Sorry for the old reference, Ultramesh is no long with us.  I only consult
at this time.  I noticed some companies on your list that are not selling
certified gear, and as such should not be posted publicly as doing so by an
industry journalist.  This would cause some people to purchase products that
they themselves would not have done so without your assertion.

However, I will follow up my statement with additional research.

Aruba Networks
I would have to say I am likely wrong here, and if they are on this list
please forward your FCC ID if you like.  Their product page shows equipment
with the following "Electromagnetic Compliance" Although their url to
country certification list shows a 404 page.

# FCC Part 15 Class B
# FCC Part 15 Class C 15.207/15.247
# FCC Part 15 Class E 15.407
# ICES-003 Class A
# RSS 210 (CAN)
# VCCI Class A
# EN 61000-3, EN 61000-4-2, EN 61000-4-3, EN 61000-4-4
# EN 61000-4-5, EN 61000-4-6, EN 61000-4-8, EN 61000-4-11
# 73/23/EEC and 89/336/EEC
# EN 55022, EN55024 (89/336/EEC)
# ETS 300 328 (89/336/EEC), ETS 301 489 (89/336/EEC)
# ETS 301 893
# AS/NZS 3548 Class A
# RFS 29 (NZ)

Avantry

I find them at Wincomm, but not at the FCC site under Avantry or Witcom.
However, given the style and cost of their equipment, its unlikely that they
have spent the kind of R&D money they appear to have spent without getting
certifed.  Again if anyone from Avantry/Witcom or even Wincomm wants to
forward the ID# to this list please feel free.

Cambridge Broadband
They appear to sell outside the US and operate in 3.5, 10.5 and 26 Ghz FDD
equipment.  As such they are unlikely FCC certified, but are likely
certified in many other countries. Looks pricey.

http://www.cambridgebroadband.com/contact.htm

CarrierComm

Appears to be an ASIC and OEM manufacturer for the cellular industry.  That
one is out of my knowledge field, but my first thought would be that they
are compliant with the regulations for SDR.

CoCo Communications
They seem to have added a protocol to existing linux based equipment.
Question for the industry: If you change the firmware on existing access
points and rebrand them to your company, are you required to recertify the
equipment?

Deliberant
Nothing further on them.

EION Wireless
Appears to have bought the Wi-Lan product line.  Their other equipment,
however doesn't show up under any FCC search.  If anyone from EION wants to
chime in, please do.

GIL Technology
Seems to be the Taiwanese manufacturer for the old Wi-Lan product line.
http://www.gil.com.tw/eng/product/wireless/libra5800.htm

Qorvus
Nothing further on them.  No FCC ID's for their WRAP board + linux offering
(based on LocustWorld) + CM9/Senao 2511MP based products.

David Peterson
No longer with the now defunct Ultramesh Inc.

On 2/16/07 7:35 AM, "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> David,
> I tried to search Ultramesh and received no results. The first one you
> listed below had several filings, Aruba Wireless Networks. This is in
> contradiction to your assertions below. Avantry and others produced no
> results but may have filed under a different name? David, do you have
> certified gear listed under a different name? People who live in glass
> houses should not throw stones. I used this URL for searching:
> https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm
> Scriv
> 
> 
> David Peterson wrote:
> 
>> I have lurked for some time now, but feel the need to address an alarming
>> trend on this list.  There are "Industry Leaders" putting "facts" out there
>> with out fully examining the truth.  Before you flame me, please read all
>> that is below my signature as proof to my comments...
>> 
>> Steve, dude... I figure these are advertisers to your blog/newsletter and as
>> such should have come with a disclaimer.  Your claim of " Please note that
>> I'm deliberately not listing vendors who only sell
>> sub-systems such as antennas, radio cards, etc. - only full-blown
>> radio systems suitable for outdoor use. An additional caveat is that
>> I won't knowingly list systems that are not FCC certified." is patently
>> untrue as you will notice below.  I have added my comments on the vendors I
>> know personally.  You have placed yourself as an industry leader for some
>> time now.  I would have expected that you would not adopt a "don't ask,
>> don't tell" mentality to your claim of "knowing" something.  I only say this
>> as it only took some personal knowledge of the industry and one hour of my
>> time to discover the flaws in your claim.
>> 
>> Patrick, as an "Industry Leader", I would expect that you would not just
>> accept anything as "fact" without researching the claim first.  There are a
>> lot of people who accept what you say as fact.
>> 
>> While this information is not 100% accurate as the FCC has a lot of work
>> submitted to them every day. I am merely suggesting that the statements of
>> the "Industry Leaders" should be viewed with the traditional skepticism that
>> should accompany statements from a vendor/vendor-subsidized source.
>> 
>> Don't forget to read below the ______ line.  I have pasted my search results
>> from www.fcc.gov site.
>> 
>> David Peterson
>> Formerly of Ultramesh Inc.
>> (a repackaging manufacturer of LocustWorld mesh software + Senao + PCEngines
>> motherboards)
>> 
>> ---------
>> Read below : all information is freely available at www.fcc.gov in the OET
>> search page.
>> ---------
>> 
>> Aruba Networks
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: Aruba Networks
>> 
>> Avantry
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: Avantry
>> 
>> Cambridge Broadband
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: Cambridge Broadband
>> 
>> CarrierComm
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: CarrierComm
>> 
>> CoCo Communications (WISP cum "manufacturer")
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: CoCo Communications
>> 
>> Deliberant
>> 
>> I only list them as they only have recently started to "reclassify" RTL-8186
>> wireless OEM modules.   They have sold many radios "illegal" as this list
>> has classified them. If you look at their recent certs you will find that
>> they do not manufacture radios but have re-certified them in order to please
>> forums such as this.   They have been a homebrewer turned
>> integrator/assembly house since they started.
>> 
>> See if their certs match their output power:
>> 
>>> From fcc.gov
>> ---------
>> FCC IDENTIFIER:       UB8-DLB7000
>>    
>> Name of Grantee:      Deliberant LLC
>>    
>> Equipment Class:     Part 15 Spread Spectrum Transmitter
>> Notes:     DIGITAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
>> Grant Notes      FCC Rule Parts     Frequency
>> Range (MHZ)     Output
>> Watts     Frequency
>> Tolerance     Emission
>> Designator
>> 20 28 36     15C     2412.0  -  2462.0     0.09441
>> 20 28 36     15C     5745.0  -  5825.0     0.06109
>> -----------
>> 
>>> From Deliberant
>> 
>> ---------------
>> DLB7023 802.11a + g 23dBi Integrated Dual Radio
>> Sku: DLB7023
>> The DLB7023 802.11a + g 23dBi Dual Radio features an 802.11a interface with
>> 23dBi antenna as well as an 802.11b/g interface that operate simultaneously.
>> 
>> This hardware configuration, along with extremely flexible software
>> configuration options, make the DLB7023 one of the most versatile platforms
>> on the market today. Each interface can be an AP, Client, or WDS bridge,
>> which results in the perfect outdoor radio for remote repeaters, apartment
>> communities, and dual-band APs and CPEs.
>> ------------------
>> 
>> (Could be wrong, let me know if 0.06109 EIRP  = the above specs...)
>> 
>> EION Wireless 
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: EION Wireless
>> 
>> GIL Technology
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: GIL Technology
>> 
>> Qorvus (they only repackage LocustWorld based software with CM9/Ubiquiti and
>> 200mW Senao cards)
>> 
>> There are no applications on file that match the search criteria specified:
>> Applicant Name: Qorvus
>> 
>> -----------
>> 
>> On 2/15/07 10:17 PM, "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>> Steve, here are a few off my head that are not there...Freewave, MDS,
>>> Lightpointe is with an "e" on the end, Wave Wireless (formerly
>>> Waverider, etc.), ZTE (ZiMAX), Huwaie, Acton Wireless Broadband (AWB),
>>> is Cirronet still around?, Qualcomm (with their MediaFLO), Arraycom,
>>> Terabeam actually dba's as Proxim.
>>> 
>>> P.S. - thanks for only including legal vendors
>>> 
>>> Patrick Leary
>>> AVP WISP Markets
>>> Alvarion, Inc.
>>> o: 650.314.2628
>>> c: 760.580.0080
>>> Vonage: 650.641.1243
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of Steve Stroh
>>> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 4:39 PM
>>> To: WISPA General List
>>> Subject: [WISPA] Broadband Wireless Internet Access Vendors list
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I've posted my most recent update to my Broadband Wireless Internet
>>> Access Vendors list at http://www.bwiavendors.com/2007/02/
>>> bwia_vendors_up_1.html
>>> 
>>> This update lists 85 unique vendors, and while that's a lot, I know
>>> there's more. If you could take a look at it and tell me of any
>>> vendors that I missed, I would appreciate it.
>>> 
>>> Please reply OFF-LIST; I don't want to clutter the list.
>>> 
>>> Please note that I'm deliberately not listing vendors who only sell
>>> sub-systems such as antennas, radio cards, etc. - only full-blown
>>> radio systems suitable for outdoor use. An additional caveat is that
>>> I won't knowingly list systems that are not FCC certified.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for any help you can offer to make this a better, more
>>> complete list.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Steve
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> Steve Stroh
>>> 425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Writing about BWIA again! - www.bwianews.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to