Re: [WSG] Big Websites that turned Accessible

2005-10-04 Thread Peter Ottery
On 10/5/05, Zach Inglis wrote
> For an article i'm writing I need a list who have turned their
> website into Web Standard compliant websites.

there are many lists scattered around already compiled - like this one:
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/redesignwatch/

hth, cheers, pete
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Big Websites that turned Accessible

2005-10-04 Thread Brent Edwards
On 10/4/05 2:46 PM, "Zach Inglis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> For an article i'm writing I need a list who have turned their
> website into Web Standard compliant websites.
> 
> Such as Yahoo!
> **
> The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
> 
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
> 
http://www.sprint.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Big Websites that turned Accessible [final]

2005-10-04 Thread Zach Inglis

Fair doos. No, I am using Apple's Mail.


Anyway, Jeremy ended up helping me. Cheers though.
http://www.zachinglis.com/web-accessibility/web-standards-as-it-is/


On 4 Oct 2005, at 22:13, Paul Bennett wrote:


(1) Trim your posts
(2) That reply would be better off-list

Tip to 'pay' for this post (ala evolt.org):

If, for any reason, you're using word-to-html conversion, here's a  
handy tool to help you clean up some of that gorgeous WORD 'markup':


http://textism.com/wordcleaner/

:)
Paul
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**






**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Big Websites that turned Accessible

2005-10-04 Thread Paul Bennett
(1) Trim your posts
(2) That reply would be better off-list

Tip to 'pay' for this post (ala evolt.org):

If, for any reason, you're using word-to-html conversion, here's a handy tool 
to help you clean up some of that gorgeous WORD 'markup':

http://textism.com/wordcleaner/

:)
Paul
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Big Websites that turned Accessible

2005-10-04 Thread Zach Inglis

I am perfectly aware of that.

On 4 Oct 2005, at 20:55, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:


Zach Inglis wrote:

For an article i'm writing I need a list who have turned their   
website into Web Standard compliant websites.




Just a word of warning: "web standards compliant" and "accessible"  
are not synonyms. It is possible to create sites that formally  
validate to the syntax of web standards, but are still dysmally  
inaccessible. I'd start focussing on exactly what list you're  
trying to compile...


P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**






**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Big Websites that turned Accessible

2005-10-04 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

Zach Inglis wrote:
For an article i'm writing I need a list who have turned their  website 
into Web Standard compliant websites.


Just a word of warning: "web standards compliant" and "accessible" are 
not synonyms. It is possible to create sites that formally validate to 
the syntax of web standards, but are still dysmally inaccessible. I'd 
start focussing on exactly what list you're trying to compile...


P
--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**