Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
Hi Angrez, Thanks for clarifying that. Although it does work on watir, do you have any idea why it doesn't work on FireWatir? Seems to be that would be nice to have both the relative path and the absolute path for the element src. If you'd like, i'd be happy to take a look at the code and perhaps come up with a solution. Thanks for your hard work. -Bach - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17320#17320 ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
Hi Bach, The method for finding the element initially worked for Absolute path but while implementing it for forms i got into trouble. So its like this: Whatever HTML you see in Firefox browser will be used for identifying the element. In case you want it to work both with WATiR and FireWatir you can use regular expression like this: ff.image(:src, /\/Images\/Global\/placeitemsinbag.gif/).click - Angrez On 1/18/07, Bach Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Angrez, Thanks for clarifying that. Although it does work on watir, do you have any idea why it doesn't work on FireWatir? Seems to be that would be nice to have both the relative path and the absolute path for the element src. If you'd like, i'd be happy to take a look at the code and perhaps come up with a solution. Thanks for your hard work. -Bach - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17320#17320 ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
Hi Angrez, I just installed the latest gem, 1.0.1. I ran the same test again the script errors at this line: $FF.button(:src, 'http://www.anntaylor.com/Images/Global/placeitemsinbag.gif').click I get the following error: 1) Error: test_1(TestCase): FireWatir::Exception::UnknownObjectException: Unable to locate object, using src and http://www.anntaylor.com/Images/Global/placeitemsinbag.gif C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/firewatir-1.0.1-mswin32/./MozillaBaseElement.rb:739:in `assert_exists' C:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/firewatir-1.0.1-mswin32/./MozillaBaseElement.rb:897:in `click' FireWatir_AnnTaylor.rb:18:in `test_1' - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17256#17256 ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
'll be releasing version 1.0 of FireWatir next week, which includes starting the FireWatir from the script itself i.e. you don't have start Firefox manually and then run the script. This will work for Windows only. Next week you say? This week, based on when you said it, even... I must say that the last time I went looking into FireWatir, it was not nearly at this level. I'll be looking for your release (have gotten on the google group). - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17160#17160 ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
Hi Bach,
Did you tried the latest gem that is there on the code.google.com. It has
support for frames. The syntax that you are using is correct. Could you let
me what errors you get or it simply doesn't work?
Also try using the latest gem from code.google.com.
Regards,
Angrez
On 1/12/07, Bach Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Angrez,
here is the test i'm using:
def test_1
$FF = Firefox.new
$FF.goto(www.anntaylor.com)
$FF.link(:text, 'WEEKEND CASUAL').click
$FF.image(:index, '25').click
$FF.form(:name, 'OrderByVariantSimple').select_list(:index,
'1').select_value(/\d+/)
$FF.form(:name, 'OrderByVariantSimple').select_list(:index,
'2').select_value(/\d+/)
$FF.form(:name, 'OrderByVariantSimple').select_list(:name,
'OMQuantity0').select_value('1')
$FF.form(:name, 'OrderByVariantSimple').checkbox(:id,
'AddToBag0Id', 'on').set(set_or_clear=true)
$FF.button(:src, '
http://www.anntaylor.com/Images/Global/placeitemsinbag.gif').click
$FF.image(:src, '
http://www.anntaylor.com/Images/Global/BTN_CHECKOUT.gif').click
$FF.image(:index, '26').click
end
Try running it. It works correctly in Watir but when it gets to the
following two lines, it breaks in firewatir.
$FF.form(:name, 'OrderByVariantSimple').checkbox(:id,
'AddToBag0Id', 'on').set(set_or_clear=true)
$FF.button(:src, '
http://www.anntaylor.com/Images/Global/placeitemsinbag.gif').click
It doesn't select the checkbox in the first line and can't find the image
for the button in the second line.
If it's an error on my part, please let me know what needs to be changed.
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17112#17112
___
Wtr-general mailing list
Wtr-general@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
___
Wtr-general mailing list
Wtr-general@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
Hi Angrez, I did not have any problems installing FireWatir. I followed the installation guide at http://code.google.com/p/firewatir/ and it worked like a charm. I tried to run a few scripts that I had successfully run with Watir and they seemed to break when it got to clicking buttons in forms. Other than that, it worked very well. Keep up the good work. I'd also like to help you guys out if you need it. -Bach - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17058#17058 ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
Hi Bach, Could you please let me know the scripts or the statements that failed? Regards, Angrez On 1/11/07, Bach Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Angrez, I did not have any problems installing FireWatir. I followed the installation guide at http://code.google.com/p/firewatir/ and it worked like a charm. I tried to run a few scripts that I had successfully run with Watir and they seemed to break when it got to clicking buttons in forms. Other than that, it worked very well. Keep up the good work. I'd also like to help you guys out if you need it. -Bach - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17058#17058 ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
Hi, Yeah we have been working on improving the performance of FireWatir for last few months. The performance has been improved significantly and it runs faster than IE on windows. FireWatir has been tested just on Windows with different Firefox versions like 1.5, 1.5.0.4, 1.5.0.7 , 2.0 and 2.0.0.1. I'll be releasing version 1.0 of FireWatir next week, which includes starting the FireWatir from the script itself i.e. you don't have start Firefox manually and then run the script. This will work for Windows only. Though it should work on Linux, Mac its not tested yet. Also I would like to know any issues/problems that you faced while installing FireWatir so that we can include the same in the Installation Guide. Your suggestions are always welcome. I have created a separate list for FireWatir discussion at google groups: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Angrez On 1/10/07, Bach Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I recently installed firewatir and modified one of my tests that was using watir to use FireWatir and the tests ran very fast. I read in some other posts that firewatir was supposedly slower due to using jssh to send messages to the browser. When I ran the the unit tests for firewatir, the tests completed pretty quickly, however, unit tests for IE Watir was a bit slower in that the browser was less responsive. I was wondering if there have been advancements recently with firewatir because I didn't notice the slowness everyone else was talking about. Thanks. - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?threadID=6078messageID=17014#17014 ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
Re: [Wtr-general] Speed of Firewatir vs. Watir
On 1/10/07, Angrez Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Yeah we have been working on improving the performance of FireWatir for last few months. The performance has been improved significantly and it runs faster than IE on windows. FireWatir has been tested just on Windows with different Firefox versions like 1.5, 1.5.0.4, 1.5.0.7 , 2.0 and 2.0.0.1. I'll be releasing version 1.0 of FireWatir next week, which includes starting the FireWatir from the script itself i.e. you don't have start Firefox manually and then run the script. This will work for Windows only. Wow. Thanks. Just thanks. I can't use it today, but I really appreciate the work. Someday soon, maybe. -Chris ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
