Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 1/8] gnttab: drop useless locking

2017-08-15 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 15/08/17 15:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Holding any lock while accessing the maptrack entry fields is
> pointless, as these entries are protected by their associated active
> entry lock (which is being acquired later, before re-validating the
> fields read without holding the lock).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich 

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper 

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 1/8] gnttab: drop useless locking

2017-08-15 Thread Jan Beulich
Holding any lock while accessing the maptrack entry fields is
pointless, as these entries are protected by their associated active
entry lock (which is being acquired later, before re-validating the
fields read without holding the lock).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich 

--- a/xen/common/grant_table.c
+++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c
@@ -1140,19 +1140,14 @@ __gnttab_unmap_common(
 smp_rmb();
 map = _entry(lgt, op->handle);
 
-grant_read_lock(lgt);
-
 if ( unlikely(!read_atomic(>flags)) )
 {
-grant_read_unlock(lgt);
 gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "Zero flags for handle %#x\n", op->handle);
 op->status = GNTST_bad_handle;
 return;
 }
 
 dom = map->domid;
-grant_read_unlock(lgt);
-
 if ( unlikely((rd = rcu_lock_domain_by_id(dom)) == NULL) )
 {
 /* This can happen when a grant is implicitly unmapped. */




___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel