Design for 800 600 and work with the restrictions I say. Don't forget a lot of laptop and a handheld devices will need to look at your site also.
Thanks,
Paul
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:42:27 +1100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Browser Resolutions
>
> Whilst stats can tell some stories, your question is almost one of those
> "how long is a piece of string?" types. Screen resolutions vary with
> target audiences. I have clients with agricultural based sites where I
> am still getting reports of screens at 640 x 480! Don't forget either
> that the return of resolution does not necessarily mean that the user
> has the window maximised.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ric
>
> Stephen Stagg wrote:
>
>> Slightly off-list but important all the same.
>>
>> I traditionally design sites to look good at 800x600 and best at
>> 1024x768. Now, tho, it seems as if users visiting with resolutions of
>> 800x600 are around the 1% margin. Could those of you with access to
>> good stats packages for your sites please tell what the %es of users
>> with different resolutions is. I KNOW that a good site should display
>> well at any resolution BUT when it comes to things like down-sampling
>> images and the like, this sort of info can be very useful.
>> Thanks
>>
>> Stephen
>> ******************************************************
>> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>>
>> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
>> ******************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>
> ******************************************************
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> ******************************************************
>
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
