Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Deployment of AirFiber bridges

2014-01-27 Thread Robertson, Joshua
I’ve got three pairs running and will be adding another couple in the coming 
months.  Current distances are 300m (-43 dBm), 450m (–46 dBm), and 850m (–53 
dBm) all on 6’ non-penetrating masts on school roofs.  Two of the sets have 
been up since early last Summer.  All are getting around 775 megabit full 
duplex and I haven’t had any connectivity drops due to rain, snow, or ice.  For 
the price you can’t beat them, just make sure you ground them well as they’re 
really sensitive to it.

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888

From: Jack R. Madderra jack.madde...@tu.edumailto:jack.madde...@tu.edu
Reply-To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date: Monday, January 27, 2014 at 11:22 AM
To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Deployment of AirFiber bridges

Has anyone deployed the AirFiber bridges on their campus networks?  Please 
provide some feedback if you have.

http://www.ubnt.com/airfiber#af

Thank you!

Jack R. Madderra, MCSE, A+, Net+, Sec+, Project+
Network Manager
Touro University California
1310 Club Drive ~ Mare Island
Vallejo, CA  94592
ph: 707.638.5427
fax: 707.638.5430
===
What services do we offer? Go to http://it.tu.eduhttp://it.tu.edu/
Need help? Go to https://servicedesk.tu.eduhttps://servicedesk.tu.edu/, login 
with your campus network username and submit a service request!

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Reasons for NOT upgrading to iOS 7?

2013-09-24 Thread Robertson, Joshua
I second Julian's opinion about speed on older devices as I too got stuck with 
a terribly slow iPhone 3G after the iOS 4 upgrade.  I did, however, take the 
plunge on my 4S and so far speed has been good.  I have heard some speed 
complaints from people with plain iPhone 4 though.

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888

From: j...@nww.commailto:j...@nww.com j...@nww.commailto:j...@nww.com
Reply-To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:00 AM
To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Reasons for NOT upgrading to iOS 7?

One of my editors noted there are stories online about the large percentage of 
upgrades to iOS 7 in a very short time; but he himself has NOT. He wondered 
about why others may be refusing or delaying the upgrade.

I was curious about what, if anything, you folks are hearing about this, either 
through personal conversations (or even impressions) or possibly feedback from 
the Help Desk staff as they deal with endusers?

Again, in keeping with Listserv rules, no one will be quoted/identified; at 
this point just trying to see if this is worth exploring. Thanks.

Regards,
John Cox
Senior Editor

Network World
492 Old Connecticut Path
Framingham, MA 01701
USA
Direct: 978-834-0554
HQ reception: 508-766-5301
john_...@nww.commailto:john_...@nww.com
www.networkworld.comhttp://www.networkworld.com/

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Release Notes for Cisco Prime Infrastructure, Release 2.0 [Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0 Cisco Systems

2013-09-04 Thread Robertson, Joshua
Agreed, it is completely nuts.  What I've heard is that PI 2.0 will be WLC
7.4 and below, PI 2.1 will support WLC 7.5 and above.

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888





On 9/4/13 1:47 PM, Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu wrote:

It's a dilemma, and absolute BS on Cisco's part. You couldn't make this
foolishness out of the WNBU up if you wanted to.

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Francisco J.
Medina Jiménez
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 2:52 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Release Notes for Cisco Prime Infrastructure,
Release 2.0 [Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.0 Cisco Systems

Hi all,
Great notice, but CPI 2.0 does not support 7.5.x
If you want to manage WLC 7.5.x from CPI you need CPI 1.4  MSE 7.5 but
you can't upgrade from CPI 1.4 to 2.0 ... It's a little dilemma

El 04/09/2013 20:09, Hurt,Trenton W. escribió:
 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/prime/infrastructure/2.0/release
/notes/cpi_rn.html


 Sent from my iPhone
 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


-- 
-
Francisco J. Medina Jiménez

Área de Redes y Comunicaciones
Universidad de Granada
Centro de Servicios de Informática y Redes de Comunicaciones (CSIRC)
Campus de Fuentenueva. Edificio Mecenas.
18071 Granada (Spain)
E-mail: f...@ugr.es
Tlf: +34 958 241 432
Fax: +34 958 244 221
-
Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es Ud. el destinatario
indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación o copia
sin autorización queda prohibida en virtud de la legislación Vigente.
Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique
inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by professional privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly
prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please
immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it
-

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] [Off-Topic] Computer Labs

2013-08-21 Thread Robertson, Joshua
At Old Dominion University (my previous employer) we went to a combination
of a few central labs, a virtual computer lab, and a learning commons
area.  The students really embraced the learning commons which included
configurable furniture with power outlets, group meeting rooms with
TVs/projectors, printers that were accessible wirelessly, as well as some
computer stations.  Most students opted to just bring their own laptops or
tablets and then used our power, wi-fi, printers, and tvs/monitors and
were very happy with the setup.  In most of the new academic buildings
going up rather than providing dedicated labs the decision was made to
offer more learning commons spaces.

I really see this as the future of the university computer lab -- offering
an comfortable area for students to work on their own laptops/tablets
while being able to utilize university resources and meeting spaces.

http://www.odu.edu/learningcommons/

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888





On 8/21/13 2:56 PM, Eric T. Barnett ebarn...@astate.edu wrote:

We have a new Liberal Arts building that is currently in construction.
The floor plans aren't quite nailed down yet but there was something on
the current plans that made me wonder. There's no less than six computer
labs in the building. Seeing that we make all of our Freshmen buy iPads
and that laptops are super cheap nowadays, I was wondering just how
useful computer labs are now/will be in the next two years or so. Getting
rid of most or all of those labs would cut down on costs considerably.
I've heard of some colleges dumping computer labs as they seem to be
needed less and less as users have more and more tech available cheaply.
What's your take?

Regards,

Eric Barnett
Senior Network Engineer/Wireless Administrator
Information and Technology Services
Arkansas State University
(870) 680-4243
http://wireless.astate.edu




**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ubiquiti Air Fiber- any first hand experience?

2013-05-31 Thread Robertson, Joshua
After running AirFiber for a bit I thought I'd reply to this thread.  I have a 
290m link running great at excellent signal strength with a speed of 743 
megabits full duplex going between two schools.  I have been very impressed by 
how well and reliably it has worked and I'm going to add another pair of 
AirFiber for a 400m link between two schools in the next month.

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888

From: Luke Jenkins ljenk...@weber.edumailto:ljenk...@weber.edu
Reply-To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:05:20 -0600
To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ubiquiti Air Fiber- any first hand experience?

From page 26 of the User Guide: Note: Minimum link distance is approximately 
100 m.

It looks like you need to turn the TX power and RX gain down for short links.

-Luke


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Chuck Anderson 
c...@wpi.edumailto:c...@wpi.edu wrote:
What is the link length people have been installing?  We have a lot of
just-off-campus locations that are only about 50m to 300m away, and
I've read that AirFiber (and others) don't like such short links.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:21:04PM +, Lee H Badman wrote:
 Thanks, Jacob. Very helpful.

 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
  On Behalf Of Jacob M. Dawson
 Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 7:57 AM
 To: 
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ubiquiti Air Fiber- any first hand experience?

 Our local WISP, NRV Unwired, has three links up, and can't say enough good 
 things about them.  He has them set up in a chain and has reported he's been 
 able to push over 500Mbps through them.  I suspect he can probably go higher, 
 but is equipment limited.  At least one of those links has been up for about 
 six months, and I haven't heard of any problems.  We thought they were pretty 
 interesting, so we have a link's worth and one for a spare, which we'll be 
 putting up soon.

 Jacob M. Dawson
 Network Research Engineer
 Virginia Tech
 On Apr 1, 2013, at 16:16 , Keith Jeremy Noah 
 kjn...@uwm.edumailto:kjn...@uwm.edumailto:kjn...@uwm.edumailto:kjn...@uwm.edu
  wrote:


 I've put out many feelers, hopefully they will pan out.
 At minimum, I'll share what we learn.

 Keith Noah
 University Information Technology Services
 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
 Network Operations Center
 Cell:414-810-6789
 Office:414-229-4972

 
 From: Lee H Badman 
 lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edu
 To: 
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 2:50:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ubiquiti Air Fiber- any first hand experience?
 I see some happy reports overseas, via Twitter, but little on the domestic 
 front.

 From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
 [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
  On Behalf OfKeith Jeremy Noah
 Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 2:55 PM
 To: 
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ubiquiti Air Fiber- any first hand experience?

 Same here.
 We are looking into installing one or two of these now, but we have no 
 experience with this yet.

 Keith Noah
 University Information Technology Services
 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
 Network Operations Center
 Cell:414-810-6789
 Office:414-229-4972

 
 From: Lee H Badman 
 lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edu
 To: 
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 1:45:26 PM
 Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Ubiquiti Air Fiber- any first hand experience?
 Hi All,

 Has anyone actually installed a Ubiquiti AirFiber bridge link? Looking for 
 first-hand testimonial before I put one in service?

 Thanks-

 Lee Badman

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Luke Jenkins
Network Engineer
Weber State University
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group 

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wow vision veos: Will products using Miracast be an alternative?

2013-05-28 Thread Robertson, Joshua
The whole idea behind Wi-Fi Direct is to be able to stay connected to a
wi-fi network while making an ad-hoc connection at the same time to a
device.  So this will not be an issue.  Battery life on the other hand...

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888





On 5/24/13 9:38 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:

On 5/24/2013 10:45 PM, Barron Hulver wrote:
 Will products using Miracast take hold and be an alternative?

 http://www.wi-fi.org/wi-fi-certified-miracast%E2%84%A2

In their FAQ...

 7.  How is Miracast related to Wi-Fi Direct?
 Wi-Fi Direct allows devices to connect directly to each other, without
 the need for a Wi-Fi
 AP, and often requiring just the push of a button. Wi-Fi Direct allows
 source and display
 devices to discover one another and provides the underlying
 device-to-device connectivity
 for Miracast.

Sounds like if you ALSO need wireless internet, you're SOL...

Jeff

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent
Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM2 7.4 stability issues?

2013-04-25 Thread Robertson, Joshua
On pre-7.4 code as long as you're on the same layer 2 vlan as the AppleTV and 
have multicast enabled you'll still see the advertisements and be able to use 
it, it's just when you try to cross L3 boundaries or disable multicast that 
you'll need 7.4 or greater.

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888

From: Mark Duling mark.dul...@biola.edumailto:mark.dul...@biola.edu
Reply-To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:27:35 -0700
To: EDUCAUSE Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM2 7.4 stability issues?

The default profile is even applied to the WLANs by default.

Our position is that airplay is officially unsupported at this point since 
there are some unknowns administratively and politically with this, and we have 
some old WiSMs running 7.0 for a bit more yet.  So we're not advertising this 
service or anything, but it looks like at least technically it works quite 
well.  One thing I don't understand, is that I've seen a couple of appleTVs 
associated to those old WiSMs that are broadcasting themselves as airplay 
receivers.  Since only 7.4 supports the gateway, I don't understand how those 
are getting advertised like that.


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Mark Duling 
mark.dul...@biola.edumailto:mark.dul...@biola.edu wrote:
Hi Lee,

The have a new document based on 7.4:  
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/technology/bonjour/Bonjour_DG_Guide.pdf

It is as simple as it could be now.  Doesn't require multicast.  Just enable 
the Bonjour snooping option globallly on each controller (off by default), and 
turn it off on each WLAN you don't want to snoop on (on by default at WLAN 
level).  That's it because there is a default profile that you can use, but 
apparently now Apple in later ios releases has changed airplay mirroring so you 
have to add the AirTunes service type to the default profile (it is defined 
but not active) before mirroring will work.  It is incredibly simple on 7.4.

Mark


On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Lee H Badman 
lhbad...@syr.edumailto:lhbad...@syr.edu wrote:
Mark-

Do you have a Doc on the Airplay thing? Sometimes they come from places other 
than CCO…

-Lee Badman

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Mark Duling
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 3:50 PM

To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WiSM2 7.4 stability issues?

7.4.100.0 has been very stable for us with failover pairs.  We're enjoying the 
AirPlay support too, which seems very solid.

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Joe Roth 
jr...@binghamton.edumailto:jr...@binghamton.edu wrote:
Has anyone else seen stability issues with 7.4? We had to downgrade from 7.4 to 
7.3 due to our 1142 APs crashing. We had the patched engineering release that 
was supposed to fix this, but apparently there were multiple 1142 issues. The 
bug that we were hitting has yet to be patched.

Our hopes in going to 7.4 was to use a single HA only controller in a pool 
with our production controllers. Apparently this feature was implemented in 
7.4. Has anyone been able to use this? We did not get to test it due to the 
downgrade.

Thanks.

--
Joe Roth
Networking Group
Binghamton University
Ph. 607-777-7528tel:607-777-7528
Fax 607-777-4009tel:607-777-4009
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] students per AP in residence halls

2013-01-22 Thread Robertson, Joshua
Mike,
   With the WiSM2 on 7.2 you can use RF Profiles to manage your thresholds.  
The option is under Wireless-RF Profiles and then you can assign it to APs 
under the AP Groups (WLANs-Advanced-AP Groups).  This way you can tweak the 
settings at whatever scale you want.

Josh Robertson
Sr. Wireless Engineer / InfoSecurity Admin
Denver Public Schools
Department of Technology Services
(720)423-3675

To open a new support call, please call the DoTS Hotline at 720-423-3888

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dorshimer, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:53 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] students per AP in residence halls

We have the typical corridor deployment and also experienced low power levels 
due to default RRM/TPC thresholds. We didn't like the idea of micromanaging 
power levels or the huge cost increase and security concerns of placing WAPs in 
the rooms. In Cisco land, a workaround for now, was increasing the power 
threshold from the default -70 to -50 whenever there are three or more 
neighbors. I've only seen the way to do this globally per each controller, and 
changes are only invoked by the Power Assignment Leader. I was hoping to be 
able to create groups and manage RRM per building but I'm either overlooking 
that feature or imagined it. We're using wism2's on 7.2 code.

So for now this is a campus-wide adjustment. Given the majority of our coverage 
model is corridor based in academic and res hall buildings, it appears to be a 
benefit in most locations. We have fairly good overlap so it is rare that any 
given WAP is at full power, even with the increased threshold. If we end up 
with too much channel noise we might reduce the threshold a bit. NCS heat maps 
show improved coverage into corner and obstructed areas and our Fluke AirCheck 
and some laptop testing confirm.

Michael Dorshimer
Network Administrator
Shippensburg University

From: Tristan Gulyas 
tristan.gul...@monash.edumailto:tristan.gul...@monash.edu
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Date: Monday, January 21, 2013 11:34 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] students per AP in residence halls

Hi Tom.

The issue we've had is not one of density but one of coverage; in some site 
surveys we'e conducted recently in our residential spaces, we are finding that 
one AP might cover only a small amount of students, say, 6-12 reliably.

The challenges have been that our residential halls are old, double-brick with 
all sorts of reinforcement. We are site surveying for 2.4GHz - we can't justify 
the cost of a high density deployment to support 5GHz everywhere.

I have also noticed that HP produce a small active wall-outlet switch+AP which 
is PoE powered.  It is b/g/n 2.4GHz-only (sigh) and is aimed at the hospitality 
industry.

Where are people placing their APs?  We currently place them in the corridor, 
however our challenge has been that the APs see each other and RRM wants to 
drop the power levels.  We also run into issues if we have more than three APs 
in direct line of sight.

I'm curious - how do hotels deal with this problem?  They have similar 
construction and requirements.

Cheers,
Tristan
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Tom O'Donnell 
to...@maine.edumailto:to...@maine.edu wrote:
I was wondering what other schools have for a ratio of students to
AP's in the residence halls, either definitely or approximately?

If you have such a number, how do you count dual-band AP's?  They're
doing more than a 2.4GHz AP, but not quite as much as two AP's.

Then one last related question... Would anyone know their relative mix
of 2.4GHz vs. 5GHz connections in residence halls?

Thanks.

--
Tom O'Donnell
Senior Manager of Network and Server Systems
Information Technology Services
University of Maine at Farmington
(207) 778-7336tel:%28207%29%20778-7336
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 7.2.111.3

2012-10-10 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
I didn't see it happen on any of my 3600s, but under 7.2.110.0 I was seeing 
intermittent crashes on my 3500s (using WiSM2s).  TAC suggested I try upgrading 
to 7.3.101.0 which I did Sunday, also they provided a debug image to load on my 
3500s so that if it happens again they can grab more details.  It's too early 
to tell if 7.3 fixes it though as it's been Fall break the last couple days.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Eric T. Barnett
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 10:53 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@listserv.educause.edu
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 7.2.111.3

I've played around with all of the new codes that are supposed to take care of 
that and all of them are causing my 3500 and 3600 APs to be unstable and crash. 
They usually come right back, but it's really annoying. I've got to put in a 
TAC, but I just haven't had time. Anybody else have this problem? I'm running 
5508s.


Eric Barnett
Senior Network Engineer/Wireless Administrator
Information and Technology Services
Arkansas State University
(870) 680-4243
http://wireless.astate.edu



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Rick Coloccia
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 10:16 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 7.2.111.3

Yes, none!
-Rick
On 10/8/2012 11:07 AM, Legge, Jeffry wrote:
Has anyone used the new WLC version 7.2.111.3 that addresses Windows 8  client 
interoperability? Any problems with it?


--

Rick Coloccia, Jr.

Network Manager

State University of NY College at Geneseo

1 College Circle, 119 South Hall

Geneseo, NY 14454

V: 585-245-5577

F: 585-245-5579



CIT will never ask for your password or other confidential information via 
email.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=03I9qTarnm=80218b494c52t=20121010c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=03I9qTarnm=80218b494c52t=20121010c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=03I9qTarnm=80218b494c52t=20121010c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Disabling 802.11b speeds

2012-09-27 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
That post belonged to me.  You can still disable the 802.11b data rates (1, 2, 
5.5, 11), which I have done at our campuses.  You just need to leave the 
802.11n MCS0 rate (6.5/7) in order to keep the iThingies happy.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/


-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Randy Ethridge
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:14 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Disabling 802.11b speeds

We too were thinking of disabling the B rates. But I read (post below) that 
some people run into Apple devices dropping connection when they did this so I 
am still looking at this.

Post:
If you're using Cisco one thing to check is that the MCS0 data rate is enabled. 
 I had a lot of problems with Macs and iThings dropping after I disabled the 
802.11b rates and MCS0.  Per TAC's suggestion I re-enabled the MCS0 rate and 
have not been experiencing the problems since.  Apparently it has to do with 
the OS dropping the data rate to MCS0 to save power, but not checking if that 
rate is supported before doing it. 



Randy Ethridge
Network Engineer V
Information Services
Eastern Illinois University
rlethri...@eiu.edu 

Office Ph. 217-581-7640 

Proud to say I am EIU 

EIU THINKS GREEN: Before printing this e-mail think if it is necessary 


- Original Message -
From: Todd M. Hall t...@msstate.edu
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:54:59 AM
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Disabling 802.11b speeds

This has been discussed in the past, but it has been a long time.

We're at the point that we have to turn off the lower connection rates on our 
campus.  I'm curious what other schools have done and the positive/negative 
results from the changes.  We have disabled 1, 2, 5.5, and 11 Mbps in some of 
our buildings with great success, but some might argue to just eliminate 1  2 
Mbps rates.  Also, I'd be interested to hear from schools that have not 
disabled these rates and why not.

--
Todd M. Hall
Sr. Network Analyst
Information Technology Services
Mississippi State University
t...@msstate.edu

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
--

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 705211983) is spam:
Spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=705211983m=fae4e6b97e8dt=20120927c=s
Not spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=705211983m=fae4e6b97e8dt=20120927c=n
Forget vote: 
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=705211983m=fae4e6b97e8dt=20120927c=f
--
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Client location / tracking...

2012-09-21 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
I got a Fluke AirCheck this summer and have found its locate feature to work 
quite well with the (optional) directional antenna.  It graphs the signal 
strength and also can play sounds (lower/slower = farther, higher/quicker = 
closer).  My student workers have been able to quickly pick up how to use it 
and effectively track down devices.

http://www.flukenetworks.com/enterprise-network/network-testing/AirCheck-Wi-Fi-Tester

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/



-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeff Kell
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 12:38 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Client location / tracking...

I was wondering what other folks are doing for client location in cases where 
you have a problem with a client, random interference, trying to locate a 
stolen device, etc.

We are an Aruba shop and have Airwave, which will get you in the general 
vicinity; but in crowded or multi-floor buildings it's really just a rough 
guesstimate.

There are numerous tracking / pinging / location utilities for identifying APs, 
but not that much for tracking actual clients.

I would guess you need a promiscuous mode wireless adapter/driver combination 
and some sort of directional antenna at the very least, but rather than second 
guess myself and start playing around with Pringles cans grin I thought I'd 
ask first rather than reinventing the wheel.

