[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] [RFC] avoid debugger_trap when we don't expect

2008-01-30 Thread Keir Fraser
This doesn't need to be fixed on x86 -- the int3 handler will return
silently if the debugger is not configured. It would be nice if the ia64
handler would do the same. If that is not possible then change only ia64
code and if you need to be able to probe gdbstub configuration then add a
public function to do that rather than grope at internal state. The same
goes for powerpc, *if* it is broken in the first place.

 -- Keir

On 30/1/08 05:03, Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 This patch avoid debugger_trap when we don't setup a debugger.
 
 kexec_crash() is called after debugger_trap_immediate().
 Because we want to use the safe path at kexecing,
 we should avoid the debugger path.
 And the trap is a needless work.
 
 Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Best Regards,
 
 Akio Takebe
 ___
 Xen-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] [RFC] avoid debugger_trap when we don't expect

2008-01-30 Thread Akio Takebe
Hi, Keir

This doesn't need to be fixed on x86 -- the int3 handler will return
silently if the debugger is not configured. It would be nice if the ia64
handler would do the same. If that is not possible then change only ia64
code and if you need to be able to probe gdbstub configuration then add a
public function to do that rather than grope at internal state. The same
goes for powerpc, *if* it is broken in the first place.

I know the int3 hanlder return well on x86 if it is not configured.
But the route may be not safe. The debugger_trap is called after hypervisor
panic and dom0 panic. So I want to avoid the needless route for kexec/kdump.

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe


___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] [RFC] avoid debugger_trap when we don't expect

2008-01-30 Thread Keir Fraser
On 30/1/08 08:48, Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This doesn't need to be fixed on x86 -- the int3 handler will return
 silently if the debugger is not configured. It would be nice if the ia64
 handler would do the same. If that is not possible then change only ia64
 code and if you need to be able to probe gdbstub configuration then add a
 public function to do that rather than grope at internal state. The same
 goes for powerpc, *if* it is broken in the first place.
 
 I know the int3 hanlder return well on x86 if it is not configured.
 But the route may be not safe. The debugger_trap is called after hypervisor
 panic and dom0 panic. So I want to avoid the needless route for kexec/kdump.

Oh no, then all bets are off. :-) We could be screwed and fail to kexec no
matter what we do.

 -- Keir



___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] [RFC] avoid debugger_trap when we don't expect

2008-01-30 Thread Akio Takebe
Hi, Keir

On 30/1/08 08:48, Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This doesn't need to be fixed on x86 -- the int3 handler will return
 silently if the debugger is not configured. It would be nice if the ia64
 handler would do the same. If that is not possible then change only ia64
 code and if you need to be able to probe gdbstub configuration then add a
 public function to do that rather than grope at internal state. The same
 goes for powerpc, *if* it is broken in the first place.
 
 I know the int3 hanlder return well on x86 if it is not configured.
 But the route may be not safe. The debugger_trap is called after hypervisor
 panic and dom0 panic. So I want to avoid the needless route for kexec/kdump.

Oh no, then all bets are off. :-) We could be screwed and fail to kexec no
matter what we do.

OK. I just suggested a safer way than current code.
Recently we found a bug around the trap handler on ia64,
so I worry about such a thing.
I still want to avoid the needless code on ia64.
so I'll talk in xen-ia64 ML.

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe


___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel