Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-14 Thread Ralph
Where, O Where is our WISPA Crown dude?

I am not in a position at the moment to recommend Crown to ANY WISP, not
even if one was my worst enemy!

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ralph
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:14 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

 

I wish I could say nice things. I wish I could say nice things.  But Mama
told me that if I can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.

I have a pretty good Crown Castle horror story developing.  I will be glad
to share the details if things do not get ironed out, and quickly.

 

I will say that if you are considering it, do not get into a contract with
them. They still think we are all Cell Carriers or Clearwire!

 

 

If the representative from the Kinder, Gentler, WISPA member Crown Castle
happens to be listening, I think he needs to reply to me off list!

 

 

Ralph

Brightlan.net 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-14 Thread Rick Harnish
Probably on the memb...@wispa.org list.  George Njezic is his name.  I will
see him next week as he is on the Let's Negotiate a Tower Contract panel
at ISPAmerica.

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ralph
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:23 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

 

Where, O Where is our WISPA Crown dude?

I am not in a position at the moment to recommend Crown to ANY WISP, not
even if one was my worst enemy!

 

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Ralph
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:14 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

 

I wish I could say nice things. I wish I could say nice things.  But Mama
told me that if I can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.

I have a pretty good Crown Castle horror story developing.  I will be glad
to share the details if things do not get ironed out, and quickly.

 

I will say that if you are considering it, do not get into a contract with
them. They still think we are all Cell Carriers or Clearwire!

 

 

If the representative from the Kinder, Gentler, WISPA member Crown Castle
happens to be listening, I think he needs to reply to me off list!

 

 

Ralph

Brightlan.net 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-12 Thread Tom DeReggi
yeah, that's an excellent example, of what I was getting at...
A transaction at of that sort, (low antenna count and low price) wouldn't spark 
a alot of interest, or atleast not at a low cost per antenna, waiving fees.
Heck, last time I place an antenna upgrade, the app touched like 10 different 
people as it went from stage to stage. The cost to a tower company to accept a 
small # antenna app is almost as high as accepting an order for many antennas. 
Ther are many tower Cos that are happy accepting 1 antenna apps, but they also 
charge $500 per antenna in those cases, because there is a minmum transaction 
level to make it worth while to process the order, and in most cases could get 
5 for the same price..

They could always help out as a good gesture, good neighbor, charity type 
thing, but then again some would say, what about the liabilty, or the reason 
we charge the big bucks is that our towers are build stronger to surive the 
tornados. Why give away our value? 

One of the mistakes I've made in the past is, I represented Help me, I wont be 
a pain on your resources, All I need is 1U of space, all I need is help for a 
month, can you help me out on the price? 
No sales rep cares about that. To get help I have to represent, I'm ready to 
commit to a five year contract, I'll need a lot of resources from you, I need 6 
antennas today, and I expect to add 3 times that by the time I'm complete, if 
you give me a good price today. 

But, that said, I hear you.

It sucks most for the rural end user. The one that has to look at the 300ft 
tower in their back yard everyday, but still cant get broadband, because of the 
tower cost..

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


  - Original Message - 
  From: CBB - Jay Fuller 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 2:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing



  Honestly, what i'd need to put up on this crown tower is three radios ; one 
as a backhaul,
  a 5.7 omni and a 900 mhz omni.

  Wouldn't need it if the tornado hadn't destroyed the downtown tower site we 
were on
  (and the owners weren't taking forever to rebuild it)

  can't see the justification happening...

  we've got everyone moved to a different tower except for four people

- Original Message - 
From: Tom DeReggi 
To: WISPA General List 
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing


I dont doubt the claims made, but

Our experience with Crown has been very positive. I'd argue probably 
easiest of all, after all things considered, reviewing our last 10 years as a 
WISP and working with tower companies.

Going into these type agreements, meaning with any national tower company, 
its important to recognize that tower reps are just like any other large dollar 
large volume leasor/landlord, where there are managers and lawyers on staff, 
that look at the letter of the law and every minute detail in their contracts, 
and make decissions from a far as a NON-Emotionally-attached apponent. They 
represent their interests, not yours.  Most of the initial template contracts 
are written to be one sided in favor of the tower leasor, and are clear about 
the tower company's remedies in cases of a Leasee's default, and not so clear 
on what if any remedies are availale to the leasee in cases of Leasor's breach. 
That is unless you've been fortunate enough to get the terms changed to be more 
favorable to you, before you signed them. terms (meaning length of time 
commitment) specifically is a common issue of challenge, after a falling out 
occurs.  Anytime something evolves to a legal battle, its likely going to 
evolve to a situation that would be considered unfortunate or ugly for all 
parties involved. Its the equivellent of a divorce for business..  

I'd also argue that Tower companies are probably still taking a beating 
financially right now. I'm sure the Clearwire failures have led to large scale 
revenue loss nationwide. And I'm sure BTOP/BIP programs of the past 2 years 
weren't helping much, encouraging wireless companies to build their own towers, 
instead of entering into rental type lease agreement for colo space.  The 
tower consolidators probably paid well to aquire the other tower companies. 
There are big dollars at stake, and they need to target big revenue to get 
their ROI..   

At the end of the day, a leasor has to say why do I want to help this 
guy, what's in it for me?. If this isn't going to be one of my customers, why 
shouldn't I rake every last penny out of them that I can? Even if it seems 
unethical or unsympathetic, doesn't loyalty have to be given to the stock 
holders, and my wallet, first?. 

I can tell you, I've worked with some ruthless landlords over the years, 
and comparatively Crown was a Saint, no where near that level of Bad.  I delt 
with one leasor (NOT related

Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-11 Thread Chuck Hogg
I was told there would be a change at WISPALOOZA...after 6 weeks of
negotiations, we walked away.  A friend of mine decommissioned a Crown site
he was on.  They removed everything.  Some how a cable hanger was still
there.  Crown is fighting with them to get them to pay back rent for that
one cable hanger.  The claim was $14,000 in back rent and $4,000 to remove
the cable hanger.  Each month that $14k increases.

Regards,
Chuck


On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:05 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote:

 **

 Looked at a Crown tower today - and remembered the horror stories.
 Not interested unless there is a real change.



 - Original Message -
 *From:* Ralph ralphli...@bsrg.org
 *To:* 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 *Sent:* Saturday, March 10, 2012 9:13 PM
 *Subject:* [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

  *I wish I could say nice things… I wish I could say nice things.  But
 Mama told me that if I can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.
 *

 *I have a pretty good Crown Castle horror story developing.  I will be
 glad to share the details if things do not get ironed out, and quickly.*

 * *

 *I will say that if you are considering it, do not get into a contract
 with them. They still think we are all Cell Carriers or Clearwire!*

 * *

 * *

 *If the representative from the “Kinder, Gentler, WISPA member Crown
 Castle” happens to be listening, I think he needs to reply to me off list!
 *

 * *

 * *

 *Ralph*

 *Brightlan.net *

 --

 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-11 Thread bret clark
We have good relationships with the local Crown rep people who have been 
good to work with, so no horror stories, but the start up fees to get on 
one of their towers is just ridiculous..I'm not an ATT or Verizon with 
a gazillion $$$. I would probably do a lot more business with Crown, but 
only had 2 arms and 2 legs and they are long gone!



On 3/11/2012 10:26 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
I was told there would be a change at WISPALOOZA...after 6 weeks of 
negotiations, we walked away.  A friend of mine decommissioned a Crown 
site he was on.  They removed everything.  Some how a cable hanger was 
still there.  Crown is fighting with them to get them to pay back rent 
for that one cable hanger.  The claim was $14,000 in back rent and 
$4,000 to remove the cable hanger.  Each month that $14k increases.


Regards,
Chuck


On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:05 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
par...@cyberbroadband.net mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote:


Looked at a Crown tower today - and remembered the horror stories.
Not interested unless there is a real change.

- Original Message -
*From:* Ralph mailto:ralphli...@bsrg.org
*To:* 'WISPA General List' mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Sent:* Saturday, March 10, 2012 9:13 PM
*Subject:* [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

*I wish I could say nice things… I wish I could say nice
things.  But Mama told me that if I can’t say something nice,
don’t say anything at all.*

*I have a pretty good Crown Castle horror story developing.  I
will be glad to share the details if things do not get ironed
out, and quickly.*

**

*I will say that if you are considering it, do not get into a
contract with them. They still think we are all Cell Carriers
or Clearwire!*

**

**

*If the representative from the “Kinder, Gentler, WISPA member
Crown Castle” happens to be listening, I think he needs to
reply to me off list!*

**

**

*Ralph*

*Brightlan.net *


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org mailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org mailto:Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-11 Thread Tom DeReggi
, if the lessor's goal is to get more money, try to get 
something in return for that that would be worthwhile for you to spend that 
additional money. Maybe more antenna or Freq bands for that higher price. That 
would be more beneficial than paying more per antenna. In other word, if the 
goal may be to get more money, they might not care how they accomplish it, and 
may be open to suggestions)

3) You'll be more likely to get what you want if the end result is staying a 
customer of theirs, as there is a cost to them for every decission, and they 
have a better chance to cost justify a favor, it they can make back their money 
over time from you. 

