Re: [Wireshark-dev] --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt
On 11/29/14 05:44, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi Jeff, 2014-11-26 19:26 GMT+01:00 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com: On 11/26/14 13:01, Stephen Fisher wrote: Is there any reason a user would have both GTK3 and GTK2 installed and not want to use GTK3 for wireshark-gtk builds? We could simplify it to be --with-gtk/--without-gtk and --with-qt/--without-qt and just use the latest version of GTK on the system (3.x, if available, otherwise 2.x) when requested. The default could remain to make a Qt and GTK build and if the user didn't want GTK anymore, just pass --without-gtk to the configure script. I have both Gtk3 and Gtk2 installed but build with Gtk2. The Gtk3 UI just looks horrible to me (and, no, I'm not one who really cares about how things look but, well, I have a choice). Could you please share a screenshot about what you find horrible in GTK3? I'm using the Debian package which looks quite good to me and I managed to get the OS X version to be nice as well: (I generally build on Fedora though what I push to my users is for RHEL/CentOS.) I think what really did it for me was the Decode-As window: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201307/msg00198.html I can (still) barely tell which tab I'm on. http://balintreczey.hu/blog/beautiful-wireshark-on-os-x-using-homebrew-and-gtk3quartz/ Looking at it more I think another thing that bothers me even on the home page is that the (disabled - because in my build environment I don't have capture privs) start capture now icon is green (but with a different color background) rather than, as in the Gtk2 or Qt versions, well, not green at all. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt
Hi Jeff, 2014-12-01 18:59 GMT+01:00 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com: On 11/29/14 05:44, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi Jeff, 2014-11-26 19:26 GMT+01:00 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com: On 11/26/14 13:01, Stephen Fisher wrote: Is there any reason a user would have both GTK3 and GTK2 installed and not want to use GTK3 for wireshark-gtk builds? We could simplify it to be --with-gtk/--without-gtk and --with-qt/--without-qt and just use the latest version of GTK on the system (3.x, if available, otherwise 2.x) when requested. The default could remain to make a Qt and GTK build and if the user didn't want GTK anymore, just pass --without-gtk to the configure script. I have both Gtk3 and Gtk2 installed but build with Gtk2. The Gtk3 UI just looks horrible to me (and, no, I'm not one who really cares about how things look but, well, I have a choice). Could you please share a screenshot about what you find horrible in GTK3? I'm using the Debian package which looks quite good to me and I managed to get the OS X version to be nice as well: (I generally build on Fedora though what I push to my users is for RHEL/CentOS.) I think what really did it for me was the Decode-As window: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201307/msg00198.html I can (still) barely tell which tab I'm on. Yes, the active and inactive tabs look almost the same, because there is no theme installed for GTK+ and the default look was pretty ugly. Adwaita became the built-in standard theme from GTK+3.14 thus the default look should change to something similar to what I attached on every system. http://balintreczey.hu/blog/beautiful-wireshark-on-os-x-using-homebrew-and-gtk3quartz/ Looking at it more I think another thing that bothers me even on the home page is that the (disabled - because in my build environment I don't have capture privs) start capture now icon is green (but with a different color background) rather than, as in the Gtk2 or Qt versions, well, not green at all. I can hardly fix that in GTK+3, it is the the icon shipped with Wireshark. :-) Cheers, Balint ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Gtk3 ugliness (Was: --without-gtk3 doesn't imply --with-qt)
On 12/01/14 13:29, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi Jeff, 2014-12-01 18:59 GMT+01:00 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com: On 11/29/14 05:44, Bálint Réczey wrote: Hi Jeff, 2014-11-26 19:26 GMT+01:00 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com: On 11/26/14 13:01, Stephen Fisher wrote: Is there any reason a user would have both GTK3 and GTK2 installed and not want to use GTK3 for wireshark-gtk builds? We could simplify it to be --with-gtk/--without-gtk and --with-qt/--without-qt and just use the latest version of GTK on the system (3.x, if available, otherwise 2.x) when requested. The default could remain to make a Qt and GTK build and if the user didn't want GTK anymore, just pass --without-gtk to the configure script. I have both Gtk3 and Gtk2 installed but build with Gtk2. The Gtk3 UI just looks horrible to me (and, no, I'm not one who really cares about how things look but, well, I have a choice). Could you please share a screenshot about what you find horrible in GTK3? I'm using the Debian package which looks quite good to me and I managed to get the OS X version to be nice as well: (I generally build on Fedora though what I push to my users is for RHEL/CentOS.) I think what really did it for me was the Decode-As window: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201307/msg00198.html I can (still) barely tell which tab I'm on. Yes, the active and inactive tabs look almost the same, because there is no theme installed for GTK+ and the default look was pretty ugly. Adwaita became the built-in standard theme from GTK+3.14 thus the default look should change to something similar to what I attached on every system. That certainly looks usable (a big improvement from what's there now). :-) I guess it's just a question of when I upgrade to a Fedora version with the new Gtk3. http://balintreczey.hu/blog/beautiful-wireshark-on-os-x-using-homebrew-and-gtk3quartz/ Looking at it more I think another thing that bothers me even on the home page is that the (disabled - because in my build environment I don't have capture privs) start capture now icon is green (but with a different color background) rather than, as in the Gtk2 or Qt versions, well, not green at all. I can hardly fix that in GTK+3, it is the the icon shipped with Wireshark. :-) Hmm it works well with Gtk2 though: I get a nice green icon when I can capture and a nice gray icon (with the same shape) when I can't capture. Do you mean for Gtk3 we need to ship 2 icons (one for enabled and one for disabled) or are we disabling the icons the wrong way [in Gtk3]? ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] The possibility of a curses based Wireshark
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 06:54:43PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: I would totally make this with TurboVision as the TUI. Ah, the good oll' days. And I had no idea it was open source now! ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] Toolbar icons without text -- know issue in Qt?
On 11/25/14 1:56 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote: Is it a known issue in Wireshark Qt that it only shows icons in the main toolbar, even when the icons and text option is chosen in the preferences? The necessary plumbing from the preferencesChanged signal to a slot that calls main_ui_-mainToolBar-setToolButtonStyle doesn't currently exist, but it should be easy enough to add. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wireshark-dev] The possibility of a curses based Wireshark
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:05:20AM +0100, B?lint R?czey wrote: While I would not stop you from starting a nice big interesting project you can already run Wireshark remotely via HTTP using GTK+ 3's Broadway backend. You just need to use a tunnel for HTTP and it works way better on high-latency networks than X forwarding. Wow! I didn't know that existed. Thanks. ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
