Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: WSJT-X fortran runtime error
Hi Bill, I change the size of array in lib/jt65_decode.f90 Perfectly understand that is a lot of work in progress. Just to know the value was modified from 30 to 50 in r6282. As sourceforge back alive I tested also some previous versions with this infamous signals. r6277 2 good decodes, 1 false r6280 2 good decodes, 52 false, of which 42 from 2 to 3 KHZ. In normal operation there is correct decodes of signals that is difficult to see on widegraph. Happy to Year to All 73 Sandro IW3RAB Il 29/12/2015 20:35, Bill Somerville ha scritto: > On 29/12/2015 17:37, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: >> Aggressive decoding is zero, as default. >> I try a lot before write, and without a ini file (removed in every >> round) it is zero. >> >> I have to remove "Two pass decodings" to not hangup program, but seem >> that is not the target. >> >> In windows I have some results. My linux as bigger video and is more >> friendly for some operations. >> A strong dirty signal (I have a lot of them) cause the problem, that >> seem be solved some time ago. > > Hi Sandro, > > stations using low DF values without the benefit of split operating are > liable create several audio harmonics when audio levels are too high. > The users of JT65HF could elect to shift their dial frequency down a > little when transmitting but that is not very user friendly for them. > > Joe and Steve are busy with documentation matters at present but I am > sure that the new code in the JT65 decoder will receive more polishing > before a release of v1.7 is scheduled. > > For now you can make a small change to avoid this issue, in > lib/jt65a.f90 increase the size of the array 'dec(50)' to 'dec(100)'. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS > > -- > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > -- ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
[wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: WSJT-X fortran runtime error
Hi Bill, Aggressive decoding is zero, as default. I try a lot before write, and without a ini file (removed in every round) it is zero. I have to remove "Two pass decodings" to not hangup program, but seem that is not the target. In windows I have some results. My linux as bigger video and is more friendly for some operations. A strong dirty signal (I have a lot of them) cause the problem, that seem be solved some time ago. 73 Sandro IW3RAB Il 29/12/2015 17:37, Bill Somerville ha scritto: > On 29/12/2015 16:32, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: >> I found on screen a "Fortran run time error: index '51' of dimension 1 >> of array 'dec' above upper bound of 50" in Windows, "decode" button >> fixed light blue. > > Hi Sandro, > > in "Settings->Advanced" you probably have "Aggressive decoding level" > greater than zero, currently that is not recommended on HF as it > generates many false decodes and exceeds an internal limit on decodes. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > -- > ___ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > -- ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: WSJT-X fortran runtime error
On 29/12/2015 17:37, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: > Aggressive decoding is zero, as default. > I try a lot before write, and without a ini file (removed in every > round) it is zero. > > I have to remove "Two pass decodings" to not hangup program, but seem > that is not the target. > > In windows I have some results. My linux as bigger video and is more > friendly for some operations. > A strong dirty signal (I have a lot of them) cause the problem, that > seem be solved some time ago. Hi Sandro, stations using low DF values without the benefit of split operating are liable create several audio harmonics when audio levels are too high. The users of JT65HF could elect to shift their dial frequency down a little when transmitting but that is not very user friendly for them. Joe and Steve are busy with documentation matters at present but I am sure that the new code in the JT65 decoder will receive more polishing before a release of v1.7 is scheduled. For now you can make a small change to avoid this issue, in lib/jt65a.f90 increase the size of the array 'dec(50)' to 'dec(100)'. 73 Bill G4WJS -- ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
