Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Document device parameter of libxl_device_type_add functions

2014-11-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 13:19 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:44:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
  Euan Harris writes ([PATCH] libxl: Document device parameter of 
  libxl_device_type_add functions):
   The device parameter of libxl_device_type_add is an in/out parameter.
   Unspecified fields are filled in with appropriate values for the created
   device when the function returns.  Document this behaviour.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Acked-by: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
  
  Konrad, this should go into 4.5 IMO because it's a doc comment
  describing existing behaviour which we want everyone to rely on.
 
 Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com

and applied, thanks all.



___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Document device parameter of libxl_device_type_add functions

2014-11-18 Thread Euan Harris
The device parameter of libxl_device_type_add is an in/out parameter.
Unspecified fields are filled in with appropriate values for the created
device when the function returns.  Document this behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Euan Harris euan.har...@citrix.com
---
 tools/libxl/libxl.h | 4 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.h b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
index c3451bd..41d6e8d 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/libxl.h
+++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
@@ -1109,6 +1109,10 @@ void libxl_vtpminfo_list_free(libxl_vtpminfo *, int 
nr_vtpms);
  *   domain to connect to the device and therefore cannot block on the
  *   guest.
  *
+ *   device is an in/out parameter:  fields left unspecified when the
+ *   structure is passed in are filled in with appropriate values for
+ *   the device created.
+ *
  * libxl_device_type_remove(ctx, domid, device):
  *
  *   Removes the given device from the specified domain by performing
-- 
1.9.3


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Document device parameter of libxl_device_type_add functions

2014-11-18 Thread Ian Jackson
Euan Harris writes ([PATCH] libxl: Document device parameter of 
libxl_device_type_add functions):
 The device parameter of libxl_device_type_add is an in/out parameter.
 Unspecified fields are filled in with appropriate values for the created
 device when the function returns.  Document this behaviour.

Thanks.

Acked-by: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com

Konrad, this should go into 4.5 IMO because it's a doc comment
describing existing behaviour which we want everyone to rely on.

Ian.

 Signed-off-by: Euan Harris euan.har...@citrix.com
 ---
  tools/libxl/libxl.h | 4 
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.h b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
 index c3451bd..41d6e8d 100644
 --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.h
 +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
 @@ -1109,6 +1109,10 @@ void libxl_vtpminfo_list_free(libxl_vtpminfo *, int 
 nr_vtpms);
   *   domain to connect to the device and therefore cannot block on the
   *   guest.
   *
 + *   device is an in/out parameter:  fields left unspecified when the
 + *   structure is passed in are filled in with appropriate values for
 + *   the device created.
 + *
   * libxl_device_type_remove(ctx, domid, device):
   *
   *   Removes the given device from the specified domain by performing
 -- 
 1.9.3
 

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Document device parameter of libxl_device_type_add functions

2014-11-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:44:20PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
 Euan Harris writes ([PATCH] libxl: Document device parameter of 
 libxl_device_type_add functions):
  The device parameter of libxl_device_type_add is an in/out parameter.
  Unspecified fields are filled in with appropriate values for the created
  device when the function returns.  Document this behaviour.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Acked-by: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
 
 Konrad, this should go into 4.5 IMO because it's a doc comment
 describing existing behaviour which we want everyone to rely on.

Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com
 
 Ian.
 
  Signed-off-by: Euan Harris euan.har...@citrix.com
  ---
   tools/libxl/libxl.h | 4 
   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
  
  diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.h b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
  index c3451bd..41d6e8d 100644
  --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.h
  +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.h
  @@ -1109,6 +1109,10 @@ void libxl_vtpminfo_list_free(libxl_vtpminfo *, int 
  nr_vtpms);
*   domain to connect to the device and therefore cannot block on the
*   guest.
*
  + *   device is an in/out parameter:  fields left unspecified when the
  + *   structure is passed in are filled in with appropriate values for
  + *   the device created.
  + *
* libxl_device_type_remove(ctx, domid, device):
*
*   Removes the given device from the specified domain by performing
  -- 
  1.9.3
  

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel