Re: [WSG] Keyboard Tabbing no longer working in FF v11/Mac
tee wrote: I wonder what might gone wrong with my FF, it focuses on input fields.: address url, google seach and the one in the page. check the settings for accessibility.tabfocus http://kb.mozillazine.org/Accessibility.tabfocus Susanne *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***
Re: [WSG] why :first-child pseudo-class doesn't work for some selectors/elements?
Am 06.03.2011 11:03 schrieb tee: http://jsbin.com/apate4/9/ According to the spec, it should work. The :first-child pseudo-class represents an element that is the first child of some other element. http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#first-child-pseudo that means first child of any type and doesn't match in your case. Try the first-of-type pseudo-class instead: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#first-of-type-pseudo but I'm not sure which browser-support you get for this one. It works in my Seamonkey 2.1 nightly but I didn't check other browsers. greetings Susanne *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***
Re: [WSG] Opera 9.26 Problem
Web Dandy Design wrote, On 13.03.2008 12:47: We recently built a site for a client and tested across various browsers including Opera 9.26. The site layout looks fine on our machines and we have looked at the site on PC and MAC. However the client's French distributor says that the site doesn't look right when they are using Opera v9.26, revision 8835, Win32, Windows XP. Has anyone ever come across this problem before? The site is: www.charis.uk.com http://www.charis.uk.com/ . Check which dpi- and font-size settings they are using. The Site breaks (i.e. provokes a floatdrop) on my end, if I use any basic font-size 16px or a minimum fontsize 13px. In Opera 9.26 *and* Seamonkey - both under Linux. greetings Susanne -- http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 10119 Berlin, Tel: 030 - 443 24 173 Bürogemeinschaft im Prenzlauer Berg 2 Räume (35qm) ab sofort frei *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ***
Re: [WSG] Character encoding mismatch
Paul Collins wrote, On 10.11.2005 12:44: I thought this was the correct way to add special characters for XHTML, but what I am reading now seems to contradict this. This is the part of standards where I get a bit confused. Does anyone have any advice or know of some good articles where they explain this in simple terms?? Have a look at the material in W3Cs internationalization-Section W3C I18N Topic Index http://www.w3.org/International/resource-index.html#charset I like the Tutorial: Character sets encodings in XHTML, HTML and CSS http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/#choosing At least they try to explain the rather complicated stuff for everyone. ;-) HTH Susanne -- http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lottumstr. 22, 10119 Berlin, Tel: 030 - 440 483 47 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] overflow: hidden not working...
Chris Stratford wrote, On 07.03.2005 11:33:
http://www.simplyrewarding.net/forums/thread_20.html
That thread is an example of a extreemly wide image.
WHY doesn't my forum table Clip the large image?
Where do I need the overflow: hidden???
Try adding:
table.posts {table-layout: fixed;}
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915/tables.html#propdef-table-layout
I checked it with the edit styles-Bookmarklet and it works in Mozilla
1.8b, I'm not sure about cross-browser support.
HTH
Susanne
--
http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lottumstr. 22, 10119 Berlin, Tel: 030 - 440 483 47
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
Re: [WSG] empty named anchors
Ben Curtis wrote, On 20.01.2005 23:58: Or drop the anchor tag altogether. What is the browser compatibility of this: a href=#someIdOnThePageGo to Some ID/a ... h2 id=someIdOnThePageSome ID/h2 My initial tests show great support. Anyone know better? I've been told, that some Screen-Readers don't support jumping to elements with id only. Since inner site links are especially useful for SR-Users, it seems like a good idea to keep the name-attribute. Susanne -- http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung 10119 Berlin ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Charsets priority and form submissions
Ray Dickman wrote: Does the charset provided over http take priority over the charset specified in the html meta tags? Server should win and does in Mozilla. To sum up, conforming user agents must observe the following priorities when determining a document's character encoding (from highest priority to lowest): 1. An HTTP charset parameter in a Content-Type field. 2. A META declaration with http-equiv set to Content-Type and a value set for charset. 3. The charset attribute set on an element that designates an external resource. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/charset.html#spec-char-encoding How does this decision affect the submission of forms? That is, if a meta tag says latin1, and the http says utf8, in what charset will the data be submitted to the server? Third aspect is: form accept-charset= http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#adef-accept-charset I'm not sure what happens in which browser whith conflicting settings, but I wouldn't rely on any data without excessive testing. ;-) Susanne -- Susanne Jäger http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Text selection in CSS layouts
Aaron Pollock wrote: Can anyone help as to why (in IE at least) it's not possible to select/copy text without selecting other content automatically in this page? http://www.marketingmixers.com/new.php This happens to me a lot on CSS layouts but I've never had a definitive explanation. This time, a client's asked for one. Any way I can fix it? IIRC it happens with absolutely positioned element in (some?) IEs in Strict-Mode. Workaround is forcing IE into Quirksmode. Susanne -- Susanne Jäger http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] font too small??
john wrote: So, what would be affecting these users who are saying the text is too small? Default computer font size? What do I tell them, or is there anything more I can do on my site? http://cslewis.drzeus.net You define font-size for the #content text to 80% of my preferred font-size. For me that's too small for reading comfortably, especially if I don't use Verdana but another less huge font. Additionally there might be a special problem for some IE users. There are IE installations, that always default to font-size: smallest if sizes are only given in em. To help those users you need a base font-size in %. Try adding font-size: 100.01% to your body Style. The .01 part is for compenating possible rounding errors in Safari and Opera. Zooming the page in Mozilla breaks the positioning of the header and ends up in overlapping elements. hth Susanne -- Susanne Jäger http://sujag.de - Webentwicklung und -beratung ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