Thanks in advance,

Jeff

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
--

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 703876852) is spam:
Spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703876852m=0dca622ad5fet=20120921c=s
Not spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703876852m=0dca622ad5fet=20120921c=n
Forget vote: 
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703876852m=0dca622ad5fet=20120921c=f
--
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

2012-09-19 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
If you're using Cisco one thing to check is that the MCS0 data rate is enabled. 
 I had a lot of problems with Macs and iThings dropping after I disabled the 
802.11b rates and MCS0.  Per TAC's suggestion I re-enabled the MCS0 rate and 
have not been experiencing the problems since.  Apparently it has to do with 
the OS dropping the data rate to MCS0 to save power, but not checking if that 
rate is supported before doing it. 

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/



-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Linchuan Yang
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 3:28 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

Dear All

Could you please provide the links on the forums of Apple website, and other 
official evidence that shows IPv6 is the main reason for this problem? Some 
clients of ours have the same issue, we are using Cisco wireless network.

Thank you.

Yours,
Linchuan Yang (Antony)
Wireless Networking Analyst
Network Assessment and Integration,
IITS-Concordia University
Tel: (514)848-2424 ext. 7664



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Russ Leathe
Sent: September-18-12 4:10 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

Yes, indeed.  We found that IPv6 was on by default.  The theory is, it would 
try to get  an IPv6  DHCP first, timeout, grab an IPv4, then retry IPv6. In 
doing so, disconnect.

From Terminal,

networksetup  -setv6off Wi-Fi

Disconnects are a major problem with OSX 10.5 and above...just read the forums 
on Apples site.




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Londono, Hernan
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2012 3:44 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] High Number of Disconnections - Mac 10.5 and up

I would like to know if anyone is having an issue with a lot of disconnection 
for Mac computers with OS versions 10.5 and up. We are an Aruba deployment (M3 
controllers and AP-105s/125s). For the past 3 weeks we have seen a high amount 
of disconnections where about 90% have been tracked Apple notebooks with the 
latest OS versions. I'd be grateful to hear if anyone one is having, of has had 
the same issue recently, and any possible recommendations to address the issues.


HERNAN LONDONO
Associate CIO
Barry University


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


--
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
--

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 703364122) is spam:
Spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703364122m=81e459a64729t=20120919c=s
Not spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703364122m=81e459a64729t=20120919c=n
Forget vote: 
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=703364122m=81e459a64729t=20120919c=f
--
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Cisco WLC 7.3 Posted

2012-08-30 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Just a heads up Cisco has posted WLC 7.3 code, release notes are at 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn73.html

It has some interesting new features like true HA, support for the 2600 series 
APs, and virtual controllers.  Also the ability to disable IPV6 has been 
restored.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/



**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 7.3 Posted

2012-08-30 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
It's my understanding that WCS is as good as dead, and Cisco Prime 
Infrastructure (NCS + LMS) is the only way forward.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Bruce Boardman
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:08 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 7.3 Posted

TAC mentioned today that NCS 1.2 was comming out any day (they had the release 
notes) and that Cisco Works LMS was being rolled in. Sounds messy. I'm thinking 
WCS may be the way to go for the wireless management if that train is going to 
be maintained. Any thoughts?


|Bruce Boardman, Network Engineer, Syracuse University -  315 889-1667

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] on behalf of Garry Peirce 
[pei...@maine.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 2:14 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 7.3 Posted
I also see that  if using NCS, 1.2  is required (if using NCS) which does not 
appear to be available yet.
As well as VM WLCs , it looks like a new huge controller on the block , the 
8500 (8510?) - only info I could find is below.
https://www-uk.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.3/configuration/guide/b_wlc-cg_chapter_01.html#topic_667F106CD23C411591B609092DAF7BAE

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Robertson, Joshua A.
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 12:24 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC 7.3 Posted

Just a heads up Cisco has posted WLC 7.3 code, release notes are at 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn73.html

It has some interesting new features like true HA, support for the 2600 series 
APs, and virtual controllers.  Also the ability to disable IPV6 has been 
restored.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=698359531m=bd87447ca255t=20120830c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=698359531m=bd87447ca255t=20120830c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=698359531m=bd87447ca255t=20120830c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Bonjour gateway webinar- anyone attend?

2012-07-25 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
I asked many of the same questions as Anders without a reply so I'm also 
wondering if they just weren't prepared/hadn't thought of the problems 
associated with having the devices on wired, if having vlans across a L3 
boundary will require a controller there to terminate them, and if/how roaming 
works with it.  Hopefully when they get to beta testing these issues will be 
handled and information provided.


Here's the link for the presentation recording: 
http://cisco-apps.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/sreg2/register/online_detail.pl?RS=2403275;





Demo videos on YouTube



AVC:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6ZLSc_lYEg



Bonjour Services Directory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDy1cgxeGDw


Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[Description: wifilogoside-small]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Bonjour gateway webinar- anyone attend?

Good stuff- thanks, Joe. I will view it once it's available in archive, but 
that's a great summation.

-Lee



From: Joe Rogers [mailto:j...@usf.edu]mailto:[mailto:j...@usf.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:12 PM
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
Cc: Lee H Badman
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Bonjour gateway webinar- anyone attend?


I listened to it.  It basically sounds like they're running an avahi process on 
the controller and caching any service advertisements on any VLANs (including 
wired VLANs) trunked to the controllers.  Of course you need to have your 
controllers in a convenient location to get all of necessary the VLANs to them. 
 When a client makes a service discovery request, the controller serves up the 
information from its cache.  They are planning some level of filtering to 
restrict which clients can see which services (Apple TV's, etc).  But, it 
wasn't yet clear what could be used for filtering (cilent MAC, username, radius 
attribute, etc).  Per-SSID filtering was shown in the demo, but when I asked 
the moderators, they said they were considering all of the above filtering 
options.

So, this solution does help solve the cross-subnet boujour service discovery 
problems in our environment, but we'll still face authorization issues.  We 
can't simply create a 'student' and 'faculty' SSID and only allow the faculty 
to see Apple TV's.  There are times when a student should be allowed to display 
their iDevice's screen on the classroom's AppleTV.  Ideally that should be a 
privilege granted by the faculty member to a specific student as needed for a 
given class session.  This really isn't something the network can 'bandaid'.  
It really needs to be a feature of the Apple products.  The basic password 
security of Apple TV's simply isn't sufficient.

Unfortunately the webcast didn't address any possibility of location-aware 
service discovery to limit the number of Apple TV's that might show up on an 
iDevice.

On a side note, the Cisco webcast did cover their addition of NBAR support to 
the WLC's which has some cool application 
identification/prioritization/filtering potential.

Joe Rogers
Senior Network Engineer
University of South Florida


On 07/25/2012 10:59 AM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Did anyone sit in on this 
http://tools.cisco.com/gems/cust/customerSite.do?METHOD=WLANGUAGE_ID=EPRIORITY_CODE=SEMINAR_CODE=S16814
 ?

Any impressions?

Thanks-

Lee

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Adjunct Instructor, iSchool
Syracuse University
315 443-3003


** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=687438728m=286ccf7424b0t=20120725c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=687438728m=286ccf7424b0t=20120725c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=687438728m=286ccf7424b0t=20120725c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.jpg

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Bonjour Gateway

2012-07-20 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Yeah, my guess would be they're probably baking a version of avahai into the 
controller code similar to what Aerohive is doing.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[Description: wifilogoside-small]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Mike King
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 11:01 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Bonjour Gateway


That is a current document. The webex is about a new controller release 7.4, 
which is supposed to have a bonjour gateway in it. (It might be avahai under 
the covers on controller)
On Jul 20, 2012 10:26 AM, John York yo...@brcc.edumailto:yo...@brcc.edu 
wrote:
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=685733606m=edece36caabbt=20120720c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=685733606m=edece36caabbt=20120720c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=685733606m=edece36caabbt=20120720c=f

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.jpg

RE: Web-Auth on WLC 7.2.103.0

2012-07-19 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Do you have 60+ interfaces defined by any chance?  If so you're hitting bug  
CSCua39580 discovered by me.  I just got an ES build yesterday that's supposed 
to fix it.  If you want more information just drop me a mail.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[Description: wifilogoside-small]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Eric T. Barnett
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 10:27 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Web-Auth on WLC 7.2.103.0

As far as I can tell web-authentication in general is broken in both 7.2.103.0 
and 7.2.110.0.  I've had to drop back to 7.1.91.0.  Anyone else run into that?

Eric Barnett
Senior Network Engineer/Wireless Administrator
Information and Technology Services
Arkansas State University
(870) 680-4243
http://wireless.astate.edu



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Legge, Jeffry
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:32 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Web-Auth on WLC 7.2.103.0

Has anyone done web-auth passthrough on wlc 7.2.103.0 with wism2's. The 
webserver field does not exist. If it is better is someone willing to work 
offline?
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=685373520m=9caf24f621e0t=20120719c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=685373520m=9caf24f621e0t=20120719c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=685373520m=9caf24f621e0t=20120719c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image003.jpg

RE: ncs/wlc/mse new code available

2012-06-12 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Just a heads up for anyone else thinking of moving to this code... I just 
nailed down a bug in my lab where if you have more than 59 dynamic interfaces 
then L3 web authentication will fail to work (both internal and external).  The 
workaround is to delete the 60th and any further interfaces then reboot and 
webauth works again.  I'm working with Cisco now for a bug ID and escalation of 
the issue.  I have reproduced it on both a WiSM2 and 2504 running 7.2.110.0.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[cid:image002.jpg@01CD48B2.67DE68A0]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hurt,Trenton W.
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 5:47 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] ncs/wlc/mse new code available

This is 7.2MR1...

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/ncs/1.1/release/notes/NCS_RN1.1.1.html 
 - NCS

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn7_2_110_0.html
  --WLC

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/mse/3350/release/notes/mse7_2_110_0.html
  --MSE


Trenton Hurt, CWNA, CCNP(W), CCNA(W), CCNA(V), CCNA(R/S)
Wireless Network Administrator
University of Louisville
Phone (502) 852-1513
FAX (502) 852-1424
[cid:image003.png@01CD48B2.67DE68A0]



Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=673024577m=c7e4f6de7f12t=20120606c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=673024577m=c7e4f6de7f12t=20120606c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=673024577m=c7e4f6de7f12t=20120606c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image002.jpginline: image003.png

RE: WISM2

2012-05-01 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
The only caveat I ran into when first installing them last summer was the 
requirement for 12.2.33-SXJ on the chassis, but the need for an upgraded IOS 
image on the switch is understandable as it was a new module at the time.  
Since then I've been running three of them across two chassis with my 
residential APs on them and they've performed great.  And we're replacing the 
remaining WiSMs with WiSM2s this summer.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[cid:image001.jpg@01CD2775.2F6E3120]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Legge, Jeffry
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 8:12 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WISM2

Has anyone installed Cisco WISM2 blades? Any problems or caveats?
-Jeff Legge
Radford University


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=652287531m=80bd9373f0aat=20120430c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=652287531m=80bd9373f0aat=20120430c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=652287531m=80bd9373f0aat=20120430c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.jpg

RE: WCS to NCS migration trouble

2012-02-24 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Mine was the same way, started it one morning and came back the next morning to 
finally find it complete.  My WCS export zip file was 14GB.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[cid:image001.jpg@01CCF30A.84F12340]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hurt,Trenton William
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 5:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WCS to NCS migration trouble

Mine ran for 10hrs, and then it was just done.   They seem to have left out any 
type of progress meter for this as well as when you apply an update to NCS.  I 
did work with TAC on an issue during an upgrade and they did a rootkit and 
where able to run a ps aux from cli to watch the process.  He joked that this 
was the progress meter.  I have put in for a feature request to get some kind 
of status bar added for this issue.

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Andy Page
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 4:44 PM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] WCS to NCS migration trouble

Hello,

I'm wondering if anyone else had trouble with WCS to NCS migration...

We just bought Cisco NCS, managed to get it installed (virtual appliance, fwiw) 
and seems to work well in the short amount of time I've played with it. We 
wanted to import everything from WCS, so I followed the instructions on 
upgrading it to a version that allowed for exporting (7.0.230.0), which 
produced wcs.zip. On the NCS server (1.1.0.58), we were unable to get it to 
connect via ftp to our ftp server to grab the zip, but sftp seemed to work (the 
'show rep repname' command worked, where it wouldn't with ftp).

Anyhow, I ran the 'ncs migrate wcs-data wcs.zip rep ncs-ftp-repo' command and 
only received the below output...

Initiating WCS 7x DB restore .  Please wait...
INFO: no staging url defined, using local space.rval:2

Is this normal? Should I see a status somewhere? I've let the thing go for 
hours with nothing else showing up on the screen. Ctrl-C sends me back to exec 
mode where I can start ncs again, but after logging into NCS, I see no new data 
(controllers, mse, etc).

If you went the WCS to NCS migration route, how was your experience?

Thanks,
Andy Page
Network Design Professional
University of Notre Dame
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=618945449m=454229481e9dt=20120223c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=618945449m=454229481e9dt=20120223c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=618945449m=454229481e9dt=20120223c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.jpg

RE: End of Sale/End of Life Announcement on WiSMs

2012-02-02 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
We hit the same issue here, we have 7 WiSM 1s and 3 WiSM 2s.  I had just 
finally gotten away from a mixed code environment this past summer after 
putting the last 1010s out to pasture and now there's this.

On our end we're working to fund replacing the WiSM 1s with WiSM 2s this 
summer, fingers crossed that will work out.  I am very disappointed that Cisco 
would kill upgrades to the WiSM 1 code so shortly after introducing the WiSM 2.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[cid:image001.jpg@01CCE1B4.A8E562F0]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:32 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] End of Sale/End of Life Announcement on WiSMs

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps2706/ps6526/end_of_life_notice_c51-691055.html

Somehow this escaped me, and now I'm dealing with not getting wind of it 
earlier.

It's no surprise that WiSMs are getting long in the tooth, but the part of the 
announcement that (I think) sucks is that we have a quantity of 3600 APs ready 
to get installed. These APs need 7.1 Code. WiSMs will not run 7.1 code.

We have (6) 5508s, and 24 controllers on 12 WiSMs. So we have the unfortunate 
choices of either running a mixed code environment (yeah, that sounds fun) 
where 3600s may hit controllers that can't let them associate, shelving our 
3600s until we get our 5508s in place and WiSMs retired at the pace we had 
planned on, or quickly rushing to get rid the WiSMs so we're not faced with 
either of the first two situations.

Sharing in case anyone else can benefit...



Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Adjunct Instructor, iSchool
Syracuse University
315 443-3003




Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=611088130m=6f0ed873d08et=20120202c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=611088130m=6f0ed873d08et=20120202c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=611088130m=6f0ed873d08et=20120202c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.jpg

RE: [Spam:6.1 SpamScore] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Very high number of wireless devices returning from break

2012-01-26 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Same here, I've had to expand subnets for 15 buildings since the semester 
started (we give each building a subnet), and looking at the logs I've got 
another 5 or so that will need it in the near future.  More buildings that used 
to be good on a /24 are requiring a /23, and buildings that had /23s are 
starting to need /22s.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[cid:image002.jpg@01CCDC1E.2E11A660]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcelo Lew
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:16 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [Spam:6.1 SpamScore] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Very high number of wireless 
devices returning from break

Yes, same here.  We just added a few more subnets to our pool, have been 
running out of addresses since classes started January 3rd.

Marcelo Lew
Wireless Enterprise Administrator
University Technology Services
University of Denver
Desk: (303) 871-6523
Cell: (303) 669-4217
Fax:  (303) 871-5900
Email: m...@du.edumailto:m...@du.edu

[cid:image003.jpg@01CCDC1E.2E11A660]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Wright, Don
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 9:10 AM
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Very high number of wireless devices returning from 
break

All,
 It seems an alarmingly high number of wireless devices have returned to 
our campus this week.  After at least of year of steadily increasing numbers, 
we are now seeing a roughly 40% increase since last December.  At first I 
didn't believe what I was seeing and opened a case with the vendor to confirm 
reporting was accurate.  Tied into this, we upgraded by a major version earlier 
this month and I thought this could be related.  Apparently not the case, 
everything we've looked at tells us that the numbers are accurate.  I'm still 
looking a stats, but haven't been able to come up with anything yet.
Is anyone else seeing this magnitude of increase in devices over winter 
break ?

Don Wright
Brown University
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=604646304m=c0c9f91a164dt=20120126c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=604646304m=c0c9f91a164dt=20120126c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=604646304m=c0c9f91a164dt=20120126c=f

. ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image002.jpginline: image003.jpg

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Very high number of wireless devices returning from break

2012-01-26 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Our peak usage tends to be between 1pm and 7pm Monday-Thursday.  We have about 
8k concurrent users during those times.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/


-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Laird, Sara M
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 1:34 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Very high number of wireless devices returning from 
break

While I have not looked at any hard numbers yet, we have had complaints about 
poor wireless in areas that have never been a problem in the past.  We have 
checked all the hardware and everything is running, I think we may be over 
saturating.  What do you find to be your peak hours for wireless?  I checked 
from 10 to 1 today we had approx. 1500 wireless connections.  Last night from 8 
to 10pm we had 6500.  Is this what everyone else is finding?

Sara M. Laird
Network Administrator
Mount Saint Mary's University
301.447.5014
Faith   Discovery   Leadership   Community

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


-- 
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
--

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 604696403) is spam:
Spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=604696403m=7c027951a203t=20120126c=s
Not spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=604696403m=7c027951a203t=20120126c=n
Forget vote: 
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=604696403m=7c027951a203t=20120126c=f
--
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless only dorms, advice?

2012-01-18 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
We purchased a few older apartment buildings which we converted to dorms and 
are doing wireless only in them.  For the wireless we’re using Cisco 1142i and 
put one per apartment (some apartments are 2 beds, some are 4).

As mentioned you definitely want to do PoE on the switches to provide better 
power visibility and have a good UPS.  Since you’re going Cisco as well I’d 
suggest N+N controller redundancy as this will be their only network 
connectivity.  If I were doing it now I’d go with a 3500 series for CleanAir, 
but that wasn’t available at the time.

The only issue we’ve really ran into are gaming systems which wanted to use 
lower rates or couldn’t handle our captive portal authentication.

Also starting in the Fall in our other residence halls we shut down all wired 
jacks prior to move in and only activated them upon request (no charge).  All 
the dorms have 802.11n (mostly Cisco 3502i) installed in the hallway (densely) 
with the exception of a handful with APs in the rooms.  I created a couple 
web-forms for the students to use.  One activates the port + creates an 802.1x 
exception for a gaming device (known gaming OUIs), the other just activates the 
port for computer usage.  While we have had a lot of gaming device activations, 
we have seen very few activations for computer usage.  So as such it seems that 
our users have pretty much gone wi-fi only for their computers and are just 
using the wired ports for gaming at this point.

But personally if I were in charge of new construction I would still want one 
cabled drop in addition to the AP in the room and would do activations upon 
request as Philippe mentioned.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/
[cid:image001.jpg@01CCD5F4.13A504A0]

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Voll, Toivo
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:48 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless only dorms, advice?

I pretty much second Rick’s comments. We also don’t have wireless-only dorms 
yet, but the next one will have much less wire than our existing ones.

One AP per suite is what we’ve done, but you have to also consider non-RF 
placement issues – vandalism concerns, maintenance access and residents 
complaining about blinky lights above their beds.

Does the architect have issue with visible APs? If the APs are above ceiling / 
behind walls, do indeed check the materials and placement of ventilation ducts. 
Also, plan on PoE switches (and UPSes?) so power-cycling capability and 
visibility into the gear are improved.

Keep in mind that the tiling of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz doesn’t have to be the same, 
nor power levels, since the number of non-overlapping channels differs. I’d try 
to find as many carrots as possible to steer people to 5 GHz. 2.4 GHz is a 
pain, with game console controllers, microwaves and number of other consumer 
devices adding to the lack of channels. Depending on your vendor, having a good 
ability to sniff the air / do spectrum analysis can be helpful in figuring out 
whether a wing just lost connectivity due to a microwave, misbehaving AP or 
rogue AP. Other design decisions – do you plan to support broadcast/multicast 
discovery (wireless printers, time capsules etc.) or legacy devices that 
require low data rates (i.e. Nintendo).

Toivo Voll
Network Administrator
Information Technology Communications
University of South Florida



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]mailto:[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU]
 On Behalf Of Rick Brown
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 13:52
To: 
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDUmailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless only dorms, advice?

Sara,

We have not moved that way but are looking at implementing wireless in the 
dorms.   We have decided to factor in several things in determining the density 
of wireless.  You'll need to consider the fact that students are coming in with 
3-4 wireless devices per person these days with at least a couple being used 
simultaneously.  You'll also want to factor in the residence hall layouts.  
We've determined that we'll probably need to place at least one per suite.  
This is due both to multiple devices per user but also due to construction 
material and layout of the suites.  If you want to take full advantage of 
802.11N technology you'll also want to design based on 5GHz coverage with also 
reduces your coverage area.  Even in our older residence halls where there are 
two people per room and 4 to 5 bedrooms per suite one AP is going to be pushing 
it and we may find that we need two to a 8-10 person suite. Our residence halls 
tend to be constructed with concrete block with 

RE: New cisco 3600 4x4 ap

2011-11-09 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Ouch, and a new price point to go with it... $1495 list

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hurt,Trenton William
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:46 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] New cisco 3600 4x4 ap

Here is some info that I have gathered..
Cisco 3600 AP details

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11983/index.html

http://cisco-apps.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/sreg2/register/regdetail_private.pl?LANGUAGE=EMETHOD=DTOPIC_CODE=S15342PRIORITY_CODE=

http://scharloo.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/deep_dive_feature_comparison_cisco_ap.jpg


Trent

Trenton Hurt, CCNP(W), CCNA(W), CCNA(V), CCNA(R/S)
Wireless Network Administrator
University of Louisville
Phone (502) 852-1513
FAX (502) 852-1424
[cid:image001.png@01CC9ED1.76CC3670]



Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=575096439m=7e583ed2c1c3t=2009c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=575096439m=7e583ed2c1c3t=2009c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=575096439m=7e583ed2c1c3t=2009c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

inline: image001.png

RE: Cisco Wireless- WCS versus NCS

2011-11-02 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Just finished migrating.  Overall I'd say it's a big improvement in 
performance, presentation,  reporting.  So far my only disappointment has been 
running into this fun bug:

Bug ID: CSCtt94353 Heatmaps are not drawn after migration from WCS to NCS

So to get heatmaps to show again each map had to have the Recompute RF 
Prediction command executed.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 1:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Wireless- WCS versus NCS

Have any WCS shops yet migrated to NCS? Any thoughts?

Thanks-

Lee

Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Adjunct Instructor, iSchool
Syracuse University
315 443-3003




Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=560800824m=9ccfe4e8d846t=20111005c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=560800824m=9ccfe4e8d846t=20111005c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=560800824m=9ccfe4e8d846t=20111005c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] GD code version for Cisco 4402 WLC

2011-08-05 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
I've found 7.0.116.0 to be very stable, I've been happily running it since late 
April on 7 WiSMs and 1 4400 series with no issues, and since late May on two 
WiSM 2s.  It also incorporates some new features not found in 7.0.98.218.  As 
for APs we've got a mix of 1131AG, 1142N, and 3502i for academic, 3502i for 
residential, and 1242AG for outdoor.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jamie Savage
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 11:28 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] GD code version for Cisco 4402 WLC

Hi all,
 We have a Cisco 4402 WLC that we've been running for a while with no major 
issues.   The code we're running is 6.0.182.0 and figured perhaps it's time to 
upgrade prior to the school year.  As nothing on the Cisco web-site is labelled 
GD, I was looking for recommendations for a stable version to move to.

.thanks in advanceJ

James Savage   York University
Senior Communications Tech.   108 Steacie Building
jsav...@yorku.camailto:jsav...@yorku.ca4700 Keele 
Street
ph: 416-736-2100 ext. 22605Toronto, Ontario
fax: 416-736-5830M3J 1P3, CANADA ** 
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=537502494m=e14253cbt=20110805c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=537502494m=e14253cbt=20110805c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=537502494m=e14253cbt=20110805c=f

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: Interference in dorms.

2011-07-21 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
Currently we're addressing this issue by installing the 3500 series Cisco Clean 
Air Access Points in all of our dorms and increasing the number of APs in the 
dorms while we do it.  These access points do interference detection and will 
map it in Cisco WCS.  I have a feeling it's probably going to look pretty scary 
once the students move back in, but with the ability to see what's causing the 
interference we can start better addressing it and educating our users.  Also 
by deploying more APs we're hoping that more devices will use 5ghz instead of 
2.4.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lay, Daniel
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:16 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Interference in dorms.

Last year we had several students that would complain about poor wireless 
coverage in their rooms. It was usually followed by the comment that they did 
not have this problem at home or in other areas of the campus. After performing 
various test and wireless scans I am of the opinion that a good portion of 
these problems were introduced by the students themselves by bringing in 
various devices that emit 2.4 interference. I am curious about how any of you 
guys have addressed this problem and informed the students of these potential 
interferences. Have any of you added a section to orientation that discusses 
the problem of interference and did it have good results. Did any of you do a 
poster campaign with good results or did you issue a Faraday cage to each 
student to store their stuff in (yes that was a joke). I can only see this 
problem getting worse with wireless printers and game consoles that all have a 
potential to cause interference. I am open to any ideas and or suggestions. 
Thanks.

Daniel Lay
Networking Specialist
Samford University



Spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=531692329m=806a26c22aeet=20110721c=s
Not 
spamhttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=531692329m=806a26c22aeet=20110721c=n
Forget previous 
votehttps://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=531692329m=806a26c22aeet=20110721c=f
** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Strange Cisco AP problem

2011-04-19 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
After talking to my SE and one of the Engineers in the Wireless BU they have 
confirmed that 7.0.116.0 is indeed MR1, and they are calling 7.0.98.218 MR 
0.5 since it has all the bug fixes but no new features.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edumailto:j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jan-Bart Hilhorst
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 6:27 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Strange Cisco AP problem

All,

7.0.116.0 is also available, though you could also wait for the 7.0MR1, which 
according to Cisco will be released in May 2011.

Regards,

Jan-Bart Hilhorst

Van: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] Namens paulle
Verzonden: zaterdag 16 april 2011 22:49
Aan: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Strange Cisco AP problem

Folks, there is new code maintenance release posted to CCO that has bug fixes. 
Since the problems are hard to pin down you may want consider upgrading to this 
code to see if it makes a difference.

The release to consider is 7.0.98.218.

Cheers


On 4/15/11 10:17 PM, Watters, John john.watt...@ua.edu wrote:
I have the exact same issue in several locations on campus -- a couple in 
dorms, and a couple in academic buildings. I have not actually been able to see 
the problem (you were lucky there), but the description (from numerous sources) 
is identical. And, not just MACs, but many/most devices including PCs (Win 7  
XP) and various phones. No help from Cisco so far. But, since I don't have a 
machine that always fails (it seems that you might have access to at least one 
of these), nor can I recreate the problem, I can understand why Cisco is not 
doing very much to help me. I have certified all my WiSM  AP configs with the 
Cisco WLC Config Analyzer tool. Made a couple of minor adjustments that didn't 
seem to make any difference with this problem (or any that I am seeing). Turned 
off all b access too (I had previously limited it to 11 Mbps only). No clues at 
all. But, the reports still stream in at a rate of 3-4/week with none of them 
resolved. Started having the problem with the 6.0.199.4 code and it persists 
with the 7.0.98.0 code that I am now running (at Cisco's request; it has been 
rock solid as far as I can tell).

I thought I had it narrowed down a while back, but maybe not. We have seen 
times when a machines fails to get an ARP entry even after getting a good DHCP 
address. Obviously, no traffic ever went to or from the device with this entry 
missing. It was easy to duplicate too. When a machine got into this state, it 
would stay in it as long as it was associated with an AP on one controller. 
When it went to another controller (not via a roam, but with a new association) 
it would be fine. When it came back under the control of the original 
controller, it would have the problem again, even several days later. It could 
only be cured by rebooting the WiSM controller. This seems to have gone away 
with the 7.0.98.0 code though.

