Re: [Wireshark-users] [ANNOUNCE] WinPcap 4.0 has been released

2007-01-30 Thread Jeff Morriss

Note that WinPcap 4.0 didn't go in until rev 20622 which isn't up in the 
prerelease directory.

Jaap Keuter wrote:
 Hi List,
 
 On the back of WinPCap 4.0 our fearless leader has made a new prerelease
 http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2-20620.exe
 with a whole bunch of fixes and improvements.
 
 Lets give this installer a serious testdrive.
 
 Thanx,
 Jaap
 
 On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
 
 As of today, WinPcap 4.0 is available in the download section of the
 WinPcap website, http://www.winpcap.org/install/ .

 This software release contains major improvements to the kernel
 driver, which has been thoroughly reviewed (and partially rewritten).
 As a result, WinPcap 4.0 is extremely more reliable and stable than
 previous versions!
 The 4.0 version also adds the long awaited stable support for x64
 platforms, including Windows XP and the upcoming Vista.
 Finally, this release includes support for the CACE Technologies
 Wireless AirPcap Adapters, the first open and affordable solution for
 Wi-Fi capture on the Windows platform.
 Full details of the changes can be found in the change log attached at
 the end of this message.

 As always, we profoundly thank all the users that tested the
 development versions of WinPcap 4.0, it would not have been possible
 without your help and precious suggestions. Thanks!

 Gianluca Varenni
 WinPcap Team



 Changelog from WinPcap 4.0 beta3
 

 - Added support for Vista x64 by digitally signing all the binaries of
   the WinPcap distribution.

 - Better error handling in the installer - if the installation of the
   Microsoft Network Monitor Driver (NetMon) fails.

 - Improved the documentation layout and readability - updated the
   style sheet and migrated to Doxygen 1.5.1.

 =

 
 ___
 Wireshark-users mailing list
 Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
 http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
 
 
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


[Wireshark-users] error while loading dfilter_macro':No such file or directory

2007-01-30 Thread Xiaoguang Liu

Version 0.99.6-SVN-20621 (SVN Rev 20621) on win xp sp2

every time openning wireshark, I saw the erorr message in subject and I have
to click OK to continue.
any idea?
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] error while loading dfilter_macro':No such file or directory

2007-01-30 Thread Luis Ontanon
As a workarround please put an empty file in the dir called
dfilter_macros in wireshark's directory.
As soon as I re-stabilize the code I'm working on, i'll checkin a fix.
Luis

On 1/30/07, Xiaoguang Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Version 0.99.6-SVN-20621 (SVN Rev 20621) on win xp sp2

 every time openning wireshark, I saw the erorr message in subject and I have
 to click OK to continue.
 any idea?

 ___
 Wireshark-users mailing list
 Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
 http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users




-- 
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


[Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Persio Pucci

Hello folks,

is there a way to open in Wireshark files captured by an Acterna packet
analyzer in a Frame Relay interface?

Regards,

Persio
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


[Wireshark-users] Y axis advanced fields

2007-01-30 Thread Persio Pucci

Hello again,

is there nay good documentation on how to use Wireshark's IO Graphs Y axis
advanced fields?

Regards,

Persio
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Y axis advanced fields

2007-01-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
Persio Pucci wrote:
 Hello again,
  
 is there nay good documentation on how to use Wireshark's IO Graphs Y 
 axis advanced fields?
  
The best you can get is at 
http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChStatIOGraphs.html

Why not write it yourself and share it with us?

Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


[Wireshark-users] Exporting IO Graphs

2007-01-30 Thread Persio Pucci

Hi there, it's me again.

Is there anyway to export IO graphs to image files? That would help a lot on
reports.

Regards,

Persio
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] [ANNOUNCE] WinPcap 4.0 has been released

2007-01-30 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi,

Ahh crap, I thought Gerald was holding of until the new WinPcap. Hope he
does that soon then.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Jeff Morriss wrote:


 Note that WinPcap 4.0 didn't go in until rev 20622 which isn't up in the
 prerelease directory.

 Jaap Keuter wrote:
  Hi List,
 
  On the back of WinPCap 4.0 our fearless leader has made a new prerelease
  http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2-20620.exe
  with a whole bunch of fixes and improvements.
 
  Lets give this installer a serious testdrive.
 
  Thanx,
  Jaap
 
  On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
 
  As of today, WinPcap 4.0 is available in the download section of the
  WinPcap website, http://www.winpcap.org/install/ .
 
  This software release contains major improvements to the kernel
  driver, which has been thoroughly reviewed (and partially rewritten).
  As a result, WinPcap 4.0 is extremely more reliable and stable than
  previous versions!
  The 4.0 version also adds the long awaited stable support for x64
  platforms, including Windows XP and the upcoming Vista.
  Finally, this release includes support for the CACE Technologies
  Wireless AirPcap Adapters, the first open and affordable solution for
  Wi-Fi capture on the Windows platform.
  Full details of the changes can be found in the change log attached at
  the end of this message.
 
  As always, we profoundly thank all the users that tested the
  development versions of WinPcap 4.0, it would not have been possible
  without your help and precious suggestions. Thanks!
 
  Gianluca Varenni
  WinPcap Team
 
 
 
  Changelog from WinPcap 4.0 beta3
  
 
  - Added support for Vista x64 by digitally signing all the binaries of
the WinPcap distribution.
 
  - Better error handling in the installer - if the installation of the
Microsoft Network Monitor Driver (NetMon) fails.
 
  - Improved the documentation layout and readability - updated the
style sheet and migrated to Doxygen 1.5.1.
 
  =
 
 
  ___
  Wireshark-users mailing list
  Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
  http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
 
 
 ___
 Wireshark-users mailing list
 Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
 http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users



___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Gdk-ERROR **: file gdkdisplay-win32.c: line 72 (wireshark 0.99.4 on windows server 2003)

2007-01-30 Thread Enyuan.Wu
Hi Jaap,

Thanks for your effort. I would like to say yes, you are right! NetOp is
the point! 

And I start Wireshark on my virtual PC for hours, without problem!

Thanx,
Enyuan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: Montag, 22. Januar 2007 16:51
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Gdk-ERROR **: file gdkdisplay-win32.c:
line 72 (wireshark 0.99.4 on windows server 2003)

Hi,

NetOp as in http://www.netop.com/netop-13.htm ??
That could be your culprit. My guess is it creates some virtual display
which totally freaks out GTK+.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hi Jaap,

 Thanks for your quick echo, and here are my answers to your inquires:

 Q: Did you run Wireshark with a multimonitor setup before?
 A: No.I installed it on the server, and I access the server only via
 NetOp. I don't know how NetOp handles with Monitor-settings. I don't
 know where it is exactly or do not know whether it has monitor, or how
 many.

 Q: And did you move certain windows to the secondary monitor?
 A: No.

 Hope it helps for debugging. If you need more information, let me
know.

 Regards
 Enyuan

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaap
Keuter
 Sent: Montag, 22. Januar 2007 14:23
 To: Community support list for Wireshark
 Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Gdk-ERROR **: file gdkdisplay-win32.c:
 line 72 (wireshark 0.99.4 on windows server 2003)

 Hi,

 Interesting. It sure seems like a GTK+ thing to me, getting confused
 over
 the monitors connected. Did you run Wireshark with a multimonitor
 setup before? And did you move certain windows to the secondary
monitor?
 Then maybe it's in the stored window positions and sizes found in
 Document
 and Settings\You\Application Data\Wireshark\recent.

 Thanx,
 Jaap

 On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi all,
 
  Recently I installed wireshark 0.99.4 on windows server 2003 (EE
SP1),
  and try to catch some packages, sometimes it runs into trouble with
 the
  following errors:
 
  1)Gdk-ERROR **: file gdkdisplay-win32.c: line 72 (enum_monitor):
  assertion failed: (*index _gdk_num_monitors)
  Aborting...
  Gdk-ERROR (recursed )**: file gdkdisplay-win32.c: line 72
  (enum_monitor): assertion failed: (*index _gdk_num_monitors)
  Aborting...
 
