Re: [WISPA] PPPoE Termination point -- NOC or Tower

2010-11-10 Thread chris
What kind of AP’s do you use? We use Mikrotik AP’s and the PPPOE is done at the 
tower. We use a Radius server to centralize the management of the customers. 

Chris

If you don’t use Mikrotik’s already then a 493ah would be a good solution.


From: Marco Coelho 
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:33 AM
To: motor...@afmug.com ; WISPA General List 
Subject: [WISPA] PPPoE Termination point -- NOC or Tower

We're at another growth milestone and are evaluating some network changes.  We 
are planning on doubling our network footprint this next quarter.

Currently, we terminate all PPPoE connections at a main NOC.  This has shown 
some limitations as time has gone on.  They are manageable, but it would be 
better not having to deal with.

We are looking into installing small servers at each tower and just running 
OSPF between that tower and our NOCs.  This would tend to make cpe connections 
more robust as packet loss due to interference caused by a clueless or 
unscrupulous competitor would not leave the customers linksys router lost.

What are are the general opinions here on this?

If tower site termination is the norm, what hardware (extended temp range) are 
you using at the towers?

Microtik or other software?



-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] PPPoE Termination point -- NOC or Tower

2010-11-10 Thread Mike Hammett
I use Mikrotik RB493AH now.  If you need something bigger, look at the 
other RouterBoards.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 11/10/2010 10:33 AM, Marco Coelho wrote:
We're at another growth milestone and are evaluating some network 
changes.  We are planning on doubling our network footprint this next 
quarter.


Currently, we terminate all PPPoE connections at a main NOC.  This has 
shown some limitations as time has gone on.  They are manageable, but 
it would be better not having to deal with.


We are looking into installing small servers at each tower and just 
running OSPF between that tower and our NOCs.  This would tend to make 
cpe connections more robust as packet loss due to interference caused 
by a clueless or unscrupulous competitor would not leave the customers 
linksys router lost.


What are are the general opinions here on this?

If tower site termination is the norm, what hardware (extended temp 
range) are you using at the towers?


Microtik or other software?



--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

[WISPA] PPPoE Termination point -- NOC or Tower

2010-11-10 Thread Marco Coelho
We're at another growth milestone and are evaluating some network changes.
We are planning on doubling our network footprint this next quarter.

Currently, we terminate all PPPoE connections at a main NOC.  This has shown
some limitations as time has gone on.  They are manageable, but it would be
better not having to deal with.

We are looking into installing small servers at each tower and just running
OSPF between that tower and our NOCs.  This would tend to make cpe
connections more robust as packet loss due to interference caused by a
clueless or unscrupulous competitor would not leave the customers linksys
router lost.

What are are the general opinions here on this?

If tower site termination is the norm, what hardware (extended temp range)
are you using at the towers?

Microtik or other software?



-- 
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/