Re: [Xen-devel] Patch ping
On 29/04/16 17:03, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > Hello, > > Just for my internal patch book-keeping, I assume this patch did not get > into staging because of the code freeze and is planned for 4.8? > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg01444.html That fix should go into 4.7, but you need to CC Wei to get a release ack. ~Andrew ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Patch ping
Hello, Just for my internal patch book-keeping, I assume this patch did not get into staging because of the code freeze and is planned for 4.8? http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-04/msg01444.html Thanks, Razvan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping
>>> On 29.03.16 at 19:34, wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:21:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> REST maintainers, >> >> may I please ask for acks or otherwise on >> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg03193.html > > Could you resend the ones you want in 4.7 pls? Since they didn't change - why would I need to? > I recall Reviewing one of them - and one of those patches was an RFC - has > that changed? Is not RFC anymore? It's still named RFC, but that shouldn't preclude it from going in when found reasonable (i.e. if I can get an x86 maintainer's ack for it and the one remaining earlier patch in that series, I'd still put both in). Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:21:40AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > REST maintainers, > > may I please ask for acks or otherwise on > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg03193.html Could you resend the ones you want in 4.7 pls? I recall Reviewing one of them - and one of those patches was an RFC - has that changed? Is not RFC anymore? ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] patch ping
REST maintainers, may I please ask for acks or otherwise on http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg03193.html (v2 of patch 2: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg02804.html) http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg03135.html http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg03179.html http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-03/msg03180.html Thanks, Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping
Jan Beulich writes ("patch ping"):
> REST maintainers,
>
> may I ask for an ack or otherwise for
> http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01956.html
> , which is basically a follow-up to the above (and will need [trivial]
> re-basing before committing)?
I see no problem with this patch.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Jan Beulich wrote: > ARM maintainers, > > may I ask for an ack or otherwise for > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01207.html On that patch: Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini > along with a statement whether the ARM side alignment should > also be reduced, just like settled on for x86 in > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01322.html > ? The alignment can be reduced to 8 bytes on ARM too. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] patch ping
ARM maintainers, may I ask for an ack or otherwise for http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01207.html along with a statement whether the ARM side alignment should also be reduced, just like settled on for x86 in http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01322.html ? REST maintainers, may I ask for an ack or otherwise for http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-02/msg01956.html , which is basically a follow-up to the above (and will need [trivial] re-basing before committing)? Thanks, Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:13:41PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:48:18PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Konrad, > > > > any word on > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01253.html > > Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01370.html > > Shouldn't that have Reported-by: Sander..? > Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01485.html > > Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > sent several days ago (there were more earlier today) for 4.5? > > > > Thanks, Jan Pushed to staging with the Release, Reviewed, Acked, etc tags applied. > > > > ___ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] patch ping
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:48:18PM +, Jan Beulich wrote: > Konrad, > > any word on > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01253.html Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01370.html Shouldn't that have Reported-by: Sander..? Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01485.html Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > sent several days ago (there were more earlier today) for 4.5? > > Thanks, Jan > ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
[Xen-devel] patch ping
Konrad, any word on http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01253.html http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01370.html http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-12/msg01485.html sent several days ago (there were more earlier today) for 4.5? Thanks, Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
