Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product

2009-03-11 Thread Daniel Eklund
Lih-Er, 

We have used the Proxim Tsunami Quickbridge product for some time now and are 
very happy with it. However, it's going to cost you at least twice what you 
have budgeted. 

- Original Message - 
From: Lih-Er Wey we...@msu.edu 
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:54:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product 

Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product 

I need to bring network to a structure (2- story ) in a field from a building 
(about 1000 feet away, 7 -story ) . 

It does not need high bandwidth. I would like to hear any product 
recommendation fro m you. 

The budget range is under a $1000 for a pair of wireless bridge. I am more 
concern about the reliability and security sides 

of the product. 

By the way, does anyone have experience with NanoStation5 from Ubiquiti 
network? It is quite inexpensive ($160 a pair). 

Thanks! 

Lih-Er Wey 

Wireless Project, Network Management 

Academic Technology Services 

Michigan State University 





__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 3924 (20090310) __ 

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. 

http://www.eset.com 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product

2009-03-11 Thread Doug Payne
We've been using a couple of Bridgewave products for several years now. 
They seem bullet-proof and require minimal maintenance (we buy support 
that includes annual checkups). We've got a couple of 1000Mbps versions 
and a 100Mbps version. Don't have the exact model numbers at hand, but 
I'm pretty sure they're the 60Ghz models. Our distances are relatively 
short, probably less than 1,000 meters; we use them when cabling is 
difficult because it crosses water or because it's to non-campus 
premises where we don't have easy conduit access.


--
Doug Payne
Manager, Network Support and Development, IST
University of Waterloo

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product

2009-03-11 Thread Rick Brown
Due to the availability of more channels in the 5GHz range I'd recommend 
going with 11a radios. Less chance for interference.


Rick



Lee H Badman wrote:


We have several bridge links in use, and have a history going back to 
Aironet (pre-Cisco days). For current small locations, the Cisco 1400 
is very nice- but pricy compared to what you want to spend. The 1300 
is also pricey, and we’ve had some issues with it. But the Cisco 1200 
AP can work in bridging mode, and we have around a half-dozen pairs in 
service. These can be had on the secondary market fairly cheaply, and 
if you get your antennas, feed cable, and lightening protection from a 
place like Sparco Technologies, you’ll pay a fraction of Cisco’s 
prices for like-quality bits and pieces.


You should be able to put together a 54 Mbps bridge link using 1200 
APs (secondary market) working in bridge mode with antenna hardware 
from Sparco Tech for under $1000. But you’ll also need station cabling 
to each bridge location. Just make sure that you get 1200s with 11g 
radios- not 11b.


If you want to go dirt cheap- get Linksys WRT54G routers, flash them 
with DD-WRT or the like, and they’ll do bridging as well and still 
take the directional antennas- but I’d have a hard time standing 
behind this sort of thing in a production environment.


-Lee

Lee H. Badman

Wireless/Network Engineer

Information Technology and Services

Syracuse University

315 443-3003



*From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] *On Behalf Of *Lih-Er Wey

*Sent:* Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:55 PM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge 
product


I need to bring network to a structure (2-story) in a field from a 
building (about 1000 feet away, 7-story).


It does not need high bandwidth. I would like to hear any product 
recommendation from you.


The budget range is under a $1000 for a pair of wireless bridge. I am 
more concern about the reliability and security sides


of the product.

By the way, does anyone have experience with NanoStation5 from 
Ubiquiti network? It is quite inexpensive ($160 a pair).


Thanks!

Lih-Er Wey

Wireless Project, Network Management

Academic Technology Services

Michigan State University

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 3924 (20090310) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


** Participation and subscription information for this 
EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.





--

Richard E. (Rick) Brown
Network Systems Engineer
Communication Technologies
Office of Information Technology
N.C. State University
(919) 515-5489 office
(919) 515-1641 fax
(919) 601-1651 cell
rick_br...@ncsu.edu
http://www.ahecta.org/

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product

2009-03-11 Thread Robert Owens
I have been testing some of the new Ubiquiti Products for a point to point 
application. Specifically the new Bullet5 product. So far I have been impressed 
with their abilities but have just used them in a test setup so far. They have 
a very good price point. They are new enough that they are somewhat hard to 
find and have no long term history although the company has been in the 
Wireless ISP provider area for some time. Are current bridges are using Cisco.

Bob Owens
Kansas State University
  - Original Message - 
  From: Philippe Hanset 
  To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:15 AM
  Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product


  Lih-Er,


  Considering your budget, you could:
  Acquire two linksys WRT54GL and load open-wrt, then use the WDS protocol,
  (2.4 GHz only!!!)


  or get two Proxim AP-4000 (Ebay has good deals on those), use WDS and enable 
the turbo mode.
  The Proxim has two radios. So we usually use one radio (the 5 Ghz) for 
bridging
  to the small structure and the other radio (2.4 GHz) for  Wi-Fi coverage.
  The bridge will pass multiple VLANs!


