Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:47:38PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Because I'm mixing paravirt and cpufeatures a bit oddly. > > That's fine. All X86_BUG_* are synthetic and exactly for stuff like > that. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. So should these patches just go in as is? --Andy -- Andy Lutomirski AMA Capital Management, LLC ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 04:47:38PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Because I'm mixing paravirt and cpufeatures a bit oddly. That's fine. All X86_BUG_* are synthetic and exactly for stuff like that. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX
On Mar 1, 2016 2:46 PM, "Borislav Petkov" wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:50:18PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Borislav, if you're okay with this (ab)use of the cpufeatures stuff > > Because of X86_BUG_ESPFIX? Why abuse? Because I'm mixing paravirt and cpufeatures a bit oddly. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/entry/32: Get rid of paravirt_enabled in ESPFIX
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 03:50:18PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Borislav, if you're okay with this (ab)use of the cpufeatures stuff Because of X86_BUG_ESPFIX? Why abuse? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
