Re: [WSG] [Spam] :changing font sizes from within a page.
I am also interested.I have been asked to deliver it inside a SharePoint site. I would like to hear from anyone who has been there...done that Thanks, Ben On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:05 PM, designer desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk wrote: I would be grateful if someone could tell me what is the current best practice for letting users change the font-size (e.g., by clicking on three 'a's of different sizes to make different css files be used) on the web site. Is it still a good idea, or do we go for the approach of using the browser to do it? Any and all helpful suggestions gratefully appreciated. Thanks, Bob *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *** -- Web Master Western Creek Soccer Club *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***
Re: [WSG] Login/password app?
Hi Brooke, I used .htaccess as a way to control this aspect as a simple solution before you find a more robust one as needed. I suggest trying it out and see what you think. Option I = Manually put it together via a tutorial http://www.freewebmasterhelp.com/tutorials/htaccess/ Option II = htadmin a prepared solution = $5 http://www.htadmin.com/ After spending the wopping $5 a long time ago and saw later that it was also easy to replicate . depending on skill level. Cheers, On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Brooke Nelson brook...@gmail.com wrote: I need an app that will prompt users for a login and password to view a certain page. I will need a different login/password combo for each user. I know that there is likely a simple solution to this, but I haven't needed anything like this before. Is there any easy PHP-based script to use? Basically, I would like a little form with a username and password field that when entered correctly will reveal or direct users to another page. Thanks in advance for your help! If it matters, my site is hosted on an Apache/Linux server. Thanks, Brooke *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *** -- Web Master Western Creek Soccer Club *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***
Re: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information
Hi Elizabeth, Thanks for your clarification as that brings it back into perspectiveI think I read too much into Andrews reply;-) I am all about equal opportunity and would not dream of intentionally excluding anyone especially when it is so easy to include as many as possible. Cheers, ben On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Elizabeth Spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ben In Australia, HREOC is responsible for administering various anti-discrimination legislation, including the Disability Discrimination Act. (It comes under the banner of 'equal opportunities' rather than 'human rights'.) One form of discrimination is offering a service to one group and refusing to offer it, or offering on less advantageous terms, to another group. For website designers/builders, this means that if you sell stuff (or even just offer free information) to the general public and present it in such a way that people with a disability (e.g. blind people using screen readers; people with movement disorders that make it difficult/impossible to use a mouse) can't access it, you are breaking the law. *Elizabeth Spiegel* *Web editing* *0409 986 158* *GPO Box 729, Hobart TAS 7001* *www.spiegelweb.com.au* *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Benedict Wyss *Sent:* Saturday, 25 October 2008 11:07 PM *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org *Subject:* Re: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information Hi Andrew, First off..good reply. I like the last paragraph re human rights. Even though I don't need to be forced to be compliant to standards as I have a conscience but (and excuse my ignorance) when has being able to access the internet a human right. I thought it was the domain of things like security, sustenance and protection from the elements. I am further thinking that in order to obtain justifiable rights the movement inevitably swings heavily to the right/left in an attempt to end up in the middle ground. I am interested in hearing peoples thoughts on this one. Is it a human right or...? [disclosure: no offense intended] Cheers, On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Andrew Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben, AGIMO publishes guidelines that cover some of what you asked for - it is up to individual organisations as to which guidelines they follow and how far - it shouldn't be that way but it is. Each organisation that I've worked in over the last 25 years in Government has had their own writing standards - and since there has been a web, their own web content/usability/accessibility standards in one form or another. Most are compliant in some way or another with WCAG 1.0 - but this is based on interpretation, and these interpretations vary between organisations. Privacy is looked after by the Australian Privacy Commissioner ( http://www.privacy.gov.au/). An study of the Australian Government web standards environment is not complete without examining the role of the Australian Human Rights Commission (http://www.hreoc.gov.au). One of the Commissioners, Graeme Innes, has put the lot of us on notice - he will (to use his words) name and shame organisations that have inaccessible sites. He has started this already. Cheers, Andrew On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And then the clouds parted... http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/ If anyone wants to add then please do so but shall consider this closed. Cheers, On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am looking for any and all links to comprehensive listings of: 1. Australian Government Industry Best Practices 2. Australian Government Standards (Privacy, Accessibility and Usability) I have been googling for a while and coming up with bunk. All assistance welcomed. Thanks, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- --- Andrew Boyd http://onblogging.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http
[WSG] Re: Searching for standards information
And then the clouds parted... http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/ If anyone wants to add then please do so but shall consider this closed. Cheers, On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am looking for any and all links to comprehensive listings of: 1. Australian Government Industry Best Practices 2. Australian Government Standards (Privacy, Accessibility and Usability) I have been googling for a while and coming up with bunk. All assistance welcomed. Thanks, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] Searching for standards information
Hi all, I am looking for any and all links to comprehensive listings of: 1. Australian Government Industry Best Practices 2. Australian Government Standards (Privacy, Accessibility and Usability) I have been googling for a while and coming up with bunk. All assistance welcomed. Thanks, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Re: Searching for standards information
Hi Andrew, First off..good reply. I like the last paragraph re human rights. Even though I don't need to be forced to be compliant to standards as I have a conscience but (and excuse my ignorance) when has being able to access the internet a human right. I thought it was the domain of things like security, sustenance and protection from the elements. I am further thinking that in order to obtain justifiable rights the movement inevitably swings heavily to the right/left in an attempt to end up in the middle ground. I am interested in hearing peoples thoughts on this one. Is it a human right or...? [disclosure: no offense intended] Cheers, On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Andrew Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben, AGIMO publishes guidelines that cover some of what you asked for - it is up to individual organisations as to which guidelines they follow and how far - it shouldn't be that way but it is. Each organisation that I've worked in over the last 25 years in Government has had their own writing standards - and since there has been a web, their own web content/usability/accessibility standards in one form or another. Most are compliant in some way or another with WCAG 1.0 - but this is based on interpretation, and these interpretations vary between organisations. Privacy is looked after by the Australian Privacy Commissioner ( http://www.privacy.gov.au/). An study of the Australian Government web standards environment is not complete without examining the role of the Australian Human Rights Commission (http://www.hreoc.gov.au). One of the Commissioners, Graeme Innes, has put the lot of us on notice - he will (to use his words) name and shame organisations that have inaccessible sites. He has started this already. Cheers, Andrew On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And then the clouds parted... http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/ If anyone wants to add then please do so but shall consider this closed. Cheers, On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am looking for any and all links to comprehensive listings of: 1. Australian Government Industry Best Practices 2. Australian Government Standards (Privacy, Accessibility and Usability) I have been googling for a while and coming up with bunk. All assistance welcomed. Thanks, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- --- Andrew Boyd http://onblogging.com.au *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] How to send two values to javascript
I believe it is as follows; onchange=showSubcategory(name, email, message) --- if they are the name=name and name=email, etc. or, if you want to parse text, then onchange=showSubcategory(banana, orange, apple) -- So when it arrives at the script it becomes an array starting at [0] to be used how you want. Cheers, Ben On Nov 15, 2007 9:37 AM, Michael Horowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have examples using one value onchange=showSubcategory(this.value) from a form to a script. What if I need to send two values one from the current element in the form and one from another element Thanks -- Michael Horowitz Your Computer Consultant http://yourcomputerconsultant.com 561-394-9079 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] intuitive text resizer for accessibility toolbar
Hi Felix, you are right in everything you write..but, there are always exceptions, in that we need to (at Veteran's Affairs) cater for visitors accross the board. We need to consider the realestate taken up and the text size which are oposite forces and so we need to find a happy medium. My idea is to have a basic font size to allow a reasonable amount of content with less scrolling and then in an accessibility toolbar give the visitor the oportunity to increase the font size in the main content area. This to me seems like a decent compromise. I am open to correction on that, but it seems fair though. So I will still need to place a text resizing mechanism to cover that government standard for the site. While awaiting the responses from the list I came up with a simple solution using a few lines of JS. With the + button, the visitor can increase the (h1 to 4 and p) tags to double the size in the main content area and the - button will return it to normal. I worked on the assumption that lower that normal font sizes are unneccessary but as a standard we are obliged to offer a larger text size alternative, and one that differs from the cnrt+/- that applies to the whole site. Cheers, Ben On 6/21/07, Felix Miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2007/06/21 00:12 (GMT-0400) Benedict Wyss apparently typed: I just searched on google and found a couple that left me feeling rather mentally limp, so your my next port of call. please pass back links to a text resizer that has the following ability: I think what you want is to reinvent the wheel and clutter your page duplicating browser tools. One job of a modern web browser to provide its user with whatever text size adjustment is required to make a page comfortable and/or usable. They all provide by default a size determined by scientific tests to be a size that works well for the broadest range of users, along with at least one tool to tailor it to personal whim. Presumably each user has either already done so or found doing so unnecessary. All you need to do is accommodate them all by leaving the base size as you found it and setting only contextual sizes relative to the base size presumptively chosen by each individual user. http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/font-size http://www.lighthouse.org/accessibility/ http://www.informationarchitects.jp/100e2r?v=4 -- Respect everyone. I Peter 2:17 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/ *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] intuitive text resizer for accessibility toolbar
Ya gotta love the WSG, This is exactly why I post here, where people respond with decent honest answers with out too much in the way of restriction. For that I thank you! :-) All right, so I exaggerated on the Government Standard, you got me.;-) I am still unsure on how to proceed, so bare with me a little longer. Even though I agree on the fixed reasonable font size but, with some sites there is an over stuffing of content and we have managed to trim the content owners down on this and so arrive at an agreed amount that if fixed at a larger font will turn the page into more than necessary scrolling which in the end leads to a percentage not willing to scroll too much. (no there are not masses of content). So even faced with the official W3C standards we still have to compromise whether we like it or not and so I ask the pointed question - What is the happy medium? Please don't quote the various Standards bibles because I am not about that, we as web developers need to live with in these standards and if a few conflict with each other then that is what we can come here to discuss and agree on. (correct me if I am wrong). So do I approach the powers that be and indicate it is unnecessary to have this option or do I find a happy medium like I suggested in the previous post? (my aim being to accommodate the W3C/ Accessibility / IA / etc Standards and funnily enough provide a decent site for the intended audience). Yours Faithfully, Ben PS: Side Question: does everyone else see multiple entries for each of my posts or does this only appear spasmodically on gmail? (I only send it once). Is there a setting to change? On 6/22/07, Philip Kiff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Benedict Wyss wrote: My idea is to have a basic font size to allow a reasonable amount of content with less scrolling and then in an accessibility toolbar give the visitor the oportunity to increase the font size in the main content area. This to me seems like a decent compromise. I am open to correction on that, but it seems fair though. So I will still need to place a text resizing mechanism to cover that government standard for the site. I'm not sure what you mean by government standard here. There is some debate about whether text resizer widgets are a good idea at all, and I don't think that there is any government standard that explicitly requires them. There are a variety of arguments about this, but a couple quick ones are: is the widget usable without JavaScript? (This is required for the site to meet W3C WCAG 1.0 Priority 1 Guidelines). Is it usable without cookies? How can you inform a visitor that the widget exists, and what it will do, if they cannot read the text on the site to begin with? What is usually required from a standards perspective, at minimum, is that a site use relative font sizes in a way that allows a visitor to increase the font size of the site using browser controls. Some very respectable sites provide a link to increase text size that offer simply an explanation of how to increase the text size in different browsers, rather than trying to change the size of the fonts being sent to the browser. [...] I worked on the assumption that lower that normal font sizes are unneccessary but as a standard we are obliged to offer a larger text size alternative, and one that differs from the cnrt+/- that applies to the whole site. I don't think you are obliged to offer a larger text size alternative, and one that differs from the cnrt+/- that applies to the whole site. On 6/21/07, Felix Miata wrote: I think what you want is to reinvent the wheel and clutter your page duplicating browser tools. One job of a modern web browser to provide its user with whatever text size adjustment is required to make a page comfortable and/or usable. [] All you need to do is accommodate them all by leaving the base size as you found it and setting only contextual sizes relative to the base size presumptively chosen by each individual user. I'd have to agree with Felix on this one, particularly for a site whose target market includes large numbers of seniors. Seniors are more likely to be unfamiliar with how web browsers work than the younger population, and as a result, they will be less likely to know how to change the font size in their browsers, and they will also be less likely to understand the function of font resizing widgets on a page, no matter how you present them. And given that deteriorating vision is such a common issue for that population, the best approach for a site targeting that market would be to use a large enough default size that most users can use it. To do this, I would seriously consider following Felix's recommendation of leaving the base size as you found it. Phil. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
[WSG] intuitive text resizer for accessibility toolbar
Hi all, I just searched on google and found a couple that left me feeling rather mentally limp, so your my next port of call. please pass back links to a text resizer that has the following ability: - specify tags - specify divs - decent instruction, not weak attempts - leave me feeling warm and fuzzy inside ;-) thanks in advance, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] intuitive text resizer for accessibility toolbar
To expand a bit further: What is the standard? - multiple inc/decreases? - restore or not to restore? - a single increase and a single decrease? - no decrease? - simple v complex JS? - no inc or decrease? even I also need to change the sizes of multiple elements in the main content area only. ie: h1,2,3,4 and p, for starters. Cheers, On 6/21/07, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I just searched on google and found a couple that left me feeling rather mentally limp, so your my next port of call. please pass back links to a text resizer that has the following ability: - specify tags - specify divs - decent instruction, not weak attempts - leave me feeling warm and fuzzy inside ;-) thanks in advance, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] dl v table for form layout
Hi all, I am having a discussion with colleagues here at work (won't mention our site as it stinks) about the best way forward for form layouts. I have one person saying he will continue to use tables till otherwise informed. I have another who uses none of the above, which you can imaging is not that good to look at with everything butting up against each other. His other suggestion was to add nbsp's to move things about. I like to use the definition list with Labels. Now I know the dl I am using is not being used exactly as it was originally used (good point), but I say it is 100 times better than tables. Can I get a WSG response on the best format to layout a form. Cheers, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Browser Check with Firefox 1.5
I have FF 2.0 and it renders fine on first and second glance. Fix up those strict validation issues and see how you go again. Rgds', Ben On 4/17/07, Jonathan O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Samuel Just for interest, I checked it in both Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Opera 9.01 on Mac OS X 10.4.9. In both cases, the page background is a red tile pattern with orange highlights. The text area appears as a very very pale red (or deep pink) surrounding a white background for the form. I hope that this is of some help. Your html code doesn't validate, which probably doesn't help. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.intrepidtravel.com %2Fafricatrees Some of your style sheets don't validate, either. http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F% 2Fwww.intrepidtravel.com%2Fcss% 2Flayout_generic.csswarning=1profile=css21usermedium=all http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F% 2Fwww.intrepidtravel.com%2Fcss% 2Flayout_tripbox.csswarning=1profile=css21usermedium=all http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F% 2Fwww.intrepidtravel.com%2Fscripts%2Fyui%2Fcontainer%2Fassets% 2Fcontainer.csswarning=1profile=css21usermedium=all Although I suspect that the latter is tailored to some specific condition, like a specific browser, maybe. -- Jonathan O'Donnell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://purl.nla.gov.au/net/jod +61 4 2575 5829 On 17/04/2007, at 4:06 PM, Samuel Richardson wrote: Hi all, I've noticed a problem on our website when rendering pages with Firefox 1.5 (and possibly lower). If you have Firefox 1.5 installed could you please take a look at the following page: http://www.intrepidtravel.com/africatrees And let me know if the main content area renders with a black background. Has anybody encountered this rendering bug before? I think it might be related to the size of the background image being used in that content field. It's only occurring when using Firefox 1.5 (and possibly lower), Firefox 2.0 renders that pages fine. -- Samuel Richardson 0405 472 748 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: Autoresponders on the list Was: Re: [WSG] equal height columns
This is definitely an issue and I second it. But if we as professionals are going to deal with this issue on an ongoing basis then a solution will be handy and left for the administrator to pass to the offending party involved. My suggestion only. So that being said is there a solution that suits all? People need to have auto responders for business reasons, does this mean we say people on the list have to send and receive from a web mail address not a work address? Cheers, Ben On 4/18/07, Matthew Cruickshank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear WSG, I suggest that those annoyed at these autoresponders begin a list of companies, organisations, and people who can't operate their email machines. This way you can avoid doing business with them, or - when you see them on the street - you can throw scrunched up balls of paper at them. And to those sending these autoresponders... I know that these email thingymabobs and computer dohickys get a little complex. Perhaps you could enroll in a night class? .Matthew Cruickshank http://docvert.org Convert MS Word to clean HTML for free *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] best standard / format for imbeded mp3 player in browser
I like some of the flash players out there. I did a little searching and found an option using flash but parseing a url to it with 1 line of code to put in the page. I set a demo here http://wysstech.com/audio/test.htm. Any opinions on this method On 4/12/07, Brad Pollard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For those after a flash component, this one is good: http://www.1pixelout.net/code/audio-player-wordpress-plugin/ brad fatpublisher http://fatpublisher.com.au - Original Message - *From:* Jixor - Stephen I [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2007 3:53 PM *Subject:* Re: [WSG] best standard / format for imbeded mp3 player in browser Yes, IMHO the best thing to do is to provide both a direct link to the file and a flash player that is customized to your site's design. James Ellis wrote: Hi Ben a href=/path/to/file.mp3file.mp3 [50 Kb]/a works well and allows people to play the file in the player of their choice (maybe they even have their browser set up to do this if they want). They can also download it for later playing. If you want to play it inside a browser then I'm sure there is a flash component that will play mp3's with play and pause buttons? HTH James On 4/12/07, Benedict Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, just wondering which (free) mp3 player works best cross browsers with minimal code etc etc All opinions and suggestions welcome. Thanks, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
[WSG] best standard / format for imbeded mp3 player in browser
Hi all, just wondering which (free) mp3 player works best cross browsers with minimal code etc etc All opinions and suggestions welcome. Thanks, Ben *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
