[Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww04]
Hi, I report a benchmark result of this week. In LTP, pselect01 and syslog05 failed. Both cases passed when testing manually. TEST ENVIRONMENT Machine : Tiger4 Kernel : 2.6.16.33-xen Changeset: 13475:b4df7de0cbf7 (xen-ia64-unstable) Dom0 OS : RHEL4 U2 (2P) DomU OS : RHEL4 U2 (8P) #DomU: 1 Scheduler: credit Device : tap (tap:aio) TEST RESULT unixbench4.1.0: Pass bonnie++-1.03 : Pass ltp-full-20061121 : 3/831 FAIL (see attachment) iozone3_191 : Pass lmbench-3.0-a5: Pass Best regards, KUWAMURA and Fujitsu members Test Start Time: Thu Jan 25 19:45:11 2007 - Testcase Result Exit Value -- -- abort01PASS 0 accept01 PASS 0 access01 PASS 0 access02 PASS 0 access03 PASS 0 access04 PASS 0 access05 PASS 0 acct01 PASS 0 acct02 PASS 0 adjtimex01 PASS 0 adjtimex02 PASS 0 alarm01PASS 0 alarm02PASS 0 alarm03PASS 0 alarm04PASS 0 alarm05PASS 0 alarm06PASS 0 alarm07PASS 0 asyncio02 PASS 0 bind01 PASS 0 bind02 PASS 0 brk01 PASS 0 capget01 PASS 0 capget02 PASS 0 capset01 PASS 0 capset02 PASS 0 chdir01PASS 0 chdir01A PASS 0 chdir02PASS 0 chdir03PASS 0 chdir04PASS 0 chmod01PASS 0 chmod01A PASS 0 chmod02PASS 0 chmod03PASS 0 chmod04PASS 0 chmod05PASS 0 chmod06PASS 0 chmod07PASS 0 chown01PASS 0 chown02PASS 0 chown03PASS 0 chown04PASS 0 chown05PASS 0 chroot01 PASS 0 chroot02 PASS 0 chroot03 PASS 0 chroot04 PASS 0 clone01PASS 0 clone02PASS 0 clone03PASS 0 clone04PASS 0 clone05PASS 0 clone06PASS 0 clone07PASS 0 close01PASS 0 close02PASS 0 close08PASS 0 confstr01 PASS 0 connect01 PASS 0 creat01PASS 0 creat03PASS 0 creat04PASS 0 creat05PASS 0 creat06PASS 0 creat07PASS 0 creat08PASS 0 creat09PASS 0 dup01 PASS 0 dup02 PASS 0 dup03 PASS 0 dup04 PASS 0 dup05 PASS 0 dup06 PASS 0 dup07 PASS 0 dup201 PASS 0 dup202 PASS 0 dup203 PASS 0 dup204 PASS 0 dup205 PASS 0 execl01PASS 0 execle01 PASS 0 execlp01 PASS 0 execv01PASS 0 execve01 PASS 0 execve02 PASS 0 execve03
[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ is not registered.
Hi
NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ is used but not registered.
I've never experienced but system will panic in the very long run.
I wonder why Isaku missed it.
Thanks,
Kouya
Signed-off-by: Kouya Shimura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -r b4df7de0cbf7 xen/arch/ia64/xen/xensetup.c
--- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/xensetup.c Wed Jan 24 12:28:05 2007 -0700
+++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/xensetup.c Fri Jan 26 18:57:54 2007 +0900
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include asm/vmx.h
#include linux/efi.h
#include asm/iosapic.h
+#include xen/softirq.h
unsigned long xenheap_phys_end, total_pages;
@@ -436,6 +437,10 @@ void start_kernel(void)
init_xen_time(); /* initialise the time */
timer_init();
+#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_IA64_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK
+open_softirq(NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ, new_tlbflush_clock_period);
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if ( opt_nosmp )
{
diff -r b4df7de0cbf7 xen/include/asm-ia64/flushtlb.h
--- a/xen/include/asm-ia64/flushtlb.h Wed Jan 24 12:28:05 2007 -0700
+++ b/xen/include/asm-ia64/flushtlb.h Fri Jan 26 18:57:54 2007 +0900
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ extern volatile u32 tlbflush_clock;
#define tlbflush_current_time() tlbflush_clock
u32 tlbflush_clock_inc_and_return(void);
+void new_tlbflush_clock_period(void);
static inline void
tlbflush_update_time(volatile u32* time, u32 timestamp)
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Patch][RFC] fix PAL_HALT ( is Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] dumpcore is failed for PAL_HALT)
Hi, Anthony Hi, Anthony In VTI side, ACPI is emulated by ACPI module of Qemu. I think it supports S5. Good news. But I look like Qemu don't trap acpi_power_off called by linux on VTI. I'll investigate it. I'm sorry, the GFW was very old. If I update the latest GFW, I can shutdown domVTi with my patch. As you said, Linux on domVTi call acpi_power_off(), then Qemu-dm emulate ACPI S5 state. Best Regards, Akio Takebe ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Mini-OS on ia64
Hi Alex, it took a long time, but now it's going on. I got managed the re-architecture of the x86 part of mini-os. Please can you update the extras/mini-os directory in the ia64-xen tree from the x86-xen tree! Then I'll be able to send a first patch with the ia64 extensions for mini-os. Thanks. Dietmar. Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 16:31 schrieb Alex Williamson: On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 15:12 +0200, Dietmar Hahn wrote: As far as I know nobody is working on it. OK, then I will start. Thanks Dietmar. I think this is something we need to watch closely so that ia64 can be ready should mini-os start being used for fully virtualized domains. At the moment I have running a rudimentary trap handler for the physically addresses (start_info, bootinfo and console page) and the event handler for timer and console events. Are there any guidelines to get in the sources? I imagine you'll have to do some re-architecture of the code to allow ia64 to fit cleanly into the existing code. The might mean making architecture specific sub-directories under extras/mini-os and moving the existing architecture specific files under them. That should probably be coordinated on xen-devel, but please keep xen-ia64-devel in the loop. When you're ready to add the ia64 code, submit that to the xen-ia64-devel list. Thanks, Alex ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] New domain builder in xen-unstable
Hi, This is a heads up, mainly to the PowerPC and IA64 folks, that Gerd's new domain builder (including new Elf parser) is now checked into xen-unstable. This has disabled the old builder and elf-parsing code which will shortly be removed entirely. So far the new libelf has only been run-tested on x86, so... For IA64: most of the code is in place, but the new code needs some run-testing and possibly some small fixups to get it working. For PPC: looks like you have your own domain builder, which you may or may not decide to merge with the main code (it would be nice to!). Either way, you *do* use the common elf parser, and so your domain builder code needs to be changed to talk to Gerd's libelf. -- Keir ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: New domain builder in xen-unstable
On 26/1/07 5:04 pm, Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not sure what you mean by our own domain builder; we've been implementing xc_linux_build() for quite a while now (and thus integrated with xend). Sorry, I misunderstood. I was seeing all the libelf churn, and I missed the fact that xc_linux_build() is going away entirely (?). I'm still not sure what you mean by our own domain builder -- there is simply no way we're going to add more ifdefs to tools/libxc/xc_linux_build.c (or equivalent)... xc_linux_build() is still provided in the 'new world' and is still used by xend. For ia64/x86 it is now a thin wrapper around Gerd's new domain-building infrastructure. For ppc you can continue to have your very own version under libxc/powerpc if you want to, and not use Gerd's new domain-building infrastructure. But the elf code that you rely on is going away, so you need to move to using libelf, which I'm sure Gerd can give you some pointers about. -- Keir ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel][Patch]move vmx_vcpu_thash() to assemble
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 12:55 +0800, Zhang, Xing Z wrote: move vmx_vcpu_thash() to assemble. It’s good to performance. Applied. Thanks, Alex ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH] Remove dead code
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:13 +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote: Remove dead code, Applied. Thanks, Alex ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ is not registered.
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 20:05 +0900, Kouya SHIMURA wrote: Hi NEW_TLBFLUSH_CLOCK_PERIOD_SOFTIRQ is used but not registered. I've never experienced but system will panic in the very long run. Applied. Thanks, Alex ___ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
