Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wi-Fi 6E Branding Rant

2021-01-20 Thread Carlo Terminiello
Hi,

 

Let’s be honest, the requirement for a brand are being defined by the technical 
marketing leads so we end up with numbers and confusion, until someone embraces 
a consumer/customer centric naming convention confusion will reign.  Remember 
the alternative is these standards get named things like “Orange” “O2” “Scion” 
“Lollipop” etc…

 

Which is worst?

 

C

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 on behalf of Samuel Clements 

Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 

Date: Wednesday, 20 January 2021 at 16:10
To: 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wi-Fi 6E Branding Rant

 

I concur - it's a messy situation, and one that's not made any better by the 
likes of AT (5Ge anyone?). If I had a nickel for everyone that thought that 
5Ge was 5G and/or that Wi-Fi 6 was 6GHz, I'd have a whole ton of nickels... I'm 
not sure that Wi-Fi 7 representing 6GHz would have been much better - all the 
5s and 6s are bound to be confusing - and making the 7 mean 6 would just 
exacerbate the problem for a non technical crowd anyway. I mean, these are the 
same people that can't understand why 802.11 amendments are lower case - and 
why 802.1X is okay. Technical people gonna technical...

  -Sam

 

On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 8:40 AM Jennifer Minella  wrote:

LOL. You’re not wrong… it’s a tough challenge. It *is* still WiFi 6 (802.11ax) 
so WiFi 7 would be confusing. I think the best way I’ve seen it consistently 
used with non-Wi-Fi pros is to call it “WiFi 6- Extended” meaning it’s extended 
in to other RF spectrum. That’s not official but I think even Chuck uses that 
moniker for it. 

 

The more common confusion we run in to is people thinking the “6” in WiFi 6E 
means 6GHz. 

 

I’m sure other folks here have some additional ideas for keeping it straight 
for non-WiFI peeps. As for us, we just constantly re-iterate what 6E is (and 
isn’t) pretty much every time the phrase comes out of our mouths, even if that 
means multiple times in a webinar, Tech Talk, or client meeting. 

 

You’re in good company with your frustration though 

-jj

 

___

Jennifer Minella, CISSP, HP MASE

VP of Engineering & Security

Carolina Advanced Digital, Inc.

www.cadinc.com

j...@cadinc.com

919.460.1313 Main Office

919.539.2726 Mobile/text 

 

From: Green, William C  
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 6:52 PM
Subject: Wi-Fi 6E Branding Rant

 



"Wi-Fi 6E” is not a good branding for what 6GHz provides, in my personal 
opinion.  I hope the Wi-Fi Alliance reconsiders.

 

I've been discussing Wi-Fi 6E in my organization for over a year-- and nobody 
can keep that “E” in their heads.  They constantly confuse "Wi-Fi 6" as the 
same as "Wi-Fi 6E" in meetings, products, and strategies.   The whole point of 
the Alliance branding was to make things more understandable to non-technical 
audiences right?  Doesn’t 6 vs 6E fly in the face of that?  I’m not good at 
naming things, so am use to recognizing branding failures like this.

 

I understand most of the underlying technology is the same-- other than 6GHz 
capability.  Most people don't care about the underlying technology unless it 
accomplishes something they need.  6GHz is a once in a generation 
differentiator that will enable far more than the changes from 802.11ac to 
802.11ax, which was deserving of a new number.  Not having that capability 
reflected in a more differentiated branding is causing and will continue to 
cause unneeded confusion.  

 

I understand the Alliance has already placed a lot into marketing of the term 
"Wi-Fi 6E", but that's sunk cost.  Pick a new branding.  Perhaps, Wi-Fi 7.  You 
can leave all 6E materials and just say its the same thing as Wi-Fi 7.  Have 
everything in the futures pipeline do a +1 on their PowerPoints.  Will the 
Alliance incur some ridicule, yes, but less than continuing with 6E in my 
personal opinion.

 

Do I think this rant will change anything?  No.  But naming a frustration is 
sometimes useful for dealing with it.  I’m moving on.



--
William Green, Director of Networking and Telecommunications
The University of Texas at Austin | ITS | 512-475-9295 | gr...@austin.utexas.edu

 

 

**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community 

Visit https://cadinc.com/blog for tech articles and news.

**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community 

**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. 

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 8540 Code version- holiday work

2020-12-09 Thread Carlo Terminiello
Michael,

We had similar issues earlier in the year with 8.8 code on AireOS controllers 
specifically with MacOS and IOS clients and had to do a lot of digging into arp 
on the AP and locally conncted switch, it seems the Apple devices were 
poisoning arp but sending out responses on behalf of the local gateway, it's 
worth investigating in this area.

Just another pointer, its seems the software end of life is actually related to 
your 8510 WLC, seems the 700w are supported on later WLC like 3504, 5520, 8540 
running 8.8 or 8.10, if you can get hold of a later WLC or spin up a VM 
temporarily and move some AP access to a later version of code it may help you 
determine if it’s a known bug that has already been fixed in later versions.

Rgds

Carlo

On 09/12/2020, 01:09, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
on behalf of Michael Vinson"  wrote:

Kyle,

I wanted to reply to your post...

We have Cisco 702W APs in our residence halls and have been fighting issues 
with wireless for many months now.  This issue seemed to appear this fall 
semester.

Students are complaining they are getting disconnected from wireless or not 
being able to get connected to wireless.  We have been able to reproduce the 
issue on an iPhone, iMac, MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air.  We also had several 
Windows laptops fail one day while testing, but this happened to use only once. 
 We are also having reports of other devices such as Android phones or other 
BYOD devices, but the main complaint is coming from Apple devices.

What we have seen while testing with Apple devices is the AP and WLC show 
the device connected.  The users wireless device also shows that it is 
connected to the SSID, but when the issue is happening you can't pass any 
traffic.  Everything will be working fine (pings and a streaming YouTube video) 
and all of a sudden the pings will stop and YouTube will fail after the buffer 
is exhausted.  Some times it will come back after a short amount of time or we 
have seen it not come back for over an hour.  What is interesting is while one 
or more of the devices are experiencing issues, we have other devices working 
off the same AP just fine.  

We are using Cisco 8510 WLCs running 8.5.161.7   The previous semester we 
were running 8.5.140We initially upgraded this fall to 8.5.161.4, then down 
graded to 8.5.140 and then upgraded to 8.5.161.7 based on recommendations from 
Cisco.  All these version have had issues.

Students have said if the go to Campus buildings, dens or community centers 
that the wireless works great.  The APs in these locations are 3702 or 3802 
APs.  We have done a small amount of testing with a 1815 and have not 
experienced any issues on this. 

We have been working with Cisco and Apple for help, but have had no 
solution at this time.  Cisco has also told us that the 702W AP no longer has 
software support, so if this issue is due to a Cisco bug that it will not be 
fixed.

Michael Vinson
Iowa State University, IT Services
Network Engineer

**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community


**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] [EXT] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Article: Android 11 tightens restrictions on CA certificates

2020-09-14 Thread Carlo Terminiello
Hi Jamie,

 

In a Cisco WLC client RUN state is derived from association and authentication 
states, for any dot1x authenticated WLAN the WLC will only forward or proxy 
DHCP requests once auth state is passed. If your clients are associated ie 
connected but not authenticated they won't get an IP address.

 

You can check client auth state or debug them by running the following at the 
CLI: (6th column below for auth state)

 

(WLC2-DCU) >show client summ

 

Number of Clients 3 

GLAN/

    RLAN/

MAC Address   AP Name    Slot Status    WLAN  Auth 
Protocol Port Wired Tunnel  Role

- --  - -  
  - --- 

08:3d:88:57:29:be AP1810w_sandycove_44B8  0   Associated 17   Yes   
802.11n(2.4 GHz) 13   No    No  Local

ac:5f:3e:c1:d9:11 AP1810w_sandycove_44B8  0   Associated 17   Yes   
802.11n(2.4 GHz) 13   No    No  Local

f8:3f:51:3a:8d:92 AP1810w_sandycove_4690  1   Associated 17   Yes   
802.11ac(5 GHz)  13   No    No  Local

 

then run a “show client detail ”

 

and scroll down to look for EAP message timeouts or failures.

 

 

  Number of Interim-Update Sent.. 0

  Number of EAP Id Request Msg Timeouts.. 0

  Number of EAP Id Request Msg Failures.. 0

  Number of EAP Request Msg Timeouts. 0

  Number of EAP Request Msg Failures. 0

  Number of EAP Key Msg Timeouts. 1

  Number of EAP Key Msg Failures. 0

  Number of Data Retries. 1220

  Number of RTS Retries.. 0

  Number of Duplicate Received Packets... 0

  Number of Decrypt Failed Packets... 0

  Number of Mic Failured Packets. 0

  Number of Mic Missing Packets.. 0

  Number of RA Packets Dropped... 0

  Number of Policy Errors 0

  Radio Signal Strength Indicator -69 dBm

  Signal to Noise Ratio.. 26 dB

 

“debug aaa events enable” can also help.

 

Rgds

 

Carlo

 

On 11/09/2020, 21:25, "The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
on behalf of Floyd, Brad"  wrote:

 

    Jamie,

    Not getting an IP address (assuming no IP infrastructure / routing failure) 
could definitely be a result of a certificate failure during the 4-way 
handshake, therefore causing an 802.1X failure. I believe there is a particular 
step in the 4-way handshake that likely indicates a certificate failure, but I 
don't remember off the top of my head which one it is.

    Thanks,

    Brad

    

-Original Message-

    From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Price, Jamie G

    Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 1:14 PM

    To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU

    Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] [EXT] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Article: Android 11 
tightens restrictions on CA certificates

    

On our Cisco controllers, I see some devices "connected" and they should be 
issued a DHCP address in this network. They are not getting an IP address 
(0.0.0.0). Is this a symptom they are not passing with the cert? Thus failing 
802.1x?

    

Thank you

    

-Original Message-

    From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 On Behalf Of Higgins, Benjamin J

    Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 7:19 AM

    To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU

    Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] [EXT] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Article: Android 11 
tightens restrictions on CA certificates

    

Can confirm that this "feature" has prevented SecureW2 from onboarding 
Android 11 devices to our network.  While the app appears to *deliver* the 
certificates - they are in the drop down when you edit the WiFi Profile - if 
you attempt to connect to the network is sits and spins.  If you edit the 
profile again, you will find that the SecureW2 delivered certificate is no 
longer in the drop down list.  Only "Use system certificates" or "Do not 
validate" is there...

    

-Original Message-

    From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 On Behalf Of Jonathan Waldrep

    Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 8:39 AM

    To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU

    Subject: [EXT] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Article: Android 11 tightens restrictions 
on CA certificates

    

On 2020-09-10 22:19:21, Johnson, Christopher wrote:

    > This popped up in my news feed, that's going to affect the user 
experience even more for onboarding apps for those with private CAs I'd imagine.

    > 

> 

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Instability issues?

2020-01-13 Thread Carlo Terminiello
Hi,

 

Sounds similar to the Apple ARP spoofing problem from the summer that hit a few 
manufacturers that use local switching models, I’d start with checking ARP 
tables on client, AP, switch, router to make sure everything is as it should be.

 

Rgds

 

Carlo

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 on behalf of "Glassman, Stephen" 

Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 

Date: Saturday, 11 January 2020 at 15:18
To: 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless Instability issues?

 

Hi John, 

 

We’ve experienced intermittent issues with our AP230’s since around 
Thanksgiving but are only hearing about it from others-we have not witnessed 
the issue first hand.  The symptom seems to be that the client is connected but 
cannot get to the internet or if they can it’s really slow but the issue seems 
to come and go and it’s certainly not affecting everyone….



On Jan 11, 2020, at 1:01 AM, John Rodkey  wrote:

 

Are others who are  using Aerohive 650 experiencing instability issues?  We 
have experienced a rather extensive problem that came with sudden onset about 
1/4/2020 .

Clients appear to be able to connect to the AP, get an IP and are able to ping 
the default gateway, but not beyond.  The ethernet network is unaffected, and 
the gateway is able to ping the rest of the network and the AP, but not the 
client.

 

John

**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community 

 

**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community 


**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC & ISE combo issues

2019-10-10 Thread Carlo Terminiello
Hi,

 

Have you had a look at the AAA server statistics, will list number of auth 
requests, passes, fails, timeout etc.. example output below, may help focus the 
investigation. Of course a ‘debug client ’  always helps

 

Example output:

 

(wlc01) >show radius auth statistics

Authentication Servers:

 

Server Index. 1

Server Address... 10.203.251.110

Msg Round Trip Time.. 41087 (usec)

Average Msg Round Trip Time.. 154 (usec)

Exponential Msg Round Trip Time.. 37068 (usec)

First Requests... 303910

Retry Requests... 42

Accept Responses. 22698

Reject Responses. 213

Challenge Responses.. 280986

Malformed Msgs... 0

Bad Authenticator Msgs... 0

Pending Requests. 0

Timeout Requests. 42

Consecutive Drops ... 0

Unknowntype Msgs. 0

Other Drops.. 13

AuthZ Requests... 0

AuthZ Accept Responses... 0

AuthZ Reject Responses... 0

 

--More-- or (q)uit

 

 

Server Index. 2

Server Address... 10.128.50.42

Msg Round Trip Time.. 154643 (usec)

Average Msg Round Trip Time.. 163837 (usec)

Exponential Msg Round Trip Time.. 208352 (usec)

First Requests... 24776

Retry Requests... 34

Accept Responses. 24380

Reject Responses. 396

Challenge Responses.. 0

Malformed Msgs... 0

Bad Authenticator Msgs... 0

Pending Requests. 0

Timeout Requests. 34

Consecutive Drops ... 0

Unknowntype Msgs. 0

Other Drops.. 0

AuthZ Requests... 0

AuthZ Accept Responses... 0

AuthZ Reject Responses... 0

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 on behalf of Mathieu Sturm 

Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 

Date: Wednesday, 9 October 2019 at 08:11
To: 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC & ISE combo issues

 

The WLC is on version 8.3.140.0 (we still have 2600 series AP’s that we need to 
replace so we are pretty limited) and ISE is 2.2 (patch 5). 

 

Van: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 Namens Letts, Richard J
Verzonden: dinsdag 8 oktober 2019 22:41
Aan: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC & ISE combo issues

 

What version of core on the WLC / what model of AP?

 

We had an issue at the start of the year with  version of code on cisco 3500 
series AP  where clients would successful authenticate  with the AP, but the 
association would never get passed from the AP through to the controller and 
thence on to the ISE. Clients would get a ‘bad password’ (or similar type of 
error) displayed on their computer which would confuse them, and there would be 
nothing recorded in the WLC or ISE logs.

 

Authentication and Association isn’t the way around people normally think of 
this.

https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/WiFi_Basics_and_Best_Practices/802.11_Association_process_explained

 

anyway, I think you’re going to need to include version numbers of the ISE and 
WLC code for more help.

 

Thank you

 

Richard Letts

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 On Behalf Of Mathieu Sturm
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 2:50 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC & ISE combo issues

 

Hello, since the start of the new academic year we’ve been having some troubles 
with our Cisco setup. We have 3 Cisco WLC 5520’s (one of these is standby), 
around 850ap’s and 5 Cisco ISE’s (1 admin node, 1 monitor node and 3 
radius-only nodes). 

 

We have this setup since 2018. There were some problems sometimes but nothing 
major. Now recently it’s taking a long time for people to get connected. We 
have around 20k students and 3K staff with peaks to nearly 9K associations. 

