[WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype?
I'm trying to prioritize Skype but the L7 patterns are hit or miss. Is there any other way to ID Skype traffic? Maybe something that looks at the number of connections, the type of connections (UDP) and data rate? Or maybe something else? Has anyone tried to go beyond L7 patterns to ID Skype? Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype?
the L7 filter rules I used to mark skype for QOS mysteriously stopped working about 2-3 months ago... Before that, they worked great.. Nick Olsen Network Operations (321) 205-1100 x106 From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:16 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype? I'm trying to prioritize Skype but the L7 patterns are hit or miss. Is there any other way to ID Skype traffic? Maybe something that looks at the number of connections, the type of connections (UDP) and data rate? Or maybe something else? Has anyone tried to go beyond L7 patterns to ID Skype? Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype?
Maybe it's a newer version of Skype? Skype goes to great lengths to conceal itself and slip through firewalls which sometimes is needed for it to work, but it would be nice if there was a config option that made it more easily identifiable for time when it's not an intruder on the network and on is actually trying to help it work better. Greg On May 5, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: the L7 filter rules I used to mark skype for QOS mysteriously stopped working about 2-3 months ago... Before that, they worked great.. Nick Olsen Network Operations (321) 205-1100 x106 From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:16 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype? I'm trying to prioritize Skype but the L7 patterns are hit or miss. Is there any other way to ID Skype traffic? Maybe something that looks at the number of connections, the type of connections (UDP) and data rate? Or maybe something else? Has anyone tried to go beyond L7 patterns to ID Skype? Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype?
You would think so. But the whole Idea of it is working no matter what. So they use whatever they need to (stun...etc..) Nick Olsen Network Operations (321) 205-1100 x106 From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 11:37 AM To: n...@brevardwireless.com, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype? Maybe it's a newer version of Skype? Skype goes to great lengths to conceal itself and slip through firewalls which sometimes is needed for it to work, but it would be nice if there was a config option that made it more easily identifiable for time when it's not an intruder on the network and on is actually trying to help it work better. Greg On May 5, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Nick Olsen wrote: the L7 filter rules I used to mark skype for QOS mysteriously stopped working about 2-3 months ago... Before that, they worked great.. Nick Olsen Network Operations (321) 205-1100 x106 From: Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:16 AM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Has anyone found anything better than layer 7 patterns for identifying Skype? I'm trying to prioritize Skype but the L7 patterns are hit or miss. Is there any other way to ID Skype traffic? Maybe something that looks at the number of connections, the type of connections (UDP) and data rate? Or maybe something else? Has anyone tried to go beyond L7 patterns to ID Skype? Greg WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
