[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14506] PROXY protocol (v2) support (HAproxy) for TCP: skip and maybe implement a full dissector

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14506

--- Comment #9 from Alexis La Goutte  ---
(In reply to christian.rohmann from comment #8)
> Hey Alexis,
> 
> did you get to check out the PCAP files I provided?
> Is there anything else I could provide to help you finish the dissector?
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks again for taking the time and effort to implement this.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Christian
Hi Christian,

it is always work in progress but actually very busy...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14506] PROXY protocol (v2) support (HAproxy) for TCP: skip and maybe implement a full dissector

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14506

--- Comment #8 from christian.rohm...@inovex.de ---
Hey Alexis,

did you get to check out the PCAP files I provided?
Is there anything else I could provide to help you finish the dissector?



Thanks again for taking the time and effort to implement this.


Regards

Christian

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 13673] Can not post anything on ask.wireshark.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13673

Graham Bloice  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
 CC||graham.blo...@trihedral.com

--- Comment #10 from Graham Bloice  ---
As these reports were all for the older Ask website, I'm closing this out.  Any
issues with the new Ask site should be raised on a new item.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 14575] Possible segmentation fault in HTTP dissector, dissect_http_heur_tcp(...)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14575

Roland Haenel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Roland Haenel  ---
Yes, you're right, I got it now.

Looks like the safety of tvb_strncaseeql() prevented havoc here. Maybe the code
could be refactored to look better, along with the negative offset stuff you
mentioned it should probably read 

if((tvb_strncaseeql(tvb, -8, "HTTP/1.", 7) == 0)|| 

instead of

if((tvb_strncaseeql(tvb, linelen-8, "HTTP/1.", 7) == 0)|| 

But you can close the bug anyway because there is effectively nothing bad
happening here.

Thanks for your time and sorry for reporting a non-issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___
Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list 
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
 mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe