Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-12 Thread Andrew Maben

On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Designer wrote:


So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:

Buy now,
Buy it now,
etc...


I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're  
looking for would be:


a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 4 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 5 nowBuy Now/a



Andrew

109B SE 4th Av
Gainesville
FL 32601

Cell: 352-870-6661

http://www.andrewmaben.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

In a well designed user interface, the user should not need  
instructions.




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***

Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-12 Thread Designer

Andrew Maben wrote:

On Mar 10, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Designer wrote:


So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:


Buy now,

Buy it now,

etc...


I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're looking 
for would be:


a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 4 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 5 nowBuy Now/a



Andrew


Thanks Andrew - Simon put me on to this also, and it's EXACTLY what the
validator is demanding.

--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-12 Thread russ - maxdesign
 a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
 a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
 a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
 a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 4 nowBuy Now/a
 a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 5 nowBuy Now/a

This is an elegant solution but has one drawback.

The title attribute is sometimes not supported by screen readers. Even in
screen readers that do support titles, the option is not often turned on due
to lack of knowledge or information overload.

For many screen reader users, the solution above would give repeated links
saying buy now - which is not ideal.

Steve Faulkner wrote about the inaccessibility of title attributes a while
ago:
http://www.sf.id.au/ozewai/

A possible solution, as mentioned before on this thread, is to use slightly
more descriptive link content - such as including the title in the link
content. You can also hide some of the link content if needed:
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/more-links/

The interesting challenge here is the difference between passing
accessibility tests vs helping real world users. The title method shown
above is elegant and would pass many accessibility tests, yet could be less
than ideal for real world screen reader users. The slightly more verbose
methods, including those where hiding is used, are less elegant but much
more accessible for real users.

The choice, as always, is yours  :)
Russ




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-12 Thread Al Sparber

From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're 
looking for would be:


a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 4 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 5 nowBuy Now/a



Andrew

Thanks Andrew - Simon put me on to this also, and it's EXACTLY what 
the

validator is demanding.


There really is not an accessibility validator in the same sense as 
there is an HTML or CSS validator. Accessibility is not black and 
white. I believe your original code is fine:


h1 EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER /h1
a href=esim/btsa.htmlAbout the book/a
a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say/a

h1 MANCHESTER KISS /h1
a href=mk/introduction.htmlIntroduction/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt2.htmlWhat the author says/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.htmlWhat the critics say/a

An assistive reader, in the vast majority of cases,  is not going to 
machine-gun What the critics say. It's going to read the headings, 
then the content/links that come below.


This might be a case of overanalyzing things a bit. The goal is not to 
satisfy a machine-based checker, but to provide a usable and 
accessible page.


--
Al Sparber - PVII
http://www.projectseven.com
Extending Dreamweaver - Nav Systems | Galleries | Widgets
Authors: 42nd Street: Mastering the Art of CSS Design









***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-12 Thread Designer

Al Sparber wrote:

From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may be late to the party with this, but I think what they're 
looking for would be:


a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 1 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 2 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 3 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 4 nowBuy Now/a
a href=LINK title=Buy TITLE 5 nowBuy Now/a



Andrew


Thanks Andrew - Simon put me on to this also, and it's EXACTLY what the
validator is demanding.


There really is not an accessibility validator in the same sense as 
there is an HTML or CSS validator. Accessibility is not black and white. 
I believe your original code is fine:


h1 EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER /h1
a href=esim/btsa.htmlAbout the book/a
a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say/a

h1 MANCHESTER KISS /h1
a href=mk/introduction.htmlIntroduction/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt2.htmlWhat the author says/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.htmlWhat the critics say/a

An assistive reader, in the vast majority of cases,  is not going to 
machine-gun What the critics say. It's going to read the headings, 
then the content/links that come below.


This might be a case of overanalyzing things a bit. The goal is not to 
satisfy a machine-based checker, but to provide a usable and accessible 
page.


Thanks Al, I appreciate your input on this. Point is, I am new to giving 
accessibility some serious consideration  (other than the obvious 
simple things) and my only teacher at this stage are the various 
checkers such as those which come in the FF dev toolbar. Only this last 
week I decided to put a few sites on the W3C site thing 
(http://www.w3csites.com/) and, of course, you have to specify certain 
ratings such as html validation as well as WAI/section 508 validation. I 
thought this was an interesting challenge/tutorial to see what was 
needed to get my sites to pass automatic WAI3 validation.  It has been a 
very educational exercise and there has been a couple of things (like 
the case discussed here) which I would never have dreamed of.  Clearly, 
accessibility is a big area and currently outside of my expertise, but 
it's a start.


Or do you think it's a misleading one, perhaps?
--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-12 Thread Al Sparber

From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

There really is not an accessibility validator in the same sense 
as there is an HTML or CSS validator. Accessibility is not black 
and white. I believe your original code is fine:


h1 EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER /h1
a href=esim/btsa.htmlAbout the book/a
a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say/a

h1 MANCHESTER KISS /h1
a href=mk/introduction.htmlIntroduction/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt2.htmlWhat the author says/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.htmlWhat the critics say/a

An assistive reader, in the vast majority of cases,  is not going 
to machine-gun What the critics say. It's going to read the 
headings, then the content/links that come below.


This might be a case of overanalyzing things a bit. The goal is not 
to satisfy a machine-based checker, but to provide a usable and 
accessible page.


Thanks Al, I appreciate your input on this. Point is, I am new to 
giving accessibility some serious consideration  (other than the 
obvious simple things) and my only teacher at this stage are the 
various checkers such as those which come in the FF dev toolbar. 
Only this last week I decided to put a few sites on the W3C site 
thing (http://www.w3csites.com/) and, of course, you have to specify 
certain ratings such as html validation as well as WAI/section 508 
validation. I thought this was an interesting challenge/tutorial to 
see what was needed to get my sites to pass automatic WAI3 
validation.  It has been a very educational exercise and there has 
been a couple of things (like the case discussed here) which I would 
never have dreamed of.  Clearly, accessibility is a big area and 
currently outside of my expertise, but it's a start.


Or do you think it's a misleading one, perhaps?


No. Just confusing :-) It's much more a subjective area than is CSS or 
general markup, for example. I would sign off on the heading/DD 
scenario you have, with the duplicated link text. But that's not to 
say you should. You might want to subscribe to the WebAim 
accessibility mailing list and see if you can get a clear concensus 
there.


http://list.webaim.org/

Best of luck.

--
Al Sparber - PVII
http://www.projectseven.com
Extending Dreamweaver - Nav Systems | Galleries | Widgets
Authors: 42nd Street: Mastering the Art of CSS Design







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-11 Thread Designer

Al Sparber wrote:


[snip]
. . . No one is forcing you 
to not use Buy Now 20 times, on 20 different links. . . .


Well Al, they are if I want to make an 'accessible' site which passes 
the WAI validation.  No-one is 'forcing me' not to put font tags in the 
markup, or lay it out with tables, or etc.


:-)

--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility -solution!

2007-03-11 Thread Designer

Simon Moss wrote:
In fact there is a let-out clause - 
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#link-text - you *can* use the 
same text for different links, providing you use unique title text for 
each one...


(still irritating - but as you say - there is a point there...)

Simon




Brilliant Simon! I used the title attribute and it now passes fine! 
Thank you!


(http://www.webscribe.fsnet.co.uk/menufiles/menu.html)

(It seems many of us have a lot to learn . . . :-)

--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-11 Thread Al Sparber

From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Al Sparber wrote:


[snip]
. . . No one is forcing you to not use Buy Now 20 times, on 20 
different links. . . .


Well Al, they are if I want to make an 'accessible' site which 
passes the WAI validation.  No-one is 'forcing me' not to put font 
tags in the markup, or lay it out with tables, or etc.


:-)


That's an interesting bit of logic ;-) Nevertheless, I'm glad you've 
found a solution. 





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



[WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Designer
I am confused by the WAI validator failing validation on a section of a 
page which has the following code:


dd
  a href=mk/introduction.htmlIntroduction/a
/dd
dd
  a href=mk/introduction_pt2.htmlWhat the author says/a
/dd
dd
  a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say/a
/dd
dd
  a href=mk/mkchapters.htmlSample chapters/a
/dd

The validator (Cynthia) says :

Rule: 13.1.2 - All Anchor elements are required not to use the same link 
text to refer to different resources.


* Failure - Anchor Element at Line: 143, Column: 15

The page in question is at 
http://www.webscribe.fsnet.co.uk/menufiles/menu.html


I'm obviously missing something . . .  can anyone help?Thanks.

--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread John Faulds

a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say/a

Same text - different destinations.


On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:43:51 +1000, Designer  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say/a




--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Designer

John Faulds wrote:

a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say/a

Same text - different destinations.



Thanks John!   But . . .

That's what I want : 2 different books, each in it's own headed list, 
both with a section on what the critics say.  Does this mean I can't 
have that?  If so, that is ridiculous!!


If I have 20 items for sale in a list, does that mean I can't have a 
'buy now' button for each of them, because the link text is the same? 
Ludicrous!

--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Al Sparber

From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks John!   But . . .

That's what I want : 2 different books, each in it's own headed 
list, both with a section on what the critics say.  Does this mean 
I can't have that?  If so, that is ridiculous!!


If I have 20 items for sale in a list, does that mean I can't have a 
'buy now' button for each of them, because the link text is the 
same? Ludicrous!


See checkpoint 13.1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/

--
Al Sparber
PVII
http://www.projectseven.com

Designing with CSS is sometimes like barreling down a crumbling 
mountain road at 90 miles per hour secure in the knowledge that 
repairs are scheduled for next Tuesday.





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Designer

Al Sparber wrote:

From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks John!   But . . .

That's what I want : 2 different books, each in it's own headed list, 
both with a section on what the critics say.  Does this mean I can't 
have that?  If so, that is ridiculous!!


If I have 20 items for sale in a list, does that mean I can't have a 
'buy now' button for each of them, because the link text is the same? 
Ludicrous!


See checkpoint 13.1:
http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/



That's why it failed validation of course.  viz:

13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link. [Priority 2]
Link text should be meaningful enough to make sense when read out 
of context -- either on its own or as part of a sequence of links. Link 
text should also be terse.
For example, in HTML, write Information about version 4.3 instead 
of click here. In addition to clear link text, content developers may 
further clarify the target of a link with an informative link title 
(e.g., in HTML, the title attribute).


So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:

Buy now,
Buy it now,
Buy this now,
Now buy it,
Get it at once,
Purchase now,
Get yer wallet out,
Fork out now,
Dig in for the dosh,

etc etc.  :-)

Ludicrous!  I see the point, obviously, but really!!!

--
Bob

www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Tony Crockford

Designer wrote:


Ludicrous!  I see the point, obviously, but really!!!



not really, you're missing the obvious.

the links should be

buy book on cooking ISBNx
buy book on Shiatsu ISBNx
buy book on Vegetarian cooking ISBN

etc and the visual styling would be a graphic buy now (using some 
accessible image replacement technique)


and everyone is happy.

you the designer can have your visual button, and Google and all the 
other people that can't see your button get a meaningful list to choose 
from.


think about it...

;o)





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun

Designer wrote:

So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:

Buy now,
Buy it now,
Buy this now,
Now buy it,

 .

No, it doesn't.
It should rather be:

Buy product A now,
Buy product B now,
Buy product C now,
Buy product D now,
.

Your own page should then probably have something like:

EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER
About the book (- EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER)
What the critics say (about EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER)
What the readers say (about EVERY STREET IN MANCHESTER)
--
MANCHESTER KISS
Introduction (to MANCHESTER KISS)
What the author says (about MANCHESTER KISS)
What the critics say (about MANCHESTER KISS)
Sample chapters (from MANCHESTER KISS)

...and you can probably hide the part I've placed in parentheses from 
normal view, in order to keep the graphical design as is.


Makes kind of sense to me when I go through those links.

regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no


***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Al Sparber

From: Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:

Buy now,
Buy it now,
Buy this now,
Now buy it,
Get it at once,
Purchase now,
Get yer wallet out,
Fork out now,
Dig in for the dosh,

etc etc.  :-)

Ludicrous!  I see the point, obviously, but really!!!


Accessibility sometimes involves judgement calls. No one is forcing 
you to not use Buy Now 20 times, on 20 different links. But you can 
use:


Buy Machester Kiss now
Buy Manchester Hug now

--
Al Sparber - PVII
http://www.projectseven.com
Extending Dreamweaver - Nav Systems | Galleries | Widgets
Authors: 42nd Street: Mastering the Art of CSS Design







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Designer wrote:
 John Faulds wrote:
 a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say/a
 a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say/a

 Same text - different destinations.


 Thanks John!   But . . .

 That's what I want : 2 different books, each in it's own headed list,
 both with a section on what the critics say.  Does this mean I can't
 have that?  If so, that is ridiculous!!

 If I have 20 items for sale in a list, does that mean I can't have a
 'buy now' button for each of them, because the link text is the same?
 Ludicrous!

What about:
a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say spanabout
XXX/span/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say spanabout
YYY/span/a

Then you use your favorite method to hide the span elements.

---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Nick Fitzsimons

On 10 Mar 2007, at 19:18:00, Thierry Koblentz wrote:


What about:
a href=esim/btsa_pt2.htmlWhat the critics say spanabout
XXX/span/a
a href=mk/introduction_pt3.html What the critics say spanabout
YYY/span/a

Then you use your favorite method to hide the span elements.



As long as your favourite method doesn't involve the use of display:  
none; or visibility:hidden, as they will hide the content from  
screenreaders :-)


Regards,

Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/





***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



Re: [WSG] target and accessibility

2007-03-10 Thread Simon Moss
In fact there is a let-out clause -  
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/#link-text - you *can* use the same  
text for different links, providing you use unique title text for each  
one...


(still irritating - but as you say - there is a point there...)

Simon

www.simonmoss.co.uk


That's why it failed validation of course.  viz:

13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link. [Priority 2]
 Link text should be meaningful enough to make sense when read out  
of context -- either on its own or as part of a sequence of links. Link  
text should also be terse.
 For example, in HTML, write Information about version 4.3 instead  
of click here. In addition to clear link text, content developers may  
further clarify the target of a link with an informative link title  
(e.g., in HTML, the title attribute).


So I repeat : 20 items for sale would have to be:

Buy now,
Buy it now,
Buy this now,
Now buy it,
Get it at once,
Purchase now,
Get yer wallet out,
Fork out now,
Dig in for the dosh,

etc etc.  :-)

Ludicrous!  I see the point, obviously, but really!!!




***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***