a myspace account. He used a hotmail email address to get it. He had permission to use neither of them. I finally found out about the myspace account and went in to check out what he'd been saying. His trash and sent messages had both been erased between when I got the password out of him and when I had time to check on it. (I didn't know that his zune, a video player would ALSO allow him to get on the net and work on his page, talk to his friends etc. deep sigh) So, I contacted myspace, using his account, and asked for all of the deleted information. I explained that I was the father of a minor and that he had no permission to use their site and I wanted to know what was being hidden from me. I gave my full name AND phone number as well as my email address. They were very good about contacting me quickly about this issue. However they flatly refused to provide me with any information! They had NO proof of age etc. on the account. Nothing to verify that the child was over 18 etc. And *I* as the PARENT am prevented from accessing the account information! go get it from your teen is basically what I was told. WTF is this??? Absolutly amazing. So, what do the rest of you do to try to protect or control your kids these days? thanks marlon WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Approved Ad] $2, 750 Worth of WISP Management Gear for $499
http://www.ebox-platform.com/ This is a better solution for the money. RickG wrote: Does anyone have one yet? On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:56 PM, BlueMesh sa...@bluemesh.net wrote: *Which Would You Prefer to Manage Your WISP?* *Bandwidth Controller. $500 - $1,000* *Services Router.. $475 - $1,200* *Network Access Controller... $595 - $695 + $50 / month* *MT SNMP/Monitoring Router $300 - $800* *Or* *All That Gear Packed Inside a 5 x 7 Indoor Router for only $499!* *Click here http://www.bluemesh.net to see the BlueMesh Networks Managed Router in action. * *Once the web page loads, click on the button titled See Live Demonstration of Meshview Administrative Features. If you like what you see, order yours TODAY!* * sa...@bluemesh.net or call Toll FREE (866) 630-4689* *As a new Vendor Member of WISPA (March 2010), we couldn't think of a better way to introduce ourselves than by bringing WISPA Members the latest in Network Management solutions... at an affordable price.* ***We were fighting several pieces of equipment, all running different firmware, each with their own configuration set. Then we came across BlueMesh Networks Managed Router. Our job managing the WISP suddenly became simpler, easier, and a lot less expensive. We highly recommend BlueMesh gear to WISP Owners/Operators.* *-Neil Neiwert, Owner Wilderness Wireless, Southern Idaho WISP * * * BlueMesh Networks | © 2010 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] USF Changes
Nice call RickG RickG wrote: I repeat, thats still a tax. On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com wrote: But USF comes from the ratepayers of the telecom services, not tax dollars. Brian -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on Behalf Of RickG Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 2:50 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF Changes As a WISP, I resent the idea that my tax dollars may be used to compete with me. As a taxpayer, at what point will the government realize we cant afford all this? -RickG On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Marco Coelho coelh...@gmail.com wrote: FCC to propose revamping Universal Service Fund AP By JOELLE TESSLER, AP Technology Writer Joelle Tessler, Ap Technology Writer – Fri Mar 5, 5:25 pm ET WASHINGTON – Federal regulators trying to bring high-speed Internet connections to all Americans will propose tapping the government program that now subsidizes telephone service in poor and rural areas. The Federal Communications Commission will include a proposal to revamp the Universal Service Fund as part of a national broadband plan due to Congress on March 17. Although the proposal itself has been expected for months, Friday's announcement offered the first solid details. The FCC said it envisions transforming the Universal Service program over the next decade to pay for high-speed Internet access instead of the traditional voice services that it currently finances. The proposal would create a Connect America fund inside the Universal Service program to subsidize broadband, and a Mobility Fund to expand the reach of so-called 3G, or third-generation, wireless networks. It's time to migrate this 20th-century program, said Blair Levin, the FCC official overseeing the broadband plan, which was mandated by last year's stimulus bill. We need to move the current system from the traditional networks to the new networks. The Universal Service Fund was established to ensure that all Americans have access to a basic telephone line. Today, the program subsidizes phone service for the poor, funds Internet access in schools and libraries and pays for high-speed connections for rural health clinics. But its biggest function is to bring telephone service to remote, sparsely populated corners of the country, where it is uneconomical for the private companies to build networks. Funding for the $8-billion-a-year program comes from a surcharge that businesses and consumers pay on their long-distance bills. That revenue base is shrinking, placing the Universal Service Fund under mounting pressure even as the FCC seeks to use it to subsidize broadband. The agency's plan will lay out several options to pay for the proposals it outlined Friday, including one that would require no additional money from Congress and one that would accelerate the construction of broadband networks if Congress approves a one-time injection of $9 billion. Either way, Levin stressed, the proposal would not increase the annual size of the Universal Service Fund, but rather would take money from subsidies now used for voice services. The FCC would also seek to save money by subsidizing no more than one broadband provider in an areas. Some critics of the program have complained that wireless companies now overlay landline systems with new networks considered duplicative. Levin said Connect America would not favor one technology over another, be it cable, DSL or wireless. The FCC proposal also envisions revamping the multibillion-dollar intercarrier compensation system, the Byzantine menu of charges that telecom carriers pay to access each other's networks and connect calls. Any changes to the Universal Service Fund would also require changes to intercarrier compensation because rural phone companies tend to rely heavily on both funding sources. The FCC's latest proposals will be part of a sweeping national roadmap for bringing universal, affordable broadband connections to all Americans. Although the plan is due on March 17, the agency has already begun releasing details, including a proposal to make more wireless spectrum available for mobile broadband connections by letting television broadcasters and others voluntarily cede some airwaves. Some of the proposals will likely require congressional action, while others might be up to the FCC to implement. Yahoo article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100305/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_fcc_universal_service ;_ylt=AgSGtpiLKKQbXooR3LKvT.cPLBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTMzNGcwMmcyBGFzc2V0Ay9hcC8yMDEw MDMwNS9hcF9vbl9oaV90ZS91c190ZWNfZmNjX3VuaXZlcnNhbF9zZXJ2aWNlBHBvcwM3BHNlYwN5 bl90b21ic3RvbmUEc2xrA2ZjY3RvcHJvcG9zZQ-- -- Marco C. Coelho Argon Technologies Inc. POB 875 Greenville, TX 75403-0875 903-455-5036
Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: The FCC's role in regulation of net-neutrality
YES Jack Unger wrote: I trust that government will be able to keep up just fine. Do you support the alternative of making government so small that you can drown it in a bathtub? Glenn Kelley wrote: Title II of the Communications Act—the section that regulates telecommunications common carriers is now being considered by the FCC to oversee broadband. FCC Commissioner Robert M. McDowell during a talk he gave to the Free State Foundation asked: (see First Do No Harm: A broadband plan for Amercia) “Exactly what kind of companies might get tangled up into this regulatory Rubik’s Cube?…Any Internet company that offers a voice application?” … “With this newfound authority, why stop at voice apps? Isn’t voice just another type of data app? As the distinction between network operators and application providers continues to blur at an eye-popping rate, how will the government be able to keep up?” Much more on the blog: www.HostMedic.com -- _ Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com Email: gl...@hostmedic.com Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] About Hulu and Netflix and youtube... increaseddata delivery is here to stay.
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/105483 sa...@michianawireless.com wrote: Hmm great comcast plans on launching there own on demand service now... http://www.cedmagazine.com/News-Comcast-On-Demand-Online-live-next-month-111309.aspx; John Buwa Michiana Wireless WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] About Hulu and Netflix and youtube... increaseddata delivery is here to stay.
I want a piece of the 5 cent a Gig bandwidth, if I don't have to carry it in a bucket. Josh Luthman wrote: Ok where's my stupid stick. Some of these people need to be knocked out. I like this post: ...and so begins the war... between companies like netflix and ISPs. Both making contrary claims on the cost of bandwidth. Who knows the price of bandwidth (to the last mile) more - ISPs or Netflix? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. --- Albert Einstein On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Frank Crawford mogoo...@gmx.com wrote: http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/105483 sa...@michianawireless.com wrote: Hmm great comcast plans on launching there own on demand service now... http://www.cedmagazine.com/News-Comcast-On-Demand-Online-live-next-month-111309.aspx John Buwa Michiana Wireless WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Nanostation Loco2
I was curious Bob did she say you were right or was that you talking out loud. :-P Robert West wrote: Portability is one thing to consider. He wants to use it as a client from his truck to open networks. I tried using the NS2 for the same reason but it was a pain in the butt due to the size and the plastic pipe mount stand offs on the rear of the NS2. I suppose if you could make up a magnetic mount with a short mast to put the thing on it would be better. My wife. Went to Mallorca Spain this past August to visit her mother. Wanted to take a NS2 with her so that she could pick up open networks while there. (Mom is over 80 and has no want for internet) I say, take a Loco instead, why ya want to lug a bulky NS2 all the way to Spain? But no, female... She takes a NS2. She conceded when she returned that the Loco was the better option. Too bulky for taking from place to place. (Airport security was curious about that thing, by the way) The bonus is that she never removed the Cat5 patch cable between uses, just wound it up and put it away. After a couple of days it no longer worked, she somehow caused an open in the Cat5 where it enters the plastic cover on the NS2 from bending it at too sharp of an angle. As a result, she spent a month paying for internet time at cafes. I was right for once. Bob- -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 7:33 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Nanostation Loco2 Have you compared them to the NS2? I'd be afraid to lose 6dbm and 2dbi...that's nearly 3 times the power! On 11/5/09, Jayson Baker jay...@spectrasurf.com wrote: We have a huge network deployed using these (actually, the Nano Loco 2). They work awesome. We regularly get 18-23Mbps through them. On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Nick Olsen n...@brevardwireless.com wrote: I was thinking about getting one of these to have for using open wireless when I can't find any. Like keep it in the truck and have it if I can't find any wireless networks with just my laptop. So I'm curious as to how good they work. And what kind of power they are putting out. I Understand that receive sensitivity will be more of a factor in this case. I like that they are cheap, And can be used as a client. But Haven't found much on them in terms of specs. Nick Olsen Brevard Wireless (321) 205-1100 x106 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] New Video and Research Shows that Libraries Play a Key Role in Connecting the Disconnected