  Philippe Hanset
  Univ of TN






  On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:58 AM, Daniel Eklund wrote:


Lih-Er,

We have used the Proxim Tsunami Quickbridge product for some time now and 
are very happy with it.  However, it's going to cost you at least twice what 
you have budgeted.

- Original Message -
From: Lih-Er Wey we...@msu.edu
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:54:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product


I need to bring network to a structure (2-story) in a field from a building 
(about 1000 feet away, 7-story).
It does not need high bandwidth. I would like to hear any product 
recommendation from you.
The budget range is under a $1000 for a pair of wireless bridge. I am more 
concern about the reliability and security sides
of the product.
By the way, does anyone have experience with NanoStation5 from Ubiquiti 
network?  It is quite inexpensive ($160 a pair).
Thanks!
Lih-Er Wey
Wireless Project, Network Management
Academic Technology Services
Michigan State University



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 3924 (20090310) __
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found 
athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.


  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



IDEngines and Autoconnect

2009-03-11 Thread Dennis Xu
We have heard many positive feedback about IDEngines and Autoconnect. We are 
just trying to evaluate this product and I cannot find this company anymore. Is 
this product completely replaced by XpressConnect? For the folks using this 
product, do you still get good support? will you stay with this product or look 
for other alternatives? Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks,

Dennis Xu
Network Analyst
Computing and Communication Services
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] IDEngines and Autoconnect

2009-03-11 Thread Randall C Grimshaw
The IdEngines company closed and was in part acquired by ... but the 
Autoconnect product is also marketed as Cloudpath.net XPressConnect

And yes, we are also a satisfied customer.

Randy

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis Xu
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 12:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] IDEngines and Autoconnect

We have heard many positive feedback about IDEngines and Autoconnect. We are 
just trying to evaluate this product and I cannot find this company anymore. Is 
this product completely replaced by XpressConnect? For the folks using this 
product, do you still get good support? will you stay with this product or look 
for other alternatives? Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks,

Dennis Xu
Network Analyst
Computing and Communication Services
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] IDEngines and Autoconnect

2009-03-11 Thread Jim Gogan
We started looking at the IDEngines Autoconnect product, but learned 
that they actually OEM'd that product from Cloudpath (i.e. their 
XpressConnect product).As such, we turned our attention and 
evaluation efforts in that direction, were very pleased with what we 
found, and just purchased a University-wide subscription for the 
product.   See www.cloudpath.net for details.


You probably can't find anything about Identity Engines now because 
they've gone bye-bye (see attached).


-- Jim Gogan
   ITS Communication Technologies
   Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Dennis Xu wrote:

We have heard many positive feedback about IDEngines and Autoconnect. We are 
just trying to evaluate this product and I cannot find this company anymore. Is 
this product completely replaced by XpressConnect? For the folks using this 
product, do you still get good support? will you stay with this product or look 
for other alternatives? Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks,

Dennis Xu
Network Analyst
Computing and Communication Services
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Potential Customer Ltr 1 fnl email.pdf
Description: Binary data


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] IDEngines and Autoconnect

2009-03-11 Thread Lee H Badman
One personal observation... but first I need to agree with Randy. This utility 
and it's ease of use has been very helpful in configuring our 802.1x 
supplicants, and the ID Engines folks were great to work with.

That being said- the latest Mac versions and now Windows 7 (and Ubuntu) seem to 
be much better at autoconfiguring all on their own- at least for 
PEAP/MS-CHAPv2. The drawback- they won't get set up correctly for trusting only 
your Auth servers. But then again, most iPhones and such probably aren't 
trusting the server cert either. I don't recommend not trusting the cert, but 
this is one area that is probably wildly inconsistent among and across 
PEAP/MS-CHAPv2 environments. 

Also- the use of the XPressConnect tool requires use of Windows supplicant- no 
more Intel ProSet/Broadcom/Toshiba/Linksys, etc wireless utility. These third 
party utilities are often far more functional than the native Windows wireless 
clients, but it can be very hard to support a variety of supplicants so you 
need to be restrictive to just Windows client for the Cloudpath tool to be 
effective.

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Randall C Grimshaw
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 12:12 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] IDEngines and Autoconnect

The IdEngines company closed and was in part acquired by ... but the 
Autoconnect product is also marketed as Cloudpath.net XPressConnect

And yes, we are also a satisfied customer.

