Go (nextwave)
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 4:33 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 as Mesh on Muni WiFi (OFF LIST)
Jerry,
802.11b/g with beam forming
Is that Gonetworks's or Wavion ? (I am not aware of a 3rd mfg. doing
outdoor radios with beamforming)
Thanks
Faisal Imtiaz
Computer Office Solutions Inc. /SnappyDSL.net
Ph: (305) 663-5518 x 232
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 7:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 as Mesh on Muni WiFi
Thanks for the reply.
We took over and currently operate a small Muni network that was
originally built with Vivato panels and access points. AP's connect to
the panels via WDS and this reasonably well but Vivato is defunct.
In order to continue deployment we started using another manufacturers
radios with one 802.11b/g with beam forming + 802.11a backhaul mesh
channel.
Works very very well within itself but it does not inter-operate with
the existing Vivato WDS. The factory is working on trying to resolve the
issue but they don't seem real committed to getting it working (maybe
that will change).
On top of that, with the market the way it is, I get this nagging
feeling that they may pull out of the US market leaving me with yet
another unsupported radio.
Not being one to wait around I am exploring alternate solutions. One
idea was to roll my own mesh kits with MikroTik using two b/g + one n
radio for client access, and one 3.65 as BH (we are working on getting
our license).
Seems like a good use of a 5MHz channel as well as spectrum.
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wyble
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 3:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 as Mesh on Muni WiFi
Jerry Richardson wrote:
I'm thinking that an MT board with two 2.4b/g radios and a 3.65 radio
might make a good solution for a muni wifi?
I might suggest some 5GHz N radios as many clients have N these days.
Also 2.4 b/g of course.
3.65 can be used for backhaul applications as well as point to multi
point, perhaps as a master/slave setup. What kind of coverage area are
you looking at? What kind of geography?
--
Charles Wyble (818) 280 - 7059
http://charlesnw.blogspot.com
CTO Known Element Enterprises / SoCal WiFI project
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