This is a better link to what is really going on. http://www.google.com/search?q=libraries+closingie=utf-8oe=utf-8aq=trls=org.mozilla:en-US:officialclient=firefox-a RickG wrote: Received this in my email today. -RickG *** November 2, 2009 New Video and Research Shows that Libraries Play a Key Role in Connecting the Disconnected Connected Nation launches New Video and Policy Brief, “Connecting America Through Broadband at the Library” Link to Blog http://connectednation.com/in_the_news/the_blog/2009/10/new-video-and-research-shows-that.php Link to Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz_NdjVxc1Y Link to FCC Filing http://connectednation.com/_documents/FCCLibraryAccessFiling102009FINAL.pdf Link to Graphs http://connectednation.com/_documents/LibraryApps_102809_FINAL.ppt In recent research and activities, Connected Nation has found that libraries, across the country, are playing a critical role in connecting America’s disconnected. And, Americans are already speaking out about how libraries are transforming their families’ lives through broadband. Connected Nation has captured some of these stories in a video called “Connecting America Through Broadband at the Library.” In addition, Connected Nation’s survey research--which was recently filed in a policy brief with the Federal Communications Commission—further validates the important role libraries play as a community technology hub. Below are some of these testimonies. Watch Video “Connecting America Through Broadband at the Library.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz_NdjVxc1Y Along with this anecdotal evidence, Connected Nation conducted surveys across the states of Tennessee and Ohio to better understand the role of libraries in the broadband age. The report has been filed with the FCC, encouraging the commission to consider the important role community anchor institutions—specifically libraries—play in the national broadband plan. Key findings of this survey research include: • Significant percentages of those who normally don't subscribe to broadband – specifically single parents, minorities and low-income residents – are relying on the local library as their sole or primary Internet resource: 25 percent of single parents, 25 percent of minorities, 18 percent of low income residents, and 11 percent of people with disabilities depend on libraries for Internet connections. • More than one-half of library Internet users (51 percent) have children at home, suggesting that a significant portion of library Internet users are children. Of this group, 42 percent do not have a broadband connected computer at home. • Library Internet users are significantly more likely than other Internet users (those who connect at home or elsewhere) to use a number of online applications related to workforce development and education, civic engagement and healthcare. • Nearly half of library Internet users (46 percent) search for jobs online, compared to 29 percent of other Internet users. • Library Internet users are significantly more likely than other Internet users to communicate online with local government officials (25 percent compared to 14 percent.) • 28 percent of library Internet users communicate online with healthcare professionals, compared to 16 percent of other Internet users. To view the filing, click here http://connectednation.com/_documents/FCCLibraryAccessFiling102009FINAL.pdf . To view more data from this survey, click here to view graphs. http://connectednation.com/_documents/LibraryApps_102809_FINAL.ppt These voices and research are already helping Connected Nation work with the Bill Melinda Gates Foundation in a pilot program called Opportunity Online. http://www.opportunityonline.org/ This initiative partners the Bill Melinda Gates Foundation, Connected Nation and the American Library Association to host broadband summits for librarians, public and private leaders and other influencers in six different states. These summits help communities across each state devise a plan for greater library connectivity, especially for libraries that cannot offer broadband connected computers. Following the summits, the libraries are offered the opportunity to apply for grants to help fund their connectivity plans. To learn more about the Opportunity Online summits, click here. http://www.opportunityonline.org/ For more information, contact Jessica Ditto at jdi...@connectednation.org or (202) 251-4749. Related Links: FCC Filing: Connecting America through Broadband at the Library: A Connected Nation® Policy Brief Watch Video: Connecting America Through Broadband at the Library In The News: Connected Nation: Libraries key to rural broadband access (The Hill, October 30, 2009) Jessica Ditto Communications Director Connected Nation 877.846.7710 - Office 202.251.4749 - Mobile jdi...@connectednation.org www.connectednation.org
Re: [WISPA] Gotta Have
They do. http://www.telephoneparts.com/index.cgi?pcode=PLT-100020-010placement=1 Marlon K. Schafer wrote: Yeah, those are awesome. I wish they had shielded connectors as well. marlon - Original Message - From: Mike m...@aweiowa.com To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 7:01 AM Subject: [WISPA] Gotta Have I have learned a lot from this list. I think there is some real talent lurking here. We all have discovered certain things which just make life as a WISP easier. I think it would be beneficial to list participants in general if there was a thread which contained a description and use of something you find invaluable -- hardware, software etc ... you would like to share with the group. I'll start: what: EZRJ-45 connector system where: www.ezrj45.com why: As my eyes get older, and especially in low light situations, I find it very difficult to get all those individual conductors on a CAT5 run in the right order while crimping an end. This is a quite ingenious system. The plugs have holes all the way through. You can verify the color code easily BEFORE crimping and cutting the tags. It takes a special crimp tool which has a pair of blades that cut the tags as it crimps the connector in place. Maybe not a time saver in my case, but definitely a GRIEF saver. I've not miswired an Ethernet plug since I started using this system. Mike WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] customer information
