[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6354] Calling proto_tree_add_item with FT_BYTES causing failed assertion
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6354 Guy Harrischanged: What|Removed |Added Component|GTK+ UI |Dissection engine ||(libwireshark) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6354] Calling proto_tree_add_item with FT_BYTES causing failed assertion
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6354 --- Comment #4 from Stephen Fisher st...@stephen-fisher.com 2011-09-26 11:23:17 MDT --- (In reply to comment #3) The last release I see is 1.6.2 but the SVN development version is 1.7.0. How do I get 1.6.2 development? Is there going to be a new release coming soon based on 1.7.0 development? The trunk for the 1.6 releases is available via subversion: https://anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark/trunk-1.6/ Or you can download the tarball of the 1.6.2 source code: http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/wireshark-1.6.2.tar.bz2 The 1.7.x development (main) trunk will roll into version 1.8, but won't be released until next year. See the life cycle development wiki page for more details: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LifeCycle along with the release road map: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Roadmap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6354] Calling proto_tree_add_item with FT_BYTES causing failed assertion
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6354 Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #1 from Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl 2011-09-19 08:11:09 CEST --- You cannot copy plugins from one version to the other, the API/ABI is NOT guaranteed to be compatible. If you need it for 1.6.x you'll have to compile it within 1.6.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6354] Calling proto_tree_add_item with FT_BYTES causing failed assertion
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6354 --- Comment #2 from Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu 2011-09-19 01:02:32 PDT --- For example, we don't guarantee that any given FT_ type will have the same numerical value from one major release to another; we got rid of one FT_ type, FT_EBCDIC, after 1.6 (it's no longer necessary - you use ENC_EBCDIC in the last argument to proto_tree_add_item() if the string is in EBCDIC), which renumbered some FT_ types. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching all bug changes. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-bugs mailing list wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe