Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread designer

- Original Message - 
From: Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:21 AM
Subject: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!


 So, before heading this way for some help, I checked out the site on many
 platforms.

 http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/
 http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/c/global.css


Sorry Lori,

But on my winXP machine [not SP2]  the site misbehaves in FF1.0 - the right
column appears underneath  the left one! In IE6 etc it is fine.

Please note that you get a bad 'flash of unstyled content' in IE5.5.

Bob McClelland,
Cornwall (U.K.)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Lori Leach
I made some changes to the menu per Philippe, and I not happy with the
results.  I can't get it to move up and it seems there are so many hacks in
there I don't know which one to change to make it move.

Here is that with his menu system implemented:
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/index2.htm
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/global2.css

I want the menu system to be exactly like the one on www.adaptivepath.com
except on the right of the design rather than the left. The implementation
that was used in the original css is the one that they used with mods. They
did not use UL, and they used floats. It works for them - why will it not
for me. Or do you see problems with theirs too??

Now, on the font size, I showed the client the larger font size, and he does
not like it. He wants it back like it was, small. He says that most of his
visitors will be in the banking industry and not your normal passer by
(thought I tried to explain the benefits) and he says that they will be able
to read it.

Here is the page with a larger font size (done in points) for all content,
and a width now added to the right float. Does it still fall under the
left side?
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/index.htm
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/global.css


Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Philippe Wittenbergh
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 1:21 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread David Laakso
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:52:51 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:


Here is the page with a larger font size (done in points) for all  
content,
and a width now added to the right float. Does it still fall under the
left side?
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/index.htm
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/global.css

Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations
Lori,
XP_SP2 1280 optimal LCD
FF
Menu breaks right on 1st zoom click.
Right coumn holds, and no longer breaks.
Text in the 2 upper containers(right coloumn) breaks at bottom on 3rd zoom  
click.
Opera7.54
Menu just starts to break right at 110%(one letter and pipe).

Best,
David
--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Lori Leach
David,

Thanks for looking...

Apparently then there is nothing that I can do to keep the menu from
breaking when you zoom as I have a fixed width design and not fluid. I am in
a corner of sorts, as this is the layout he wants, refuses fluid, and this
is the menu he wants. So I conclude that there is nothing I can do - right?

Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:49 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!


On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:52:51 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:



 Here is the page with a larger font size (done in points) for all
 content,
 and a width now added to the right float. Does it still fall under the
 left side?
 http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/index.htm
 http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/global.css


 Lori Leach
 ZenfulCreations


Lori,

XP_SP2 1280 optimal LCD
FF
Menu breaks right on 1st zoom click.
Right coumn holds, and no longer breaks.
Text in the 2 upper containers(right coloumn) breaks at bottom on 3rd zoom
click.
Opera7.54
Menu just starts to break right at 110%(one letter and pipe).

Best,

David

--
http://www.dlaakso.com/

Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**




**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread David Laakso
Lori, Dunno. I can test. However, I couldn't code my way out of a wet  
paper bag. David

On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:50:04 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

David,
Thanks for looking...
Apparently then there is nothing that I can do to keep the menu from
breaking when you zoom as I have a fixed width design and not fluid. I  
am in
a corner of sorts, as this is the layout he wants, refuses fluid, and  
this
is the menu he wants. So I conclude that there is nothing I can do -  
right?

Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 9:49 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:52:51 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

Here is the page with a larger font size (done in points) for all
content,
and a width now added to the right float. Does it still fall under the
left side?
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/index.htm
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/global.css
Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations
Lori,
XP_SP2 1280 optimal LCD
FF
Menu breaks right on 1st zoom click.
Right coumn holds, and no longer breaks.
Text in the 2 upper containers(right coloumn) breaks at bottom on 3rd  
zoom
click.
Opera7.54
Menu just starts to break right at 110%(one letter and pipe).

Best,
David
--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread David Laakso
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:50:04 -0500, Lori Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:

David,
Thanks for looking...
Apparently then there is nothing that I can do to keep the menu from
breaking when you zoom as I have a fixed width design and not fluid. I  
am in
a corner of sorts, as this is the layout he wants, refuses fluid, and  
this
is the menu he wants. So I conclude that there is nothing I can do -  
right?

Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations
Lori,
Dunno. I can test-- however, I couldn't code my way out of a wet paper bag.
I'd be willing to bet someone else on the list will be able to resolve  
this.

David

--
http://www.dlaakso.com/
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Gunlaug Srtun
Lori Leach wrote:
Apparently then there is nothing that I can do to keep the menu from
 breaking when you zoom as I have a fixed width design and not fluid.
 I am in a corner of sorts, as this is the layout he wants, refuses 
fluid, and this is the menu he wants. So I conclude that there is 
nothing I can do - right?
Lori,
There is a lot you can do-- if you think it's worth the extra work.
That's up to you, of course, but it may pay of on a later job.
I've had a look at this one, without really looking into the code / css.
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/index.htm
It is a fine looking page, but it is a bit weak... :-)
Fixed width isn't really a problem-- if the content can use the height
for readjustments when we zoom text of force a minimum font size.
Containers with no set height, or a min-height / IE/win height-hack set,
would take up a lot of adjustment before anything would break or overflow.
We don't use hacks to make web pages work across browserland - we use
standard css for standard-compliant browsers. Only old browsers like
IE/win is in need of hacks in most layouts. That's why many of us trim
IE/win last, when all the standard-compliant browsers presents a web
page styled as we like it.
If you use IE/win as design-default, then you should at least test with
IE's accessibility-options. IE/win can ignore your font sizes, and a web
page should survive that option since it is one of the few options
IE/win users have (although few are aware of it). It doesn't have to
look perfect though.
The same with the standard-compliant browsers like Opera, FF and Safari.
Things will have to move away from pixel-perfection when we use
text zoom options, but it's alright as long as the page can take it.
Personally I zoom text on all web pages to at least 200%, and use
minimum font size = 28px as a sort of benchmark. What font size the
page has doesn't matter all that much if it can take this test. Few
pages on the web can, and few will need to go this far.
Those two images with text on top, in the right column, can't adjust of
course, and because containers have fixed height there, the text will
overlap if I change font size too much in a standard compliant browser.
IE6 just pushes everything downwards, which at least keeps the text
readable. Improvements are possible there.
The footer has a similar, fixed, height-problem if I zoom text. In IE6
the height expands and the background-image repeats, so the text becomes
dark on dark background. In the standard-compliant browsers the text
overflows downwards. Should also be possible to improve on.
There is a strange thing with the width on that page though, as its
visible and centering part is less than 780px wide-- but it creates a
scrollbar just below 1000px width. What makes your nav-bar act strange
on text zoom is that the nav-bar expands outside the visible
page-border, and into this extra space at the right side.
If the page's real width was the same as the visible page, then the
nav-bar would adjust into two lines-- which it does if I zoom high
enough. That doesn't really break the page, and is something that is
worth looking into.
Plenty to do-- or ignore. :-)
regards
Georg

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-29 Thread Lori Leach
Thank You Georg and everyone for your help.
Georg, I will use much of what you have said to correct the pages. Again,
thank you.

The link for this however will no longer work, as the SEC needs to approve
the content for them prior to publish, and I can't have it on my server for
any length of time.

Agian, thank you so much for your time and expertise.

Lori Leach
ZenfulCreations


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-28 Thread Kornel Lesinski

Konqueror 3.0.5
Wow, amazing it works. CSS in Konq 3.0 is sooo bug ridden. Safaried Konq  
3.3 behaves much better.

IE4 - PC
Ignore it. IE4 is suicidcal when it comes to CSS.
All Versions of Opera
If in Opera 6, you can ignore it.
But if it breaks in latest Opera you have a problem.
Opera 7.5 has one of the best CSS implementations around,
so you should double-check your CSS against validator and specs
(because CSS validator is absolutely dump in some cases :()
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-28 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Lori Leach wrote:
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/ 
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/c/global.css

So - can I get a double check on the ones that appear to work okay,
 and some possible direction on what I need to do to get it to work 
right in the ones that don't...  I really DON'T want to use hacks any
 more than absolutely necessary.
As commented by others; text fonts are way too small, and your page is
relying on that font size. Pixel-perfection based on font size is not
reliable...
No problems in any of my browsers:
Opera 7.54 - Firefox 1.0 - IE6.
- all on win2K-pro.
However, no hacks will save it if a visitor knows anything about
browser-options like minimum font size, text zoom or font size
override (in IE/win).
regards
Georg
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Browser Check - such inconsistencies!

2004-12-28 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On 29 Dec 2004, at 9:21 am, Lori Leach wrote:
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/
http://www.zenfulcreations.com/sites/sss/c/global.css

Netscape 6.2 - PC
IE5 - Mac (looks different at different resolutions)
IE4 - PC
All Versions of Opera
So - can I get a double check on the ones that appear to work okay, 
and
some possible direction on what I need to do to get it to work right 
in the
ones that don't...  I really DON'T want to use hacks any more than
absolutely necessary.
Others have mentioned it, the body text in your left column is really 
too small for me to read.

The right column drops below the left one in IE Mac; div#right is 
floated but you didn't specify a width on it; hence it expands to the 
full width of the parent container.
Give it a width (required for floats per CSS2.0), and it should work OK

Your top menu disappeared; a positioned object within a 100% high div 
(100% of what ?) is asking for problems
#top {
	position: relative
	height: 100px /*height of graphic*/
}
#nav is doing nothing usefull

#nav div {
   position:absolute;
   /*width:500px; */
   bottom:0;
   right:0;
   border-left:1px solid #00245D;
}
This should get your menu to show up.
#nav a are floated elements, again without a width, each block expands 
to the full width of their parent.

Take a look at how I coded this navigation:
http://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/phantom-links/inline-block_list.php
Using inline-block instead of float to deal with IE Mac.
HTH
Philippe
---/---
Philippe Wittenbergh
now live : http://emps.l-c-n.com/
code | design | web projects : http://www.l-c-n.com/
IE5 Mac bugs and oddities : http://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**