Whats your plan if they raise the tower lease to an unacceptable level. Once you have a workable plan tell them no. Frank jp wrote: We've got a municipal lease for one of our towers in a town (We have several towers/sites in the town) and it's up for renewal. The municipal leaders wants a map of all users in town and where they get their service from. They want a listing of all users intown and out of town, who use the tower on the site we lease from the town. They want a listing of revenues attributed to the site since the lease began. I don't mind giving out maps of our service area, but I think this is going a bit far, and isn't likely to be helpful. I wouldn't want such information to fall into other companies hands with an FOI request or careless distribution either. Is any of this illegal to provide? I know CPNI would prevent me from disclosing VOIP records. Any other legal impediments to sharing this? I don't make any security/privacy promises in our AUP. Showing them enough information might be helpful with my case to contribute enough information to show we aren't getting rich off the site and wish for more coverage or expansion. Showing a town coverage information is good for spreading word of mouth about where we can serve in case people didn't think we served that area. But showing all of it would be good for competitors and customers might distrust us a bit for being too free or think we are promoting identity theft. I know darn sure some celebrity customers don't want their name on a local list of clients. Any suggestions on gracefully handling such a request? WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Verizon Wireless = Joke
If you keep wireless in perspective, 13.10.660 (e) (10) exempts you from 13.10.660 through 13.10.668, inclusive, and the 30 page app. As far as Tom's county, they have the same type of requirements except it only applies to licensed freq's not unlicensed. Frank Tim Sylvester wrote: In Santa Cruz County California, it can cost $25K to go through the permitting process to install an antenna. The County charges $6,000 for a use permit to install a Wireless Communication Facility. That includes towers or just adding an antenna to an existing tower or rooftop. Then they charge you another $750 to $1,000 for the building permit to install the antenna. To be on the safe side you also need to hire a land-use planner for $15K to $20K to handle the permit process on your behalf. After the antenna is installed, you have to hire an engineering firm to measure the RF emissions to make sure that the new antenna operates within the FCC RF radiation exposure standards. This doesn't include any outside engineers the county might have to hire to review your application and it does not include any fees for leasing the tower or rooftop. The county code for Wireless Communications Facilities is 30 pages long with a 30 page application. Check them out at: http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/SantaCruzCounty/html/SantaCruzCounty13/Sant aCruzCounty1310.html#13.10.659 Tim -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hogg Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:47 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Verizon Wireless = Joke Try T-Mobile at $4500 here. Regards, Chuck Hogg Shelby Broadband 502-722-9292 ch...@shelbybb.com http://www.shelbybb.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Cameron Kilton Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:33 AM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Verizon Wireless = Joke I was interested in a Verizon Wireless tower, than they tell me there is a non-refundable $2500 application fee. WOW, what a rip off. I attached there application if nobody else has one to laugh at. -Cameron --- - WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- - WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Verizon Wireless = Joke
Most of the ordnances that I have researched go out of there way to provide definitions for the terms that someone has deemed appropriate, with that said, there are no definitions for small scale, low powered, or short-range, compared to other wireless like cellular I'm inclined to include WIMAX, especially if it was my setup and my money. I think the operative term in the ordinance was visually inconspicuous. Frank Tim Sylvester wrote: Section 13.10.660 (3) (10) talks about: Small scale, low powered, short-range wireless internet transmitter/receivers (e.g., Wi-Fi hotspots). Would that include WiMAX? Tim -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Frank Crawford Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 5:43 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Verizon Wireless = Joke If you keep wireless in perspective, 13.10.660 (e) (10) exempts you from 13.10.660 through 13.10.668, inclusive, and the 30 page app. As far as Tom's county, they have the same type of requirements except it only applies to licensed freq's not unlicensed. Frank Tim Sylvester wrote: In Santa Cruz County California, it can cost $25K to go through the permitting process to install an antenna. The County charges $6,000 for a use permit to install a Wireless Communication Facility. That includes towers or just adding an antenna to an existing tower or rooftop. Then they charge you another $750 to $1,000 for the building permit to install the antenna. To be on the safe side you also need to hire a land-use planner for $15K to $20K to handle the permit process on your behalf. After the antenna is installed, you have to hire an engineering firm to measure the RF emissions to make sure that the new antenna operates within the FCC RF radiation exposure standards. This doesn't include any outside engineers the county might have to hire to review your application and it does not include any fees for leasing the tower or rooftop. The county code for Wireless Communications Facilities is 30 pages long with a 30 page application. Check them out at: http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/SantaCruzCounty/html/SantaCruzCounty13 /Sant aCruzCounty1310.html#13.10.659 Tim -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hogg Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 10:47 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Verizon Wireless = Joke Try T-Mobile at $4500 here. Regards, Chuck Hogg Shelby Broadband 502-722-9292 ch...@shelbybb.com http://www.shelbybb.com -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Cameron Kilton Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 11:33 AM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Verizon Wireless = Joke I was interested in a Verizon Wireless tower, than they tell me there is a non-refundable $2500 application fee. WOW, what a rip off. I attached there application if nobody else has one to laugh at. -Cameron --- - WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- - WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ - --- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ - --- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ --- - WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ --- - WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless
Re: [WISPA] FCC's Warrentless Household Searches Alarm Experts
I agree with Jack 100% and they can do it within bounds set forth in the US Constitution and Amendment IV The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Its a bad day when the public believes gov agency's are above the law. Jack Unger wrote: FROM THE FCC WEBSITE: About the FCC The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent United States government agency. The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. The FCC's jurisdiction covers the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. possessions. _ In other words - The FCC has the power to shut down illegal transmitters. It's their job. It's that simple. For example, if someone is transmitting on a Fire Department frequency and jamming the Fire Department's radio system, FCC engineers respond, they locate the source of the jamming and take the jamming transmitter off the air. Same thing if someone is jamming an airport control tower frequency, or any other frequency. This principle applies to ANY transmitter including licensed transmitters, unlicensed transmitters and any transmitters, including those in wireless routers. Mike Hammett wrote: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/fcc-raid/ - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Suggestions on Firewall
http://www.vyatta.com/ Patrick D.. Nix, Jr wrote: Maybe trying another approach... has anyone successfully implemented a firewall using Imagestream rebel with powercode? I have written some iptables rule and placed them in the post config script I can see where it is applying them but doesn't seem to be blocking properly. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bret Clark Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:32 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions on Firewall PFSense on a high end computer probably fit the bill...http://www.pfsense.com/ On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 10:45 -0500, Patrick D.. Nix, Jr wrote: Basically just wanting to protect our servers 8 servers total (3 email 2 DNS 1 Web 2 offsite backup) -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Alan Long Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:34 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Suggestions on Firewall How may users behind it? How much throughput? Aerowire Alan Long Director of Network Operations alan.l...@aerowire.net 687 North Dean Road Auburn, AL 36830 tel: 3342759998 mobile: 336092 -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Patrick D.. Nix, Jr Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 10:30 AM To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Suggestions on Firewall Any suggestions on a good linux firewall distro. I'm looking at either implementing this or going with an older Cisco PIX 525. Which would be the best way to go? Something with a nice GUI would be good Thanks WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.76/2183 - Release Date: 06/18/09 05:53:00 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Streamlined DC Powered System
http://www.invictusnetworks.com/ - Original Message - From: Bryan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:07 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Streamlined DC Powered System That's where I've gotten my RMS boards most recently. Recently being 6-12 months ago... On Jul 9, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Steve wrote: Hi John, I don't know about invictusneteworks. -- John McDowell wrote: Steve, do you normally by from invictusnetworks? I'm having trouble getting to their site. WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Manager- Help needed
Post your question here and I think you will get and answer. http://www.wisp-forums.com/ Frank - Original Message - From: ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 11:43 AM Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik User Manager- Help needed I'm very frustrated with this application. Having trouble getting SSL activated on the authentication server. I have posted numerous times on MT's forum and received not even one answer. I have not received any support from my support ticket either. Who is the best MT consultant to use to help me figure out what is wrong? Thanks Ralph Brightlan.net Atlanta WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] FCC changes
Travis, Put a different name on it like Equipment removal fee and drive on. Frank - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 8:51 PM Subject: [WISPA] FCC changes This could turn in to something it shouldn't really fast... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/30/AR2008053002776.html We charge 100% of the remaining contract because we are eating the cost on the equipment and rolling a truck (for both installation and pickup). Now they want to regulate how much we can charge for early termination. :( Travis Microserv WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach
When ya'll get done jawjacking about crap that isn't going to get to a solution I could use some guidence about this. (There are no plans to create Block level boundary files.) http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/bdy_files.html With this info we can put together a self indexing program that only needs the information you allready have. It's not that big of deal provided we don't have to pay for the census data. Frank - Original Message - From: CHUCK M [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach Then The JURY members were uneducated boobs... a little reading and it is very evident he should not be in jail.part of the scare tactic the IRS uses every yearsad but true If one wanted to read more http://www.originalintent.org/ Chuck Moses -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser Sent: May 19, 2008 10:45 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach Your wrong, Wesley Snipes is going to jail for 3 years because a JURY felt he should. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victoria Proffer Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:38 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach I don't know if you are aware of this but there is no law requiring you to pay income tax, have you ever read any of the U.S. code? Why do you think they want to pass a federal sales tax so bad, cause all this is coming out on the internet and people are starting to stop paying the income tax. Just type income tax on Youtube. That is why Wesley Snipes is going to jail for 3 years... On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Kurt Fankhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or perhaps you are one of those that doesn't believe the govt has the right to impose an imcome tax... I don't know if you are aware of this but there is no law requiring you to pay income tax, have you ever read any of the U.S. code? Why do you think they want to pass a federal sales tax so bad, cause all this is coming out on the internet and people are starting to stop paying the income tax. Just type income tax on Youtube. Kurt Fankhauser WAVELINC P.O. Box 126 Bucyrus, OH 44820 419-562-6405 www.wavelinc.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2 Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 12:53 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA]FCC approves new method for tracking broadband's reach While at it, bill the IRS for your time in filling out their data requests which they will use against you. Ditto the census bureau, you must be really steamed when they roll around... Or perhaps you are one of those that doesn't believe the govt has the right to impose an imcome tax... I feel godwins law about to be invoked. Tinfoil hats anyone... WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Victoria Proffer CEO St. Louis Broadband Visit us @ www.StLBroadband.com 314-974-5600 WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ __ NOD32 3110 (20080519) Information __ This
Re: [WISPA] OT: Plesk
Travis, You can still buy Plesk, it's $1399.00 for unlimited :-) http://www.parallels.com/en/buyonline/plesk/linux/ Frank - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:07 PM Subject: [WISPA] OT: Plesk Hi, We have been running a few plesk hosting servers for the last 3-4 years. About three weeks ago they changed their pricing model from a one-time, up front purchase of their software to a monthly lease. We need to add another server, but are not interested in a lifetime monthly lease option. What is everyone else running for domain hosting boxes that allow the customers full-control of only their domain? thanks, Travis Microserv WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Anyone sell/setup webcams with their wireless service?
Not that I'm aware of. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rabbtux rabbtux Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 5:44 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Anyone sell/setup webcams with their wireless service? Are there any support issues I need to be aware of? (ie customers call from out of country about webcam performance, etc) On 9/19/07, Frank Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Axis 206, 207, 207 wireless, 211. Reasonably Priced at Newegg and PC-Connection. Netcam watcher pro for off site monitoring. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rabbtux rabbtux Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:09 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Anyone sell/setup webcams with their wireless service? Just looking for suggestions. Would like to offer a simple indoor webcam we can sell preconfigured to new wireless customers. This is a new reason for those with second homes to buy our year round service for them. Any camera suggestions? we're looking at panasonic BL-C30A for this use. Any cautions or encouragements for adding this to our menu of offerings? Appreciate your feedback! Thanks, Marshall ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON ** ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA www.ispcon.com ** ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT ** ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 ** ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at http://www.ispcon.com/register.php ** WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON ** ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA www.ispcon.com ** ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT ** ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 ** ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at http://www.ispcon.com/register.php ** WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON ** ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA www.ispcon.com ** ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT ** ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 ** ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at http://www.ispcon.com/register.php ** WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON ** ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA www.ispcon.com ** ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT ** ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 ** ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at http://www.ispcon.com/register.php ** WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Ethernet Extenders
This might work of your application. Approx -$1100.00 /ea http://www.adtran.com/adtranpx/Rooms/DisplayPages/LayoutInitial_webrQS%20_Q29udGFpbmVyPWNvbS53ZWJyaWRnZS5lbnRpdHkuRW50aXR5JTVCT0lEJTVCMzY2RjgzQ0E5OTMzOUE0NUFFMEE2MDhDMUZDQURCRDAlNUQlNUQ. Frank - Original Message - From: Eric Muehleisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 1:31 PM Subject: [WISPA] Ethernet Extenders Can anyone offer any experiences with ethernet extenders? We are looking for an alternative to wireless backhaul in one of our ILEC towns. We own the copper and are looking to go up to 1 mile. We have looked at VDSL as an alternative also. This particular application requires 20mb/s full-duplex. Any knowledge or advise is appreciated. -Eric -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM
Does anyone know the technical requirements of CALEA? If so please send me a link to the final draft. thanks frank - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Meaning 2.9.44? Does anyone know if what MT's doing meets the technical requirements of CALEA? I know there's still staffing and contact issues. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Doug Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:28 PM Subject: [WISPA] Fw: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM For those who aren't on Mikrotik's mailing list: - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:46 AM Subject: CALEA RouterOS Support and MUM Eight days until the US MUM! There is still time to get a good deal on flights and hotel accommodations. http://mum.mikrotik.com/2007/US/ The following CALEA features will be included in the next version of both RouterOS 2.9.XX and 3.X beta. CALEA features included in RouterOS --- Multiple subject/multiple destination packet interception and streaming in following formats: * Call Content Connection (CCC) Interface according to PKT-SP-ES-DCI-I01-060914 (PacketCable 2.0 PacketCable Electronic Surveillance Delivery Function to Collection Function Interface Specification) * Call Content Connection (CCC) Interface according to ANSI/SCTE 24-13 2006 (IPCalblecom Electronic Surveillance Standard) that is approved method for Communication Content delivery to LEA according to ATIS-113.2007 (Lawfully Authorized Electronic Surveillance For Internet Access and Services) * TZSP format - for reception with 'Ethereal', tcpdump, trafr (sniffer stream reader for linux) - http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html CALEA-server package * accepts multiple CCC streams (identified by destination port/source address/case id) * stores communication content according to IP Network Access Intercept Requirements and Method(FBI-WISPA draft) specified full content intercept requirements (without out-of-band events) * stores communication content of multiple subjects/cases * stores communication content in libpcap format * new libpcap file based on different conditions (interval/size/packet count) * generates hash for each pcap file (md5/sha1/sha256) Initial documentation can be found at: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Calea Don't forget to attend the MUM CALEA Panel Discussion and register for the MikroTik CALEA Workshop: - MikroTik CALEA Workshop, Wednesday May 30th 1-5PM (registration required [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - CALEA Panel Discussion, Friday June 1st 11:15-12:45 http://mum.mikrotik.com/2007/US/agenda Regards, Training MikroTik -- -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/815 - Release Date: 5/22/2007 3:49 PM -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ?
Trango's mesh box uses rb532 plus daughter bd and mikrotik OS. It's in thier manual. Frank - Original Message - From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 5:12 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ? Rick, I have to agree with Ralph on this one. Since you have admitted on a public list that you believe there are no certified Mikrotik systems out there it would not be in your best interest to start off with such a system. Regards, Dawn DiPietro ralph wrote: The first thing I'd do in a case like that, is use an FCC approved system to start with. The fact that you don't plan to leaves you open for controversy from the beginning. Why would you do anything else? Ralph -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Rick Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 8:44 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ? We're looking to provide service to a school nearby, using Mikrotik and SR5 / SR9 cards. Anyone have proposals to a school with info in it addressing the issue of will you fry our children ? -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ?
Travis; The router board also connects to a MiniPCI CM9 wireless board that functions as a WiFi Access Point. Page 5, Section 2, Paragraph 1 of trango's mesh manual, the trango atlas radios are for backhaul. hope this helps frank - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:25 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ? The Trango MESH box uses Trango radios (thus FCC certified) and an RB532 for doing the routing. The RB is NOT providing any wireless service. Travis Microserv George Rogato wrote: If the mesh box that is a MT box is legit and certified, why not just drop trango from the picture? What is the purpose of trango ? Dawn DiPietro wrote: Frank, Then I would suggest Rick go the Trango route. Regards, Dawn DiPietro Frank Crawford wrote: Trango's mesh box uses rb532 plus daughter bd and mikrotik OS. It's in thier manual. Frank - Original Message - From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 5:12 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ? Rick, I have to agree with Ralph on this one. Since you have admitted on a public list that you believe there are no certified Mikrotik systems out there it would not be in your best interest to start off with such a system. Regards, Dawn DiPietro ralph wrote: The first thing I'd do in a case like that, is use an FCC approved system to start with. The fact that you don't plan to leaves you open for controversy from the beginning. Why would you do anything else? Ralph -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Rick Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 8:44 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ? We're looking to provide service to a school nearby, using Mikrotik and SR5 / SR9 cards. Anyone have proposals to a school with info in it addressing the issue of will you fry our children ? -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] LiteStation5
http://www.ubnt.com/litestation5.php4 - Original Message - From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 7:53 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] LiteStation5 Got a url? Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: Has anybody used these? Do they work well? Are they stable? Can they do 5.3GHz or just 5.8GHz? Just wondering how they work. Thanks Andrew -- George Rogato Welcome to WISPA www.wispa.org http://signup.wispa.org/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in
John; What size would you like, I'll make it happen for anyone that needs sizes other than what was shipped. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 8:51 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in Hey Rick, I know you do not have any shirts big enough to fit around my well endowed beer-belly but do you think you could send me one anyway? Maybe someday I will accidentally lose enough weight to fit into one of those shirts! :-) Scriv Rick Harnish wrote: I have another 35 shirts in Bluffton, IN. I can help fulfill the need if you run out Mac. I should thank Frank Crawford from Washington State for his donation of shirts and time. I believe he said his daughter has a Tshirt Shop. The designed, printed and shipped the shirts. I have attached a picture of the Tshirts. Thanks, Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac Dearman Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in Hey folks, WISPA ordered some T-shirts for us that were here (N. Louisiana) and in Mississippi They say WISPA Building Emergency Communications on the front and on the right sleeve they say Hurricane Katrina Relief Team 2005 Please send [EMAIL PROTECTED] you size and mailing addy and we will get yours shipped out to you. The sizes available are XL, L Medium and I think there are 60 of them all total. First come first served on sizes and I can think of a few of US that would stretch a medium sized T-shirt to the point of disgrace :-) and/or even shameful for public display! Again I want to thank all of you for your kindness and hard work. I am at home and will be working on my network this week as I await some more gear to come in to get a few more backhaul links in. Any of you ready for another round down there? If you havent been to Bay St. Louis, Diamondhead, Waveland or Pearlington - - - - - - you aint seen a thing. I need some help for this weekend or first part of next week. I need a couple climbers as well as a few installers. I need some help re-vamping the network in South Mississippi as the original plan does have its faults. I have Steve Milton in Seattle who is the Cisco gate keeper and he has done an outstanding job. He is just a phone call away with any changes we need. I think if I can get MCI to give us a full Class C we would be in good shape there and then we could just assign public IPs to all routers on the network. The ATAs have given us fits with NAT and I think that we now have Aaron supplying us with the Linksys - 2 port ATA and firewall routers that will enable us to build a highly reliable and redundant backhaul and AP scenario. (THANKS Aaron) Later Cats, Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. www.inetsouth.com www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts) 318-728-8600 - Rayville 318-728-9600 318-376-2562 - cell ___ Camp-shagnasty mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.bleedingsnort.com/mailman/listinfo/camp-shagnasty -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 9/26/2005 -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 9/26/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in
Brian; You need to contact Rick Harnish as I don't know what the plan for distribution included. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 7:36 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in Are these for sale for WISPA members? John Scrivner wrote: What a guy! Thank you! I am a XX-L. John Scrivner 1100 North 11th Street Mt. Vernon, Il. 62864 Cheers, Scriv Frank Crawford wrote: John; What size would you like, I'll make it happen for anyone that needs sizes other than what was shipped. Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scrivner Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 8:51 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] RE: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in Hey Rick, I know you do not have any shirts big enough to fit around my well endowed beer-belly but do you think you could send me one anyway? Maybe someday I will accidentally lose enough weight to fit into one of those shirts! :-) Scriv Rick Harnish wrote: I have another 35 shirts in Bluffton, IN. I can help fulfill the need if you run out Mac. I should thank Frank Crawford from Washington State for his donation of shirts and time. I believe he said his daughter has a Tshirt Shop. The designed, printed and shipped the shirts. I have attached a picture of the Tshirts. Thanks, Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac Dearman Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Camp-shagnasty] T-shirts are in Hey folks, WISPA ordered some T-shirts for us that were here (N. Louisiana) and in Mississippi They say WISPA Building Emergency Communications on the front and on the right sleeve they say Hurricane Katrina Relief Team 2005 Please send [EMAIL PROTECTED] you size and mailing addy and we will get yours shipped out to you. The sizes available are XL, L Medium and I think there are 60 of them all total. First come first served on sizes and I can think of a few of US that would stretch a medium sized T-shirt to the point of disgrace :-) and/or even shameful for public display! Again I want to thank all of you for your kindness and hard work. I am at home and will be working on my network this week as I await some more gear to come in to get a few more backhaul links in. Any of you ready for another round down there? If you havent been to Bay St. Louis, Diamondhead, Waveland or Pearlington - - - - - - you aint seen a thing. I need some help for this weekend or first part of next week. I need a couple climbers as well as a few installers. I need some help re-vamping the network in South Mississippi as the original plan does have its faults. I have Steve Milton in Seattle who is the Cisco gate keeper and he has done an outstanding job. He is just a phone call away with any changes we need. I think if I can get MCI to give us a full Class C we would be in good shape there and then we could just assign public IPs to all routers on the network. The ATAs have given us fits with NAT and I think that we now have Aaron supplying us with the Linksys - 2 port ATA and firewall routers that will enable us to build a highly reliable and redundant backhaul and AP scenario. (THANKS Aaron) Later Cats, Mac Dearman Maximum Access, LLC. www.inetsouth.com www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts) 318-728-8600 - Rayville 318-728-9600 318-376-2562 - cell ___ Camp-shagnasty mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.bleedingsnort.com/mailman/listinfo/camp-shagnasty -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 9/26/2005 -- Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.7/112 - Release Date: 9/26/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
