Re: Operation not permitted

2019-12-14 Thread Egan Ford via X11-users
Just upgraded to Catalina today.  Same problem with ~/Documents, et al.
Adding XQuartz, uxterm, etc... did not work.  However adding /bin/bash to
Security/Privacy fixed it for me (I've not switched to zsh yet).

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:27 PM Jonathan Prescott via X11-users <
x11-users@lists.apple.com> wrote:

> All of that makes sense.  However, with Catalina, macOSX/Darwin seems to
> now treat the Documents, Downloads, and Desktop directories a little
> differently, at least with regard to whatever xterm is doing in starting
> processes and setting permissions.  Eterm does as well.  rxvt does not.
> Those are the only X-Window terminal applications I have tried.  Apple
> Terminal, and iTerm2 also do not have a problem.  Any other directory in
> the user’s home directory also do not have problems at all, no matter what
> terminal program you use.  Even xterm and Eterm start to behave normally if
> you futz around with them.  Doesn’t matter whether they are started as part
> of the X11.app/XQuartz.app, or from a separate terminal session, like
> Terminal.  Doesn’t happen on Mojave or earlier MacOSX releases.
>
> These three directories are probably considered by Apple to be, for the
> normal user, needing more security, and there may be an obscure bug that
> xterm and others have triggered in Catalina.
>
> Apple has been making security related changes to the file structure since
> moving to APFS as the boot disk file system.  It would be interesting to
> see if the behavior was different if the user’s home directory was located
> on an HFS+-formatted volume, or an NFS/SMB/Appletalk volume.
>
> Since X11 on MacOSX is now pretty much a volunteer effort, it’s not clear
> how much attention is being paid to something obscure like this, especially
> if there are alternatives and workarounds.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > On Oct 24, 2019, at 6:43 PM, JF Mezei via X11-users <
> x11-users@lists.apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > ps -a -f
> >
> > bike:~ $  ps -a -f -x | grep 9780
> >  501  9780 1   0  6:22PM ?? 0:00.28 /opt/X11/bin/xterm
> >  501  9968  9780   0  6:22PM ttys0000:00.01 bash
> >  501 10057 10029   0  6:31PM ttys0000:00.00 grep 9780
> >
> > One would have to look at the xterm code which creates the process whose
> > input and output are to itself (so it can display in the window).
> >
> > In this case, the xterm was created from the X11 GUI  "Applications"
> > menu optiosn wghere I have one to run xterm. But note that the parent
> > process of the created xterm is 1 and not that of the X11 app.
> >
> > Another example:
> >
> >0 86493 86492   0   0:00.01 ttys0000:00.02 login -pf root
> >0 86494 86493   0   0:00.01 ttys0000:00.01 -sh
> >0 86503 86494   0   0:05.07 ttys0000:45.66 xterm -e login
> >0 86504 86503   0   0:01.08 ttys0010:04.05 login
> >  501 86526 86504   0   0:00.00 ttys0010:00.01 -bash
> >0 86562 86526   0   0:00.00 ttys0010:00.00 ps -a -f -x
> >
> >
> > In this example I am GUI logged in as root. Start a terminal.app window.
> > Which causes the "login -pf root" command and the "sh" commands.
> > I then issued a export DISPLAY="10.0.0.21:0.0" (not shown since not a
> > process), and xterm-e login.
> >
> > Notice the login process is created as a root process. It spanws a
> > supbrocess to run bash under my normal usename of 501.
> >
> > I am not sure about flag inheritance when the "login" happens to another
> > process. But in the second example, the bash running under 501 is not a
> > child of xterm, it is a child of login. while xterm is in the tree, it
> > is under a different username and the bash process does not inherit any
> > of root's powers.
> >
> > I know this doesn't answer things, but a better understanding of process
> > inheritance of whatecer flag Apple uses to allow/disallow access to your
> > onw files would point to what binary needs to be granted access.
> > ___
> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> > X11-users mailing list  (X11-users@lists.apple.com)
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/jprescott12%40icloud.com
> >
> > This email sent to jprescot...@icloud.com
>
>  ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> X11-users mailing list  (X11-users@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/egan%40sense.net
>
> This email sent to e...@sense.net
>
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list  (X11-users@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: 
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com


cmd-tilde is not alt-tilde post catalina

2019-12-14 Thread Egan Ford via X11-users
Hi all,

I just "upgraded" to Catalina today.  Post upgrade I cannot use cmd-~
(tilde) to bounce around the focus.  alt-~ (tilde) works.  Any other Mac
app works with cmd-~.  Muscle memory prefers cmd-~.  Others see this?
Thanks.
 ___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
X11-users mailing list  (X11-users@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: 
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/x11-users/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com