Re: [wsjt-devel] Windows 10 Pro time test

2018-12-05 Thread ai4fu
Please bear the following in mind while considering why you are seeing 
DT ≠ 0:



From Bill (G4WJS) a bit further back in this same thread...


"The DT figure is the measured difference between your PC clock and the 
sync of a decoded signal. A positive DT implies that the signal clock 
is behind yours. Positive components of the DT are the sender's clock 
being slow, and propagation delay. Also contributing are latencies 
including audio buffering and other processing delay which can be at 
either of both ends of the link and like propagation delay can only 
increase the DT, net clock difference can contribute a negative or a 
positive DT component."


I would be most interested to hear if you tried pushing the limits of 
how far out of sync you could push things and still manage decodes. The 
guide indicates "A means for synchronizing the computer clock to UTC 
within ±1 second". I wonder how far that boundary could be pushed and 
what the DT readings would be for, say, someone up to 900ms off. Maybe 
I should try it for myself...


Pardon my idle musings. I would be inclined to agree, even before the 
testing, that this falls under the "tempest in a teapot" category.


Best,
AI4FU(Jim)
 
On Wednesday, December 5, 2018 at 6:48 PM, John Kludt 
 wrote:

 
Yeah, the one thing I have wondered about is all the the version to 
version -X variance in protocols that are out there right now.  How 
does everyone know the decode failures are related  to DT and not   
72/75/77 bit issues?  Checking against Time.Is my computer's are 
always spot on and I almost never see a DT of  zero.  I also don't 
seem to have decoding problems.

 
I use Net Time Sync on both Win 7 and Win 10 machines for both 
terrestrial and EME FT8/JT65.

 
Anyway, following the thread with interest and hoping we do not 
over,- engineer the solution when the cause is a bit unclear

 
John
 
Sent from my Verizon Motorola Smartphone
On Dec 5, 2018 6:30 PM, David Fisher  wrote:

Since I apparently put the match to this issue, I’m going to run an 
experiment.


I normally run my Win 10 Pro (homebuilt) computer with the Meinberg 
NTP service. It has worked extremely well. But, it has also been 
said that the Windows service may be fine. So, let’s find out.


I’ve disabled Meinberg on my computer and reenabled the WTS. I’ve 
verified, and will continue to verify, that these setting stick 
across reboots. They are. The hardware clock on this computer has 
some miles on it and runs a bit slow, so whatever time service I 
use, it has some work to do.


Before someone jumps on it – this is Windows 10 PRO, not Home. It’s 
running 1809, and updates regularly as the patches come out. The 
system runs will and is reliable.


I’ll keep an eye on “DT” readings and compare the system clock with 
WWV from time to time. I’ll report what I find. Maybe this is a 
tempest in a teapot.


Dave / NX6D
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


Re: [wsjt-devel] Windows 10 Pro time test

2018-12-05 Thread John Kludt
Yeah, the one thing I have wondered about is all the the version to version -X 
variance in protocols that are out there right now.  How does everyone know the 
decode failures are related  to DT and not   72/75/77 bit issues?  Checking 
against Time.Is my computer's are always spot on and I almost never see a DT of 
 zero.  I also don't seem to have decoding problems.

I use Net Time Sync on both Win 7 and Win 10 machines for both terrestrial and 
EME FT8/JT65.

Anyway, following the thread with interest and hoping we do not over,- engineer 
the solution when the cause is a bit unclear

John

Sent from my Verizon Motorola Smartphone
On Dec 5, 2018 6:30 PM, David Fisher  wrote:
>
> Since I apparently put the match to this issue, I’m going to run an 
> experiment.
>
> I normally run my Win 10 Pro (homebuilt) computer with the Meinberg NTP 
> service. It has worked extremely well. But, it has also been said that the 
> Windows service may be fine. So, let’s find out.
>
> I’ve disabled Meinberg on my computer and reenabled the WTS. I’ve verified, 
> and will continue to verify, that these setting stick across reboots. They 
> are. The hardware clock on this computer has some miles on it and runs a bit 
> slow, so whatever time service I use, it has some work to do.
>
> Before someone jumps on it – this is Windows 10 PRO, not Home. It’s running 
> 1809, and updates regularly as the patches come out. The system runs will and 
> is reliable.
>
> I’ll keep an eye on “DT” readings and compare the system clock with WWV from 
> time to time. I’ll report what I find. Maybe this is a tempest in a teapot.
>
> Dave / NX6D___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


[wsjt-devel] Windows 10 Pro time test

2018-12-05 Thread David Fisher
Since I apparently put the match to this issue, I’m going to run an experiment.

I normally run my Win 10 Pro (homebuilt) computer with the Meinberg NTP 
service.  It has worked extremely well.  But, it has also been said that the 
Windows service may be fine.  So, let’s find out.

I’ve disabled Meinberg on my computer and reenabled the WTS.  I’ve verified, 
and will continue to verify, that these setting stick across reboots.  They 
are.  The hardware clock on this computer has some miles on it and runs a bit 
slow, so whatever time service I use, it has some work to do.

Before someone jumps on it – this is Windows 10 PRO, not Home.  It’s running 
1809, and updates regularly as the patches come out.  The system runs will and 
is reliable.

I’ll keep an eye on “DT” readings and compare the system clock with WWV from 
time to time.  I’ll report what I find.  Maybe this is a tempest in a teapot.

Dave / NX6D


___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel