Li-Fi Projects?

2018-03-20 Thread Jason Cook
Howdy,

Has anyone been involved in any Li-Fi installs? We've been asked to investigate 
it under a green projects idea.

It seems these are the main vendors.
https://purelifi.com/
http://vlncomm.com

That's about all I have at the moment, just interested to see how things have 
gone if you have or if any obvious things to note.

Regards

Jason

--
Jason Cook
Information Technology and Digital Services
The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
Ph: +61 8 8313 4800
e-mail: 
jason.c...@adelaide.edu.au>

CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
---
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains 
information which may be confidential and/or copyright.  If you are not the 
intended recipient please do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the 
contents of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error, please 
notify the sender by reply email and delete this email and any copies or links 
to this email completely and immediately from your system.  No representation 
is made that this email is free of viruses.  Virus scanning is recommended and 
is the responsibility of the recipient.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.



Unlicensed wireless Gig Link for 1000' PtP

2018-03-20 Thread Lee H Badman
Apologies to those of you who will get this twice.

I need to replace a licensed Gig bridge on a short link with smaller/cheaper 
but still Gig. I know there are many options, but I'm looking for feedback 
specifically on two 60 GHz options:

1.  IgniteNet MetroLinq https://www.ignitenet.com/products/metrolinq/
2.  Siklu EtherHaul -600 
https://www.siklu.com/portfolio-posts/etherhaul-600-series-v-band/

Are any of you using either, and at what length? Anything good or bad to report 
from reliability, quirkiness, support, etc?

Thanks very much,

Lee Badman


Lee Badman | Network Architect

Certified Wireless Network Expert (#200)
Information Technology Services
206 Machinery Hall
120 Smith Drive
Syracuse, New York 13244

t 315.443.3003   f 315.443.4325   e lhbad...@syr.edu w 
its.syr.edu

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
syr.edu




**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba 8.0

2018-03-20 Thread Trinklein, Jason R
We are upgrading our AOS to the latest patch tonight. We have faced a lot of 
bugs with AOS up until now. We were one of the first universities to deploy AOS 
8.0.0.0, being that we wanted to build our new Aruba infrastructure from the 
ground up with the benefits of 8, which was brand new when we started. We are 
excited about the bug fixes reported in the PDF.

-- 
Jason Trinklein

Wireless Engineering Manager

College of Charleston

81 St. Philip Street | Office 311D | Charleston, SC 29403

trinkle...@cofc.edu | (843) 300–8009
On 3/20/18, 5:25 AM, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
on behalf of Kees Pronk"  wrote:

FYI : AOS 8.2.1.0 has just been released and contains 35 pages of fixes :-) 
Seems like a miracle my test with 8.2.0.2 in the Study Center has been nearly 
flawless up until now :-O

-Kees

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] Namens Lionel Shigemura
Verzonden: woensdag 14 maart 2018 17:15
Aan: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba 8.0

Hi Chad,

Helpful observations.  We’re looking at an upgrade without MM for our small 
Campus.  280 WAPs that will grow to ~400 using a high density design using 7220 
& 7210.  Still investigating the cost/benefit for MM or non-MM upgrade.

We’ll need more Q & A with HPE and our local vendor.  Can’t make Atmosphere 
due to scheduling conflicts.

Lionel Shigemura
Univ of HI - Leeward CC

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 14, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Kenny, Eric  wrote:
>
> Hi Chad,
>
> We’ve been running 8.x for almost a year and have certainly hit a fair 
share of issues.  We are currently on 8.2.0.2 which has been running since it 
was released.  Myf advice is that you might have better luck using the CLI 
rather than the web GUI to make configuration changes.
>
> Some things we’ve noticed in our deployment:
>
> - The “DHCP Required” option to ensure only client devices that have 
obtained an address via DHCP are allowed access to the network ended up causing 
major issues.  This resulted in web pages loading very slowly or halfway, or 
not at all.
> - Lots of AP crashes in 8.2.0.2.
> - Configuration push from MM to MD had some issues initially with 
consistency checking.
> - Configuration missing after upgrades possibly due to MDs reverting to 
previous config version as a result of being unable to contact the MM
> - Inconsistencies for client count and AP count on the MM, but looking at 
the MDs directly shows correct information
> - Inconsistencies with bandwidth contracts being applied to dual stack 
clients, usually it is applied to the link local IPv6 address instead of the 
IPv4 address.
>
> Hope that helps,
> ---
> Eric Kenny
> Network Architect
> Harvard University IT
> ---
>
>> On Mar 12, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Chad Patterson  wrote:
>>
>> We are planning to move to the Aruba 8.0 controller architecture/code at 
some point in the future and We’d like to know how it was for those of you who 
have made the move. Was it painful? Any unexpected issues?  Any information or 
experience you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks all!
>>
>> Chad Patterson
>> Network Administrator
>> ITS-Wireless
>> Florida State University
>> (850) 645-3402
>> cpatter...@fsu.edu
>>
>> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8146030670174ef92e5608d58e448205%7Ce285d438dbba4a4c941c593ba422deac%7C0%7C0%7C636571347252462431=a%2FWvF8LceMsOkOtD8vDwRaXAw2XgBrg95S9xTp62ySg%3D=0.
>
>
> **
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
Group discussion list can be found at 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8146030670174ef92e5608d58e448205%7Ce285d438dbba4a4c941c593ba422deac%7C0%7C0%7C636571347252462431=a%2FWvF8LceMsOkOtD8vDwRaXAw2XgBrg95S9xTp62ySg%3D=0.
>

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
Group discussion list can be found at 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.educause.edu%2Fdiscuss=02%7C01%7C%7C8146030670174ef92e5608d58e448205%7Ce285d438dbba4a4c941c593ba422deac%7C0%7C0%7C636571347252462431=a%2FWvF8LceMsOkOtD8vDwRaXAw2XgBrg95S9xTp62ySg%3D=0.
Disclaimer ( 

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba 8.0

2018-03-20 Thread Kees Pronk
FYI : AOS 8.2.1.0 has just been released and contains 35 pages of fixes :-) 
Seems like a miracle my test with 8.2.0.2 in the Study Center has been nearly 
flawless up until now :-O

-Kees

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] Namens Lionel Shigemura
Verzonden: woensdag 14 maart 2018 17:15
Aan: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Aruba 8.0

Hi Chad,

Helpful observations.  We’re looking at an upgrade without MM for our small 
Campus.  280 WAPs that will grow to ~400 using a high density design using 7220 
& 7210.  Still investigating the cost/benefit for MM or non-MM upgrade.

We’ll need more Q & A with HPE and our local vendor.  Can’t make Atmosphere due 
to scheduling conflicts.

Lionel Shigemura
Univ of HI - Leeward CC

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 14, 2018, at 9:08 AM, Kenny, Eric  wrote:
>
> Hi Chad,
>
> We’ve been running 8.x for almost a year and have certainly hit a fair share 
> of issues.  We are currently on 8.2.0.2 which has been running since it was 
> released.  Myf advice is that you might have better luck using the CLI rather 
> than the web GUI to make configuration changes.
>
> Some things we’ve noticed in our deployment:
>
> - The “DHCP Required” option to ensure only client devices that have obtained 
> an address via DHCP are allowed access to the network ended up causing major 
> issues.  This resulted in web pages loading very slowly or halfway, or not at 
> all.
> - Lots of AP crashes in 8.2.0.2.
> - Configuration push from MM to MD had some issues initially with consistency 
> checking.
> - Configuration missing after upgrades possibly due to MDs reverting to 
> previous config version as a result of being unable to contact the MM
> - Inconsistencies for client count and AP count on the MM, but looking at the 
> MDs directly shows correct information
> - Inconsistencies with bandwidth contracts being applied to dual stack 
> clients, usually it is applied to the link local IPv6 address instead of the 
> IPv4 address.
>
> Hope that helps,
> ---
> Eric Kenny
> Network Architect
> Harvard University IT
> ---
>
>> On Mar 12, 2018, at 1:37 PM, Chad Patterson  wrote:
>>
>> We are planning to move to the Aruba 8.0 controller architecture/code at 
>> some point in the future and We’d like to know how it was for those of you 
>> who have made the move. Was it painful? Any unexpected issues?  Any 
>> information or experience you can provide would be greatly appreciated. 
>> Thanks all!
>>
>> Chad Patterson
>> Network Administrator
>> ITS-Wireless
>> Florida State University
>> (850) 645-3402
>> cpatter...@fsu.edu
>>
>> ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
>> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
>> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
>
>
> **
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
>

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.
Disclaimer ( http://www.avans.nl/over-avans/e-mail-disclaimer )

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.