I think my current problem, and yours is not related to the missing ARP problem.

Please let me know if you get even a clue as to what is happening. I will do 
the same. I am under a lot of pressure to solve this.

-jcw

===
John Watters
Network Engineer
The University of Alabama
Office of Information Technology
205-348-3992




From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lay, Daniel 
[dl...@samford.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 5:20 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Strange Cisco AP problem

I have run into a very odd issue. We have received complaints from students 
that they are having wireless issues in specific dorm areas. After receiving 
such a report I went to investigate, I walked the entire dorm connecting to 
each AP with several devices(an iphone, an Ipad, a XOOM tablet, and a laptop) 
and everything worked exactly as it was supposed to. The next morning as I was 
sharing my findings with the helpdesk guys 2 students walked in, and as luck 
would have it they were from the same dorm that I had just verified the evening 
before. So we went back to the dorm to look at it from their device
So now we are back at the dorm looking at a student's Mac Book 
Pro. When the student is anywhere else on campus it works just fine on wireless 
with any SSID. In his room however we cannot Tx/Rx to the network or to  
internet. One strange thing to note here is that while his machine could not 
Transmit or receive data it did get an IP address from DHCP. I was also able to 
connect to the same AP with my IPAD 

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC code

2011-03-23 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
I would recommend waiting for the 7.x MR1 code.  We currently have 7 WiSMs and 
use webauth with an external webserver and encountered massive problems with 
the 7.0.98.0.  When there were a lot of webauth logins on a WiSM it would 
become unresponsive over its management interface and thus would not properly 
process new logins and you couldn't remotely connect to it either.  This is a 
bug that was fixed in 7.0.98.209 (ES release).  That ES release was rock solid 
for months and now I've been running 7.0.114.92 (beta for MR1) for weeks 
without issue.  So I would definitely recommend 7.x MR1, but I would not go for 
7.0.98.0 since MR1 is right around the corner and fixes so many bugs.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of P. Manoj Abeysekera
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 5:13 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC code

John,

Here at the Fairfax County Public Schools, we do web auth on 6.0.199.4 code. 
With more than 200 plus controllers I haven't seen any issue. However I did 
asked about going to 7.x code and was told to wait till next maintenance 
release that should arrive in couple of weeks (2nd week of April ). 
Interestingly I was told the exact opposite, ask TAC not the AM or SE.

Wow,
Manoj
FCPS

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 22, 2011, at 4:53 PM, John York yo...@brcc.edu wrote:

 We're upgrading from a 4402 to 5508 WLC system.  The 4402 has had nagging 
 problems with webauth off and on for as long as I remember.  We're presently 
 having trouble on 5.2.193.0, which I thought was good.  One flavor is that 
 the login page doesn't redirect properly--the WLC fqdn shows in the browser's 
 url window but the browser doesn't go there.  Typing the url as 
 https://x.x.x.x/login.html works for them, even though the client's DNS 
 resolves the address properly.  The other flavor is the login page appears, 
 but doesn't work--the traffic doesn't make it to the Access Control Server or 
 appear in the ACS logs.  This will happen to one person while several others 
 have no problem.  A day or two later, the problem person's login works great 
 and someone else has trouble.  I've seen several bug reports on these.
 
 Anyway, the new WLC came with 6.0.199.4.  I asked TAC what load they 
 recommended and the answer was that I should really ask my account manager or 
 vendor, but they would use 7.0.98.0.  Would 7.0.98.0 be a good load to go to, 
 and does webauth work better with that load?
 
 Thanks
 John
 
 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


-- 
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
--

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 458421530) is spam:
Spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=458421530m=16ac468fb280t=20110322c=s
Not spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=458421530m=16ac468fb280t=20110322c=n
Forget vote: 
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=458421530m=16ac468fb280t=20110322c=f
--
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any experiences with Cisco 3500-series CleanAir access points?

2011-02-18 Thread Robertson, Joshua A.
I've deployed 20 of the Cisco 3500i access points so far for testing and my 
early experience was mixed with them, but it's starting to look up.

The first issue is that you have to run version 7 code, since I'm running WiSMs 
this mean moving two (for redundancy) 150 AP controllers over to the code.  I 
initially upgraded some 1142s to the new code level as well to get full use out 
of the controller.  However, within about a month I ran into an issue where the 
management port became unresponsive.  I had this occur another two times 
(almost always 4 weeks into it) before TAC nailed it down to a bug which occurs 
when using webauth for authentication.  Now I'm running an ES release with a 
fix until MR1 comes out next month, and for the time being I only have the 
3500i APs on the controller, I moved the others back to a version 6 controller. 
 With that said I've been running the ES code for 10 weeks with no problems now.

I find that the CleanAccess spectrum analysis is very useful in dorms where 
there's lots of RF interference from devices the students bring in and it has 
helped save time with troubleshooting issues, however I haven't found it as 
useful in academic buildings where the environment is more controlled.  Another 
thing with CleanAccess is that to fully utilize it you really need to have a 
MSE appliance, the reporting in WCS is anemic without one to store historical 
and detailed data.  However, with the combination of WCS and MSE I really like 
the solution.

As long as my test with the MR1 of WLC 7 code goes well our plan is to upgrade 
all our dorms from 1131s to 3500is this summer.

Josh Robertson
Network Systems Senior Engineer
Old Dominion University
Office of Computing  Communications Services
(757)683-5046
j2rob...@odu.edu
http://occs.odu.edu/

-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Barron Hulver
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 2:18 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Any experiences with Cisco 3500-series CleanAir access 
points?

Does anyone have any experiences with the Cisco 3500-series CleanAir 
access points?  We have a small project (about 40 access points) coming 
up and I'm thinking about deploying these as a pilot instead of the 
1142s that we would normally deploy.  I've discussed this will one of my 
people who handles our wireless deployments (Art Ripley) and he thinks 
we should.

For background, we have most of the campus covered in wireless and a 
couple of years ago we started deploying for performance instead of 
coverage (more access points per square foot).  We have nine Cisco WLCs 
(a mix of 4404-100s and 5508s) and a mix of 1131 and 1142 access points. 
  We do not use WCS.  Instead, we (Nathan Broome and I) have  developed 
our own wireless management software.  This has worked well for us but 
I'm wondering if I should move to an off-the-shelf package when 
deploying the 3500s.  Any thoughts on this?

I've arranged a meeting with our local Cisco sales office next week and 
this will be one of the topics I want to discuss.

Thanks,

Barron

Barron Hulver
Director of Networking, Operations, and Systems
Center for Information Technology
Oberlin College
148 West College Street
Oberlin, OH  44074
440-775-8798
http://www2.oberlin.edu/staff/bhulver/

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


-- 
BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
--

Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 447776807) is spam:
Spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=447776807m=20d0a7995158t=20110218c=s
Not spam:
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=447776807m=20d0a7995158t=20110218c=n
Forget vote: 
https://www.spamtrap.odu.edu/b.php?i=447776807m=20d0a7995158t=20110218c=f
--
END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.