 

The problem is that it is difficult to get connected sometimes. I see the user 
trying to connect in the WLC’s but don’t see them trying in the ISE’s (it looks 
like the attempt gets lost somewher).

I can see the following worrying log message in the 

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Internet Connectivity Issues

2019-09-24 Thread Carlo Terminiello
Hi Sean, 

 

Agree with your sentiment, as just as another, we heard recently that .125 
would be the last MR in the 8.8 train, forcing customers over to 8.10 for 
mainline which has not even been released yet…

 

It’s taken a year for 8.8 to get stable enough for a relatively stress-free 
life, and just as I type this our 3504’s have started flipping between HA pairs 
for another eventful afternoon.

 

C

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 on behalf of "Gray, Sean" 

Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 

Date: Tuesday, 24 September 2019 at 15:59
To: 
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Internet Connectivity Issues

 

Hi Carlo,

 

We will be upgrading to the TAC recommended 8.8.125.0 later tonight. We thought 
that this could eliminate some problems and at least squash a few bugs that we 
may be running into.

 

I really wish Cisco would make an MD release available for the 8.8 train, it 
seems to have been a continual ED train since it came out of the gate.

 

Thanks

 

Sean 

 

Sean Gray | B.Sc (Hons)

Voice, Collaboration & Wireless Network Analyst

ITS, University of Lethbridge

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
 On Behalf Of Carlo Terminiello
Sent: September 24, 2019 7:41 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Internet Connectivity Issues

 

Hi, 

 

We were hit with similar problems across multiple sites on earlier 8.8 builds, 
now running the latest/ last 8.8.125.3 escalation build from Cisco on multiple 
controllers with stable results.

We are seeing one issue with MBP whereby they remain associated and on session 
timeout stop forwarding traffic.

 

This is a corner case and yet to be successfully identified as a bug by Cisco 
TAC.

 

Rgds

 

Carlo

 

On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 14:18, John Turner  wrote:

I second Mark's suggestion - we've detected this problem at nearly a dozen of 
our higher ed and enterprise customers. 

 

Seems that the issue is between a waking macbook and an android 

 

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/aironet-3800-series-access-points/214491-arp-responses-for-default-gateway-ip-add.html

 

Traditional tools aren't finding this - we are detecting a drop in traffic as 
well as the duplicate gateway address that triggers an advisory alert. 

 

John

 

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:57 AM Mark Reboli  wrote:

Look into the Issue with apple sleeping devices changing their IPs to your 
gateway.  We experienced this causing intermitted issues.  Take a look at the 
link below:

 

https://community.meraki.com/t5/Wireless-LAN/Help-Windows-client-receiving-incorrect-MAC-address-of-Gateway/td-p/39963

 

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me off line

 

m

Mark Reboli

Network/Telecom Manager

Misericordia University

(570) 674-6753

 

This e-mail and accompanying attachments are confidential.  The information is 
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any 
review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication 
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all 
copies. Thank you for your cooperation.

 

 

 

 

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ethan Grinnell
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 11:04 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Internet Connectivity Issues

 

External Email: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust 
the sender and know the content is safe.

What AP models do you have?

 

We're still on AireOS 8.5.144.33. The COS APs have been running pretty well for 
us.

 

We've had intermittent issues on IOS APs though. The radios periodically reset 
and can't seem to clear some packets. Once an AP starts having issues the radio 
may even cycle every few minutes indefinitely. Do you monitor the AP syslogs?

 

Here are the bug IDs for this:

CSCvp86151 IOS APs radio reset with code 44, mostly seen on 2.4GHz radio

CSCvp66546 702w Radio reset due to tx stuck

 

The first one doesn't have a real solution yet, we're running debug images to 
capture more information. TAC says it might be related to high QBSS, but I saw 
an AP report high QBSS with no other APs or other known Wi-Fi sources above -80 
dBm, so I'm not convinced.

