Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul/test: fix 32-bit build
On 10/02/17 07:38, Jan Beulich wrote: > Commit 7603eb256 ("x86emul: use eflags definitions in x86-defns.h") > removed the EFLG_* definitions without updating the use sites (which > - oddly enough - happen to all be in 32-bit only code paths). > > Signed-off-by: Jan BeulichReviewed-by: Andrew Cooper ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul/test: fix 32-bit build
>>> On 10.02.17 at 09:15,wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:38:51AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Commit 7603eb256 ("x86emul: use eflags definitions in x86-defns.h") >> removed the EFLG_* definitions without updating the use sites (which >> - oddly enough - happen to all be in 32-bit only code paths). >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > Reviewed-by: Wei Liu Thanks. > And I also notice that this directory is not built by default, hence it > slipped my pre-commit build test (which does 32bit build as well) and > oostest build test. And we shouldn't try to build this by default, as it definitely requires a much newer tool chain than what our base requirement is. Jan ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86emul/test: fix 32-bit build
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:38:51AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > Commit 7603eb256 ("x86emul: use eflags definitions in x86-defns.h") > removed the EFLG_* definitions without updating the use sites (which > - oddly enough - happen to all be in 32-bit only code paths). > > Signed-off-by: Jan BeulichReviewed-by: Wei Liu Ah sorry! I would have sworn I did several mechanical replaces, but apparently something went wrong... And I also notice that this directory is not built by default, hence it slipped my pre-commit build test (which does 32bit build as well) and oostest build test. Wei. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel