RE: SMTP Reverse lookup

2001-05-11 Thread Davide Libenzi


On 05-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
 Not a huge problem, but slightly annoying.
 
 Finally got reverse lookup working under Windows 2000, but now SMTP will
 reply 989081168.1272@com instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED].  

0.71 will show the full FQDN w/o stripping the host part.



- Davide




Re: SMTP Reverse lookup

2001-05-06 Thread John Kielkopf


Seeing that XMail POP3 does it correctly (or as I see as correctly),
shouldn't I expect SMTP to act the same?

Since the top level domains are never/seldom used on their own, it would
seem sensible not to strip down to that point, or at least stop stripping
once it finds a match in the handled domains list.

I suppose I could put host.webifi.com in the pointer record, but since the
same IP address is used for mail, www, ftp, news, etc.. etc.. I seems more
logical to just use the root domain... and I'm not the only one that does
this.

- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Kielkopf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: XMail Mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: RE: SMTP Reverse lookup



 On 05-May-2001 John Kielkopf wrote:
  Not a huge problem, but slightly annoying.
 
  Finally got reverse lookup working under Windows 2000, but now SMTP will
  reply 989081168.1272@com instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED].

 The reverse lookup of Your IP is webifi.com where webifi.com is Your
domain.
 It would be more correct to have host.webifi.com instead of having an IP
linked
 to a domain name.
 XMail strip off the host part that, in Your case, is part of the domain
name.




 - Davide