 

The 702W bug has a good debug image in place though. TAC found that stranded 
packets for clients in power save mode (mostly Murata or Samsung S10 devices) 
would accumulate in memory and after 60 seconds the AP radio resets to clear 
the packets. But the reset didn't clear them (or more accumulated) so it just 
continues resetting the radio. The fixed image discards packets that couldn't 
be transmitted after 20 seconds, without resetting the radio. It also has a 
coun

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Internet Connectivity Issues

2019-09-24 Thread Carlo Terminiello
;>
>> We have also experienced AVC crippling our network. Once the traffic
>> volumes are higher than X. Performance goes south and can get to 0.
>>
>>
>>
>> Nothing else similar to your description, though that issue was on 8.2
>> and we are currently 8.5
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jason Cook
>>
>> Information Technology and Digital Services
>>
>> The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains
>> information which may be confidential and/or copyright.  If you are not the
>> intended recipient please do not read, save, forward, disclose, or copy the
>> contents of this email. If this email has been sent to you in error, please
>> notify the sender by reply email and delete this email and any copies or
>> links to this email completely and immediately from your system.  No
>> representation is made that this email is free of viruses.  Virus scanning
>> is recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv <
>> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> *On Behalf Of *Lee H Badman
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 24 September 2019 9:25 AM
>> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Internet Connectivity Issues
>>
>>
>>
>> Are you running AVC? If so, you might try disabling. It has caused us no
>> end of trouble in the past, similar symptoms. One man’s opinion from past
>> experience.
>>
>> Lee Badman (mobile)
>>
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2019, at 7:49 PM, Gray, Sean  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> We are getting reports of internet connectivity issues from our wireless
>> users. The problem is very temperamental with users bouncing from being
>> able to browse & access App content flawlessly, to experiencing a complete
>> failure to browse to websites and refresh App content. As an example I was
>> able to successfully test Instagram via Safari on an iPhone, and
>> simultaneously fail to see the same content on the Instagram App on the
>> same phone.
>>
>>
>>
>> At this point we are struggling to narrow down the root cause. We have
>> looked at everything from traffic volume to ISP instabilities. But as yet
>> there is no consistent smoking gun. My reason for reaching out to the group
>> is we are running slightly dated code on our HA pair of 5520s. We are
>> running 8.8.111 and plan to upgrade to the latest release as soon as
>> possible. But I’m wondering if anyone out there is running 8.8.111 that
>> have seen or is seeing similar issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> **
>> Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire
>> community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the
>> message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply.
>> Additional participation and subscription information can be found at
>> https://www.educause.edu/community
>>
>> **
>> Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire
>> community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the
>> message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply.
>> Additional participation and subscription information can be found at
>> https://www.educause.edu/community
>>
>> **
>> Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire
>> community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the
>> message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply.
>> Additional participation and subscription information can be found at
>> https://www.educause.edu/community
>>
>> **
>> Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire
>> community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the
>> message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply.
>> Additional participation and subscription information can be found at
>> https://www.educause.edu/community
>>
>> **
>> Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire
>> community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the
>> message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply.
>> Additional participation and subscription information can be found at
>> https://www.educause.edu/community
>>
>
>
> --
> *John Turner* - *Head of Customer Success*
> *jtur...@nyansa.com *
> (339) 225-0198
> Join the Voyers Slack Community! <https://voyers-slack.nyansa.com/>
>
> **
> Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire
> community list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the
> message, copy and paste their email address and forward the email reply.
> Additional participation and subscription information can be found at
> https://www.educause.edu/community
>
-- 


Carlo Terminiello
Director
Repy Consulting Ltd
+44 7730 711 486
ca...@repyconsulting.com


This message may contain confidential information, be legally privileged
and/or protected by copyright. Please contact the sender immediately if you
have received the message in error and then permanently delete it.

Repy Consulting Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales
(registration number 1135) with registered office at 4 Beacon Way,
Banstead, Surrey, SM7 1DY

**
Replies to EDUCAUSE Community Group emails are sent to the entire community 
list. If you want to reply only to the person who sent the message, copy and 
paste their email address and forward the email reply. Additional participation 
and subscription information can be found at https://www.educause.edu/community