Re: [PATCH] cobalt: x86: Use ipipe_root_nr_syscalls
On 2/15/19 3:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 14.02.19 16:12, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019, 18:09:53 CET schrieb Jan Kiszka: >>> From: Jan Kiszka >>> >>> Required to handle compat syscalls correctly. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka >>> --- >>> >>> This is against next. The stable patch needs to touch kernel/cobalt >>> /posix/syscall.c instead. >>> >>> Testing all these would be very appreciated! >> >> Finally had time to test and review the patches. >> The Problem I saw is gone. :-) >> >> For all three patches: >> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger >> Tested-by: Richard Weinberger >> > > Thanks for testing! > > Philippe, could you pick up the generic ipipe patch? I'll take care of > the rest. > It's already there. -- Philippe.
Re: [PATCH] cobalt: x86: Use ipipe_root_nr_syscalls
On 14.02.19 16:12, Richard Weinberger wrote: Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019, 18:09:53 CET schrieb Jan Kiszka: From: Jan Kiszka Required to handle compat syscalls correctly. Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka --- This is against next. The stable patch needs to touch kernel/cobalt /posix/syscall.c instead. Testing all these would be very appreciated! Finally had time to test and review the patches. The Problem I saw is gone. :-) For all three patches: Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger Tested-by: Richard Weinberger Thanks for testing! Philippe, could you pick up the generic ipipe patch? I'll take care of the rest. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA IOT SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Re: [PATCH] cobalt: x86: Use ipipe_root_nr_syscalls
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2019, 18:09:53 CET schrieb Jan Kiszka: > From: Jan Kiszka > > Required to handle compat syscalls correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka > --- > > This is against next. The stable patch needs to touch kernel/cobalt > /posix/syscall.c instead. > > Testing all these would be very appreciated! Finally had time to test and review the patches. The Problem I saw is gone. :-) For all three patches: Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger Tested-by: Richard Weinberger Thanks, //richard