Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-16 Thread kevin mcmonagle


http://web-strategists.com:888

Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png 
transparency for the floating logo.


http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp


-best
kvn



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***



RE: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread

2007-05-16 Thread Taco Fleur
Thanks for your response, however,
 I wish I understood what you both meant by this, but I don't.
Min max width where/how?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of kevin mcmonagle
Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 5:01 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [WSG] Site check Please - new thread


http://web-strategists.com:888

Yes I agree a min width would be good, if not maybe look into png
transparency for the floating logo.

http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/png_overlay_with_no_extra_markup.asp


-best
kvn



***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***







***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***