Re: [WSG] Flyout menu questions

2004-11-09 Thread Will Jensen
Hello Ron, and to other list members,

My second comment to the list so have somewhat limited knowledge of best practices. I will be brief.

I understand this is a test site and not compete in all details. I am not certain, but suspect you will have just as much depth in most other department sections as you did in the Community Development section. if so, you have problems of usability and user interest in pursuing to the depths.

1.	The site is designed from the standpoint of the departments of the city - not from the true customers viewpoint. Ask citizens what they want to know and the site navigation could then be broken into perhaps 7-8 main categories that could be done as global nav at the top.

An example is the staff listings - these are at best a vanity section and of minimal value. Either eliminate or group all under a catch-all main section like you might on a business website. A city is a business.

Similarly - the forms for filing apps, refunds, making payments - might benefit from a common point of entry - right at the top. Your global Nav link I Want To.. might be the route, but that title leaves me wondering a bit what it really means.

2.	The best-practices gurus say no more than three pages of depth - you're at five on the left side menus. That is too deep. I know it is possible to use the depth menu like this to jump to detailed sections easily, but I had serious problems with that menu nest in Safari, IE5.5, and NN7 on a Mac. I kept falling off the menu and having to start over. Nearly 75% of the time in trying to get to level 5 was a failure.

The flyout menu failed totally in IE 5.5 on the Mac. It worked ok in Safari and NN7.

3.	The one-size-fits-all website seldom does. I would advise you and your client to go for several websites - inter-linked of course, but distinctly different. Why? There is too much subdividing of data for the present portal site. You either have to back up and break it up into different sites - or break the data into different customer-oriented  bits/sections. The separate library site is an example.

4.	The global nav at top is a problem. In Safari and NN on a Mac the drop down for I want to.. appeared about 3-4 pixels down into the pale green section AND I could not reach them with the mouse before they disappeared. In IE5.5 on Mac the same menu appeared at the top of the white center section and was also impossible to reach with the mouse before it disappeared

Will

inline: SigThkLong200.jpg

William H. Jensen, Jr.
67 Leninski Prospect
Apartment #174, 5th Floor
Moscow, Russia, 117296
Tel: (7)(095) 137-6546
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

US address for mail forwarding to Russia is:

William H. Jensen
c/o IPS, MB 951
Suite 572
666 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY, 10103
On Nov 8, 2004, at 9:58 PM, Pringle, Ron wrote:

Hello all-

I am in the process of redeveloping a large, content heavy municipal site.
There is an extraordinarily large amount of information on the current site,
and a large number of departments that need to be represented in the
navigation.

I've used the Son Of Suckerfish code to build out a flyout menu system.
Works great, looks nice. However, some of the menus get as many as five
layers deep. I'm concerned about usability (by regular and impaired users),
especially on small screen real estate. My biggest problem with it is the
depth of the submenus, how easy it is to slip off a menu 3 layers deep and
lose your place and the fact that the menus don't remain visible for a few
seconds after mousing off them.

I'm looking for a review of the navigation along with opinions and
suggestions, within the following constraints:

1. This site is templated via a single master template in DW. I would prefer
NOT to have to use more than the one template for the site, as it will
exponentially increase my workload with each additional section/template.

2. I've looked at the vertically expanding/collapsing menu systems, and have
pretty much ruled them out for use on my site for a variety of reasons.

Ideas, criticisms, suggestions and opinions welcomed.

http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/index.htm

Only the first 3 menu items in the vertical nav have been flushed out.

Regards,
Ron

p.s. for a good laugh, look at the current site at http://www.aurora-il.org



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Flyout menu questions

2004-11-08 Thread Kim Kruse
Hi Ron,
I've seen some pretty good menu system over at ProjectSeven.com
Specially these 2 might be of interest...
http://www.projectseven.com/viewer/index.asp?demo=tmm
http://www.projectseven.com/viewer/index.asp?demo=mm2
They are quite accessible and degrades gracefully with javascript turned of.
Kim
Pringle, Ron wrote:
Hello all-
I am in the process of redeveloping a large, content heavy municipal site.
There is an extraordinarily large amount of information on the current site,
and a large number of departments that need to be represented in the
navigation.
I've used the Son Of Suckerfish code to build out a flyout menu system.
Works great, looks nice. However, some of the menus get as many as five
layers deep. I'm concerned about usability (by regular and impaired users),
especially on small screen real estate. My biggest problem with it is the
depth of the submenus, how easy it is to slip off a menu 3 layers deep and
lose your place and the fact that the menus don't remain visible for a few
seconds after mousing off them.
I'm looking for a review of the navigation along with opinions and
suggestions, within the following constraints:
1. This site is templated via a single master template in DW. I would prefer
NOT to have to use more than the one template for the site, as it will
exponentially increase my workload with each additional section/template.
2. I've looked at the vertically expanding/collapsing menu systems, and have
pretty much ruled them out for use on my site for a variety of reasons.
Ideas, criticisms, suggestions and opinions welcomed.
http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/index.htm
Only the first 3 menu items in the vertical nav have been flushed out.
Regards,
Ron
p.s. for a good laugh, look at the current site at http://www.aurora-il.org

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

 

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Flyout menu questions

2004-11-08 Thread klessa
 especially on small screen real estate. My biggest problem with it is the
 depth of the submenus, how easy it is to slip off a menu 3 layers deep and
 lose your place and the fact that the menus don't remain visible for a few
 seconds after mousing off them.

I think that's a big flaw in those menus in particular, that you don't
'remember' where you are after you've clicked on a link. What I've done is
either use breadcrumbs to show location, OR use a common piece of code for
the navigation that you can use to update the link images to reflect where
you are (to stick, essentially).

 I'm looking for a review of the navigation along with opinions and
 suggestions, within the following constraints:

 1. This site is templated via a single master template in DW. I would
 prefer
 NOT to have to use more than the one template for the site, as it will
 exponentially increase my workload with each additional section/template.

Understand that, but you might end up being happier if you replaced the
template with some common code include navigation so you have more
control.

I think the site looks great, but I prefer some sort of visual indicator
on the individual menu items to indicate that there is additional content
below.


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Flyout menu questions

2004-11-08 Thread Anders Nawroth
Pringle, Ron wrote:
Ideas, criticisms, suggestions and opinions welcomed.
http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/index.htm
 

I think it's to difficult to use for many visitors, flyouts are not so 
easy to handle for everybody!

If you make Aldermans office and so on clickable, and point the links 
to simple menu-pages with the sub-choices, it would be a good 
alternative for users that have trouble with the flyouts. -- I do it 
this way myself, creating the submenus dynamically with Php.

/AndersN
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


RE: [WSG] Flyout menu questions

2004-11-08 Thread Derek Featherstone
Pringle, Ron wrote:

Ideas, criticisms, suggestions and opinions welcomed.

http://www.aurora-il.org/testsite/index.htm

Hi Ron,

I know this isn't exactly what you were looking for, but I went to do a
quick navigation test via keyboard and found that I couldn't. You should
remove the onkeypress redundancy for your style sheet switcher. As it
stands, I can't tab past the stylesheet switcher because of the onkeypress
handler.

In many browsers onkeypress can break keyboard navigation - certainly an
unintended consequence - where trying to help accessibility actually hinders
it. Onclick is a misnomer, at least the way it has been implemented in
browsers. It actually behaves more like onactivate, so onclick will be just
fine for keyboard users as well.

Hope this helps...
Best regards,
Derek.
-- 
Derek Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 613.599.9784;   toll-free: 1.866.932.4878 (North America)
Web Accessibility:  http://www.wats.ca
Personal: http://www.boxofchocolates.ca

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**