Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Carolyn Diaz
The closest I've seen in css can be found at http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menus/expand.html.

Good luck!

CarolynOn 11/8/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ?http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html
if yes, please shot a kickstart--RegardsJad madiBloghttp://EasyHTTP.com/jad/Web standards Planethttp://W3planet.net/
**The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/ See 
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list  getting help**


Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Wayne Douglas
That has about as much to do with AJAX as my mother does.

Whats wrong with using the fisheye widget? Dojo code is standards compliant, effiecientJS. Why would you try to do something like that in _pure_ CSS? If your going to do that you might as well try to do it in plain text aswell.


HTH

w

On 11/8/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ?
http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.htmlif yes, please shot a kickstart--RegardsJad madiBloghttp://EasyHTTP.com/jad/Web standards Planet
http://W3planet.net/**The discussion list forhttp://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmfor some hints on posting to the list  getting help**



Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net (http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net)
My point exactly why not use JS ?

2005/11/8, Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 That has about as much to do with AJAX as my mother does.

 Whats wrong with using the fisheye widget? Dojo code is standards compliant,
 effiecient JS. Why would you try to do something like that in _pure_ CSS? If
 your going to do that you might as well try to do it in plain text aswell.

 HTH

 w




 On 11/8/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
  any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS
 ?
 
 
 http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html
 
 
  if yes, please shot a kickstart
  --
  Regards
  Jad madi
  Blog
  http://EasyHTTP.com/jad/
  Web standards Planet
  http://W3planet.net/
  **
  The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
  **
 
 


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Paul Noone
Using a PNG you could achieve a similar effect.

This was actually demoed at WE05. You should be able to find the
presentation and podcast on the WE05 website.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jad Madi
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 6:17 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

Hi,
any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ?

http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html


if yes, please shot a kickstart
--
Regards
Jad madi
Blog
http://EasyHTTP.com/jad/
Web standards Planet
http://W3planet.net/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Patrick H. Lauke

Paul Noone wrote:

Using a PNG you could achieve a similar effect.


Did you mean SVG?

--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Paul Noone
Damn these infernal acronyms. ;) 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Patrick H. Lauke
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 9:10 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

Paul Noone wrote:
 Using a PNG you could achieve a similar effect.

Did you mean SVG?

--
Patrick H. Lauke
__
re.dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re-
+ dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
__
Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
__
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Samuel Richardson
You would have to use javascript to detect the mouse position over the 
icons to correctly scale the image, you might be able to go from having 
a small icon to a large icon just using CSS.


PNGs will allow you to have nice alpha blending around the edges of the 
images not matter what the background is behind them but you need a hack 
to implement it in IE6.


I'd suggest altering the javascript a bit to make it a bit smoother, the 
apple dock scales the image your mouse is over to it's max size and 
scales the images on either side according to where the mouse is. At the 
moment it's very jumpy, responds even if you move your mouse a little 
bit, which is kind of annoying.


Samuel


Paul Noone wrote:


Using a PNG you could achieve a similar effect.

This was actually demoed at WE05. You should be able to find the
presentation and podcast on the WE05 website.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jad Madi
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 6:17 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

Hi,
any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without JS ?

http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html


if yes, please shot a kickstart
--
Regards
Jad madi
Blog
http://EasyHTTP.com/jad/
Web standards Planet
http://W3planet.net/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


 


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)

2005-11-08 Thread Richard Czeiger
This seems to be a great way to illustrate one of the key points of the 
whole standards compliant, semantic web concept.


Basically,

   XHTML - Content (what it says)
   CSS - Form (what it looks like)
   JavaScript/DOM - Behaviour (what happens when I do this ...)

The Fisheye example looks like a perfect fit for JavaScript.
Again, why would you try do this in anything but JavaScript?

The page works when JS is turned off, so that's a good thing
The ONLY thing I'd recommend is plugging in some DOM to access the an ID 
that you give to the DIVs instead of those proprietary attributes.


R  :o)


- Original Message - 
From: Marko Mihelcic - founder of mcville.net 
(http.//www.mcville.net)|(http://board.mcville.net) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] css instead of JS(ajax)


My point exactly why not use JS ?

2005/11/8, Wayne Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

That has about as much to do with AJAX as my mother does.

Whats wrong with using the fisheye widget? Dojo code is standards 
compliant,
effiecient JS. Why would you try to do something like that in _pure_ CSS? 
If

your going to do that you might as well try to do it in plain text aswell.

HTH

w




On 11/8/05, Jad Madi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 any idea if it's possible to create menu like this one pure css without 
 JS

?


http://dojotoolkit.org/~alex/dojo/trunk/demos/widget/Fisheye.html


 if yes, please shot a kickstart
 --
 Regards
 Jad madi
 Blog
 http://EasyHTTP.com/jad/
 Web standards Planet
 http://W3planet.net/
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **





**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**