Re: [WSG] A web culture
Piero Fissore wrote: Why there is not any movie, song or books (novels) that deal about web? I mean, it's an instrument that have changed our live (and it will change it again). It seams like art isn't interested in. Why? Why do not exist a web culture? Weballergy by Sonata Arctica. It's a song more or less about Internet addiction. (Granted, it's a heavy metal song, so it's not exactly mainstream.) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] a elements and what they can contain
On 29-May-05 17:06, Ben Ward wrote: It is very much a legacy thing these days, since it is being solved for XHTML 2.0, insofaras you can attach the href= attribute to pretty much any element you like, regardless of block|inline condition. A navigation menu item could be 'li href=homepageHomepage/li' without the extra a / tag. That's the way I remember it from last time I read that spec, anyway. I know that doesn't solve the problem in production sites for about the next decade, but for reference sake it's worth noting. Ben Definitely worth noting. I can see myself using this, since it *would* solve the ambiguity issue, as well. At least for my own hobbyist needs. :) -- __ Thomas Ditmarszarggg [at] zarggg [dot] net KeyID: 0x2FAAE151 http://zarggg.net/blog2/index.php -- ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] there is no attribute name
On 14-May-05 13:47, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Chris Stratford wrote: #1 - anchors - when I have a SKIP TO CONTENT link. It doesn't like the NAME I have given the a... Isn't this the only *proper* way of anchoring inside the page??? The proper way in XHTML is using fragment identifiers: giving an ID to an element, and linking to that, e.g. a href=#contentgo to content/a ... div id=content ... Does this also apply to HTML 4.01 Strict? I guess my actual question is: What is the proper way of coding '#anchor-name' links in HTML 4.01 Strict? -- __ Thomas Ditmarszarggg [at] zarggg [dot] net KeyID: 0x2FAAE151 http://zarggg.net/blog2/index.php -- ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
Re: [WSG] Valid blockquote scenarios?
On 06-May-05 16:57, Lukasz Grabun wrote: Roger Johansson wrote: Unless I'm misreading the W3C Recommendation, blockquote elements can only have block-level content. That makes the second example incorrect. From http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/text.html#h-9.2.2 : So yes, the p (or some other block-level element) is necessary, and it goes inside the blockquote element. Have a look: http://grabun.com/tmp/block-no-p.html That page's doctype is Transitional, not Strict. The OP was speaking of the Strict doctype, if memory serves.. -- __ Thomas Ditmarszarggg [at] zarggg [dot] net KeyID: 0x2FAAE151 http://zarggg.net/blog2/index.php -- ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help **
