Re: [WSG] Web Standads Skyscraper - Anyone knows how to?
Genau Lopes Jr. wrote:
Hi,
I am developing some different advertising and would like to know, how
can i create a slide layer that appears on righr side of browser, only
when the screen resolution is more than 1024x768 pixels.
My layer should be 150 px x 600 and will be layered at right side of
the page.
Can anyone help me how can i, make this using WebStandards and some
Javascript?
style type=text/css
#adpane {
display: none;
width: 150px;
height: 600px;
float: right;
}
#maincontent {
margin-right: 0;
}
/style
script language=ECMAScript type=text/javascript
document.onload = Function {
if window.width 1024 window.height 1024 {
document.GetElementByID(adpane).style.display = block;
document.GetElementByID(maincontent).style.margin-right = 175px;
}
}
/script
div id=container
div id=adpane
img src=your/advert/file.png alt=Alternate Text /
/div
div id=maincontent
pLorem Ipsum/p
/div
/div
Should do it...
Although I was a bit sketchy on the ECMA DOM, you might want to get it
checked with someone who knows it better than me (ie: anyone ;) )
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
[WSG] XHTML 1.0, Tables and Firefox
Here in Firefox on Windows I see space below the top row of images: http://elmbrook.org/navigation2.html The border is in there only to show what's going on. In IE it looks fine. I assume it's user error. Any hints? Thanks. Jeff BTW this has to be somewhat self contained as far as CSS code for now because it's used as an include in all kinds of pages. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] XHTML 1.0, Tables and Firefox
Here in Firefox on Windows I see space below the top row of images: http://elmbrook.org/navigation2.html The border is in there only to show what's going on. In IE it looks fine. I assume it's user error. Any hints? Thanks. Jeff It's because Firefox is rendering the document in standards mode. If you change the DOCTYPE to transitional, it would be rendered in amost standards mode, which would remove the extra space, and is suitable for table-based layouts. I mention a similar effect when transitional HTML documents are served as application/xhtml+xml, whcih forces Firefox to render the document in standards mode: http://juicystudio.com/mimetest/standardsmode.asp Using CSS, you could specify a negative value for margin-bottom to solve the problem. Best regards, Gez _ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] XHTML 1.0, Tables and Firefox
I wrote: I mention a similar effect when transitional HTML documents are served as application/xhtml+xml, whcih forces Apologies, that should read XHTML documents, as only the most unstable person would deliver an HTML document as application/xhtml+xml Best regards, Gez _ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Site critique and problem - www.mondotron.com
Hi all Long term reader / first time poster - just about to launch a new site: http://www.mondotron.com and we'd appreciate any critique. The site enables users to generate free wallpaper/background images for phones/PDAs/messaging applications through the use of a Flash interface. Also, there's a small problem with Firefox 1.0 - a colleague gets a problem with a file upload button on the http://www.mondotron.com/design.php page, replicated at: http://www.mondotron.com/file-upload-button.gif The actual button appears as a small block - haven't been able to replicate it on other machines with same Firefox version. Thanks! Nettio ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height
Hi folks, This is something I've been wondering about for a long time. If you look at my blog: http://www.i-marco.nl/weblog/ Is there any cross browser, standards compliant way to get those two grey columns to be the same height? It would make the whole thing look a lot better. What I'd like is the shorter column to have extra empty space to fill it up to be just as high as the longer one. Any ideas are welcome! Cheers, Marco -- Marco van Hylckama Vlieg Senior Internet Developer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.i-marco.nl/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height
Check Roger's article out: http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200406/equal_height_boxes_with_css_par t_ii/ Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au From: Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:29:24 +0100 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height Hi folks, This is something I've been wondering about for a long time. If you look at my blog: http://www.i-marco.nl/weblog/ Is there any cross browser, standards compliant way to get those two grey columns to be the same height? It would make the whole thing look a lot better. What I'd like is the shorter column to have extra empty space to fill it up to be just as high as the longer one. Any ideas are welcome! Cheers, Marco -- Marco van Hylckama Vlieg Senior Internet Developer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.i-marco.nl/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height
From: Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is there any cross browser, standards compliant way to get those two grey columns to be the same height? Use tables ;-) Stephen -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.306 / Virus Database: 266.5.1 - Release Date: 27/02/2005 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height
So I take it it's _impossible_ to also have this work correctly in MSIE as well? If so I'm not gonna take the hassle because two third of my visitors are MSIE anyway :( Marco -- Marco van Hylckama Vlieg Senior Internet Developer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.i-marco.nl/ On Feb 28, 2005, at 12:45 AM, Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st wrote: Check Roger's article out: http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200406/ equal_height_boxes_with_css_par t_ii/ Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au From: Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:29:24 +0100 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height Hi folks, This is something I've been wondering about for a long time. If you look at my blog: http://www.i-marco.nl/weblog/ Is there any cross browser, standards compliant way to get those two grey columns to be the same height? It would make the whole thing look a lot better. What I'd like is the shorter column to have extra empty space to fill it up to be just as high as the longer one. Any ideas are welcome! Cheers, Marco -- Marco van Hylckama Vlieg Senior Internet Developer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.i-marco.nl/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height
The only other way that I can think of is with JavaScript 'offSetHeight' Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au From: Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:02:04 +0100 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200406/ equal_height_boxes_with_css_par t_ii/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height
Sorry for not putting a reference there: http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/articles/presentationaljavascript.php Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au From: Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:21:46 +1100 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height The only other way that I can think of is with JavaScript 'offSetHeight' Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au From: Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:02:04 +0100 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200406/ equal_height_boxes_with_css_par t_ii/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] getting two colums to be of the same height
Hi Marco, Faux Columns http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fauxcolumns/ are probably your best bet. On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:29:24 +0100, Marco van Hylckama Vlieg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any cross browser, standards compliant way to get those two grey columns to be the same height? It would make the whole thing look a lot better. What I'd like is the shorter column to have extra empty space to fill it up to be just as high as the longer one. -- Lindsay Evans http://lindsayevans.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
[WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
Hi guys, Can I have some people look over this site for me please? Especially Mac users, since I don't have a Mac to check it on but my client does (so I know she's going to comment on how it looks on a Mac). http://www.onehouseproductions.com Since I didn't have total control over the creation of this site (I've basically been reduced to 'code monkey' on this one) I've had to make a number of compromises that I'm not entirely happy with, but I've done the best I can to keep things nice. I'd value any suggestions anyone has about what I could do better, although in some cases I won't be able to take them up if they will deviate too much from the original design. *sigh* Cheers, Seona. __ ella for Spam Control has removed Spam messages and set aside Later for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
Hi Seona
Mac Ie5 is having a real problem with the #mainNav ul {position: absolute}
change this to float left and it should fix everything up.
This shouldn't affect any other browsers.
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au
From: Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:22 +1100
To: WSG List wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
Hi guys,
Can I have some people look over this site for me please? Especially Mac
users, since I don't have a Mac to check it on but my client does (so I know
she's going to comment on how it looks on a Mac).
http://www.onehouseproductions.com
Since I didn't have total control over the creation of this site (I've
basically been reduced to 'code monkey' on this one) I've had to make a
number of compromises that I'm not entirely happy with, but I've done the
best I can to keep things nice. I'd value any suggestions anyone has about
what I could do better, although in some cases I won't be able to take them
up if they will deviate too much from the original design. *sigh*
Cheers,
Seona.
__
ella for Spam Control has removed Spam messages and set aside Later
for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
All looks good now.
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au
From: Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:20:49 +1100
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the tip. I've made the change. Can you have a look at it and see
if it has introduced any other unexpected results? I've checked it on
IE6/Win and Mozilla and it seems to be fine, but I'm always a little nervous
about Macs because I can't check there. One day I'll actually save up enough
money to buy a Mac as a testing machine. :)
Cheers,
Seona.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1st
Sent: Monday, 28 February 2005 12:03 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
Hi Seona
Mac Ie5 is having a real problem with the #mainNav ul {position: absolute}
change this to float left and it should fix everything up.
This shouldn't affect any other browsers.
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au
From: Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:22 +1100
To: WSG List wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
Hi guys,
Can I have some people look over this site for me please? Especially Mac
users, since I don't have a Mac to check it on but my client
does (so I know
she's going to comment on how it looks on a Mac).
http://www.onehouseproductions.com
Since I didn't have total control over the creation of this site (I've
basically been reduced to 'code monkey' on this one) I've had to make a
number of compromises that I'm not entirely happy with, but
I've done the
best I can to keep things nice. I'd value any suggestions
anyone has about
what I could do better, although in some cases I won't be able
to take them
up if they will deviate too much from the original design. *sigh*
Cheers,
Seona.
__
ella for Spam Control has removed Spam messages and set
aside Later
for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
__
ella for Spam Control has removed Spam messages and set aside Later
for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
about Macs because I can't check there You can. http://www.browsercam.com/ http://danvine.com/icapture/ buy a Mac as a testing machine. :) Not necessarily. http://pearpc.sf.net BTW you'll end up with a testing PC and using Apple regularly :) -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
Exactly what happened to me :) Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au From: Jan Brasna [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:42:08 +0100 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House about Macs because I can't check there You can. http://www.browsercam.com/ http://danvine.com/icapture/ buy a Mac as a testing machine. :) Not necessarily. http://pearpc.sf.net BTW you'll end up with a testing PC and using Apple regularly :) -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
RE: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
*grin* Cool, thanks for the links. I'll have to check them out. I'm sure it will be much cheaper than buying a Mac. :) Cheers, Seona. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jan Brasna Sent: Monday, 28 February 2005 12:42 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House about Macs because I can't check there You can. http://www.browsercam.com/ http://danvine.com/icapture/ buy a Mac as a testing machine. :) Not necessarily. http://pearpc.sf.net BTW you'll end up with a testing PC and using Apple regularly :) -- Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** __ ella for Spam Control has removed Spam messages and set aside Later for me You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com attachment: winmail.dat
[WSG] resizing select dropdown boxes on FF
Does anybody know how to force select dropdown boxes to increase their height on Firefox and Netscape when the font-size is being increased by the user? I know there are ways of doing that for checkboxes and radiobuttons using em-height, but I don't think that works with dropdown boxes. Currently the way it looks on Firefox is that when the user increases the browser font-size the text inside the dropdown increases, but not the dropdown itself. Any suggestions? Andreas Boehmer User Experience Consultant Phone: (03) 9417 0468 Mobile: (0411) 097 038 http://www.addictiveMedia.com.au Consulting | Accessibility | Usability | Development ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Site check (esp. Mac): One House
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:16:21 +1100, Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *grin* Cool, thanks for the links. I'll have to check them out. I'm sure it will be much cheaper than buying a Mac. :) And then along comes a *nit-picking bozzo,* still on the back of the bus, with XP_SP2, who finds that: the fonts are much too small, that they go a little goofy on zoom in IE, that the layout breaks on zoom in IE accessibility mode, and that there's no available horizontal navigation available when images are disabled in FF, or Opera. And it's a long, long, scroll to get to the content in Lynx. -- de gustibus non est disputandum http://www.dlaakso.com/ ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Other character sets/languages
Hi Dejan, You wrote: I thought nothing of the fact that I have not seen such a result in IE6 and Mozilla 1.7. Mozilla 1.7.5 still proudly displays an ugly BOM, IE doesn't. Hmm--very interesting. I have not seen any BOM effects even though I use Mozilla at home (IE6 at work) so I downloaded XVI32 and checked some of my files composed and saved in Notepad, some with ctrl-s and some using Save as, choosing the UTF-8 encoding, and have yet to find one with a BOM at the beginning. Do you suppose Microsoft fixed Notepad when they coded Windows XP? As long as you have a web server on your intranet it shouldn't do any difference to the browser, it's just documents coming from the network. It's files from your disk that will miss the http headers. The setup at work was never intended to serve HTML. We have a program that runs things like payroll, work scheduling, and inventory that runs on the LAN; we also use the F:\ drive bit to share Excel and Word files. So, I can use an HTML file from a floppy disk, the C:\ drive, the F:\ drive, passed to me as an internal email attachment, or even from a flash memory unit on a USB plug in. AFAIK, **all** my files are missing the http headers. Regards, Gene Falck, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
