[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10750] Use of GdkPixdata / gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline deprecated in gdk-pixbuf 2.31.2
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10750 Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #16 from Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu --- Fixed in: https://code.wireshark.org/review/8578 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11205] IEEE 802.11 dissector: Add a option for disable FCS check
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11205 --- Comment #10 from Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu --- (In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #9) FCS with zero is valid or invalid ? An all-zero FCS would neither be a valid FCS nor an invalid FCS; it would not be an FCS at all, it would be padding added to frames transmitted by the Aruba hardware and also sent out as ERM packets. If the FCS field were zero, we wouldn't check it, we'd just report it as padding. (If they use a radiotap header: http://www.radiotap.org the frame includes FCS bit of the Flags field: http://www.radiotap.org/defined-fields/Flags can be used to indicate whether there's an FCS or not.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 --- Comment #5 from Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com --- Ok, you will work for fix this bug ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10750] Use of GdkPixdata / gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline deprecated in gdk-pixbuf 2.31.2
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10750 --- Comment #18 from Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu --- Thanks, I'll revisit this this weekend. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 --- Comment #4 from Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu --- (In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #3) Duplicate/related with Bug 9266 ? Similar, but different. The frame in this bug has 12 bytes of data followed by an Ethernet header, with the Ethertype being 0x0800 (IPv4) and the payload is an IPv4 packet, while the frame in the other bug has 8 bytes of data followed by an Etherent header, with the Ethertype being 0x8864 and the payload being a PPPoE Session packet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10750] Use of GdkPixdata / gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline deprecated in gdk-pixbuf 2.31.2
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10750 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CONFIRMED CC||pascal.quan...@gmail.com Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #17 from Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com --- Using Ubuntu 15.04, it still does not build for me with v1.99.6rc0-647-g8f462b0: gui_utils.c: In function ‘window_icon_realize_cb’: gui_utils.c:115:5: error: ‘gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline’ is deprecated (declared at /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf-core.h:314) [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] icon = gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline(-1, wsicon_16_pb_data, FALSE, NULL); ^ gdk-pixbuf-core.h file contains: #ifndef GDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED G_DEPRECATED GdkPixbuf* gdk_pixbuf_new_from_inline(gint data_length, const guint8 *data, gboolean copy_pixels, GError **error); #endif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED CC||alexis.lagou...@gmail.com Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com --- Duplicate/related with Bug 9266 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11205] IEEE 802.11 dissector: Add a option for disable FCS check
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11205 --- Comment #9 from Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com --- FCS with zero is valid or invalid ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10904] Crash When Overwriting Existing File
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10904 Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10904] Crash When Overwriting Existing File
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10904 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8592 merged by Gerald Combs: Qt: Don't crash after Save As. https://code.wireshark.org/review/8592 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10904] Crash When Overwriting Existing File
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10904 --- Comment #4 from Adrian adrian.h...@gmail.com --- Just tested the build and it worked perfectly. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10904] Crash When Overwriting Existing File
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10904 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8592 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs: Qt: Don't crash after Save As. https://code.wireshark.org/review/8592 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10904] Crash When Overwriting Existing File
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10904 --- Comment #3 from Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org --- Can you try ge9d8769 or later when it appears at https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/win64/ ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11219] configure should allow the user to specify the Lua version
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11219 --- Comment #3 from Anish Bhatt an...@chelsio.com --- BTW does your system provide one or more lua*.pc (pkgconfig) files? I'm guessing not but I figured I'd check. It should would be nice if Lua made those standard. Or if distributions routinely added them... (You can see the pain, suffering, and some possibly some of the resulting ranting about this over on bug 10572--which is where I reworked all the Lua detection stuff.) Yes, it provides lua.pc lua52.pc. You can see the complete file listings here for lua5.2 : http://ix.io/iIB and lua 5.3 : http://ix.io/iIC -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11044] The packet dialog triggers a crash when the capture file is reloaded
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11044 --- Comment #3 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8593 had a related patch set uploaded by Gerald Combs: Qt: Add a [closed] hint to the packet dialog. https://code.wireshark.org/review/8593 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8573] PTP/IP value-strings contain duplicates
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8573 --- Comment #33 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8597 had a related patch set uploaded by Michael Mann: Create a PTP/IP preference for vendors to break up the duplicate values in the ptp_opcode_names and ptp_respcode_names value_strings. https://code.wireshark.org/review/8597 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10640] wireshark 1.12.1 crashes on startup on Mac OS X 10.10 (Yosemite)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10640 --- Comment #21 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8595 had a related patch set uploaded by Guy Harris: Have Wireshark.app try to fix broken XQuartz installations. https://code.wireshark.org/review/8595 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10640] wireshark 1.12.1 crashes on startup on Mac OS X 10.10 (Yosemite)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10640 --- Comment #22 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8595 merged by Guy Harris: Have Wireshark.app try to fix broken XQuartz installations. https://code.wireshark.org/review/8595 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 10640] wireshark 1.12.1 crashes on startup on Mac OS X 10.10 (Yosemite)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10640 Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 --- Comment #10 from Evgeniy zhe...@tomtel.ru --- My dump is for radius based li. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 --- Comment #9 from Evgeniy zhe...@tomtel.ru --- Different platform.. asr1k is not related to Docsis.. Cmts.. btw in some docs i found that pcli can include l2 information.. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_usr_cfg/configuration/xe-3s/sec-usr-cfg-xe-3s-book/sec-lawful-intercept.html btw i found http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/sec_usr_cfg/configuration/xe-3s/asr1000/sec-usr-cfg-xe-3s-asr-1000-book/sec-lawful-intercept-IPoE.html Intercepted traffic from different users is sent to the same mediation device (MD). You must use a unique stream ID (made up of the first four digits of the eight-digit intercept ID) for each MD. The format of intercepted packets captured using RADIUS-based LI include the L2 header; this is different from the format of SNMP-based LI. so.. it's okey to include l2 header to origin packet.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11218] Diameter 3GPP Sh Interface Feature-List(630) Feature-List Flags
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11218 --- Comment #1 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8583 had a related patch set uploaded by Anders Broman: [Diameter] Added feature list dissection for 3GPP Sh interface https://code.wireshark.org/review/8583 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11218] Diameter 3GPP Sh Interface Feature-List(630) Feature-List Flags
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11218 Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11221] New: Cannot re-set manually resolved address
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11221 Bug ID: 11221 Summary: Cannot re-set manually resolved address Product: Wireshark Version: 1.12.1 Hardware: x86 OS: Ubuntu Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: Major Priority: Low Component: GTK+ UI Assignee: bugzilla-ad...@wireshark.org Reporter: ivan.ou...@gmail.com Build Information: wireshark 1.12.1 (Git Rev Unknown from unknown) Copyright 1998-2014 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org and contributors. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Compiled (64-bit) with GTK+ 3.14.9, with Cairo 1.14.0, with Pango 1.36.8, with GLib 2.43.92, with libpcap, with libz 1.2.8, with POSIX capabilities (Linux), with libnl 3, with SMI 0.4.8, with c-ares 1.10.0, with Lua 5.2, without Python, with GnuTLS 3.3.8, with Gcrypt 1.6.2, with MIT Kerberos, with GeoIP, with PortAudio V19-devel (built Feb 25 2014 21:09:53), without AirPcap. Running on Linux 3.19.0-14-generic, with locale en_US.UTF-8, with libpcap version 1.6.2, with libz 1.2.8, GnuTLS 3.3.8, Gcrypt 1.6.2. Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4200M CPU @ 2.50GHz Built using gcc 4.9.2. -- Steps to reproduce: 1) Do some analysis in such a way that you have IPs in your host columns. 2) Do a Manually Resolve Address operation (I was doing it from the packet context menu). Let's say we set 1.1.1.1 - addr_1. 3) Let's say you have misspelled your value and want addr_2 value. Try to do Manually Resolve Address operation again. If you set a new mapping (1.1.1.1 - addr_2), the IP 1.1.1.1 is still will be displayed as addr_1. I even tried to switch on/off Enable for Network Layer option, but no result. Also I played a bit with it, but a few things are helping, for example saving pcapng file and then opening it helps, but not every time. Found in Ubuntu/Gnome, but may be all-platforms bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 8515] Global variables in X.400 P1 dissector considered harmful
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8515 --- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8585 had a related patch set uploaded by Stig Bjørlykke: p1: Fixed do_address for extension attributes https://code.wireshark.org/review/8585 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11219] configure should allow the user to specify the Lua version
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11219 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|lua detection needs |configure should allow the |reworking |user to specify the Lua ||version -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11208] Protocol traces of nfsv4 acl and dacl attributes
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11208 Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11219] lua detection needs reworking
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11219 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Anish Bhatt from comment #1) configure does not understand lua path specified as --with-lua=/usr/include/lua5.2 Hmm, and I wouldn't expect to, actually. Unless *all* of Lua is in /usr/include/lua5.2--and I doubt that the libraries are down in the include directory :-). Though that's not really the problem here anyway. I guess we need to allow the user to specify the version instead of the directory (as is done today with Qt). BTW does your system provide one or more lua*.pc (pkgconfig) files? I'm guessing not but I figured I'd check. It should would be nice if Lua made those standard. Or if distributions routinely added them... (You can see the pain, suffering, and some possibly some of the resulting ranting about this over on bug 10572--which is where I reworked all the Lua detection stuff.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11208] Protocol traces of nfsv4 acl and dacl attributes
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11208 --- Comment #2 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8526 merged by Alexis La Goutte: NFS: Dissect NFSv4.1 dacl and sacl attributes https://code.wireshark.org/review/8526 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11221] Cannot re-set manually resolved address
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11221 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Bondarenko ivan.ou...@gmail.com --- Also it is not possible to delete manually resolved address. In the example above I may want to see 1.1.1.1 again. And it is better to see the list of all resolved names in editable table. (looks like a feature request rather than a bugfix?) How I can know after some time that addr_1 is 1.1.1.1 and foo_bar is 192.168.0.1 ?! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11210] wireshark does not display x.400 addresses correctly
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11210] wireshark does not display x.400 addresses correctly
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11210 --- Comment #12 from Gerrit Code Review gerrit-do-not-re...@wireshark.org --- Change 8585 merged by Anders Broman: p1: Fixed do_address for extension attributes https://code.wireshark.org/review/8585 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 --- Comment #6 from Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu --- (In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #5) Ok, you will work for fix this bug ? If there's a specification for the format of the packets, yes. I couldn't find any PacketCable/CableLabs spec for this - the specs I found all encapsulate *IP* packets, not MAC-layer packets. What mechanism was used to cause these packets to be generated (a command? Some SNMP operation?), and where is that documented in Cisco's manuals? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11197] Since ver 1.99.5, each capture attempt crashes Wireshark
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11197 --- Comment #4 from Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com --- Hi Peter, any chance to collect the memory dump? Thanks, Pascal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9935] Menu not visible in qt version if not root user
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9935 --- Comment #14 from Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org --- Marko, are you running Ubuntu? Someone reported a similar issue with Qt Creator which seems to be caused by appmenu-qt5. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appmenu-qt5/+bug/1307619 https://launchpad.net/appmenu-qt5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 --- Comment #7 from Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #6) (In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #5) Ok, you will work for fix this bug ? If there's a specification for the format of the packets, yes. I couldn't find any PacketCable/CableLabs spec for this - the specs I found all encapsulate *IP* packets, not MAC-layer packets. What mechanism was used to cause these packets to be generated (a command? Some SNMP operation?), and where is that documented in Cisco's manuals? If i remember, there is some Cisco command to configure PCLI... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11220] Cisco LI ASR1000 decoding
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11220 --- Comment #8 from Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu --- (In reply to Alexis La Goutte from comment #7) If i remember, there is some Cisco command to configure PCLI... For their cable modem equipment, there's cable intercept, but, at least in http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/cable/cmts/feature/guide/cmtsfg/ufg_cmon.pdf they seem to say that this follows the PacketCable Electronic Surveillance Specification, PKT-SP-ESP-I01-991229, which is at http://web.archive.org/web/20030428211154/http://www.packetcable.com/downloads/specs/pkt-sp-esp-I01-991229.pdf and which only has a 4-byte header followed by an IP packet rather than followed by an Ethernet packet. I couldn't find any CableLabs spec that talked about tapping *Ethernet* packets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9935] Menu not visible in qt version if not root user
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9935 --- Comment #15 from Marko Hrastovec marko.hrasto...@gmail.com --- Yes, I am running Ubuntu, but the problem has gone away a while ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9935] Menu not visible in qt version if not root user
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9935 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED See Also||https://launchpad.net/bugs/ ||1307619 Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG --- Comment #16 from Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org --- (In reply to Marko Hrastovec from comment #15) Yes, I am running Ubuntu, but the problem has gone away a while ago. It went away when you switched from Qt 5.2 to 4.8, correct? I'm going to assume that this is due to the problem described in LP bug 1307619. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 9935] Menu not visible in qt version if not root user
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9935 --- Comment #17 from Marko Hrastovec marko.hrasto...@gmail.com --- I don't know when and why it went away. It went away already in Ubuntu 14.04 and now in Ubuntu 15.04 Wireshark works fine too. I didn't change anything regarding Qt on purpose or manually. I assumed the bug was in Wireshark. Obviously I was wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