4) Dont go over your primary contact's heads, unless you are truly convinced 
that that party is a big part of the problem. If so, my guess is that higher up 
supervisors probably would help and would want to know about it, if the primary 
contact really was not doing their job appropriately.

5) If the terms of a transaction are not acceptable to you, DONT DO THE 
TRANSACTION.  Under stand that for that property, there may just not be a 
match. There is a lot of competition out there, and there are likely other 
tower leasors around to consider instead.  Moving towers, isn't always as 
expensive and disruptive as one might think. 

6) The most important part in establishing a good vendor, is being able to have 
meaningful dialogue between you and your rep, to negotiate, where both parties 
can hear each other, and look for accomplishing mutually beneficial. If a 
vendor does not provide that for you, then you need to change reps or look 
elsewhere.   (You also need to be able to provide that).  

7) If you are moving in the direction where you likely wont be a colocation 
customer at that site, try and make it that that decission was made by the 
landlord. Meaning, Create the perception that you'd like to be there at X 
specified terms. So you give the rep a chance to have your business. You are 
then the good guy. Should they then turn that down, and not want to lease to 
you, then it is on them, that they lost your business.   (They surely cant hold 
you responsible for them turning away your business).  In other words, always 
propose a resolution, or the solution that would work for you, for their 
consideration.  


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


  - Original Message - 
  From: bret clark 
  To: wireless@wispa.org 
  Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:39 AM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing


  We have good relationships with the local Crown rep people who have been good 
to work with, so no horror stories, but the start up fees to get on one of 
their towers is just ridiculous..I'm not an ATT or Verizon with a gazillion 
$$$. I would probably do a lot more business with Crown, but only had 2 arms 
and 2 legs and they are long gone!


  On 3/11/2012 10:26 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote: 
I was told there would be a change at WISPALOOZA...after 6 weeks of 
negotiations, we walked away.  A friend of mine decommissioned a Crown site he 
was on.  They removed everything.  Some how a cable hanger was still there.  
Crown is fighting with them to get them to pay back rent for that one cable 
hanger.  The claim was $14,000 in back rent and $4,000 to remove the cable 
hanger.  Each month that $14k increases. 

Regards,
Chuck



On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:05 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote:


  Looked at a Crown tower today - and remembered the horror stories.
  Not interested unless there is a real change.


- Original Message - 
From: Ralph 
To: 'WISPA General List' 
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 9:13 PM
Subject: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing


I wish I could say nice things… I wish I could say nice things.  But 
Mama told me that if I can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all.

I have a pretty good Crown Castle horror story developing.  I will be 
glad to share the details if things do not get ironed out, and quickly.



I will say that if you are considering it, do not get into a contract 
with them. They still think we are all Cell Carriers or Clearwire!





If the representative from the “Kinder, Gentler, WISPA member Crown 
Castle” happens to be listening, I think he needs to reply to me off list!





Ralph

Brightlan.net 




___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



  ___
  Wireless mailing list
  Wireless@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-11 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller

Honestly, what i'd need to put up on this crown tower is three radios ; one as 
a backhaul,
a 5.7 omni and a 900 mhz omni.

Wouldn't need it if the tornado hadn't destroyed the downtown tower site we 
were on
(and the owners weren't taking forever to rebuild it)

can't see the justification happening...

we've got everyone moved to a different tower except for four people

  - Original Message - 
  From: Tom DeReggi 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 12:45 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing


  I dont doubt the claims made, but

  Our experience with Crown has been very positive. I'd argue probably easiest 
of all, after all things considered, reviewing our last 10 years as a WISP and 
working with tower companies.

  Going into these type agreements, meaning with any national tower company, 
its important to recognize that tower reps are just like any other large dollar 
large volume leasor/landlord, where there are managers and lawyers on staff, 
that look at the letter of the law and every minute detail in their contracts, 
and make decissions from a far as a NON-Emotionally-attached apponent. They 
represent their interests, not yours.  Most of the initial template contracts 
are written to be one sided in favor of the tower leasor, and are clear about 
the tower company's remedies in cases of a Leasee's default, and not so clear 
on what if any remedies are availale to the leasee in cases of Leasor's breach. 
That is unless you've been fortunate enough to get the terms changed to be more 
favorable to you, before you signed them. terms (meaning length of time 
commitment) specifically is a common issue of challenge, after a falling out 
occurs.  Anytime something evolves to a legal battle, its likely going to 
evolve to a situation that would be considered unfortunate or ugly for all 
parties involved. Its the equivellent of a divorce for business..  

  I'd also argue that Tower companies are probably still taking a beating 
financially right now. I'm sure the Clearwire failures have led to large scale 
revenue loss nationwide. And I'm sure BTOP/BIP programs of the past 2 years 
weren't helping much, encouraging wireless companies to build their own towers, 
instead of entering into rental type lease agreement for colo space.  The 
tower consolidators probably paid well to aquire the other tower companies. 
There are big dollars at stake, and they need to target big revenue to get 
their ROI..   

  At the end of the day, a leasor has to say why do I want to help this 
guy, what's in it for me?. If this isn't going to be one of my customers, why 
shouldn't I rake every last penny out of them that I can? Even if it seems 
unethical or unsympathetic, doesn't loyalty have to be given to the stock 
holders, and my wallet, first?. 

  I can tell you, I've worked with some ruthless landlords over the years, and 
comparatively Crown was a Saint, no where near that level of Bad.  I delt with 
one leasor (NOT related to Crown) guy, that if I ever tried to negotiate, or 
include into a sentance spoken to him the word price or phrase it would be 
more fair if or but you breached the contract by, and I should be compensated 
for that ( fpr things like, no longer allowing me to have 24/7 access anymore, 
or letting other carriers move my gear and put stuff in front of mine, without 
tell me first),  the immediate response was, OK, lets cancel the lease, we 
dont want to lease to you anyway and we'd rathr you gone. Be gone in 30 days, 
or we'll remove your stuff. I reply, But I have a 5 year contract!. Replied, 
so what, take me to court and I'll barry you in legal fees.  I'm telling you, 
its better at Crown, and let me tell you why

  1) Crown knows the market.  2) Crown's only business is a business designed 
around leasing space to wireless providers. 3) The more simultaenous prospects 
they find to colo, the better their ROI.
  This dynamic is a great starting point. There is a basis for a transaction, 
and both parties have the potential to be important to the other party.  Its 
just a matter of figuring out what the numbers and terms need to be, to make it 
worth your and Crown's time.  

  And it takes some compromise and constraint, because the goliath companies 
have controls in place for doing business due to the vast inventory to manage, 
generally controls that can be encombersome for the small WISP, that is used to 
doign things on the fly.

  I often find that WISPs tend to look at their own business model, and what it 
affords, instead of being a bit more insightful, and looking into the tower 
comapny's business, and trying to identify what would be fair to them from 
Crown's perspective. In other words, the reality factor.  Sometimes the 
reality is, to do business with a powerhouse tower company, it may take a 
higher price than what the WISP's business model originally budgeted to afford. 
If a WISP is paying market

[WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-10 Thread Ralph
I wish I could say nice things. I wish I could say nice things.  But Mama
told me that if I can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.

I have a pretty good Crown Castle horror story developing.  I will be glad
to share the details if things do not get ironed out, and quickly.

 

I will say that if you are considering it, do not get into a contract with
them. They still think we are all Cell Carriers or Clearwire!

 

 

If the representative from the Kinder, Gentler, WISPA member Crown Castle
happens to be listening, I think he needs to reply to me off list!

 

 

Ralph

Brightlan.net 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing

2012-03-10 Thread CBB - Jay Fuller

Looked at a Crown tower today - and remembered the horror stories.
Not interested unless there is a real change.


  - Original Message - 
  From: Ralph 
  To: 'WISPA General List' 
  Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 9:13 PM
  Subject: [WISPA] New Crown Castle Nightmare Developing


  I wish I could say nice things. I wish I could say nice things.  But Mama 
told me that if I can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.

  I have a pretty good Crown Castle horror story developing.  I will be glad to 
share the details if things do not get ironed out, and quickly.

   

  I will say that if you are considering it, do not get into a contract with 
them. They still think we are all Cell Carriers or Clearwire!

   

   

  If the representative from the Kinder, Gentler, WISPA member Crown Castle 
happens to be listening, I think he needs to reply to me off list!

   

   

  Ralph

  Brightlan.net 



--


  ___
  Wireless mailing list
  Wireless@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless