RE: [WSG] Brand logos with links to home

2007-03-18 Thread Rowan Smith
 I was wondering what the general consensus was on whether the main logo on
a site should always be a link back to the home page. Is this a general
'rule of thumb' or do many tend not to do this?

 We routinely link the logo to the home page, and we also include an
explicit home page link in the navigation menu.

For NZ government sites it's mandatory. I saw some research (can't remember
where but I can dig it up) that pointed to the number of users that either
hit the 'back-back-back' button or the Home link when they get lost, and
start again. As Paul  says a text link in the nav is good but the logo's
also such a nice big target to hit on with a mouse.

Linking an organisation's logo back to its home page can't do any harm,
anyway.

Rowan Smith
www.rowan.net.nz






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

2005-02-02 Thread Rowan Smith
I reckon this discussion is relevant here too. 

The one I'm struggling with at the moment is a form with Select Gender M /
F. It's a government web site so I'm trying to be careful.

Checkboxes are inappropriate. I could use a select with M and F but then
what for unspecified or don't want to answer or I just ignored that
question? Also, whatever is chosen takes 2 clicks. Unchecked radio buttons
are a very usable choice, you hit one or the other or neither and move on.
Mike said ...it is sometimes invalid communications/user interface to have
one and only one 'checked' item at all times.   I said, and still hold to
the view, that sometimes a form has to be presented with none of the radio
buttons 'checked'. I agree.

The standard (the HTML spec) says that's OK, and that's how we want it to
work for usability. All good.

But RFC1866 says the user agent should make the choice - user agent must
check the first radio button of the set initially. So some
standards-compliant browser is going to over-ride my standards-compliant
form and check one of the radio buttons? Isn't this a conflict between the
standards for UI and User Agent?



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Horner
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2005 5:25 p.m.
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

That's the relevance to standards - i.e. that if it's only standard if 
there is a default radio button and never valid if none of them are 
'checked' then the standard is wrong and ought to be changed.

I heartily agree, Mike.

Have You Validated Your Code?
John Horner(+612 / 02) 9333 3488
Senior Developer, ABC Online  http://www.abc.net.au/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)

2005-02-01 Thread Rowan Smith
I think this is like FAQs - my FAQ is never there. Likewise, pre-set a control 
to option A and I'm equally likely to want option B. 

IMHO pre-setting options for the user (unless they're VERY obvious) is like 
making assumptions about them.

That said, RFC1866 says 'CHECKED' is optional but then says At all times, 
exactly one of the radio buttons in a set is checked. If none of the INPUT 
elements of a set of radio buttons specifies 'CHECKED', then the user agent 
must check the first radio button of the set initially.

Does anybody know why one button has to be checked at all times in a 
circumstance like Chris referred to?

Thanks
Rowan



Quoting Iain Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Oops, sorry I didn't really read your question thoroughly. Surely an
 e-mail
 address will be either a personal or a business address. Personally I'd
 set
 the default to personal as this seems to me the most likely option.
 
 Iain
 
 --
 Iain Gardiner
 http://www.firelightning.com
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Chris W. Parker
 Sent: 01 February 2005 19:12
 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
 Subject: [WSG] Default state of radio buttons. (Maybe OT?)
 
 
 Hello,
 
 Not sure if this is off topic or not, but let me know if it is.
 
 I'm wondering what the suggested default state of a group of radio
 buttons
 is? Let me use a current, specific example.
 
 In a form I'm writing I have one set of radio buttons. The current
 options
 are 'Home', or 'Agency'. The radio button is meant to designate what
 type of
 mailing address the customer has provided. Right now I've got neither
 option
 being defaulted to. I know that radio buttons should have exactly one
 option
 chosen at all times, but in this case it doesn't make sense to add a
 third
 option of 'None', or have the group default to one option or the other.
 
 How should I handle this? Should I bite the bullet and have the options
 default to one of the options (both options will probably be chosen an
 equal
 amount of times, as has been the case in the past)? Or maybe I should go
 to
 a drop down list with three options? 1. '-', 2. 'Home', 3. 'Agency'
 
 
 Your feedback is appreciated.
 
 Chris.
  **
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 
 ** 
 The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
  



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**