[xmail] Re: multiple smtprelay servers for custdomains and 5xx er rors

2008-04-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Oliver Stöneberg wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> > 
> > > Seems there was some post about this.
> > > 
> > > The BIG figure is when the final domain have multiple mx servers.
> > > Suppose the final domain have two mx and one is misconfigured and return
> > > a 5xx.
> > > So if xmail tries first the 'bad' server, what to do next ?
> > > 
> > > On a atomic try/retry cycle, you have two choices :
> > > 1 - don't try others mx and send back an NDR to the sender
> > > 2 - Try the others reminding MX for this try/retry cycle, and send back
> > > an NDR ONLY AND ONLY IF all mx return a 5xx, else schedule a normal
> > > retry cycle (that will retry on each mx).
> > > 
> > > I think option 2 is better :)
> > > 
> > > Could Davide tell us how xmail handles the 5xx with multiple mx ?
> > 
> > As far as smtprelay goes, a failure (of whatever type), means try the next 
> > server in the list.
> 
> That's why I wrote a mail, because it makes no sense to continue in 
> the case of a permanent error.
> 
> Is there a way to configure XMail with multiple domains and stop when 
> you get a permanent error?

I remember there was a discussion or something, time ago. But now I can't 
remember. It seems sane to me that a 5xx error stops the processing, and 
I'll schedule this for change.
Speak now or forever hold your peace, in case you rely on XMail re-trying 
even upon 5xx ...



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: XMailServer 1.25 Memory Footprint

2008-04-26 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Vinny Wadding wrote:

> Absolutely... It seemed to make no difference if the filters were running o=
> r not.  I tried it both ways around.   Results were the same when submittin=
> g mails for that domain - the buffers/cache would immediately start increas=
> ing where as the memory that xmail was using did not significantly change.

A, you meant Buffer+Cache. That is virtually free memory. The OS, 
instead of leaving memory pages sitting unused, use them for buffers.
Once memory pressure start, those pages are automatically reclaimed by the 
allocator.
Don't worry about buffer+cache, it's good to go ;)



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail

2008-04-26 Thread Hal Dell
 
Thanks to every for their help. I'll be waiting on the fix to solve the
Postini problem.

Thanks,
Hal Dell
Managing Partner
ePodWorks.net, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]