Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread designer 

Thanks Gentlemen - I thought so!

Bob





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread Edward Lynn 
I've personally never had to use that Bob. There's an explanation here...

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2025786/why-use-meta-tag-content-style-type-for-external-css

But personally I dont feel it's at all necessary

Ed

On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:58 PM, designer  wrote:

> Sorry if this is obvious, but could someone explain to me the value of
> using:
>
> 
>
> In the  section of a page. I can't grasp:
>
> a) what exactly it does,
> b) what is 'missing' if it isn't there?
>
> etc.
>
> Please.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ***
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
> ***
>
>


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread aleagi 
I think this page can help you:

http://vancouver-webpages.com/META/metatags.detail.html

Best Regards,
ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸
,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸
°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`
Luiz Gustavo Aleagi Nunes `°º¤ø,¸¸,
http://sapiensdc.com.br | http://eopen.com.br
Desenvolvedor Web - Padrões W3C, Drupal, Acessibilidade
¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°` Nosce te ipsum...¸,ø¤º°``°º¤ø,¸¸,



On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:58, designer
 wrote:
> 


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

Re: [WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread David Dorward 
On 1 Jul 2010, at 12:58, designer wrote:
> Sorry if this is obvious, but could someone explain to me the value of using:
> 
> 
> 
> a) what exactly it does,

It specifies the style sheet language (e.g. CSS or JSSS) for inline style 
**attributes**.

> b) what is 'missing' if it isn't there?


I don't know of any browser which will fail to error recover (assuming you are 
using CSS) if you don't specify it. 

That said, you are better off not using inline style attributes in the first 
place (since they mean not getting the number one benefit of CSS[1])

[1] No, not rounded corners, separation of style from content

-- 
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***

[WSG] content style type

2010-07-01 Thread designer 
Sorry if this is obvious, but could someone explain to me the value of 
using:




In the  section of a page. I can't grasp:

a) what exactly it does,
b) what is 'missing' if it isn't there?

etc.

Please.

Thanks,

Bob






***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
***