Re: Xlog and Hamlib ...

[Andy Stewart]

On 10/15/20 11:38 AM, gliderpi...@protonmail.com wrote:

Folks,

I compiled from the source the latest release of Xlog  2.0.19 running Ubuntu 
20.04 with the latest HamLib 4.1  (http://n0nb.users.sourceforge.net/) and 
tested it with a Kenwood TS-890S.  I found the "Band" frequencies was the only 
success data transferred from the radio.   Xlog was unable to get the data for 
"Mode", "Power".   I tested Hamlib 4.1 and was successful getting these 
parameters using rigctl on the TS-890S.    Has anyone else have any issue using 
the latest release of Hamlib and Xlog?


73's, Oscar (N6PAZ).

Sent from ProtonMail , encrypted email based in 
Switzerland.




HI Oscar,

Mode should have worked.  I'm not sure about power.  I have not tested Xlog on 
Ubuntu 20.*, nor have I tested it with Hamlib 4.1.  I would use the Hamlib 
rigctl program to verify that Hamlib is working correctly.


73,

Andy

--
Andy Stewart (KB1OIQ)
Vice President: PART of Westford, MA (WB1GOF)

Xlog and Hamlib ...

[gliderpilot]

Folks,

I compiled from the source the latest release of Xlog 2.0.19 running Ubuntu 
20.04 with the latest HamLib 4.1 (http://n0nb.users.sourceforge.net/) and 
tested it with a Kenwood TS-890S. I found the "Band" frequencies was the only 
success data transferred from the radio. Xlog was unable to get the data for 
"Mode", "Power". I tested Hamlib 4.1 and was successful getting these 
parameters using rigctl on the TS-890S. Has anyone else have any issue using 
the latest release of Hamlib and Xlog?

73's, Oscar (N6PAZ).

Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in 
Switzerland.