  Then I have to click on OK on this message, then I get the
  2)MS Visual C++ Run time Library --Runtime Error! Program: {empty}
 
  Then i have to click on OK, afterwards Winshark disappears and
have
 to
  start it again, the filter options like host x.x.x.x or host
y.y.y.y
  in caputure options, which I setup in the last caputure, disappears.
  Sometimes it takes longer to get to this point.
 
  I remember that I installed it with standard windows msi installer
and
  default installation options.
 
  I search the mail list and on the internet, it seems that no one has
  reported such problem until now.
 
  What could be? It is something with GTK+?
 
  Best regards
  Enyuan
 


___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Luis Ontanon
If you send in some files (binary and decoded text) we maybe able to
reverse engineer the format and add support for them.

On 1/30/07, Persio Pucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello folks,

 is there a way to open in Wireshark files captured by an Acterna packet
 analyzer in a Frame Relay interface?

 Regards,

 Persio
 ___
 Wireshark-users mailing list
 Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
 http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users




-- 
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Murali Raju
Give ProConvert a shot -
http://www.wildpackets.com/products/free_utilities/proconvert/overview

Thanks!

_Raju

On 1/30/07, Persio Pucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello folks,

 is there a way to open in Wireshark files captured by an Acterna packet
 analyzer in a Frame Relay interface?

 Regards,

 Persio
 ___
 Wireshark-users mailing list
 Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
 http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users




-- 
May the packets be with you.
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Guy Harris
Persio Pucci wrote:

 is there a way to open in Wireshark files captured by an Acterna packet 
 analyzer in a Frame Relay interface?

The list of file formats supported by Wireshark can be found at

http://wiki.wireshark.org/FileFormatReference

It doesn't explicitly list Acterna's format; unless it uses one of the 
formats listed there, Wireshark can't read it.

In order to enhance Wireshark to read a file format that it currently 
doesn't read, somebody would need to write additional code to read that 
file format.  This would require the author of that code to know what 
the file format is.

If Acterna has documented the format, and you have that documentation, 
we could use that to write the code to read those files.  We would need 
some capture files to test it.

If they have *not* documented the format, we would have to 
reverse-engineer the format.  As Luis Ontanon indicated, that would 
require that we have capture files - we'd probably want more than one 
file, so that we can look for patterns in the file format - as well as 
decoded versions of those files giving time stamps, packet content, etc. 
for the packets in those files.
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] [ANNOUNCE] WinPcap 4.0 has been released

2007-01-30 Thread Gerald Combs
Whoah there!  :)   I just copied WinPcap 4.0 into the 0.99.5 trunk, and
plan on releasing 0.99.5pre2 later today.  I'll send a message when it's
ready.

I'm hoping to have 0.99.5 final out on Thursday or Friday.

Jaap Keuter wrote:
 Hi List,
 
 On the back of WinPCap 4.0 our fearless leader has made a new prerelease
 http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2-20620.exe
 with a whole bunch of fixes and improvements.
 
 Lets give this installer a serious testdrive.
 
 Thanx,
 Jaap
 
 On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
 
 As of today, WinPcap 4.0 is available in the download section of the
 WinPcap website, http://www.winpcap.org/install/ .

 This software release contains major improvements to the kernel
 driver, which has been thoroughly reviewed (and partially rewritten).
 As a result, WinPcap 4.0 is extremely more reliable and stable than
 previous versions!
 The 4.0 version also adds the long awaited stable support for x64
 platforms, including Windows XP and the upcoming Vista.
 Finally, this release includes support for the CACE Technologies
 Wireless AirPcap Adapters, the first open and affordable solution for
 Wi-Fi capture on the Windows platform.
 Full details of the changes can be found in the change log attached at
 the end of this message.

 As always, we profoundly thank all the users that tested the
 development versions of WinPcap 4.0, it would not have been possible
 without your help and precious suggestions. Thanks!

 Gianluca Varenni
 WinPcap Team



 Changelog from WinPcap 4.0 beta3
 

 - Added support for Vista x64 by digitally signing all the binaries of
   the WinPcap distribution.

 - Better error handling in the installer - if the installation of the
   Microsoft Network Monitor Driver (NetMon) fails.

 - Improved the documentation layout and readability - updated the
   style sheet and migrated to Doxygen 1.5.1.

 =

 
 ___
 Wireshark-users mailing list
 Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
 http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Persio Pucci

Hi, I'll give ProConverter a try to see if it works.

also I'll forward to Luis a couple of files on its format, to see what is
wrong.

Thank you all.

Persio


On 1/30/07, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Persio Pucci wrote:

 is there a way to open in Wireshark files captured by an Acterna packet
 analyzer in a Frame Relay interface?

The list of file formats supported by Wireshark can be found at

   http://wiki.wireshark.org/FileFormatReference

It doesn't explicitly list Acterna's format; unless it uses one of the
formats listed there, Wireshark can't read it.

In order to enhance Wireshark to read a file format that it currently
doesn't read, somebody would need to write additional code to read that
file format.  This would require the author of that code to know what
the file format is.

If Acterna has documented the format, and you have that documentation,
we could use that to write the code to read those files.  We would need
some capture files to test it.

If they have *not* documented the format, we would have to
reverse-engineer the format.  As Luis Ontanon indicated, that would
require that we have capture files - we'd probably want more than one
file, so that we can look for patterns in the file format - as well as
decoded versions of those files giving time stamps, packet content, etc.
for the packets in those files.
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
Murali Raju wrote:
 Give ProConvert a shot -
 http://www.wildpackets.com/products/free_utilities/proconvert/overview
   
I've added a link to the Wiki Tools and FileFormatReference pages.

Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] [ANNOUNCE] WinPcap 4.0 has been released

2007-01-30 Thread Persio Pucci

Maybe I am a little late for that, but also, would that be possible to add
IO graphs the possibility to select bits (kbps) to the Y axis? :D

Hope I am not asking too much... or maybe 0.99.6 ;)

On 1/30/07, Persio Pucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hey, maybe somebody asked for it already... but would that be possible to
include in 0.99.5 a way to export IO graphs to any graphic file format
(GIF, JPG, PNG, BMP, etc)?

Persio


 On 1/30/07, Gerald Combs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Whoah there!  :)   I just copied WinPcap 4.0 into the 0.99.5 trunk, and
 plan on releasing 0.99.5pre2 later today.  I'll send a message when it's

 ready.

 I'm hoping to have 0.99.5 final out on Thursday or Friday.

 Jaap Keuter wrote:
  Hi List,
 
  On the back of WinPCap 4.0 our fearless leader has made a new
 prerelease
 
 
http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2-20620.exe
  with a whole bunch of fixes and improvements.
 
  Lets give this installer a serious testdrive.
 
  Thanx,
  Jaap
 
  On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Gianluca Varenni wrote:
 
  As of today, WinPcap 4.0 is available in the download section of the
  WinPcap website, http://www.winpcap.org/install/ .
 
  This software release contains major improvements to the kernel
  driver, which has been thoroughly reviewed (and partially rewritten).

  As a result, WinPcap 4.0 is extremely more reliable and stable than
  previous versions!
  The 4.0 version also adds the long awaited stable support for x64
  platforms, including Windows XP and the upcoming Vista.
  Finally, this release includes support for the CACE Technologies
  Wireless AirPcap Adapters, the first open and affordable solution for
  Wi-Fi capture on the Windows platform.
  Full details of the changes can be found in the change log attached
 at
  the end of this message.
 
  As always, we profoundly thank all the users that tested the
  development versions of WinPcap 4.0, it would not have been possible
  without your help and precious suggestions. Thanks!
 
  Gianluca Varenni
  WinPcap Team
 
 
 
  Changelog from WinPcap 4.0 beta3
  
 
  - Added support for Vista x64 by digitally signing all the binaries
 of
the WinPcap distribution.
 
  - Better error handling in the installer - if the installation of the
Microsoft Network Monitor Driver (NetMon) fails.
 
  - Improved the documentation layout and readability - updated the
style sheet and migrated to Doxygen 1.5.1.
 
  =
 
 
  ___
  Wireshark-users mailing list
  Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
  http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

 ___
 Wireshark-users mailing list
 Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
 http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users



___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Persio Pucci

ProConvert did the job just fine, just to let you guys know.

I am really glad I've found this forum, Wireshark is just a tremendous tool,
light-years ahead of any other. I really pretend to help out on the forum, I
just love this tool.

Persio


On 1/30/07, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Guy Harris wrote:
 Persio Pucci wrote:


 is there a way to open in Wireshark files captured by an Acterna packet
 analyzer in a Frame Relay interface?


 The list of file formats supported by Wireshark can be found at

   http://wiki.wireshark.org/FileFormatReference

 It doesn't explicitly list Acterna's format; unless it uses one of the
 formats listed there, Wireshark can't read it.

...
 If Acterna has documented the format, and you have that documentation,
 we could use that to write the code to read those files.  We would need
 some capture files to test it
I googled around if I can find some docs about that format but couldn't
find anything.

BTW: Acterna was bought by JDSU and was formerly Wavetek Wandel
Goltermann / TTC, according to
http://www.wildpackets.com/products/free_utilities/proconvert/file_types

Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] Opening Acterna WAN capture files in wireshark

2007-01-30 Thread Guy Harris

On Jan 30, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:

 BTW: Acterna was bought by JDSU and was formerly Wavetek Wandel
 Goltermann / TTC, according to
 http://www.wildpackets.com/products/free_utilities/proconvert/file_types

And, according to

http://telephonyonline.com/backoffice/print/telecom_acterna_creates_new/

we have THE HISTORY OF ACTERNA
1923 - Communications test company Wandel  Goltermann founded

1974 - TTC founded in 1974, becomes third largest communications test  
company

1998 - Wandel  Goltermann merges with Wavetek, becomes WWG, second  
largest test company

1999 - WWG acquires ADA

2000 - Dynatech buys WWG, merges with TTC and changes name to  
Acterna. Acterna acquires Cheetah Technologies

and so on.  (Almost as much fun as watching telephone service  
providers thrashing in the US; there are probably some outside the US  
that have been as much fun to watch.)

(For even more Acterna/JDSU historical fun, see

http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=74450

.)

That's why there are several file types for Acterna on the ProConvert  
file types page.  The only one that lists WAN is Domino.

BTW, their PVA-1000 VoIP Network Analysis Suite reads several  
different types of capture files:


http://www.jdsu.com/test_and_measurement/products/descriptions/PVA-1000/index.html

although they're using the old name for one of the file types (the one  
beginning with E rather than W :-)).
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


[Wireshark-users] bogus LLC header in UDP packet

2007-01-30 Thread Martin Pokorny

Hi,

I think I may have stumbled onto a wireshark bug (ethereal version 
0.99.0, libpcap version 0.8.3 on RHEL4). An application on which I'm 
working is receiving UDP packets over gigabit Ethernet from some custom 
hardware. The packets have a fixed source and destination UDP port 
number, which we had set to 12001 and 12000, respectively. Wireshark 
shows an LLC header after the UDP header, which is simply not present; 
see first attachment (bad.pcap). In the process of poking around a bit, 
I changed the UDP port numbers to 12032 and 12048 in the pcap file, and 
wireshark no longer reported the LLC header; see second attachment 
(good.pcap). Unless I'm totally missing something about LLC (definite 
possibility), this looks like a bug in wireshark or libpcap.


I'm not subscribed to this list, please send questions to me directly.

--
Martin


bad.pcap
Description: Binary data


good.pcap
Description: Binary data
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


[Wireshark-users] Wireshark 0.99.5pre2 is now available

2007-01-30 Thread Gerald Combs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Wireshark 0.99.5pre2 is now available for testing.  Source code and a
Windows installer can be downloaded immediately from

http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-0.99.5pre2.tar.gz
http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-0.99.5pre2.u3p
http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2.exe

This release includes several bug fixes.  The Windows installer now
ships with WinPcap 4.0.

Please report any problems you find to the wireshark-dev mailing list or
open a ticket at http://bugs.wireshark.org/ .

Barring any problems, the final release will be out on February 1st or 2nd.

File verification information:

wireshark-0.99.5pre2.tar.gz: 13934469 bytes
MD5(wireshark-0.99.5pre2.tar.gz)=5a22972741fcdc6486aad575d7b1a7d4
SHA1(wireshark-0.99.5pre2.tar.gz)=d19e025f938b51787929ca42b13e4700b7231b22
RIPEMD160(wireshark-0.99.5pre2.tar.gz)=a7bdac4e943997b446b9c89d843c185c2dbb7567

wireshark-0.99.5pre2.u3p: 22313263 bytes
MD5(wireshark-0.99.5pre2.u3p)=20cb350d3d9895e68f850dc1dfc4107b
SHA1(wireshark-0.99.5pre2.u3p)=13561e61a1eb1074ab3d6dc9649c946f34ef2aaa
RIPEMD160(wireshark-0.99.5pre2.u3p)=83f4d19134d666c95c596b33de5a8abec1afc461

wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2.exe: 18134567 bytes
MD5(wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2.exe)=c579f22e9f3fa17af442ef9bb760f384
SHA1(wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2.exe)=8ffecbee0e22bf39b42fdf72785b388b90138d6c
RIPEMD160(wireshark-setup-0.99.5pre2.exe)=d1b3a3e8b2d30ebb4fb751823639cd8908262196
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFv+dcpw8IXSHylJoRAlCjAJsHtX6EfEcB+dUqWEdp2JPi7bZxOACfaDRz
/8kZSxaRxLADJgPyMT/HwxY=
=r4nl
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] [ANNOUNCE] WinPcap 4.0 has been released

2007-01-30 Thread Ulf Lamping
Persio Pucci wrote:
 Hey, maybe somebody asked for it already... but would that be possible 
 to include in 0.99.5 a way to export IO graphs to any graphic file 
 format (GIF, JPG, PNG, BMP, etc)?
  
Definitely not in the 0.99.5 - it's in the release process quite ahead.

Any new feature will be implemented if some of the developers will find 
the time and motivation to implement it. So don't expect anything here 
soon...

Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] [ANNOUNCE] WinPcap 4.0 has been released

2007-01-30 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:33:51PM -0200, Persio Pucci wrote:

 Maybe I am a little late for that, but also, would that be possible to 
 add IO graphs the possibility to select bits (kbps) to the Y axis? :D
 
 Hope I am not asking too much... or maybe 0.99.6 ;)
 
 On 1/30/07, Persio Pucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hey, maybe somebody asked for it already... but would that be possible to
 include in 0.99.5 a way to export IO graphs to any graphic file format
 (GIF, JPG, PNG, BMP, etc)?

Could you open a bug for these requests and mark it as an enhancement so 
it isn't forgotten?  The URL is http://bugzilla.wireshark.org.


Steve
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users


Re: [Wireshark-users] bogus LLC header in UDP packet

2007-01-30 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi,

According to RFC 2353 this decoding is correct. See paragraph 2.6.1.
These UDP/TCP ports are assigned by IANA to this protocol. It is
implemented as such in the LLC dissector.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Martin Pokorny wrote:

 Hi,

 I think I may have stumbled onto a wireshark bug (ethereal version
 0.99.0, libpcap version 0.8.3 on RHEL4). An application on which I'm
 working is receiving UDP packets over gigabit Ethernet from some custom
 hardware. The packets have a fixed source and destination UDP port
 number, which we had set to 12001 and 12000, respectively. Wireshark
 shows an LLC header after the UDP header, which is simply not present;
 see first attachment (bad.pcap). In the process of poking around a bit,
 I changed the UDP port numbers to 12032 and 12048 in the pcap file, and
 wireshark no longer reported the LLC header; see second attachment
 (good.pcap). Unless I'm totally missing something about LLC (definite
 possibility), this looks like a bug in wireshark or libpcap.

 I'm not subscribed to this list, please send questions to me directly.

 --
 Martin


___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users