Randy

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis Xu
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 12:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] IDEngines and Autoconnect

We have heard many positive feedback about IDEngines and Autoconnect. We are 
just trying to evaluate this product and I cannot find this company anymore. Is 
this product completely replaced by XpressConnect? For the folks using this 
product, do you still get good support? will you stay with this product or look 
for other alternatives? Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks,

Dennis Xu
Network Analyst
Computing and Communication Services
University of Guelph
5198244120 x 56217

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product

2009-03-11 Thread Fishel Erps
Lih-Er,
 
I agree with Daniel.  His suggestion is solid, and probably the most
recommended solution (price and functionality - wise) - especially for a
production environment.  I'm not sure lower cost equipment that can do WDS
bridging will have the range you desire (1000 feet).  Apple's Airport
Extreme Base Station offers this feature in 802.11n a/b/g flavors.  Apple's
HW also offers the ability to have up to 5 units in a relay or remote
setup topology.
 
This is the link to follow (page 42):
 
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/Designing_AirPort_Networks_10.5-Windows.pd
f
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/Designing_AirPort_Networks_10.5-Windows.pdf
 
 
 
 



___ 
___ 

Fishel Erps 
Sr. Network  Infrastructure Engineer 
School of Visual Arts 
LL: 212-592-2416 
Cell: 646-201-2766 
Fax: 212-592-2243 
E-Mail: fe...@sva.edu 
___ 
___ 

 


  _  

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Eklund
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:58 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge
product


Lih-Er,

We have used the Proxim Tsunami Quickbridge product for some time now and
are very happy with it.  However, it's going to cost you at least twice what
you have budgeted.

- Original Message -
From: Lih-Er Wey we...@msu.edu
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:54:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product



I need to bring network to a structure (2-story) in a field from a building
(about 1000 feet away, 7-story).

It does not need high bandwidth. I would like to hear any product
recommendation from you.

The budget range is under a $1000 for a pair of wireless bridge. I am more
concern about the reliability and security sides

of the product.

By the way, does anyone have experience with NanoStation5 from Ubiquiti
network?  It is quite inexpensive ($160 a pair).

Thanks!

Lih-Er Wey

Wireless Project, Network Management

Academic Technology Services

Michigan State University



 

__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3924 (20090310) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

 

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 



** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 




**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product

2009-03-11 Thread Robert Owens
As a follow up. I did do a test run with the Ubiquiti Bullets and set up a WDS 
link in their software and successfully carried 802.11q Trunk VLANs across the 
link between two Cisco switches.
Bob Owens
  - Original Message - 
  From: Robert Owens 
  To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 10:09 AM
  Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product


  I have been testing some of the new Ubiquiti Products for a point to point 
application. Specifically the new Bullet5 product. So far I have been impressed 
with their abilities but have just used them in a test setup so far. They have 
a very good price point. They are new enough that they are somewhat hard to 
find and have no long term history although the company has been in the 
Wireless ISP provider area for some time. Are current bridges are using Cisco.

  Bob Owens
  Kansas State University
- Original Message - 
From: Philippe Hanset 
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge 
product


Lih-Er, 


Considering your budget, you could:
Acquire two linksys WRT54GL and load open-wrt, then use the WDS protocol,
(2.4 GHz only!!!)


or get two Proxim AP-4000 (Ebay has good deals on those), use WDS and 
enable the turbo mode.
The Proxim has two radios. So we usually use one radio (the 5 Ghz) for 
bridging
to the small structure and the other radio (2.4 GHz) for  Wi-Fi coverage.
The bridge will pass multiple VLANs!


Philippe Hanset
Univ of TN






On Mar 11, 2009, at 9:58 AM, Daniel Eklund wrote:


  Lih-Er,

  We have used the Proxim Tsunami Quickbridge product for some time now and 
are very happy with it.  However, it's going to cost you at least twice what 
you have budgeted.

  - Original Message -
  From: Lih-Er Wey we...@msu.edu
  To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
  Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:54:41 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
  Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Seeking recommendation for wireless bridge product


  I need to bring network to a structure (2-story) in a field from a 
building (about 1000 feet away, 7-story).
  It does not need high bandwidth. I would like to hear any product 
recommendation from you.
  The budget range is under a $1000 for a pair of wireless bridge. I am 
more concern about the reliability and security sides
  of the product.
  By the way, does anyone have experience with NanoStation5 from Ubiquiti 
network?  It is quite inexpensive ($160 a pair).
  Thanks!
  Lih-Er Wey
  Wireless Project, Network Management
  Academic Technology Services
  Michigan State University



  __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
signature database 3924 (20090310) __
  The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
  http://www.eset.com


  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found 
athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

  ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.