Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'

2005-05-12 Thread John Watters
We are doing that without any problem. We use Cisco 340, 350, and 1200 series 
APs (exclusively),
though we are quickly getting rid of the 340/350 stuff.

-jcw



 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 From: James Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:18:55 -0400
 Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'

 Hi all,
We're in position where we may be mixing 'b' and 'g' APs in areas where 
 it's
 likely users will roam between them.  I didn't expect to have any problems
 roaming between them and my testing has proven this.  Just wondering if anyone
 knows of any 'gotchas' that I've not discovered?

 ..thxJamie








John Watters  UA: Office of Information Technology  205-348-3992

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'

2005-05-12 Thread Mike Yohe
I am not a wireless network expert, but it is my understanding that
a b connection to a WAP slows all traffic on that WAP to b speed.

- Mike
--
J. Michael Yohe
Executive Director, Electronic Information Services
Valparaiso University
410 Christopher Center, 1410 Chapel Drive, Valparaiso, IN 46383-4523
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Phone: 219-464-6763; FAX: 219-548-7720



On Thu, 12 May 2005, James Savage wrote:

 Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:18:55 -0400
 From: James Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
 WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'

 Hi all,
We're in position where we may be mixing 'b' and 'g' APs in areas where 
 it's
 likely users will roam between them.  I didn't expect to have any problems
 roaming between them and my testing has proven this.  Just wondering if anyone
 knows of any 'gotchas' that I've not discovered?

 ..thxJamie

 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
 Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'

2005-05-12 Thread King, Michael
 Close.

.11b is of course 11meg

.11g goes to compatibility mode, and drops down to something in the
order of 19meg.

 -Original Message-
 From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Yohe
 Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:42 PM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'
 
 I am not a wireless network expert, but it is my 
 understanding that a b connection to a WAP slows all traffic 
 on that WAP to b speed.
 
 - Mike

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.


RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'

2005-05-12 Thread Brassil, John
We actually fix all our b at 11 - and our a/g cells at 48 and 54.
Works like a charm...

John J. Brassil | Network Engineer, Vanderbilt Data/Video Engineering
voice 615.322.2496 

 -Original Message-
 From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Molta
 Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 3:22 PM
 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
 Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'
 
 
 The performance degradation associated with mixing b and g on 
 the network varies depending on the mix of b and g traffic. I 
 believe our recent tests of b and g clients doing 
 simultaneous file transfers through the same AP showed an 
 aggregate TCP throughput of around 12 Mbps. That's about 
 twice what you'd see on a b-only network and about half what 
 you would see on a pure-G network with no protection. Things 
 can get worse if you have lots of 11b clients associated at 1 
 Mbps because they use more bandwidth to get their work done. 
 Some organizations don't allow 11b associations at anything 
 lower than 5.5 Mbps.
 
 dm
 
  -Original Message-
  From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv [mailto:WIRELESS- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Yohe
  Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:42 PM
  To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
  Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'
 
  I am not a wireless network expert, but it is my 
 understanding that a 
  b connection to a WAP slows all traffic on that WAP to b speed.
 
  - Mike
  --
  J. Michael Yohe
  Executive Director, Electronic Information Services Valparaiso 
  University 410 Christopher Center, 1410 Chapel Drive, 
 Valparaiso, IN 
  46383-4523
  E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Phone: 219-464-6763; FAX: 219-548-7720
 
 
 
  On Thu, 12 May 2005, James Savage wrote:
 
   Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:18:55 -0400
   From: James Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
   WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
   To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
   Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] mixing 'b' and 'g'
  
   Hi all,
  We're in position where we may be mixing 'b' and 'g' 
 APs in areas
  where it's
   likely users will roam between them.  I didn't expect to have any
  problems
   roaming between them and my testing has proven this.  
 Just wondering 
   if
  anyone
   knows of any 'gotchas' that I've not discovered?
  
   ..thxJamie
  
   **
   Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
   Constituent
  Group discussion list can be found at 
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
  
 
  **
  
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
  Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
  http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
 
 **
 Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
 Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
 http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
 

**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.