Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> There are now in Linux 4.9 stable branch. Now the testing is blocked 
> because of again local migration [1]. The migration test seem less 
> reliable than the Arndale these days... is there anything we can do?

I have an osstest branch which we think will help with the Windows
migration problems.  It's currently in the osstest self-push-gate.

You'll see from my mail earlier today that I force pushed linux-4.9.

Currently I'm waiting for Juergen to tell me whether (if we know) the
bugs fixed by his series "xen/blkback: several fixes of resource
management" are present in earlier versions of Linux, such as the 3.18
that osstest is currently using.

If those bugs are present there too then moving to Linux 4.9 would not
be a regression introducing heisenbugs.  If they are then I think we
should still wait (and hope that Linux 4.9 doesn't break any further).

Ian.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-19 Thread Julien Grall



On 13/06/17 13:13, Ian Jackson wrote:

Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - 
FAIL"):

So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that
particular board, I guess?


Yes, indeed.  This has been broken for some time.


(If this was known and being looked up already, sorry for the noise.)


Julien has requested a backport of a relevant Linux patch; that was
"queued" by Greg K-H on Monday.

Normally it seems to take a week (or even two) from that happening
before the fix actually ends up in the linux-4.9.y stable branch on
kernel.org :-/.

This is, ultimately, blocking moving osstest to use Linux 4.9...


There are now in Linux 4.9 stable branch. Now the testing is blocked 
because of again local migration [1]. The migration test seem less 
reliable than the Arndale these days... is there anything we can do?


Cheers,

[1] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110535/


--
Julien Grall

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that
> particular board, I guess?

Yes, indeed.  This has been broken for some time.

> (If this was known and being looked up already, sorry for the noise.)

Julien has requested a backport of a relevant Linux patch; that was
"queued" by Greg K-H on Monday.

Normally it seems to take a week (or even two) from that happening
before the fix actually ends up in the linux-4.9.y stable branch on
kernel.org :-/.

This is, ultimately, blocking moving osstest to use Linux 4.9...

Ian.

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-13 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 03:58 +, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 110371 linux-4.9 real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2   6 xen-boot fail REGR.
> vs. 107358
> 
This caught my attention because of the 'credit2' part. I therefore
went checking and noticed from here:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2/ALL

and here:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2/ALL

That the test has been repeatedly failing, when on the linux-4.9
branch, always on arndale-bluewater.

I've checked a couple of serial logs of failing flights, and they all
look similar.

I've then looked here:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/host/arndale-bluewater.html

And seen that other jobs (not only -credit2 ones) are failing as well,
and in similar ways, when using the linux-4.9 branch:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/info.html
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd/info.html

Finally, test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 passes, on arndale-bluewater, when
on the linux-linus branch.

So, this appears to be something related to linux-4.9 and that
particular board, I guess?

(If this was known and being looked up already, sorry for the noise.)

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<> (Raistlin Majere)
-
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 110371: regressions - FAIL

2017-06-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 110371 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110371/

Regressions :-(

Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2   6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 107358

Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
 test-amd64-i386-libvirt7 host-ping-check-xen fail in 110200 pass in 110371
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 110200 
pass in 110371
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 14 guest-saverestore.2 
fail in 110336 pass in 110371
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 
110336 pass in 110371
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 110336 
pass in 110371
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in 
110336 pass in 110371
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail pass in 
110200
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail pass in 
110200
 test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 11 host-ping-check-xen/src_host fail pass in 
110336

Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stopfail REGR. vs. 107358
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds  9 debian-install   fail REGR. vs. 107358
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail in 110200 REGR. vs. 
107358

Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 17 guest-start/win.repeat fail blocked in 
107358
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop   fail in 110200 like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm  6 xen-boot fail  like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu  6 xen-boot fail like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw  6 xen-boot fail  like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd   6 xen-boot fail  like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds  6 xen-boot fail  like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-xl   6 xen-boot fail  like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm   6 xen-boot fail  like 107358
 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt  6 xen-boot fail  like 107358
 test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm  12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-i386-libvirt  12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64  9 windows-installfail never pass
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale   6 xen-boot fail   never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-xl  12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-xl  13 saverestore-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 migrate-support-check 
fail never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64  9 windows-installfail never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 migrate-support-check 
fail never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 16 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2  fail never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2  12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-xl-credit2  13 saverestore-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
 test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 saverestore-support-checkfail never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 11 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-armhf-armhf-examine  6 reboot   fail   never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm  12 migrate-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm  13 saverestore-support-checkfail   never pass
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win10-i386  9 windows-install fail never pass
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win10-i386  9 windows-install fail never pass
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64  9 windows-install fail never pass
 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64  9 windows-install fail never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win10-i386  9 windows-installfail never pass
 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win10-i386  9 windows-installfail never pass

version targeted for testing:
 linuxf1aa865ae5d4608cbfbb02f42baa1ef5ed95fce2
baseline version:
 linux37feaf8095d352014555b82adb4a04609ca17d3f

Last test of basis   107358  2017-04-10 19:42:52 Z   63 days
Failing since107396  2017-04-12 11:15:19 Z   61 days   94 attempts
Testing same since   110082  2017-06-07 11:34:26 Z5 days7 attempts