Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed?
the site is http://creekside.dpsnc.net and the CSS is located at http://creekside.dpsnc.net/print.css and http://creekside.dpsnc.net/creekside.css\ P.S... I'm aware that the URL below my name is a mess. but that's a different story :-) Bruce Gilbert Webmaster Durham Public Schools Durham, North Carolina (919) 560-9118 -Office Phone http://www.dpsnc.net Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] m To Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc group.org Subject Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed? 05/31/2004 05:47 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] roup.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a style sheet I am using for the web media=screen and I also have one for print purposes media=print. I also want to hide the CSS from older browsers such as NS 4.0 etc. using the @import feature if possible. snip/ It would help if you supplied either a URL or a code snipped. I have a guess at what the problem is, but I'd rather withhold my guesses since code would make guessing unnecessary. http://www.dpsnc.net This URL doesn't match your description, so I assume you're referring to a different one. It, by the way, is a mess. It has two heads with a form tag in between. Needless to say it doesn't validate. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the site is http://creekside.dpsnc.net and the CSS is located at http://creekside.dpsnc.net/print.css and http://creekside.dpsnc.net/creekside.css\ I take it you didn't try to validate? If you did, you probably would have found the extra quotation mark in the link/. That might solve your problem with the @-rule being ignored. If that doesn't solve the problem, copy and paste the links and @-rules you're using to your message. You should realize that while people here are very happy to help, they don't want it for you. By not running a page first through the validator, you're basically saying to people I'm too lazy to do my own work; you do it for me. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed?
thanks, I actually did run in through the validator once, but I guess not after adding the second style sheet. My mistake there. I'm really not lazy and don't expect others to do my work for meI'm just forgetfull :-) Bruce Gilbert Webmaster Durham Public Schools Durham, North Carolina (919) 560-9118 -Office Phone http://www.dpsnc.net Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] m To Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc group.org Subject Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed? 06/01/2004 10:33 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] roup.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the site is http://creekside.dpsnc.net and the CSS is located at http://creekside.dpsnc.net/print.css and http://creekside.dpsnc.net/creekside.css\ I take it you didn't try to validate? If you did, you probably would have found the extra quotation mark in the link/. That might solve your problem with the @-rule being ignored. If that doesn't solve the problem, copy and paste the links and @-rules you're using to your message. You should realize that while people here are very happy to help, they don't want it for you. By not running a page first through the validator, you're basically saying to people I'm too lazy to do my own work; you do it for me. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help * * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I actually did run in through the validator once, but I guess not after adding the second style sheet. It's a very good first line debugging tool. My mistake there. No, it's not; your patent is invalid due to prior art. I'm really not lazy and don't expect others to do my work for meI'm just forgetfull :-) I didn't mean to suggest that you are, but rather the message which was being conveyed. The statement was mostly a general, rather than being directed at you. My apologies if I offended you. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
[WSG] third style sheet needed?
I have a style sheet I am using for the web media=screen and I also have one for print purposes media=print. I also want to hide the CSS from older browsers such as NS 4.0 etc. using the @import feature if possible. When I do the @import feature the page defaults to my print style sheet for some reason. I have tried doing both @import url for the stylesheets and also leaving one as a link and the other @import. Am I doing something wrong or is there another way to get the older browsers to ignore the CSS? TIA Bruce Gilbert Webmaster Durham Public Schools Durham, North Carolina (919) 560-9118 -Office Phone http://www.dpsnc.net * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
Re: [WSG] third style sheet needed?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a style sheet I am using for the web media=screen and I also have one for print purposes media=print. I also want to hide the CSS from older browsers such as NS 4.0 etc. using the @import feature if possible. snip/ It would help if you supplied either a URL or a code snipped. I have a guess at what the problem is, but I'd rather withhold my guesses since code would make guessing unnecessary. http://www.dpsnc.net This URL doesn't match your description, so I assume you're referring to a different one. It, by the way, is a mess. It has two heads with a form tag in between. Needless to say it doesn't validate. * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help *
